The availability of N, P and K after harvesting of rice- pea cropping system the analysis was done which show some changing in soil properties. Data regarding the soil pH of surface and subsurface are presented in (Table 1). The soil samples of surface and subsurface were usually found normal to alkaline reaction and it varied from 7.21 to 8.10 and 7.25 to 8.12, respectively (Table 2). A similar finding was observed by
Rajeswar et al., (2009). The minimum pH of 7.21 at the surface was observed in the Alamgirpur village of the Parikshitgarh block, while the maximum pH of 8.10 was observed in Lawar Khas village of Daurala block. Similarly, in the subsurface, minimum pH 7.25 and maximum pH 8.12 were observed at both the same locations. Data presented in Table 2 shows that about 2.08% of the soil samples were found to be neutral, 54.17% were slightly alkaline and 43.75% was moderately alkaline at surface soil while at subsurface 2.08% of the soil samples were found to be saline, 41.66% were slightly alkaline and 56.25% were moderately alkaline. (Neutral: 6.6-7.3, Slightly alkaline: 7.4-7.8, Moderately alkaline: 7.9-8.4) This may be due to the influence of parent material, rainfall and topography
(Thangaswamy et al., 2005). In other soil properties, electrical conductivity was also observed that the electrical conductivity of surface and subsurface soil varied from 0.17 to 0.56 dSm
-1 and 0.26 to 0.48 dSm
-1, respectively. Based on the limits suggested by
Muhar et al., (1963) for judging the salt problem of soils, most of the samples were found normal (EC).
The organic carbon content in soil at the surface (0-15 cm) ranged from 0.30 to 0.51 per cent with a mean value of 0.38 per cent, while at subsurface (15-30 cm), ranged from 0.19 to 0.42 per cent with a mean value of 0.28 per cent (Table 2) The highest organic carbon (0.51 per cent) was found in Sultannagar location and minimum (0.30 per cent) in Daurala location for surface soil (0-15 cm), while in subsurface soil (15-30 cm), maximum organic carbon (0.42 per cent) in Sultannagar location and minimum (0.19 per cent) in Daurala location was recorded. Based on the rating suggested by
Singh et al., (2005), Most of the soil samples were low in organic carbon status at the surface, while subsurface soil was also low in organic carbon.
The available nitrogen content in surface (0-15 cm) and subsurface (15-30 cm) soils varied from 169.98 to 255.90 kg ha
-1 and 107.89 to 180.13 kg ha
-1, respectively (Table 3). The maximum available nitrogen 255.90 and 180.13 kg ha
-1 at surface and subsurface was found in Sultannagar village of Sururpur block and minimum 169.98 and 107.89 kg ha
-1 village Lawar Khas. Based on the rating suggested by Subbiah and Asija (1956) 97% of samples were low (<250 N kg ha
-1) and 3% of samples were medium (250-500 N kg ha
-1). Available nitrogen content was found to be maximum in surface horizons and decrease regularly with soil depth, which might be due to the accumulation of plant residues, debris at the surface which contributed through mineralization. These observations are following the findings of Prasuna
Rani et al., (1992). Correlation studies show that a significant positive correlation was found between organic carbon and available nitrogen. This might be because most of the soil nitrogen is found in organic forms. Similar results were also reported by
Kanthalia and Bhatt (1991); Paliwal (1996).
The available phosphorus (P
2O
5) in the surface (0-15 cm) and subsurface (15-30 cm) varied from 16.82 to 33.66 and 12.21 to 21.98 kg ha-1 P
2O
5, respectively (Table 3). The maximum available phosphorus 33.66 kg ha
-1 P
2O
5 was found in Sultannagar village of Sururpur block and minimum 16.82 P
2O
5 kg ha
-1 in Lawar Khas location at the surface (0-15 cm), whereas, at subsurface (15-30 cm) maximum 21.98 P
2O
5 kg ha
-1 was found in Sultannagar location and minimum 12.21 P
2O
5 kg ha
-1 in Lawar Khas location. The range is quite large which might be due to variation of soil properties
viz., pH, calcareousness, organic matter content, texture and various soil management and agronomic practices. Based on the limit suggested by
Muhr et al., (1968) 42% of samples were rated low (<25 P
2O
5 kg ha
-1) and 58% of samples were medium (16-35 P
2O
5 kg ha
-1). However, the highest available phosphorus was observed in the surface horizons and decreased regularly with depth. Higher phosphorus in the surface horizons might be due to the confinement of crop cultivation to this layer and supplement of the depleted phosphorus through external sources
i.
e. fertilizers
(Rajeswar et al., 2009). Similar results were reported by
Thangaswamy et al., (2005).
Available potassium (K
2O) surface (0-15 cm) and subsurface (15-30 cm) ranged between 170.66 to 248.56 and 103.20 to 185.12 kg ha
-1 K2O (Table 3). The maximum available potassium 248.56 kg ha
-1 K
2O was found at Sultannagar and a minimum of 170.66 kg ha
-1 K
2O in Lawar Khas location at the surface (0-15 cm). Similarly, maximum available potassium 185.12 K
2O kg ha
-1 was found in Sultannagar and minimum 103.20 K
2O kg ha
-1 Rahawati locations at subsurface (15-30 cm). Due to unawareness about potassium application and more removal from soils by crops available K is lower. In grasslands, wastes land and forest soils, probably loss K removal by plants, maintained a comparatively higher K in soils
(Choudhary Ram 2005). According to
Muhr et al., (1963), no sample was found in the low range (<125 K
2O kg ha
-1) however were the medium range (125-300 kg ha
-1K
2O the surface (0-15 cm) and Subsurface (15-30 cm). A significant positive correlation was observed between organic carbon and available potassium content. This might be due to the creation of a favorable soil environment with the presence of high organic matter. Similar results were also reported by
Paliwal (1996); Chouhan (2001).
Relationship of pH and OC with soil properties
Relationships of pH and Organic carbon with some soil properties like Available N, P and K were established by the determination of correlation coefficient values (Table 1).
OC significantly and positively correlated with the above discussed soil properties (r = 0.952, 0.658, 0.960 and subsurface, r = 0.983, 0.973 and 0.795 respectively).
The analysis indicates that pH was negatively correlated with Available N, P and K in surface (0-15 cm) and subsurface (15-30 cm).