Analysis of variance (ANOVA) based on the mean values of ten quantitative traits in forty-seven rice genotypes recorded significant differences among the genotypes with respect to all the characters considered for the study (Table 3). This suggests that there is an inherent genetic difference among the genotypes for the traits studied.
Diversity analysis using morphological data.
D2 analysis revealed the presence of significant diversity in the set of forty-seven genotypes assessed. The germplasm was distributed into six different clusters (Table 4). The genotypes within each cluster were comparatively closer to each other than the genotypes present in different clusters. Maximum number of genotypes (20) were included in cluster II followed by 18 genotypes in cluster I, cluster III and V are with 4 and 3 genotypes, respectively. Clusters IV and VI are solitary clusters. Similar results were observed by
Islam et al., (2020), as they used 113 rice genotypes for D2-analysis and observed that these genotypes were grouped into 4 clusters. Diversity analysis by
Tejawini et al., (2018) and
Salem and Sallam (2016) have also shown similar findings.
Cluster I showed the maximum intra-cluster distance (64.47) with 18 genotypes followed by cluster III (64.05) with 4 genotypes. The intra-cluster distance for clusters IV and VI was observed to be zero as these two clusters were monogenotypic. The maximum inter-cluster distance was observed between clusters II and VI (1134.14), followed by clusters II and III (802.93) and clusters V and VI (788.86). This suggests that the hybrids developed from the selected genotypes of these clusters would have a high chance to obtain heterotic combinations and produce a highly variable population in the segregating generations. One should not forget the fact that, along with the genetic distance,
per se yield and yield contributing characters should also be considered while selecting the genotypes for breeding programs. In this respect, genotypes like Desi Dhan, IR 82475-110-2-2-1-2, DRR Dhan 48,
etc. have the highest inter-cluster distance and high
per se yield so they can be considered as high yielding parents in hybridization programs.
The lowest inter-cluster distance was observed between clusters IV and VI (112.81), followed by clusters I and IV (151.44) and clusters III and IV (159.57). The genotypes in these clusters are genetically very close and hence hybridization among these lines may not be very fruitful. These results are in accordance with the earlier reports of
Thippeswamy et al., (2016), Devi et al., (2019) and
Dey et al., (2020). The intra and inter-cluster distances (D2 values) were given in Table 5 and the cluster diagram was shown in Fig 1. The inter-cluster distances between all the clusters were higher than the intracluster distances suggesting wider genetic diversity among the genotypes of different cluster groups. This is in parallel with the findings of
Mohan et al., (2015) and
Singh et al., (2020). Fig 2 represents the dendrogram of forty-seven genotypes of rice by Tocher method.
Molecular diversity using microsatellite (SSR) markers
Molecular diversity study has been assessed by using chemically designed molecular markers. These sequences are the complementary sequences of DNA that lie close to a particular gene or QTL and through primer annealing, they amplify the target gene. In the present study diversity analysis among forty-seven rice genotypes was done using 24 rice SSR markers. Out of the 24 SSRs used, all the markers showed polymorphism.
Scoring of SSR bands and PIC value
The polymorphic information content (PIC) was calculated for each locus to assess the information of each marker and its discriminatory ability and it is an evidence of allele diversity and frequency among varieties (Table 2). The highest PIC value was observed for the locus RM 507 (0.86) followed by RM 293 (0.84), RM 5791 (0.74), RM 545 (0.73) and RM 312 (0.71) and lowest by RM 552 (0.12) followed by RM 410 (0.15), RM 162 (0.22), RM 284 (0.28) and RM 19 (0.29). So, PIC value ranged from 0.86 to 0.12 with a mean value of 0.465. All the twenty-four primers showed polymorphism and the number of alleles were 2 in every case. A total of 50 alleles were amplified from 47 genotypes and this shows significant variability among the genotypes. PIC value revealed that RM 507 was considered as best marker.
Rafii et al., (2018) reported the genetic relationship and diversity analysis among 8 aromatic rice cultivars using 32 SSR primers, detecting a total of 131 alleles. The average number of alleles per locus was 4.09. Similar results were reported by Pathaichindachote
et al. (2019) evaluated a set of 167 rice genotypes using 13 polymorphic SSRs to assess the genetic diversity and genetic relationship. A total of 110 alleles were amplified and the Polymorphic Information Content (PIC) values for SSR primers ranged from 0.27(RM542) to 0.87(RM21) with a mean of 0.59. So, PIC value is related to the polymorphism of markers and a higher PIC value indicates high polymorphism.
Dendrogram analysis
Dissimilarity coefficient was used to determine the level of relatedness among the genotypes. The dissimilarity coefficient varies from zero to one, a value closer to one reflects a higher dissimilarity, whereas, closer to zero reflects a higher similarity. The average dissimilarity ranged from 0.5516 to 0.7862. A dendrogram (Fig 3) based on Jackard’s dissimilarity coefficient was constructed using UPGMA (Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Averages) method and forty-seven rice genotypes were grouped into three main clusters
i.
e., cluster I, cluster II and cluster III. Cluster I was further sub-divided into two minor sub-groups IA and IB and IA was differentiated into IA -1 and 1A-2. Cluster IIB was further sub-divided into two subgroups
i.
e., IIB-1 and IIB-2. Cluster III was divided into three subgroups IIIA, IIIB and IIIC. The genotypes included in these clusters are presented in Table 6.
The total average of dissimilarity coefficient of all the 47 genotypes is 0.701. The dissimilarity coefficient varied with a highest value of 0.78 among the cultivar IR 85850 and Lal Sundiya followed by Chauli and Swarna (0.76) and DRR Dhan 45 and URG-1 (0.73). These values reflect high dissimilarity between them showing that they are highly dissimilar from each other. The lowest value (0.48) was found between Jlgaam and URG-24 followed by 0.50 between Lal Sundiya and Swarna. This suggests there is a considerable diversity present among the genotypes in the study. Similar clustering of genotypes into various clusters and sub-clusters were reported by
Das et al., (2013), Shahriar et al., (2014), Vengadessan et al., (2016), Dey et al. (2020) and
Pathak et al., (2020).
Finally, according to the dendrogram and Jackard dissimilarity coefficient values, the most diverse cultivars among the 47 rice genotypes studied are IR 85850 and Lal Sundiya followed by Chauli and Swarna, DRR Dhan 45 and URG-1, there is a high chance that upon utilization of these genotypes in hybridization programs for crop improvement, will give useful segregants as they showed greater genetic distances. Additionally, these genotypes have lower relatedness making them genetically diverse which is of prime importance for any breeding program.