Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorT. Mohapatra

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.20

  • SJR .258 (2022)

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Research Article

Assessment of Crop Water Footprint for Different Varieties of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea)

J. Ramachandran, R. Lalitha, S. Vallal Kannan, K. Sivasubramanian
  • Email
1Department of Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Madurai-625 104, Tamil Nadu, India
Cite article:- Ramachandran J., Lalitha R., Kannan Vallal S., Sivasubramanian K. (2022). Assessment of Crop Water Footprint for Different Varieties of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 56(2): 189-194. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5831.

ABSTRACT

Background: Water Footprint is a recently used indicator which helps to reduce water depletion and alleviate water stress in areas of drought and proper crop cultivation. Hence a study was taken up to assess the crop water footprint of different groundnut varieties namely TMV 7, VRI 2, VRI 3, VRI Gn 5, VRI Gn 6, CO 3, CO Gn 4, ALR 3 and TMV Gn 13 cultivated during Kharif and Rabi seasons at Tiruchirapalli district of Tamil Nadu.
Methods: The total water requirement, blue and green crop evapotranspiration, blue and green crop water use and total water footprint for different varieties of groundnut were estimated using CROPWAT 8.0 Windows. A comparison was made between the water footprint of groundnut varieties and the strategies to reduce water footprint is presented.
Result: The total water footprint for groundnut varieties ranged from 2603 to 4889 m3 ton-1 (CV of 26%) during kharif season, while it was ranged from 1465 to 2470 m3 ton-1 (CV of 18%) during rabi season. It was found that in all groundnut varieties the blue water footprint is higher than the green water footprint, while VRI Gn 5 variety had minimum total water footprint. It was concluded that, the groundnut production is affected by different levels of blue water stress which requires effective irrigation practices and water management strategies to enhance the crop production.

REFERENCES


  1. Adarsh, S., John, J. and Thomas, G. (2019). Role of Pulses in Cropping Systems: A Review. Agricultural Reviews. 40: 185-191.

  2. Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D. and Smith, M. (1998). Crop evapo-transpiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization.

  3. Baskaran, R., Karunakaran, V. and Kamaraj, A. (2020). Effect of growing degree days on yield attributes and yield of groundnut. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology. 39(22): 53-56.

  4. Fulton, J., Norton, M. and Shilling, F. (2019). Water-indexed benefits and impacts of California almonds. Ecological Indicators. 96: 711-717.

  5. Hoekstra, A.Y., and Hung, P.Q. (2002). Virtual Water Trade: A quantification of virtual water flows between nations in relation to international crop trade Value of Water Research Report (Vol. 11). The Netherlands.

  6. Hoekstra, A.Y., Chapagain, A.K., Aldaya, M.M. and Mekonnen, M.M. (2011). The water footprint assessment manual: Setting the global standard. Earthscan Publications, Dunstan House, London, UK.

  7. Mali, S.S., Singh, D.K., Sarangi, A., Khanna, M., Parihar, S.S. and Das, D.K. (2015). Variability Mapping of Crop Evapotranspiration for Water Footprint assessment at Basin Level. Indian Journal of Soil Conservation. 43(1): 255-259.

  8. Mekonnen, M.M. and Hoekstra, A.Y. (2011). The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15: 1577-1600.

  9. Michael, A.M. (1978). Irrigation Efficiency Principles of Agricultural Engineering. Vol. 11, Jain Brothers, Jodhpur. 113-178.

  10. Murray, M. and Kostadini G. (2016). Do improved groundnut seed make african farmers more food secure from Uganda. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 48(3): 219-240.

  11. Ramachandran, J., Lalitha, R., Vallal Kannan, S. (2021). Estimation of site-specific crop coefficients for major crops of lalgudi block in Tamil Nadu using remote sensing based Algorithms. Journal of Agricultural Engineering. 58(1): 62-72.

  12. Rami, J.-F., Leal-Bertioli, S., Foncéka, D., Moretzsohn, M., Bertioli, D. (2013). Groundnut. Alien Gene Transfer in Crop Plants. Springer Science. 2.

  13. Sameer, L., Gurikar R., Kulkarni, G. N. (2014). Production and Export of Ground nut from India - An Overview. International Research Journal of Agricultural Economics and Statistics. 5: 293-298.

  14. Shruthi, G., Rao, D., Devi, L. and Masih, M. (2017). Analysis of Area, Production and Productivity of Groundnut Crop in Telangana. Agric. Sci. Digest. 37(2): 151-153.

  15. Vanham, D., Mekonnen, M., Hoekstra, A. (2020). Treenuts and groundnuts in the EAT-Lancet reference diet: Concerns regarding sustainable water use. Global Food Security. 24: 1-7.

  16. Veettil, A.V. and Mishra, A.K. (2016). Water security assessment using blue and green water footprint concepts. Journal of Hydrology. 542: 589-602.

  17. Zhao, A., Zhu, X., Liu, X., Pan, Y., Zuo, D. (2016). Impacts of land use change and climate variability on green and blue water resources in the Weihe River Basin of Northwest China. Catena. 137: 318-327.
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)