Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 56 issue 5 (october 2022) : 607-613

Genetic Analysis of Fruit Yield and its Components in Bottle Gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.]

J.R. Balat1, J.B. Patel2, I.R. Delvadiya3, A.V. Ginoya3,*
1Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh-362 001, Gujarat, India.
2Department of Seed Science and Technology, College of Agriculture, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh-362 001, Gujarat, India.
3Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara-144 411, Punjab, India.
Cite article:- Balat J.R., Patel J.B., Delvadiya I.R., Ginoya A.V. (2022). Genetic Analysis of Fruit Yield and its Components in Bottle Gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.] . Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 56(5): 607-613. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5820.
Background: The choice of parents to be incorporated in hybridization is a crucial step for breeders for the improvement of complex quantitative characters, such as fruit yield and its components. It requires extensive and detailed genetic assessment of existing germplasm and newly developed promising lines. The magnitude and type of gene action serves as criteria for selection of parents, which after hybridization are likely to produce the best recombinants for desirable traits.

Methods: Forty five bottle gourd genotypes comprising 36 hybrids and 9 parents were evaluated in four different environments. Genetic components of variation were estimated for 12 different characters including fruit yield per plant.

Result: The additive as well as dominant components were significant for fruit yield per plant and its components, revealing equal importance of both additive as well as non-additive gene effects. However, fruit yield per plant is under the control of dominance variance. Over dominance type of gene action, considerable degree of gene symmetry over all the loci, excess of dominant alleles in parents and high narrow sense heritability was found for most of the traits studied.
Bottle gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl. 2n=2x=22], is one of humankind’s first domesticated plants. It is an important cucurbitaceous vegetable crop belonging to the family Cucurbitaceae. The Lagenaria siceraria is the only annual and monoecious cultivated species of bottle gourd, while other species are wild, perennial and dioecious.
       
The choice of parents to be incorporated in hybridization is a crucial step for breeders for the improvement of complex quantitative characters, such as fruit yield and its components. It requires extensive and detailed genetic assessment of existing germplasm and newly developed promising lines, which could be used in future breeding programme or could be directly released as a variety after thorough testing. The magnitude and type of gene action serves as criteria for selection of parents, which after hybridization are likely to produce the best recombinants for desirable traits. Diallel analysis, as developed by Hayman (1954) and Jinks (1954) provides a systematic approach for the selection of parents and crosses superior for the traits under investigation.
The experimental materials comprised of 45 entries includes nine parents (ABG 1, Punjab Long, NDBG 132, Arka Bahar, Pusa Naveen, DBG 5, Samrat, DBG 6 and Santosh), their 36 F1s developed through half diallel mating design. The genotypes were evaluated in a RBD with three replications over four environments (Environments were created by two different date of sowing during kharif 2018 and summer 2019 i.e. E1= July 24, 2018; E2= August 24, 2018; E3= February 24, 2019 and E4= March 24, 2019) at Sagdividi Farm, Department of Seed Science and Technology, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh. Each entry was sown in a single row plot of 10 m length keeping 2 m × 1 m spacing. The recommended package of practices and plant protection measures of Gujarat state were followed to raise a healthy crop of bottle gourd. Five competitive plants per genotype in each replication and in each environment were selected randomly for recording observations on different characters viz., number of node bearing first female flower, number of node bearing first male flower, vine length (cm), days to first picking, fruit length (cm), fruit equatorial diameter (cm), number of fruits per plant, average fruit weight per plant (kg), days to last picking and fruit yield per plant (kg). Genetic components of variation were estimated according to method suggested by Hayman (1954) as described in detail by Singh and Chaudhary (1985).
The genetic components of variance were worked out for different characters for individual environments (Table 1-4), as suggested by Hayman (1954) as described in detail by Singh and Chaudhary (1985). Validity of hypothesis according to Hayman (1954) was tested by t2 values. Non-significant values of t2 for all the characters in individual environments except for days to first opening male flower and vine length in E2 number of fruits per plant and days to last picking in E1 and E3 and for fruit yield per plant in E1, E2 and E3 environments, suggested the adequacy of additive - dominant model to explain the variation in almost all the traits studied.
 

Table 1: Estimates of genetic components of variances for days to first opening female flower, days to first opening male flower and number of node bearing first female flower in bottle gourd.


 

Table 2: Estimates of genetic components of variances for number of node bearing first male flower, vine length (m) and days to first picking in bottle gourd.


 

Table 3: Estimates of genetic components of variances for fruit length (cm), fruit equatorial diameter (cm) and number of fruits per plant in bottle gourd.


 

Table 4: Estimates of genetic components of variances for average fruit weight per plant (kg), days to last picking and fruit yield per plant (kg) in bottle gourd.


       
The additive as well as dominant components were significant for all the characters studied except for additive (D) component in number of nodes bearing first female flower in E4 environment, vine length in E3 and E4 number of fruits per plant in E4 and fruit yield per plant in E3 and E4; for dominance components (H1) in vine length, days to first picking and number of fruits per plant in E1 average fruit weight per plant in E3 and days to last picking in E2 and E3; and for dominant component (H2) in days to first opening female flower and days to last picking in E2, fruit length in E1 and average fruit weight per plant in E3 environment.
       
These results revealing equal importance of both additive as well as non-additive gene effects for the traits studied. However, the relative magnitude of dominant components were found to be higher than additive components for fruit yield per plant indicated the preponderance of dominant (non-additive) gene action, while for the remaining traits studied with few exceptions, the preponderance of additive gene action. The preponderance of dominance components for fruit yield per plant in bottle gourd was reported earlier by Quamruzzaman and Ahmad (2010), Ray et al., (2015), Adarsh et al., (2017), Mishra et al., (2019) and Quamruzzaman et al., (2019). Preponderance of additive gene action was also reported in bottle gourd for various traits. Sirohi et al., (1986) reported that additive gene action was responsible for the inheritance of days to first male and female flower opening and fruit length; Ray et al., (2015) for fruit length and Adarsh et al., (2017) for days to first fruit harvest and fruit girth in bottle gourd.
       
Significance of h2 for number of node bearing first male flower in E2, E3 and E4, vine length in E1, days to first picking in E2, fruit equatorial diameter in E1, E3 and E4 number of fruits per plant in E1, E2 and E4 and number of node bearing first female flower, average fruit weight per plant and fruit yield per plant in all the environments, indicated unidirectional dominant gene action, which revealed that substantial contribution of dominance effects was due to heterogeneity of loci. For the remaining traits in the respective environments, bidirectional dominant gene action prevailed. The results are in accordance with the findings of Quamruzzaman and Ahmad (2010) for fruit yield in bottle gourd.
       
The covariance between additive and dominants effects (F) was found to be non-significant in all the environments for number of node bearing first female flower, vine length, number of fruits per plant, average fruit weight per plant, days to last picking and fruit yield per plant; in E1 and E2 for days to first opening female flower; in E2, E3 and E4 for days to first opening male flower and fruit equatorial diameter; in E1, E3 and E4 for number of node bearing first male flower; and in E1 and E4 environments for days to first picking and fruit length; indicating equal distribution of dominant and recessive alleles for these traits in respective environments. The results are in accordance with the findings of Quamruzzaman et al., (2019) for fruit yield in bottle gourd.
       
Environmental component (E) was significant for all the traits studied in all the environments except in E2 and E4 for number of node bearing first male flower and in E4 for fruit equatorial diameter, manifesting the pivotal role of environment in the expression of traits studied.
       
The average degree of dominance (H1/D)1/2 indicated over dominance type of gene action all four environments for all the traits studied except for days to first opening female flower and days to first opening male flower in E1, E2 and E3; for vine length and fruit length in E1; for days to first picking in E1 and E3; for fruit equatorial diameter, number of fruits per plant and average fruit weight per plant in E1 and E2; and for days to last picking in all the environments. Over dominance for fruit yield per plant and important yield components in bottle gourd was reported earlier by Quamruzzaman and Ahmad (2010), Ray et al., (2015) and Quamruzzaman et al., (2019).
       
The distribution of genes with positive and negative effects (H2/4H1) in the parents was observed nearly symmetrical in all the environments for fruit yield per plant and the other characters studied except in E2 and E4 for days to first opening female flower; in E1 for days to first opening male flower; in E3 for number of node bearing first female flower; in E2 and E3 for number of node bearing first male flower and days to last picking; in E1, E2 and E3 for fruit length; in E3 and E4 for fruit equatorial diameter and in E4 for number of fruits per plant; indicating considerable degree of gene symmetry over all the loci for the studied traits.
       
The estimates of KD/KR ratio was more than unity indicated the excess of dominant alleles in parents for all the characters studied in all the environments except for days to first opening male flower in E4; for vine length in E2 and E4; for fruit equatorial diameter in E1; for number of fruits per plant in all environments; for average fruit weight per plant E1 and E2; for days to last picking in E2 and E3 and for fruit yield per plant in E1, E2 and E3; which indicated more number of dominant genes than recessive genes in the parents. The present findings are in accordance with those of Mishra et al., (2019) and Quamruzzaman et al., (2019), who reported that ratio of dominant and recessive alleles was more than unity or fruit yield and its components indicating presence of excess of dominant alleles.
       
In the present investigation, the ratio of h2/H2, estimating the number of gene groups indicated that there was one group of genes responsible for number of node bearing first male flower in E3 environment; for days to last picking and vine length in E1 and for number of fruits per plant average fruit weight per plant and fruit yield per plant in E1 and E2 environments. For all the remaining traits in respective environments, number of group of genes control the particular characters exhibit dominance. Quamruzzaman and Ahmad (2010) and Quamruzzaman et al., (2019) observed number of gene group, which exhibits dominance was less than one for most of the traits in bottle gourd. 
       
In the present study, high estimates of narrow sense heritability were depicted for days to first opening female flower, days to first opening male flower, number of node bearing first female flower, fruit equatorial diameter, number of fruits per plant and days to last picking in all the environments, for number of node bearing first male flower, vine length, fruit length and fruit yield per plant in E1 and E2; for days to first picking in E1 and E3 and for average fruit weight per plant in E1, E2 and E3; medium for number of node bearing first male flower, fruit length and fruit yield per plant in E3 and E4, vine length in E4, for days to first picking in E2 and E4 and for average fruit weight per plant in E4 environment and low for vine length in E3 environment. In general, the characters under investigation were having high heritability indicating that the characters studied were highly heritable. The results are in accordance with the findings of Ray et al., (2015) and Quamruzzaman et al., (2019) reported in bottle gourd for fruit yield and its components.
The present study revealed the importance of dominant gene action in the improvement of fruit yield per plant. The dominance genetic components could be exploited by heterosis breeding or by intermating the selected progenies in early segregating generations which would results in the accumulation of favourable genes for increasing fruit yield. Hence, biparental mating followed by pedigree selection may give fruitful results for genetic improvement of yield in bottle gourd.

  1. Adarsh, A., Kumar, R., Kumar, A., Neetunand and Singh, H.K. (2017). Estimation of gene action and heterosis in bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria Mol. Standl.). Environment and Ecology. 35(2A): 936-944.

  2. Hayman, B.I. (1954). The theory and analysis of diallel crosses. Genetics. 39: 789-809.

  3. Jinks, J.L. (1954). The analysis of continuous variation in a diallel cross of Yicotiana rustica varieties. Genetics. 39: 767-788.

  4. Mishra, S., Pandey, S., Kumar, N., Pandey, V.P. and Singh, T. (2019). Studies on gene action involved in inheritance of yield and yield attributing traits in kharif season bottle gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Molina) Standl.]. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 8(1): 39-44.

  5. Quamruzzaman, A.K.M. and Ahmad, S. (2010). Genetic analysis of some yield components of bottle gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.]. SAARC Journal of Agriculture. 8(1): 1-9.

  6. Quamruzzaman, A.K.M., Salim, M.M.R., Akhter, L., Hasan, T., Mazed, K. and Chowdhury, M.A.Z. (2019). Genetic architecture of yield in bottle gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.]. Agricultural Sciences. 10: 567-576.

  7. Ray, P.K., Yadav, G.C., Baranwal, D.K. and Singh, H.K. (2015). Genetic estimates and gene action for obtaining promising heterotic hybrids in bottle gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.]. The Bioscan. 10(2): 801-806.

  8. Singh, R.K. and Chaudhary, B.D. (1985). Biometrical Methods in Quantitative Genetic Analysis, Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi. 318p.

  9. Sirohi, P.S., Sivakami, N. and Choudhary, B. (1986). Genetic analysis in long fruited bottle gourd. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 56(9): 623-625.

Editorial Board

View all (0)