The genetic divergence was estimated by Mahalanobis D
2 statistic.
Rao (1952) suggested the application of D
2 statistics for the assessment of genetic diversity in plant breeding. Thirty two germplasm of leafy mustard for different characters and grouped them into six clusters using Mahalanobis D
2 statistics. (Table 1), whereby different members within a cluster is being assumed to be more closely related in terms of the trait under consideration with each other than those members in different clusters. Among six clusters, cluster I consisted of 9 genotypes, followed by cluster II (8), cluster IV (7) and III (6). Clusters V and cluster VI were mono genotypic. Similarly 60 diverse genotypes of Indian mustard weregrouped into eight clusters by
Meena et al., (2020). The pattern of clustering of these germplasm is shown in Table 1. Cluster I comprised of 9 germplasm
viz, 2014/MGVAR-1, FS-13-12, FS-13-11, FS-13-5, FS-13-21, PRHC-12-14, EEC-10, FS-13-20 and FS-13-7. Cluster II comprised of eight germplasm, namely PRHC-12-9-2, FS-13-9, PRHC-12-12, FS-13-10, FS-13-8, FS-13-17, FS-13-2 and 2014/MGVAR-3. Cluster III includes six germplasm, 2014/MGVAR-2, FS-13-1, FS-13-4, 2014/MGVAR-4, PRHC-12-9-1 and PRHC-12-7-2. Cluster IV comprised of seven germplasm, FS-13-14, PRHC-12-13, PRHC-12-11, PRHC-12-6, FS-13-15, FS-13-13 and FS-13-18. Cluster V consists of one germplasm, FS-13-3. Cluster VI comprised of only one germplasm, Pusa Sag 1.
Rabbani et al., (1998) also placed 52
Brassica juncea accessions into six clusters while
Gupta et al., (1991) grouped 48 lines of
Brassica juncea into five clusters.
Rout et al., (2019) grouped 71 genotypes of Indian mustard in seven clusters.
Most of the germplasm (28.12%) remained in the first cluster and remaining cluster had 1 to 8 germplasm. The presence of higher number of germplasm in the first cluster indicates presence of lower divergence among the germplasm of that cluster. The experimental material as a whole was found to be more diverse, as the 32 germplasm formed six clusters.
Intra-cluster and Inter-cluster average D
2 values and their respective Genetic distance (D) have been given in Table 2 and 3 respectively. Intra-cluster average D2 values ranged from 0.00 to 441.91. It was maximum in cluster III (441.91) followed by cluster II (339.99), Cluster I (295.97) and cluster IV (0.00). There were also two single germplasm containing clusters having ‘zero’ intra-cluster distance which is in accordance with finding of
Abdisa (2014).
The inter-cluster average D
2 value was maximum (20534.12) between cluster V with one germplasm and cluster VI with one germplasm, followed by average D2 value of 19421.68 between clusters II and cluster VI ( Fig 1).
The minimum inter-cluster average D
2 value of 497.11 was found between cluster I with nine germplasm and Cluster IV with seven germplasm. The magnitude of heterosis largely depends on the extent of genetic diversity in the parental population. Hence, the germplasm belonging to cluster V and VI could be used in hybridization for crop improvement programme. The crosses between genotypes of these diverse clusters might be having more chances of getting desirable segregants
(Arunachalam et al., 1984).Whereas
Gupta et al., (1991) reported average intra-cluster values ranged from a minimum of 13.8 in cluster V to a maximum of 21.9 in cluster III. Inter-cluster values also ranged from as low as 29.7 between clusters IV and V to as high as 81.3 between clusters I and V.
Singh et al., (2013) from his experimental results reported that the maximum inter-cluster distance was observed between cluster II and IX followed by IV and IX. The genotypes grouped into same cluster displayed the lowest degree of divergence from one another. Therefore, hybridization programmers should always be formulated in such a way that the parents belonging to different clusters with maximum divergence could be utilized to get desirable transgressive segregants. The minimum genetic distance D=22.29 was found between cluster I and IV.
A perusal of these cluster means (Table 4) for different characters indicated considerable distance among clusters for all the characters.
Cluster III with six germplasm had the highest cluster mean value for leaves per plant at 30DAS (5.05). For leaves per plant at 45 DAS, cluster I and VI had the highest mean value (7.00) while cluster V had lowest mean value (6.07). For days to first leaves harvest, highest cluster mean value was shown by cluster VI (50.00) while the lowest was shown by cluster IV (44.00). For days to last leaves harvest, Cluster IV had shown the highest cluster mean value (73.33) while lowest cluster mean value (69.39) was shown by cluster II. Cluster III had shown highest cluster mean value for leaf area (492.76 cm
2) while the lowest cluster mean value was shown by cluster V (361.67 cm
2). For leaf length, cluster III had the highest mean value (51.74 cm) followed by cluster V(49.51 cm) while the cluster VI had lowest mean value (32.48 cm). For leaf width highest cluster mean value (21.66) had shown by cluster III while cluster IV had the lowest (18.21) mean value.
Cluster V had shown highest cluster mean (10.57 cm) for petiole length while cluster IV had shown the lowest mean value (5.90 cm). For green leaf yield per plant, cluster VI had shown the highest cluster mean (278.87 g) while cluster V had the lowest mean value (180.47 g).
For green leaf yield q/ha, cluster VI had the highest mean value (370.90 q/ha) while cluster IV had lowest mean value (231.51 q/ha). The results are in agreement with findings of
Rout et al 2019 in mustard.
Rabbani et al. (1998) found 6 clusters in mustard as in present study. I cluster was characterized by small sized leaves and lower number of leaves per plant. The second cluster accessions displayed large sized leaves at seedling. Cluster 3 consisted of three oilseed cultivars. The fourth cluster comprised of only two accessions. Cluster 5 exhibited tall stature, large sized leaves and longer duration. Finally, cluster 6 had large sized leaves and the second cluster accessions showed a lower number of leaves/plant and early maturity. On the other hand
Zada et al., (2013) reported 7 clusters having first cluster medium number of leaves per plant, cluster two had lower protein contents, cluster three had medium contents of protein, cluster four had minimum ratio between leaf length and width and protein contents. Cluster five had minimum leaf length and protein contents and cluster six had maximum leaves/plant and medium protein contents and cluster seven had maximum protein contents but in this study highest cluster mean value for protein content (26.62) was found in Cluster VI.