Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorT. Mohapatra

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 57 issue 2 (april 2023) : 255-260

Assessment of Losses in Sweet Sorghum Genotype (SSV 74) due to Leaf Blight caused by Exserohilum turcicum (Pass.) Leonard and Suggs

B.M. Kiran1,*, P.V. Patil2, M.M. Sindhu2
1Department of Plant Pathology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru-560 065, Karnataka, India.
2Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad-580 005, Karnataka, India.
Cite article:- Kiran B.M., Patil P.V., Sindhu M.M. (2023). Assessment of Losses in Sweet Sorghum Genotype (SSV 74) due to Leaf Blight caused by Exserohilum turcicum (Pass.) Leonard and Suggs . Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 57(2): 255-260. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5769.
Background: Leaf blight caused by Exserohilum turcicum (E. turcicum) is commonly or generally found on sorghum grown in the sub-tropics and tropical lowlands during summer. The pathogen is easily wind disseminated and apparently most consistent in their occurrence and severity across the diverse sorghum growing environments. The sweet sorghum variety SSV 74 was released by University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad for kharif season mainly for fodder purpose. This variety is also good for ethanol production and jaggery making. However, for the last several years this variety was showing its susceptibility to the leaf blight caused by E. turcicum and causes heavy losses both in fodder and its quality. Even though there are reports of the presence of leaf blight caused by E. turcicum on the grain sorghum, no precise information is available on the presence of the leaf blight on sweet sorghum in India as well as in the world and no information is available about the magnitude of losses caused by this disease. Hence, the experiment was conducted to assess the losses caused by the E. turcicum.

Methods: An experiment on loss assessment in sweet sorghum due to leaf blight caused by E. turcicum was carried out at Main Agricultural Research Station, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, during kharif 2017 using randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications and seven treatments. Six treatments were imposed with hexaconazole at 0.1% besides a treatment with unsprayed control.

Result: Lowest per cent disease index (PDI) (24.76%) as well as area under disease progressive curve (789.61) was observed in treatment involving six sprays of hexaconazole at 0.1% followed by five sprays, (PDI: 27.51%, AUDPC: 815.32) and four sprays T4 (PDI: 32.57%, AUDPC: 908.80). Highest fodder yield (46.47 t/ha), brix value (12.47%), crude fibre content (28.22%), leaf ash content (23.08%) and crude protein content (5.29%) was observed in treatment with six sprays of hexaconazole at 0.1%. With respect to the per cent increase over control, 17.47-37.20 per cent increase in fodder yield, 7.4-21.17 per cent in brix value, 11.64-9.66 per cent in crude fibre content, 12.74-62.91 per cent in leaf ash content and 4.36-13.00 per cent in crude protein content was observed at one spray to six sprays with hexaconazole at 0.1 per cent, respectively.
Sorghum bicolour (S. bicolar) commonly known as sorghum, which cultivated widely in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Sorghum is important cereal crop which occupies the fifth position after the rice, wheat, maize and barley (Amarnath et al., 2018). It is one of the essential staple food for the poorest and most food-insecure people in the world. Different types of sorghum are known to be cultivated in the world like grain and grass sorghum, sweet sorghum [Sorghum bicolour (L.) Moench] is the one which can be used for different purposes, like food (grain from its ear head), sugary juice and leaves make excellent fodder for animals. Sorghum is affected by number of foliar diseases viz., anthracnose, leaf blight, grey leaf spot, rust and downy mildew are widespread over all the humid regions of the world when high rainfall occurs. Leaf blight caused by E. turcicum is found to be more consistent in the sub-tropics and tropical lowlands during summer (Frederiksen, 1982) whereas, cooler temperate and tropical environments are not favorable for the occurrence of this pathogen. Since the pathogen is wind disseminated, occurrence of this disease is apparently most consistent and causes severe lose across the various sorghum growing environments. In India, the disease become first mentioned by Butler (1918) on the cultivated sorghum leaves and later it was reported by Mitra (1923) from Punjab. The symptoms of this disease may also vary keeping view with geographical region, host cultivar and pathogen. Yield losses attributed because of this ailment will usually vary with sorghum growing areas and with surroundings (Frederiksen 1982).

The variety SSV 74 (sweet sorghum variety 74) was released by University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad for kharif season mainly for fodder purpose and it’s also good for ethanol production and jaggery making. However, the variety was susceptible to leaf blight caused by E. turcicum from several years, causing heavy loss in phrases of fodder and its quality. Even though there are limited reports on presence of leaf blight caused by E. turcicum on the grain sorghum, no accurate information is available on presence of the leaf blight on sweet sorghum and magnitude of loss it causes in India as well as the world. Keeping the above fact in view, loss assessment study was undertaken to find the amount of loss it causes in fodder as well as its quality.
Field experiment was conducted at Main Agricultural Research Station, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad during kharif 2017 by following randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications and seven treatments having the gross plot size of 2.4 m×5 m and net plot size of 1.8 m×5 m and spacing followed was 30 cm×10 cm (Cv. SSV 74). Six treatments were imposed with hexaconazole (found effective under in vitro conditions) at 0.1% besides a treatment with unsprayed control and the treatments were implemented as T1: One spray at the onset of the disease, T2: Two sprays: at T1 and one week after T1, T3: Three sprays: at T1, T2 and one week after T2, T4: Four sprays: at T1, T2, T3 and one week after T3, T5 : Five sprays: at T1, T2, T3, T4 and one week after T4, T6 : at T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 and one week after T5, T7 : Unsprayed control.

The inoculum of E. turcicum was mass multiplied on sweet sorghum leaves. For this leaves were cut into small bits of 5 to 6 cm in conical flasks and autoclaved at 15 psi pressure and 120°C temperature. Sterilized flasks were inoculated with E. turcicum culture and incubated at 25°C ±1°C with 12 h darkness for 8-10 days. Mycelium and spores developed on these leaves were harvested by flooding the flask with sterilized distilled water and scraping the growth by a brush. Spore suspension thus obtained was adjusted to desired concentration (1×105 spores/ml) and sprayed twice uniformly on all treatment plots at alternative days in the evening hours when the crop was 21 days old to create high disease pressure. Observations on leaf blight severity in different treatments were taken at weekly intervals after the onset of disease by following 0-9 scale of Mayee and Datar (1986). Further, per cent disease index (PDI) was calculated using the formula (Wheeler 1969).
 
Later, PDI values were used to calculate area under disease progressive curve (AUDPC) using the following formula given by (Wilcoxson et al., 1975).
 
 
Where,
Si = Disease severity at the end of time.
Si-1= Number of successive evaluations of blight.
d = Interval between two evaluations.

Then fodder yield per plot was taken by harvesting each treatment separately 85 days after sowing. Later fodder quality parameters viz., crude protein (Anonymous, 1990), crude fibre (Horwitz 2000) and leaf ash content (Thiex et al., 2012) and Brix values were recorded as per the procedure given below.
 
Crude protein content 
 
Leaf sample from each treatment were collected one day before harvest in brown paper bag and the sample was shade dried and further oven dried overnight for the removal of moisture. Further oven dried leaf sample were ground using the mixer grinder and ground samples were maintained separately in the polybags.

Two grams of prepared sample was transferred carefully to the Kjeldhal flask, to this 10 g of potassium sulphate, 0.5 g of copper sulphate and 25 ml of concentrated sulphuric acid was added and were placed in an inclined position and heated until frothing ceased, heated and digested till the mixture was clear. After cooling the contents were transferred quantitatively to round bottom flask with water, the total quantity of water used was 200 ml. Then few pieces of fumic stones were placed prior to the addition of sodium hydroxide to make the solution alkaline so as to avoid mixing at once with acid solution.

The digested material was made up to a volume of 100 ml in a volumetric flask. Five ml of aliquot was taken in the receiver of distillation apparatus. Ten ml of 45 per cent solution of sodium hydroxide was added till the blue colour was formed.

Released ammonia was collected in 10 ml of two per cent boric acid solution. Faint reddish boric acid colour started changing to green colour since the released ammonia was absorbed by boric acid solution. Released ammonia was allowed to distil till the original volume of 10 ml of boric acid became 30 ml. Green coloured boric acid back titrated with N/100 sulphuric acid using microburette. Used volume of this standard solution was noted down.

After completion of distillation, sample in the receiver was taken by creating negative pressure of cooling. Total nitrogen per cent by weight was calculated as:
 
 
A= Volume of N/100 H2SO4 
Total crude protein per cent = N × 6.25.
 
Crude fibre content
 
Leaf sample from each treatment were collected in the brown paper bag and shade dried and further oven dried overnight for the removal of moisture. Ground sample was defatted using the petroleum ether by placing 5 g of the sample and 80ml of petroleum ether in 100 ml beaker overnight. The defatted sample was oven dried until the constant weight is achieved. Later, estimation of crude protein was done by taking 3 g of defatted sample was taken in 500 ml beaker to which 200 ml of sulphuric acid (1.25%) was added and boiled for 30 min. keeping the volume constant by adding water at constant interval (a glass rod was placed or kept in the beaker for smooth boiling). After boiling it was filtered through muslin cloth and left out residue was washed with the boiling water until washings are no longer acidic. Then the residue was added to another beaker (500 ml) with 200 ml of NaOH and which was further boiled for 30 min. Again, it was filtered through muslin cloth, washed with hot distilled water till it was free from alkali followed by washing with some alcohol and ether. The residue left on the muslin cloth was transferred to a crucible, dried overnight at 80-100°C and weighed (We). Then oven dried sample was again dried in muffle furnace for 2-3 h at 600°C. cooled and weighed (Wa). Difference in the weights (We-Wa) represents the weight of the crude fibre.
 
 
Leaf ash content
 
Ash content was determined using the high temperature muffle furnace capable of maintaining the temperatures between 500-600°C. The dried leaf sample is weighed before and after ashing to determine the concentration of ash present. The ash content can be expressed on dry basis.
 
 
Where,
Mash = Mass of the ashed sample.
Mdry = Mass of the original dried sample.
 
Brix percentage
 
Five plants from each treatment were selected randomly a day before harvest and then brix percentage from those plants was recorded using the pocket refractometer (0-93%).
Symptomatology and appearance of the disease
 
Symptoms are visible from the seedling stage to the crop maturity stage. Small, round to irregular reddish or dark brown spots develop on seedlings. On mature plants, long, elliptical, reddish purple or brown spots develop on both surface of the leaf (Fig 1a and 1b), later these spots enlarge and coalesce resulting in blighted appearance of the entire leaf (Fig 1c). Size of the spot varies from one to few centimetres in length and few millimetres in width. It primarily attacks leaf blade but under extended disease conducive environment it may also attack leaf sheath, node and stem. In humid weather, numerous greyish black spores are produced in the lesions in concentric zones. During the experiment first appearance of the disease was observed after the 30 days of sowing i.e. between 23rd July to 29th July (30th standard meteorological week) of 2017.

Fig 1: Symptoms of the disease and pathogen. a and b: Long, elliptical, reddish purple or brown spots on leaves, c: large coalesced spots on the leaf showing blighted appearance d. Pure culture of E. turcicum. e. Spores of the pathogen (40X).


 
Disease severity and area under disease progressive curve (AUDPC)
 
Different disease severity levels were observed in different treatments. Treatment involving six sprays of hexaconazole recorded least leaf blight severity (24.76%) and AUDPC (789.61). This was followed by treatments involving five sprays and four sprays of hexaconazole at 0.1% which have recorded leaf blight severity and AUDPC of 27.15% and 815.32, 32.71% and 908.80, respectively. Highest leaf blight severity (67.41%) and AUDPC value (1818.55) was observed in unsprayed control (Table 1).

Table 1a: Leaf blight severity at different intervals as influenced by hexaconazole (0.1%) spray.


 
Fodder yield and quality parameters
 
Difference in fodder yield and different quality like brix value, crude fibre content, leaf ash content and crude protein content as influenced by different number of fungicidal sprays was found significant. Highest fodder yield (46.47 t/ha), brix value (12.47%), crude fiber content (28.22%), leaf ash content (23.08%) and crude protein content (5.29%) was recorded in treatment involving six sprays of hexaconazole at 0.1% and significantly lowest fodder yield (29.18), brix value (9.83%) crude fiber content (22.67%), leaf ash content (8.56%) and crude protein content (8.56%) was recorded in unsprayed control. Fodder yield and most of the quality parameters in treatments involving one, two and three sprays of hexaconazole at 0.1% were found on par with each other (Table 2).

Table 1b: Losses in fodder yield and quality as influenced by leaf blight in sweet sorghum.



Losses in fodder yield and quality parameters varied in different spray schedules. Highest increase in fodder yield (37.20%), brix value (21.17%), crude fiber content  (19.66%), leaf ash content (62.91%) and crude protein content (13.00%) over unsprayed  control was observed in six sprays with hexaconazole @ 0.1% and it was found lowest in a single spray of hexaconazole at 0.1%, where in increase in fodder yield, brix value, crude fiber content, leaf ash content and crude protein were 17.47%, 7.40%, 11.64%, 12.74% and 4.36%, respectively over unsprayed control (Table 2).

Leaf blight disease progressed faster and reached highest in control plot (61.41%) than treated plots with hexaconazole (24.76-47.58%) (Table 1). Overall, present results are in accordance with (Lee et al., 1986) who observed that 47 and 38% reduction in fresh and dry matter yield of sudan grass [Sorghum Sudanese (Piper.) Stapf] due to leaf blight and further they also reported that, the concentration of infected leaves loose part of their nutritive value like crude protein and crude fibre. Similarly, Bunker and Mathur (2006) reported grain and fodder yield loss in sorghum due to leaf blight (E. turcicum) in Kerki local and CSH 14 variety under field condition. They reported that, in two years of testing, the per cent disease index in Kerki local was ranged from 43 to 74 and resulted in 20 to 36 per cent reduction in grain and 12 to 27 per cent in fodder yield. 60.50 per cent loss in the grain yield and 41.35 per cent loss in the stover yield due to E. turcicum in foot hills of north western Himalayas on maize were reported by (Rani et al., 2016). Kachapur and Hegde (1988), (Pandurangegowda et al., 1993; Wathaneeyawech et al., 2015) reported the Mancozeb sprays at 0.25% significantly reduced NLB and increased grain yield of maize while working with loss assessment. (Nwanosike et al., 2015) reported grain losses of 23.9-40.4% in grain yield and 11.2-36.1% in 1000-grain weight in Morogoro, Tanzania. Perkins and Pedersen (1987) reported that reduction in 500-grain weights of maize affected yield losses due to loss of active leaf area caused by E. tutcicum.
Results from the experiment shows that crop losses varied significantly between the numbers of sprays with hexaconazole at 0.1%. The losses were directly proportional to disease severity. The higher per cent disease index observed in the variety in turn reflected on the magnitude of loss as it increased the fodder yield, brix value, crude fiber content, leaf ash content and crude protein by 17.47- 37.20%, 7.4-21.17%, 11.64-19.66%, 12.74-62.91% and 4.36-13.00%, respectively over unsprayed control. Even though after the six sprays with hexaconazole at 0.1 per cent the disease was not able to manage completely. It may be concluded that losses due to blight disease can be effectively managed by combination of tolerant genotype along with the fungicide spray.
None.

  1. Amarnath, B.H., Chaurasia, A.K., Kumar, A. (2018). Effect of priming with botanicals and animal waste on germination and seedling length of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) seeds. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 7: 2917-2923.

  2. Anonymous, (1990). Protein (Crude) Determination in Animal Feed: Copper Catalyst Kjeldahl Method. 984.13. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. Rockville, Maryland. p. 250.

  3. Bunker, R.N. and Mathur, K. (2006). Assessment of losses in sorghum caused by leaf blight (Exserohilum turcicum). Journal of Mycology and Plant Pathology. 36(1): 71-73. 

  4. Butler, E.J. (1918). Fungi and Diseases in Plants. Calcutta and Simla, India Thacker, Spink and Co., Kolkatta, India. p.150.

  5. Frederiksen, R.A., (1982). Sorghum in the Eighties: Proc. Int. Symp. Sorghum. 2-7 Nov. International Crop Research Institute for Semi-arid Tropics. Patancheru Andhra Pradesh, India. pp. 263-271.

  6. Horwitz, W. (2000). Fiber (Crude) in Animal Feed and Pet Food, AOAC Official Method 962.09. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. Rockville, Maryland. pp. 265-269.

  7. Kachapur, M.R. and Hegde, R.K. (1988). Studies on turcicum blight of maize (Zea mays L.) caused by Exserohilum turcicum (Pass) Leonard and Suggs with special reference to crop loss assessment. Plant Pathology-News. 6: 33-35.                       

  8. Lee, S.B., Kim, J.G., Kim, B.K., Han, H.J. and Yang, J.S. (1986). Studies on the qualitative and quantitative damage of suddangrass infected with leaf blight (Helminthosporium turcicum Pass.). Journal of the Korean Society of Grass land and Forage Science. 6(1): 65-70. 

  9. Mayee, C.D. and Datar, V.V. (1986). Phytopathometry. Technical Bulletin-1 (Special 3), Marathwada Agric. Univ., Parbhani. p. 218.

  10. Mitra, M. (1923). Helminthosporium species on cereals and sugarcane in India. Part I Diseases of Zea mays and Sorghum vulgare caused by species of Helmintho sporium. Memoirs of the Dept. Agric. India. Botanical Series. 11: 219-242.

  11. Pandurangegowda, K.T., Shetty, H.S., Jayaramegowda, G., Sangamlal, F. (1993). Incidence of turcicum leaf blight of maize in southern Karnataka. Current Research. 22: 100-101.

  12. Perkins, J.M. and Pedersen WL (1987). Disease development and yield losses associated with northern leaf blight on corn. Plant Disease. 71: 940-943.

  13. Rani, S., Gupta, S., Singh, S. K. (2016). Status and assessment of yield losses due to maize leaf blights in foothills of North western Himalayas. Indian Journal of Plant Protection. 44(1): 94-98. 

  14. Thiex, N., Novotny, L., Crawford, A. (2012). Determination of ash in animal feed: AOAC official method 942.05 revisited. Journal of AOAC International. 95(5):1392-1397. 

  15. Wathaneeyawech, S., Kirdsiri, K., Sirithunya, P., Smitamana, P. (2015). Efficacies of some fungicides and antagonists in controlling northern corn leaf blight disease. Journal of Agricultural Technology. 11(4): 925-936.

  16. Nwanosike, M.R.O., Mabagala, R.B., Kusolwa, P.M. (2015). Effect of northern leaf bight (Exserohilum turcicum) severity on yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in Morogoro, Tanzania. International Journal of Science and Research. 4(9): 466- 475.

  17. Wheeler, B.E.J. (1969). An Introduction to Plant Diseases. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. London, p. 301. 

  18. Wilcoxson, R.D, Skovmand, B. and Atif, A.H. (1975). Evaluation of wheat cultivars for ability to retard development of stem rust. Annals of Applied Biology. 80: 275-281.

Editorial Board

View all (0)