Symptomatology and appearance of the disease
Symptoms are visible from the seedling stage to the crop maturity stage. Small, round to irregular reddish or dark brown spots develop on seedlings. On mature plants, long, elliptical, reddish purple or brown spots develop on both surface of the leaf (Fig 1a and 1b), later these spots enlarge and coalesce resulting in blighted appearance of the entire leaf (Fig 1c). Size of the spot varies from one to few centimetres in length and few millimetres in width. It primarily attacks leaf blade but under extended disease conducive environment it may also attack leaf sheath, node and stem. In humid weather, numerous greyish black spores are produced in the lesions in concentric zones. During the experiment first appearance of the disease was observed after the 30 days of sowing
i.e. between 23
rd July to 29
th July (30
th standard meteorological week) of 2017.
Disease severity and area under disease progressive curve (AUDPC)
Different disease severity levels were observed in different treatments. Treatment involving six sprays of hexaconazole recorded least leaf blight severity (24.76%) and AUDPC (789.61). This was followed by treatments involving five sprays and four sprays of hexaconazole at 0.1% which have recorded leaf blight severity and AUDPC of 27.15% and 815.32, 32.71% and 908.80, respectively. Highest leaf blight severity (67.41%) and AUDPC value (1818.55) was observed in unsprayed control (Table 1).
Fodder yield and quality parameters
Difference in fodder yield and different quality like brix value, crude fibre content, leaf ash content and crude protein content as influenced by different number of fungicidal sprays was found significant. Highest fodder yield (46.47 t/ha), brix value (12.47%), crude fiber content (28.22%), leaf ash content (23.08%) and crude protein content (5.29%) was recorded in treatment involving six sprays of hexaconazole at 0.1% and significantly lowest fodder yield (29.18), brix value (9.83%) crude fiber content (22.67%), leaf ash content (8.56%) and crude protein content (8.56%) was recorded in unsprayed control. Fodder yield and most of the quality parameters in treatments involving one, two and three sprays of hexaconazole at 0.1% were found on par with each other (Table 2).
Losses in fodder yield and quality parameters varied in different spray schedules. Highest increase in fodder yield (37.20%), brix value (21.17%), crude fiber content (19.66%), leaf ash content (62.91%) and crude protein content (13.00%) over unsprayed control was observed in six sprays with hexaconazole @ 0.1% and it was found lowest in a single spray of hexaconazole at 0.1%, where in increase in fodder yield, brix value, crude fiber content, leaf ash content and crude protein were 17.47%, 7.40%, 11.64%, 12.74% and 4.36%, respectively over unsprayed control (Table 2).
Leaf blight disease progressed faster and reached highest in control plot (61.41%) than treated plots with hexaconazole (24.76-47.58%) (Table 1). Overall, present results are in accordance with
(Lee et al., 1986) who observed that 47 and 38% reduction in fresh and dry matter yield of sudan grass [
Sorghum Sudanese (Piper.) Stapf] due to leaf blight and further they also reported that, the concentration of infected leaves loose part of their nutritive value like crude protein and crude fibre. Similarly,
Bunker and Mathur (2006) reported grain and fodder yield loss in sorghum due to leaf blight (
E. turcicum) in Kerki local and CSH 14 variety under field condition. They reported that, in two years of testing, the per cent disease index in Kerki local was ranged from 43 to 74 and resulted in 20 to 36 per cent reduction in grain and 12 to 27 per cent in fodder yield. 60.50 per cent loss in the grain yield and 41.35 per cent loss in the stover yield due to
E. turcicum in foot hills of north western Himalayas on maize were reported by
(Rani et al., 2016). Kachapur and Hegde (1988),
(Pandurangegowda et al., 1993; Wathaneeyawech et al., 2015) reported the Mancozeb sprays at 0.25% significantly reduced NLB and increased grain yield of maize while working with loss assessment.
(Nwanosike et al., 2015) reported grain losses of 23.9-40.4% in grain yield and 11.2-36.1% in 1000-grain weight in Morogoro, Tanzania.
Perkins and Pedersen (1987) reported that reduction in 500-grain weights of maize affected yield losses due to loss of active leaf area caused by
E.
tutcicum.