Morphological characterization of landraces of rice
Forty one qualitative and thirteen quantitative characters were evaluated as per Distinctiveness, Uniformity and Stability (DUS) testing guidelines given by
PPV and FRA, 2001. Beganbeach, Bilinellu, Seethmog, Juli, Kanakachudi, Kavalakannu, Kuruva and Meesebhatta had recorded anthocynin coloration only on leaves. Landraces of rice such as Beganbeach, Bilinellu and Kuruva recorded the distribution of anthocynin coloration of leaf on tips only whereas, landraces of rice
viz., Seethmog, Juli, Somasale, Kavalakannu and Meesebhatta recorded the distribution of anthocynin coloration of leaf on margins only. Seethmog, Juli, Kanakachudi, Kavalakannu, Kuruva and Meesebhatta landraces of rice showed anthocynin coloration on leaf sheath. Anthocynin coloration of auricles was recorded in the landraces of rice Seethmog, Kavalakannu and Kuruva.
The anthocynin coloration of collar was recorded in Beganbeach, Seethmog, Kavalakannnu, Kayame, Kuruva and Meesebhatta. The density of pubescence of lemma was recorded strong in landraces of rice Juli, Kalame and Kanakachudi very strong density of pubescence of lemma was exhibited by the landraces of rice Seethmog, Giddabasumati, Halaga, Kuruva, Nattijaddu and Peetasale. The density of pubescence of lemma was recorded strong in landraces of rice Juli, Kalame and Kanakachudi, very strong density of pubescence of lemma was exhibited by the landraces of rice Seethmog, Giddabasumati, Halaga, Kuruva and Peetasale. These characters are useful in varietal identification and could be used as morphological markers in the hybridization program.
Analysis of variance
The estimates of analysis of variance for yield and its contributing traits (13) in landraces of rice are furnished in Table 2.
The Days to 50% flowering (70.50-146.26), Days to maturity (86.60-179.49) and plant height(70.00-142.00) were exhibited in a wide range and the difference between the phenotypic coefficient of variation and the genotypic coefficient of variation is less for the characters like leaf width (26.63 and 25.11), test weight (19.48 and 18.70), panicle length (18.72 and 18.54), leaf length (18.44 and 18.26) and plant height (17.06 and 16.98) this indicated the low environmental influence and selection based on phenotype would be of more rewarding. Stem thickness (33.72 and 31.37), total number of tillers per plant (33.69 and 28.22), number of productive tillers per plant(36.84 and 30.79), L/B ratio (21.54 and 14.49), panicle fertility (13.25 and 10.92) and yield per plant (21.59 and 17.32) exhibited higher estimates of phenotypic coefficient of variation than genotypic coefficient of variation for above mentioned traits suggesting variation for these traits was not only genotypic but also due to the involvement of higher environmental effect.
The traits like plant height (99.10%), panicle length (98.10%), days to 50 per cent flowering (97.60%) and test weight (92.10%) showed high heritability with high genetic advance as per cent mean, indicating that these traits are less influenced by the environment and emerged as the ideal traits for improvement through the selection.
Association study
The grain yield had a significant and positive association at phenotypic level with the total number of tillers per plant, number of productive tillers per plant, test weight, panicle length and panicle fertility.
Cluster analysis
Based on D2 values all 51 rice landrace were grouped into eight clusters and values given in Table 5. Clustering pattern revealed that Cluster I had twenty landrace, forming the largest cluster, Cluster II had seventeen genotypes, cluster III had six, cluster V had four landrace, whereas Cluster IV, VI, VII and VIII had single rice landrace in each cluster (Table 3).
Range of an average intra-cluster D2 values was 0 to 5.16 (Table 4). The maximum intra-cluster distance was shown by cluster V (280.47) followed by cluster III (210.38), cluster II (160.16), while cluster I showed a minimum intra-cluster distance (153.71). Cluster IV, VI, VII and VIII had zero intra-cluster distance, as they were having single genotype each. High intra-cluster distance in Cluster V suggested wide genetic diversity among the genotypes in this cluster. Hence, the genotypes included under cluster V could be used as parents in the recombination breeding program owing to the presence of greater diversity within these genotypes.
When diversity among the clusters (inter-cluster) was studied, it showed a range of 255.57 to 1355.55. Cluster IV and cluster V showed maximum inter-cluster distance (1355.55) followed by cluster V and cluster VI (1077.79), which indicated the existence of high genetic diversity among genotypes in these clusters and therefore crosses between the genotypes of these clusters could yield desirable transgressive segregants, similar explanation was given by Amegan
et al.2020 and
Sudeepthi et al., 2020. Whereas the lowest inter-cluster distance was noticed between cluster VI and cluster VIII (255.57) followed by cluster II and cluster IV (269.07), suggesting closeness and similarities among the genotypes in these clusters for most of the traits.
Cluster means of all the characters is presented in Table 5. The cluster mean values varied in all the clusters for all the 13 quantitative traits studied. Cluster IV showed highest mean values for days to 50 per cent flowering (134.50), days to maturity (157.50) and stem thickness (0.66). Cluster III showed highest mean values for leaf length (38.05) and panicle length (34.05). Highest mean for leaf width (0.99) was exhibited by cluster VII. The results indicated the existence of high genetic diversity among genotypes in these clusters; therefore, genotypes in these clusters could be used for specific trait improvement in plant breeding programmes, similar results were explained by
Muthuramu et al., 2017.
Plant height contributed forty-five percent (45%) of total divergence indicated that genotypes differ significantly with respect to their different plant height followed by panicle length (19.14 (Table 6) and Least contribution to divergence was made by yield per plant similar results was obtained by
Raghavendra et al., 2018 and
Devi et al., 2019.