Collection of soil samples and enrichment of the isolates
The different rhizospheric soil samples were successfully collected from the different regions of Baramati. The soil samples collected were found to be the rich source of microbial diversity. Total eight isolates were obtained and they were further screened on the basis of siderophore production. Rhizospheric soil samples are the rich source of microorganisms having the ability to produce variety of biocompounds (
Pahari and Misra, 2017).
Estimation of siderophore production by qualitative and quantitative assay
Yellow coloration around the test colony was observed which indicated positive result for qualitative test.
Quantitative estimation of siderophore production was done in terms of percent siderophore units (% SU). Maximum siderophore production was 98%.
Pattan et al., (2017) also used qualitative and quantitative methods for the estimation of siderophore production.
Qualitative estimation by CAS assay and quantitative by CAS shuttle assay are popularly used to estimate siderophore production. Similar results were reported by
Pahari and Mishra, (2017).
Raval and Desai, (2015) reported that the use of the CAS assay as a comprehensive, exceptionally responsive and most convenient. Their study showed that 37% of bacteria were positive and mainly belonged to
Enterobacter,
Pseudomonas and
Bacillus, showed presence of orange halo around the colonies. For quantitative estimation, the isolates were grown in iron-deficient succinate medium and CAS assay was employed and OD value was measured at 630 nm.
Kumar et al., 2017 assayed siderophore production qualitatively by using CAS assay. Their results showed positive for the strains
Bacillus thuringiensis VIT VK5 and
Enterobacter soli VIT VK6.
Shaikh et al., (2016) also used similar approach for the quantitative estimation of siderophore production.They also used CAS shuttle assay for quantitative estimation of siderophore using succinate medium and found that
P. aeruginosa RZS9 produced 63.38% SU.
Marathe et al., (2015) used same method for the quantitative estimation of siderophore produced by
Pseudomonas which was determined by CAS-shuttle assay. The isolated strain of
Pseudomonas sp. showed 71% siderophore production.
Mokracka et al., (2004) also reported efficient siderophore production using
Enterobacter spp.
Characterization of the efficient siderophore producing isolate
Further the bacterial strain having the ability to produce siderophore was successfully characterized upto species level by using morphological, biochemical and molecular methods. The colony characters of the selected isolate were determined and were found to be Gram negative, rod shaped, non-motile and non-endospore forming. The isolate showed positive results for Voges-Proskauer, citrate, starch hydrolysis, catalase and nitrate reduction tests. It showed negative methyl red, gelatinase, oxidase and H
2S production and was able to ferment glucose with acid and gas production. On the basis of results obtained of biochemical tests by using Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology, the organism was identified upto genus level as
Enterobacter sp.The isolate was identified as
Enterobacter hormaechei subsp.
oharae DSM 16687(T) by using 16S r RNA gene analysis technique. The 16S rRNA FASTA analysis showed 99.12% similarity with the strain
Enterobacter hormaechei (Table 2).
The Neighbor-Joining method was used to inferred evolutionary history (
Saitou and Nei, 1987). The optimal tree with the sum of branch length 0.46613182 is shown. Associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) are shown next to the branches (
Felsenstein, 1985).The evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic trees, with branch lengths in the same units. The Tajima-Nei method was used to compute the evolutionary distances (
Kimura, 1980) and is in the units of the number of base substitutions per site. A gamma distribution (shape parameter = 1) was used to modeled the rate variation among sites. The positions showing upto 95% coverage of site were excluded. MEGA6 was used to conduct evolutionary analysis
(Tamura et al., 2013).
Optimization of siderophore production and statistical analysis of the CCD (by RSM and ANOVA)
The CCD under the RSM was employed in order to illustrate the nature of the response surface in the experimental region and elucidate the optimal conditions of the most significant independent variables. The average siderophore production given in Table 2 was subjected to multiple linear regression analysis. The effect of pH, time, temperature and succinic acid on siderophore production was described in the form of following equation as
Yield = 0.276 + 0.0824 pH - 0.00657 (Temperature) + 0.002437 Time (hrs.) - 0.035 Succinic Acid
For siderophore production, 49.55% of variability in the response could be explained by the model (Table 3). The closer the R
2 value to unity, the better the empirical model fits the actual data. The model explains 50.45% variability in the observed response value. Probably, 50.45% of the total variations would be due to other factors which were excluded in the model. However, the R
2 (pred) of 29.30% which is less than R
2 indicates that the model is overfit. In this study, the adjusted R
2 (41.79%) was close to the R
2 (49.55%) value. The higher the adjusted R
2 implies better the model. The relationships between the response and the predictors, pH (P value 0.003) and time (P value 0.002) are significant. The relationship between the response, siderophore production and the predictor, temperature (P value 0.128) and succinic acid (P value 0.867) is not statistically significant because their p-value is higher than the α-level. A commonly used α-level is 0.05.
The RSM model signifies better fit to the experimental data when the f value was large and the p-value is less than 0.05. Based on the above discussion, the high f and low p values with 6.83 and 0.001 respectively indicates that the regression model found in this study was significant (Table 4). The test for lack of fit was also calculated by Minitab software. Lack of fit explains the variation in the data around the fitted model. Table 4 shows the results of the lack of fit and it was found that the f and p values for the lack of fit were 9.25 and 0.006, respectively. Besides, the absence of any lack of fit (p>0.05) also strengthened the reliability of the models. Thus, it exhibits that the model was fitted well to the experimental data.
In the normal probability plot the data doesn’t fit a straight line and this verified that the residuals in the data were not normally distributed. In the normal probability plot of the effects, that are farther from 0 are statistically significant
(Chantarangsi et al., 2016). The color and shape of the points differ between statistically significant and statistically insignificant effects. The normal probability plot of the effects displays negative effects on the left side of the graph and positive effects on the right side of the graph. On this plot, the main effects for the factors A and C are statistically significant at the 0.05 level because their p-values are less than the of 0.05. These points have a different color and shape from the points for the insignificant effects shown in Fig 4a.
A standardized Pareto chart (Fig 4b) consists of bars with a length proportional to the absolute value of the estimated effects, divided by the standard error. The bars are exhibited in the order of the size of the effects, with the largest effect on top. The Pareto chart illustrates the order of significance of the variables affecting siderophore production at p≤0.05. In this Pareto chart, the bars that represent the factors C, A, CC and AA cross the reference line that is at 2.120. The variables namely time and pH were found to be statistically significant.
Surface plot is a plot that shows the 3D model of contour plot. A contour plot gives a 2D view of all the points connected to produce contour lines of constant responses.
The response surface plot shows effects of time and succinic acid on siderophore production (Fig 5a). At less incubation time and succinic acid concentration, the yield of siderophore was low. Significant improvement in production could be obtained by increasing time and succinic acid concentration when the incubation time was set at high level
i.e. 60 hours and succinic acid concentration at 0.40%, the siderophore production reached a maximum.
The Fig 5b gives the relationship between temperature and succinic acid on final yield. Maximum production was achieved at temperature 28
oC and succinic acid 0.4%.
The 3D response surface plot (Fig 6a) represents a rising ridge surface. It shows that higher siderophore yield was obtained with high time (60 hours) and low temperature (28
oC), within the chosen experimental range while Fig 6b gives effect of pH (7) and succinic acid (0.4%) on final yield of siderophore. Similarly the Fig 7a and 7b represents the relationship between pH-time and pH-temperature on siderophore yield respectively. According to
Mouafia et al., (2016) the CCD and RSM allowed the creation of a polynomial model for the optimum production of biosurfactant.