Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 55 issue 5 (october 2021) : 584-590

Organic Manure Seed Pelleting for Enhancing Soil Properties, Nutrient Uptake and Yield of Rice

R. Anagha1,*, Biju Joseph1, R. Gladis1
1Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, College of Agriculture, Kerala Agricultural University, Thiruvananthapuram, Vellayani-695 522, Kerala, India.
Cite article:- Anagha R., Joseph Biju, Gladis R. (2021). Organic Manure Seed Pelleting for Enhancing Soil Properties, Nutrient Uptake and Yield of Rice . Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 55(5): 584-590. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5564.
Background: Seed pelleting involves the sticking of target materials on to the surface of seeds. Pelleted seeds make planting of small seeds much easier by altering their shape, size and density. The call out on organic farming explains the requisite of user friendly and ecofriendly technique for seed management practices. The current study aimed to assess the effect of organic manure seed pelleting for enhancing soil properties, nutrient uptake and yield of rice.

Methods: A pot culture experiment was carried out at College of Agriculture, Vellayani during the year 2018-19 to prepare organic manure seed pellets for rice and to evaluate its influence on yield, nutrient uptake and soil nutrient status. Pelleting materials were prepared using various treatment combinations namely, FYM + Azospirillum + Phosphobacteria (T2), vermicompost + Azospirillum + Phosphobacteria (T3), bioslurry flakes + Azospirillum + Phosphobacteria (T4), charcoal powder + Azospirillum + Phosphobacteria (T5), fly ash + Azospirillum + Phosphobacteria (T6), pongamia leaf powder + Azospirillum + Phosphobacteria (T7) and bioslurry + plant extracts + Azospirillum + Pseudomonas (T8: Farmer practice).

Result: The results revealed that the highest grain yield (54.84 g pot-1) and straw yield (66.10 g pot-1) were recorded by T3. With regard to the uptake of nutrients, T3 registered the highest uptake of N, K, Ca, S, Zn, Cu and Si in grain and shoot. P uptake in grain was highest in the treatment T4 while T3 had the maximum P uptake in shoot. Nutrient status of the post-harvest soil was significantly influenced by the treatments.
Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is a short duration crop which grows well in humid tropical regions. It is an important food crop in the world and staple food of more than 50 per cent of world population. China has the largest share in world rice production with an annual production of 208.10 million metric tons followed by India with 169.50 million metric tons. In Kerala, the area under rice cultivation is 1.98 lakh hectares with a total production of 5.77 lakh tonnes and a productivity of 2.92 tonnes per hectare (GoK, 2018).
       
The generally practiced conventional rice planting methods are transplanting, broadcasting and dibbling (KAU, 2011). Though these methods are widely acceptable among farmers, they often have some limitations. The rutted germination in broadcasting leads to overcrowding and the arbitrary transplanting method makes it arduous to maintain optimum plant density. Direct seeding leads to a substantial loss of seeds, non-uniform germination and thereby yield reduction. The limitations of these conventional methods can be overcome by seed treatment methods such as pelleting.
       
Seed pelleting is a technique of seed encapsulation with inert materials to change their size and shape (Jyoti and Bhandari, 2016). Pelleting increases the weight, size and shape of seed thereby reducing seed rate and improves germination. Seed pelleting aid in rigorous application of nutrients and accelerate germination and seedling emergence which is beneficial over conventional dibbling method. It stimulates the micro environment of seed by providing growth promoting substances and precludes the loss of materials as in broadcasting. Seed pelleting increases tillering with more shoot and root biomass.
       
Organic manure seed pelleting method is gaining popularity among farmers (Manoj, 2015). Farmers use several organic sources with varying levels of nutrients. Numerous studies have been done on seed pelleting in various crop. Hence, the present study was undertaken with the objective to assess the effect of organic manure seed pelleting for enhancing soil properties, nutrient uptake and yield of rice.
Rice seed pelleting materials were prepared with different organic manures and microbial inoculants like FYM + Azospirillum + Phosphobacteria (T2), vermicompost + Azospirillum + Phosphobacteria (T3), bioslurry flakes + Azospirillum + Phosphobacteria (T4), charcoal powder + Azospirillum + Phosphobacteria (T5), fly ash + Azospirillum + Phosphobacteria (T6), pongamia leaf powder + Azospirillum + Phosphobacteria (T7) and bioslurry + plant extracts + Azospirillum + Pseudomonas (T8: Farmer practice).
       
FYM, vermicompost and charcoal powder were collected locally. Bioslurry flakes were prepared after drying biogas slurry. Pongamia leaf collected from the college premises were dried, powdered and used. Leaves of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), gliricidia (Gliricidia maculata) and kilukki (Crotalaria juncea) were mixed in equal proportion by weight, moistened and kept in earthern pot for two weeks and the extract was collected.
       
Carrier based inoculum of Azospirillum and Phosphobacteria were used at the rate of 5 g kg-1 and fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) paste was added at the rate of 25 g kg-1 as adhesive. Fenugreek paste was prepared by grinding fenugreek after soaking overnight in water.
 
Experimental site, design and treatments
 
The organic manure seed pellets were evaluated in a pot culture experiment laid out at College of Agriculture, Vellayani, in completely randomized design (CRD) with 8 treatments replicated 4 times with the test crop rice variety Uma. Organic manure seed pellets were prepared using the 7 pelleting materials with one seed per pellet. The treatments included control treatment T1 (seed alone without pelleting) and the 7 organic manure seed pellets (T2 to T8).  The pots required for the pot culture experiment were filled with 20 kg of experimental soil. Lime and FYM were applied on soil weight basis. Planting was done at the rate of one seed per pot for T1 and one pellet per pot for the remaining treatments. Fertilizer application and crop management practices were done as per package of practices (KAU, 2011).
 
Characterization of organic manure pellets
 
Bulk density of organic manure pelleting material was determined using tap volume (Saha et al., 2010). Water holding capacity was measured using Keen Racksowski box method. pH and Electrical Conductivity (EC) were measured after extraction with distilled water (1:5) using pH and EC meter, respectively. Ammoniacal and nitrate nitrogen were determined by macrokjeldahl distillation and titrimetry after extraction with 2M KCl (Hesse, 1971). Total P and K were determined using spectrophotometer and flame photometer, respectively. Total Ca and Mg were estimated using Versanate titration method. Total micronutrients were determined using atomic absorption spectrometry. Total S was determined using turbidimetry. Total B was determined by Azomethine-H method using spectrophotometry. Urease activity was estimated using colorimetric determination of NH4+ released by p-dimethyl amino benzaldehyde (Porter, 1965). Acid phosphatase activity was analysed using colorimetric estimation of p-nitro phenol released (Tabatabai and Bremner, 1969). Dehydrogenase activity was estimated using colorimetric determination of 2,3,5-triphenyl formazan (Casida et al., 1964). Humic and fulvic acid were separated by extraction with 0.5 N sodium hydroxide for 12 hours followed by acidification with concentrated HCl (Jackson, 1973).
 
Soil and plant analysis
 
Soil samples were analysed for pH, EC, ammoniacal nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen, available P, K, Ca, Mg, S, Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu and B following standard procedures. Yield and yield attributes like productive tillers, length of panicle, spikelets per panicle, filled grain %, 1000 grain weight were recorded. Plant samples were collected at harvest and analysed for total N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S, Zn, Cu and Si. Total Si was estimated using blue silicomolybdous acid method (Ma et al., 2002). Nutrient uptake was calculated from the nutrient content and dry matter weight of samples.
 
Statistical analysis
 
The data obtained from the experiment were analysed statistically using OPSTAT software. The critical difference (CD) was compared to assess the significance of treatment means at 5% level of probability.
Characterization of organic manure pelleting materials (Table 1) revealed that T6 (fly ash + Azospirillum + Phosphobacteria) recorded the highest bulk density of 1.07 Mg m-3 which might be due to the high bulk density of fly ash (1-1.8 Mg m-3) (Kishor et al., 2010).The highest water holding capacity (380.8%) was recorded by T7 (pongamia leaf powder + Azospirillum + Phosphobacteria) and this might be due to the presence of functional groups having more affinity towards water as well as hydration of colloids in pongamia leaf powder (Prakash et al., 2018). All pelleting materials recorded near neutral to slightly alkaline pH. The highest EC was recorded by T4 (bioslurry flakes + Azospirillum + Phosphobacteria) which might be due to the release of soluble salts.
 

Table 1: Characterization of organic manure pelleting materials.


       
There was no significant difference among the treatments for ammoniacal and nitrate nitrogen. The P content of pelleting materials varied significantly and the highest (1.36%) was estimated in T4 (bioslurry flakes + Azospirillum + Phosphobacteria) which is attributed to the higher P content in bioslurry (Jeptoo et al., 2013). The highest K content (1.18%) was in T7 (pongamia leaf powder + Azospirillum + Phosphobacteria). Ramanjaneyulu et al., (2017) observed that pongamia leaves have a K content of 1.30 per cent. With respect to secondary nutrients, the highest content of Ca, Mg and S were recorded by T4. Malav et al., (2015) reported that digested bioslurry contains nutrients such as Ca, Mg and S. T6 (fly ash + Azospirillum + Phosphobacteria) recorded the highest value for Fe (1.62%). This is possibly due to the presence of Fe in fly ash. Chemically, 95-99 per cent of fly ash consists of oxides of Si, Al, Fe and Ca and remaining 0.5-3.5 per cent is Na, P, K, Mg, Mn and S (Nawaz, 2013). Mn, Zn and Cu content were highest in T4. Malav et al., (2015) reported that biogas slurry contains micronutrients such as Cu (0.004 ppm), Mn (0.088 ppm) and Zn (0.023 ppm). The B content was the highest in T3 (vermicompost + Azospirillum + Phosphobacteria).
       
Enzymatic activity of pelleting materials was significantly influenced by the treatments (Table 1). T7 (pongamia leaf powder + Azospirillum + Phosphobacteria) registered the highest urease (51.65 ppm of urea g-1 soil h-1) and acid phosphatase activity (113.1 µg of p-nitrophenol g-1 soil h-1). This might be due to the presence of specific substrate in pongamia leaf powder which would have favoured the colonization of microbes enhancing urease and acid phosphatase activities. Dehydrogenase activity was maximum in T3 (vermicompost + Azospirillum + Phosphobacteria). Carpenter-Boggs et al., (2000) reported that microbial biomass, respiration and dehydrogenase activity increased with addition of compost.
       
Table 1 indicates that humic and fulvic acid content were highest in T3 (vermicompost + Azospirillum + Phosphobacteria). The castings of red worm contain high per cent of humic acid and this serves as binding sites for nutrients such as Ca, Fe, K, S and P (Adhikary, 2012). The per cent of humic acid remained high in all treatments as humic acid fraction is more stable than fulvic acid fraction.
       
Organic manure seed pelleting significantly influenced yield and yield attributes (Table 2). T3 (vermicompost + Azospirillum + Phosphobacteria) registered the maximum number of productive tillers (16.50) while T1 recorded the lowest value (9.00). T3 recorded the maximum number of spikelets per panicle (159.7) which was on par with T4 (158.3) while the lowest value of 114.4 was recorded by T1. Similar trend was observed with respect to filled grain per cent which varied from 72.59% to 94.16%. Vermicompost contains significant quantities of nutrients and N mineralization activates various enzymes and produce hormones which are involved in cell expansion which might have contributed to higher yield characters. This was in line with the findings of Atiyeh et al., (2002). Increment of yield attributes in T3 might be due to higher uptake of nutrients and more dry matter content. Thirunavukkarasu and Vinoth (2013) observed that addition of vermicompost increased the number of productive tillers in rice and was attributed to the higher availability of nutrients from vermicompost.
 

Table 2: Effect of organic manure seed pelleting on yield attributes and yield of rice.


       
The grain and straw yield of rice were significantly influenced by organic manure seed pelleting. T3 (vermicompost + Azospirillum + Phosphobacteria) recorded the highest value for grain yield (54.84 g pot-1) and straw yield (66.10 g pot-1) while the lowest was recorded by T1 (control) with values of 35.63 g pot-1 and 43.98 g pot-1, respectively (Table 2). This substantiates with the findings of Thirunavukkarasu and Vinoth (2013) that addition of vermicompost increased yield attributing characters and finally yield. Influence of T3 on increasing nutrient availability and uptake could have contributed to increase in grain and straw yields. This was in conformity with the findings of Arancon et al., (2005).
       
The pH and EC of post-harvest soil were significantly influenced by treatments (Table 3). The pH of soil after harvest ranged from 5.52 to 5.77. The highest pH was observed in T6 which was on par with T3. This might be due to the presence of carbonates and hydroxide salts in fly ash which would have reduced soil acidity (Das, 2011). T4 (bioslurry flakes + Azospirillum + Phosphobacteria) had the highest value of EC (0.363 dS m-1). This can be attributed to the release of soluble salts from bioslurry flakes.
 

Table 3: Effect of organic manure seed pelleting on pH, EC and available nutrients in soil.


 
Organic manure seed pelleting significantly influenced available nutrient status of soil. Fig 1 shows that T2 (FYM + Azospirillum + Phosphobacteria) recorded maximum value for ammoniacal N (50.40 mg kg-1). This might be attributed to decomposition and gradual mineralization of nutrients from FYM. Similar results were reported by Sommer and Hutchings (2011). Data presented in Table 3 shows that T4 (bioslurry flakes + Azospirillum + Phosphobacteria) recorded the highest (34.36 mg kg-1) available P. Organic manure seed pelleting had a significant influence on available K in soil. It ranged from 40.00 mg kg-1 in T1 to 85.00 mg kg-1 in T4. Exchangeable Ca and available S were maximum in T4 with values 285.0 mg kg-1 and 16.50 mg kg-1 respectively. This might be due to the high Ca and S content in bioslurry. The results are in line with the findings of Islam et al., (2010) who observed that addition of bioslurry apparently increased the availability of macro nutrients. T3 (vermicompost + Azospirillum + Phosphobacteria) influenced micronutrients such as Fe, Mn and Zn (Table 3). This might be due to the release of micronutrients from vermicompost leading to increased availability. This is in accordance with the findings of Srivastava et al., (2011). T2, T3 and T4 registered highest values for available B (0.22 mg kg-1) in soil.
 

Fig 1: Effect of organic manure seed pelleting on ammoniacal and nitrate nitrogen in soil, mg kg-1.


       
The experimental results with respect to uptake of nutrients in grain and shoot are presented in Table 4. Results on N uptake in grains indicated that T3 (vermicompost + Azospirillum + Phosphobacteria) recorded the highest value (0.99 g pot-1) which was on par with T4 (0.98 g pot-1). N uptake in shoot ranged from 0.26 g pot-1 (T1) to 0.51 g pot-1 (T3). The increase in N uptake might be due to the enhanced availability of N in vermicompost. T4 (bioslurry flakes + Azospirillum + Phosphobacteria) recorded the highest P uptake in grain (0.08 g pot-1). The P uptake in shoot (0.14 g pot-1) was maximum in T3. With respect to K uptake in grain, T3 registered the highest value and was on par with T4 (0.26 g pot-1). T3 recorded maximum K uptake in shoot (1.25 g pot-1) while T1 recorded the lowest value (0.58 g pot-1). Ca uptake in grain and shoot was highest in T3 with values 0.30 g pot-1 and 0.20 g pot-1 respectively. There was no significant difference in Mg uptake by grain and shoot. S uptake in grain (0.029 g pot-1) and shoot (0.045 g pot-1) was maximum in T3. T3 also recorded the highest Zn uptake of grain (3.81 mg pot-1) and shoot (4.47 mg pot-1). Cu uptake in grain and shoot was significantly influenced by T3 with values 1.00 mg pot-1 and 1.48 mg pot-1 respectively. The uptake of B in grain and shoot was maximum in T3 and both were on par with T4. Grain and shoot uptake of Si was maximum in T3 with values of 2.49 g pot-1 and 4.50 g pot-1, respectively.
 

Table 4: Effect of organic manure seed pelleting on nutrient uptake in rice.


       
The higher uptake of nutrients in grain and shoot in T3 might be due to increased tiller number, dry matter, higher yield attributes as well as grain and straw yield and also due to the influence of vermicompost. Vermicompost has the ability to hold more nutrients due to the presence of microsites facilitated by high surface area of vermicompost (Atiyeh et al., 2002). Vermicompost would have promoted microbial activity resulting in nutrient mobilization leading to more uptake of nutrients. Similar results were reported by Prasad et al., (2010) and Thirunavukkarasu and Vinoth (2013).  Release of nutrients due to the production of organic acids by decomposition of vermicompost and release of various substances promoting growth would have resulted in higher nutrient uptake and dry matter yield (Prakash and Bhadoria, 2003).
 
It can be concluded that the yield and nutrient uptake of rice was significantly influenced by organic manure seed pelleting. It was highest in the treatment where vermicompost, Azospirillum and Phosphobacteria were used as the pelleting material. Seed pelleting using vermicompost, Azospirillum and Phosphobacteria and bioslurry flakes, Azospirillum and Phosphobacteria were able to maintain significantly higher quantities of available nutrients in soil.

  1. Adhikary, S. (2012). Vermicompost, the story of organic gold: A review. Agricultural Science. 3: 905.

  2. Arancon, N.Q., Edwards, C.A., Bierman, P., Metzger, J.D., Lucht, C. (2005). Effects of vermicomposts produced from cattle manure, food waste and paper waste on the growth and yield of peppers in the field. Pedobiology. 49: 297-306.

  3. Atiyeh, R.M., Edwards, C.A., Metzer, J.D., Lee, S., Arancon, N.Q. (2002). The influence of humic acids derived from earthworm processed organic wastes on plant growth. Bioresource Technology. 84: 7-14. 

  4. Carpenter-Boggs, L., Kennedy, A.C. and Reganold, J.P. (2000). Organic and biodynamic management: effects on soil biology. Soil Science Society of American Journal. 64: 1651-1659. 

  5. Casida, L.E., Klein, D.A. and Santoro, T. (1964). Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Science. 98: 371-376. 

  6. Das, D.K. (2011). Introductory Soil Science (3rd Ed.). Kalyani Publishers, Ludhiana, 645p.

  7. GoK [Government of Kerala]. (2018). Economic Review 2017-’18. State Planning Board, Thiruvananthapuram. 

  8. Hesse, P.R. (1971). A Textbook of Soil Chemical Analysis. William Clowes and Sons, London, 153p.

  9. Islam, M.R., Rahman, S.M.E., Rahman, M.M., Oh, D.H., Ra, C.S. (2010). The effects of biogas slurry on the production and quality of maize fodder. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 34: 91-99.

  10. Jackson, M.L. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis. 2nd Edn., Prentice- Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India. 

  11. Jeptoo, A., Aguyoh, J.N. and Saidi, M. (2013). Improving carrot yield and quality through the use of bio-slurry manure. Sustainable Agricultural Research. 2: 164-172.

  12. Jyoti, B. and Bhandari, S. (2016). Seed pelleting-A key for enhancing the seed quality. Rashtriya Krishi, 11: 76-77. 

  13. KAU (Kerala Agricultural University) (2011). Package of Practices Recommendations: Crops (14th Ed.). Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, 360p.

  14. Kishor, P., Ghosh, A.K. and Kumar, D. (2010). Use of fly ash in agriculture: A way to improve soil fertility and its productivity. Asian Journal of Agricultural Research. 4: 1-14. 

  15. Ma, J.F., Tamai, M., Ichii, M., Wu, K. (2002). A rice mutant defective in active silicon uptake. Journal of Plant Physiology. 130: 2111-2117. 

  16. Malav, L.C., Khan, S.A. and Gupta, N. (2015). Impacts of biogas slurry application on soil environment, yield and nutritional quality of baby corn. Society of Plant Research. 23: 74-77. 

  17. Manoj, E.M. (2015). Bio Slurry Pellet Method of Rice Cultivation to Increase Production. The Hindu. 7 July. 2017, p.13.

  18. Nawaz, I. (2013). Disposal and utilization of fly ash to protect the environment. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science. 2: 5259-5266.

  19. Porter, L.K. (1965). Enzymes. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. [Black C.K. (Ed.)], Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 1536-1549.

  20. Prakash, Y.S. and Bhadoria, P.B.S. (2003). Relative influence of organic manures in combination with chemical fertilizers in improving rice productivity of lateritic soil. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture. 23: 77-87.

  21. Prakash, M., Ophelia, A.G., Narayanan, G.S., Anandan, R., Baradhan, G., Sureshkumar, S.M. (2018). Effect of organic seed pelleting on seedling quality, gas exchange, growth, yield and resultant seed quality parameters of black gram. Legume Research. 36: 1-7.

  22. Prasad, J., Kurmakar, S., Kumar, R., Mishra, B. (2010). Influence of integrated nutrient management on yield and soil properties in maize-wheat cropping system in an alfisol of Jharkhand. Journal of Indian Society of Soil Science. 58: 200-204. 

  23. Ramanjaneyulu, A.V., Charyulu, D.K., Neelima, T.L., Shyam, D.M. (2017). Organic inputs for sustained soil health. Towards Organic Agriculture. 171-201. 

  24. Saha, J.K., Panwar, N. and Singh, M.V. (2010). An assessment of municipal solid waste compost quality produced in different cities of India in the perspective of developing quality control indices. Waste Management. 30: 192-201.

  25. Sommer, S.G. and Hutchings, N. (2011). Review: ammonia emissions from field applied manure and its reduction. European Journal of Agronomy. 15: 1-55. 

  26. Srivastava, P.K., Singh, P.C., Gupta, M., Sinha, A., Vaish, A., Shukla, A., Singh, N., Tewari, S.K. (2011). Influence of earthworm culture on fertilization potential and biological activities of vermicomposts prepared from different plant wastes. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science. 174: 420-429. 

  27. Tabatabai, M.A. and Bremner, J.M. (1969). Use of p-nitrophenol phosphate for the assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 1: 301-307.

  28. Thirunavukkarasu, M. and Vinoth, R. (2013). Influence of vermicompost application along with nitrogen on growth, nutrients uptake, yield attributes and economics of rice (Oryza sativa L.). International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Biotechnology. 6: 599.

Editorial Board

View all (0)