Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.217, CiteScore: 0.595

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Research Article

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 55 issue 6 (december 2021) : 739-744

Effect of Application of Different Quality Water through Pitcher Irrigation and Tillage Types on Tomato Production and Soil Properties of Coastal Saline Soil of West Bengal

Rahul Adhikary1,*, Arunabha Pal1, S.K. De2
1Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Centurion University of Technology and Management, R.Sitapur-761 211, Odisha, India.
2Bidhan Chandra Krishi Visvavidyalaya, Mohanpur-741 252, West Bengal, India.
Cite article:- Adhikary Rahul, Pal Arunabha, De S.K. (2021). Effect of Application of Different Quality Water through Pitcher Irrigation and Tillage Types on Tomato Production and Soil Properties of Coastal Saline Soil of West Bengal . Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 55(6): 739-744. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5551.

ABSTRACT

Background: Water and tillage are the primary input for crop production and increasingly become scarce due to its high demand in agricultural sector. Pitcher irrigation, a traditional system of irrigation alternative to drip method is the effective innovation of localized methods of irrigation. 

Methods: In this experiment different quality water through pitcher irrigation and tillage types were taken from coastal saline soil. The effects of yield factor, soil chemical properties of saline soil were studied using pitcher irrigation and tillage types. 

Result: Results indicate that soil physical and chemical properties were all significantly improved by different pitcher irrigation with tillage practices. Results also showed that present experiment favoring better soil conditions, nutrient availabilities towards better growth and yield of crops. Our study suggests that blending of saline with freshwater in presence of mulch tillage can provide the best estimation in the improving soil properties and tomato production above the coastal saline soil.

INTRODUCTION

Pitcher irrigation is an ancient irrigation method thought to have originated in dry region like Northern Africa and Iran (Stein, 1998). The method reportedly has been used to irrigated watermelons in India and Pakistan (Mondal, 1984), horticultural crops in Brazil, Germany and Indonesia (Stein, 1997) and corn, tomato and okra in Zimbabwe (Batchelor et al., 1997) and (Brinbridge et al., 2001).
       
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is one of the most consumed vegetables in the world and global production is estimated at around 130 million ton per year (Singh et al., 2010). The major tomato producing States in India are Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Gujarat, Odisha, West Bengal, Chhattisgarh, Maharashtra, Bihar, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Telangana and Tamil Nadu . Tomato is a dietary wellspring of nutrients particularly vitamins A and C, minerals and fiber, which are significant for human nourishment and daily life. Likewise, tomatoes are the most extravagant importance of lycopene, a phyto-chemical that shields cells from oxidants that have been connected to human malignant growth (Giovannucci 1999). Other antioxidant compounds in tomato fruit include flavonoids and phenolic acids.
       
Flavonoids and phenols are regarded as potentially health benefitting compounds since they are implicated in the prevention of human inflammatory and, cardiovascular diseases as well as cancer (Mutanen et al., 2011). Most of the vegetable crops suffer by lack of good quality irrigation facilities and management practices in coastal soil. On this background pitcher pot irrigation with different kind of tillage have the opportunity to act as high water use efficiency as well as reducing soil salinity and enhancing crop productivity with in the coastal saline zones of West Bengal.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The field experiment was carried out during rabi season of 2015-16 and 2016-17 at the farmer’s field at the Simabandh village, Kakdwip, South 24 Parganas, under Coastal saline Zone, West Bengal. It situated at 21°58’ N latitude, 88° 11’ E longitudes, with an altitude at 1.21 m above the mean sea level. The selected area represents coastal saline soil with high portion of soil salinity in the field. These soils have high electrical conductivity due to salt content. The soils have developed in alluvium on the deltaic plain of the river Ganges having 1-2% slope. The soils are deep imperfectly drained and have whitish, sandy clay loam. A horizon gray mild alkaline silty clay distinctly mottled B horizon. EC in 1:2.5 soil-water extract ranges between 2.0 to 8.0 dS/m and pH is 7.43 to 7.85. Initial soil properties are organic carbon 0.58%, available nitrogen 120.80 kg/ha, available phosphorus 22.63 kg/ha and available potassium 109.33 kg/ha. The experiment was conducted in a split-plot design. The main and subplot treatments consisted of irrigation and tillage levels respectively with growing of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L) variety on a plot size of 15 square meters, the treatments were:
 
T1= Sweet water + Conventional tillage.
T2= Sweet water + Mulch tillage.
T3= Sweet water (25%) + saline water (75%) + Conventional tillage.
T4= Sweet water (25%) + saline water (75%) + Mulch tillage.
T5= Sweet water (50%) + saline water (50%) + Conventional tillage.
T6= Sweet water (50%) + saline water (50%) + Mulch tillage.
T7= Sweet water (75%) + saline water (25%) + Conventional tillage.
T8= Sweet water (75%) + saline water (25%) + Mulch tillage.
 
Laboratory analysis
 
The field works include collecting augaring samples at a depth 0-15 cm. The collected soil samples were air dried ground gently and sieved. They were analyzed for pH, Electrical conductivity (EC) using 1:2.5 soil-water suspensions with the help of glass electrode as described by Jackson (1973). Soil organic carbon (SOC) was determined by rapid titration method given Walkley and Black (1934). Available nitrogen (N) was determined by alkaline permanganate method (Subbiah and Asija, 1956), available phosphorous (P2O5) was determined by Olsen and Sommers (1982), available potassium (K2O) was analyzed by extraction with 1 N ammonium acetate at pH 7 (Jackson, l973). Soil data were collected and analyzed in university laboratory.  The information data generated from the present investigation were analyzed as per the statistical procedure proposed by (Gomez and Gomez, 1984).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Yield and yield attributes
 
The present study investigated the growth and yield attributing characters of tomato to different level of irrigation with tillage (Table 1). Among the different treatment maximum number of fruits/ plant (49.79 nos) was observed under treatment T8 and which was found to be at par with T7. The maximum fruit weight (61.77 gm) was also observed under T8. The fruit yield data was significantly influenced by different salt and sweet water treatment. Application of blending of saline and sweet water in pitcher pot for pitcher irrigation with different type of tillage caused to increase tomato yield along with yield attributes than (T3). (T8) found to be most effective in increasing number of fruit/plant, length of fruit, diameter of fruit, weight of fruit and tomato yield than the other treatments. Variations in results of yields and yield attributes of tomato due to application irrigation water with different tillage may be attributes to the variations of favorable soil condition mainly decreased soil salinity more precisely by the increasing availability of nutrients in soils. Similar finding was reported by Tesfaye et al., (2011) and Mondal et al., (1983). According to Setiawan et al., (1998) the pitcher irrigation system utilizes a bottle-like emitter made of baked clay, sand and ash. Water level is maintained constant inside the pitcher and permeates the pitcher wall to supply crops in the surrounding soil. The system has been applied successfully to horticultural products such as chilies, tomatoes in field condition. Kumari et al., (2012) reported that effect of drip irrigation levels and mulches on growth, yield and water use efficiency of tomato was significantly increased over control.
 

Table 1: Effect of irrigation and tillage on yield attributes, yield and economics of tomato.


 
Bulk density, porosity and water holding capacity
 
The applicability of these results are then tested on various physical properties in soil due to application of pitcher irrigation with different type of tillage are presented in (Table 2). At each of the pitcher irrigation treatment the values of bulk density found to decrease over control (T3). Bulk density showed to change with the following order (T2)>(T8)>(T1)>(T7) >(T6)>(T5)>(T4)>(T3). Decrease of bulk density over the year may be indicative to better results in subsequent year due to application of different type of tillage with blending of saline and sweet water in pitcher pot for pitcher irrigation. Decrease of bulk density may be due to higher organic carbon content in soil. The findings of Hangarge et al., (2002) showed that application of organic wastes and organic manures in the form of FYM reduced the bulk density finds conformity of the results of the present investigation. The results of porosity showed reverse trend of bulk density as it increases due to application of each treatments over control. Highest values are observed in (T2) under tomato and every year (Table 2). Increase of porosity may be due to higher organic carbon content in soil decrease bulk density due to more space and better soil aggregation. Such variations of results on porosity resembles with the observations of Choudhury et al., (1985) and Orji and Eke (2018). The water holding capacity in soil also shows to vary significantly with the application of blending of saline and sweet water in pitcher pot for pitcher irrigation with different type of tillage in the both years. Data have the tendency of slight increase in the subsequent years due to application of different type of tillage. Increase of water holding capacity may be due to higher organic carbon content in soil. The investigations reported by Bhattacharya et al., (2004) that the views that the application of organic manures helped to increase the water holding capacity of soil over control.
 

Table 2: Effect of irrigation and tillage on physical properties of soil.


 
Soil pH, EC and organic carbon
 
The results of the experiment found clear support for the soil chemical properties like pH and EC shows to vary significant with the application of blending of saline and sweet water in pitcher pot for pitcher irrigation with different type of tillage (Table 3). At each of the pitcher with tillage treatment the values of pH and EC found to decrease over control (T3). Lowest value is observed in sweet water + Mulch tillage (T2). The data have the tendency of slight decrease in the subsequent years due to application of different type of tillage. Decrease of EC means lowering the salt concentration in soil. Bhingardeve et al., (2006) studied the influence of saline, canal water and fertilizer level through drip irrigation on pH, EC of soil and plant height at different growth stages of brinjal. The organic carbon content in soil shows much variation with pitcher irrigation and different type of tillage. The data also showed variation due to application treatment for each of the year, however, the performances of organic carbon were much better in the second year for each of the treatments (Table 3). Highest organic carbon was recorded in plots received in (T2). Similar options are also available from the results Himabindu et al., (2019) and Adhikary et al., (2020).
 

Table 3: Effect of different irrigation and tillageon pH, EC and organic carbon of soil.


 
Available soil nutrients
 
The results on the effects of pitcher irrigation with different type of tillage on the changes of availabilities of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium after harvesting of crops every year are presented in (Table 4). Availability of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium found more in the soils received T3 than the other treatments. Highest availability of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium was recorded in T8. The available nitrogen significantly increased with the application of each of the different types of pitcher irrigation over control (T3). Increase of phosphorus content in soils over control (T3) due to each treatment were15.19 kg/ha, 15.09 kg/ha, 13.66 kg/ha, 11.49 kg/ha, 9.80 kg/ha, 9.58 kg/ha, 3.19 kg/ha  respectively in T8, T7, T2, T6, T5, T1, T4. The available K ranged between 153-388 kg/ha. The potassium availability in soil over control (T3) were 134.34 kg/ha 132.88 kg/ha,108.89 kg/ha, 77.48kg/ha, 42.38 kg/ha, 22.13 kg/ha,16.03 kg/ha respectively due to (T8), (T7), (T2), (T1), (T6), (T5) and (T4). The data further reveals that application of pitcher irrigation with different type of tillage markedly increases the availability of N, P and K over control (T3). The results are similar with the findings of Singh et al., (2012), Yihenew et al., (2015) and Pal et al., (2020).
 

Table 4: Effect of different type pitcher irrigation and tillage on chemical properties of soil.

CONCLUSION

Indiscriminate use of saline irrigation water in absence of proper management water-crop-soil poses a grave risk of endangering to develop serious crop damage. This practice also helps to improve physical properties in soil particularly bulk density in soil and also enhance the water use efficiency of the crop. Besides, each at the applied treatment facilitates to decrease electrical conductivity and increase soil organic carbon and build up soil fertility. The proposed programmed, thus envisaged to assess the effectiveness of tomato crop production by pitcher irrigation with mulch tillage in different season and conserving water towards increasing of crop productivity in this region.

REFERENCES


  1. Adhikary, R., Garnayak, R., Bera, M. and Pal, A. (2020). Soil nutrient Status of gosani block under Gajapati district, Odisha. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology. 13(1): 75-79. DOI: 10.30954/0974-1712.1.2020.9

  2. Bainbridge, D. A. (2001). Buried clay pot irrigation: a little known but very efficient traditional method of irrigation. Agricultural Water Management. 48: 79-88.

  3. Batchelor. C., Lovell, C. and Murata, M. (1997). Simple microirrigation techniques for improving irrigation efficiency on vegetable gardens. Agricultural Water Management. 32: 37-48.

  4. Bhattacharyya, R., Prakash,V., Kundu, S., Srivastav, A.K. and Gupta, H.S. (2004). Effect of long – term manuring on soil organic carbon, bulk density and water relation characteristics under soybean – wheat cropping sequence in North-western Himalayas. Journal Indian Society Soil Science. 52(3): 238-242.

  5. Bhingardeve, S.D.; V.M. Karadel and P.R. Patil, (2006). Influence of saline, canal water and n-fertilizer level through drip irrigation on ph, ece of soil and plant height at different growth stages of brinjal. Journal of Soils Crops. 16: 100-103.

  6. Choudhary, M.R., Gajri, P.R., Prihar, S.S. and Khera, R. (1985). Effect of deep tillage on soil physical properties and maize yield on coarse textured soils. Soil Tillage Research. 6(1): 31-44, https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(85)90004-2.

  7. FAOSTAT (2008). http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx.A,

  8. Giovannucci, E. (1999). Tomatoes, Tomato-Based Products, Lycopene and Cancer: Review of the epidemiologic literature. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 91: 317-331.

  9. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research (2nd Edn.). John Wiley and Sons, New York. pp. 680.

  10. Hangarge, D., S., Raut, S.D., More., S.D., Birajdar, R.R. and Pholane, L.P. (2002). Effect of Vermicompost and soil conditioner on some physical properties of soil under chilli – Spinach System. Soil and Crops. 12(1): 41-45.

  11. Himabindu, K., Gurumurthy P., Prasad, P.K. and Martin Luther, M. (2019). Available macronutrient status of soils in various cropping systems of Thotapalli irrigation project ayacut of North coastal Andhra Pradesh. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 53(4): 429-434.

  12. Jackson. (1973). Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, pp. 48-302.

  13. Kumari, A.L. and Lakshmi, G.S. (2012). Survey of tomato growing areas inAndhrapradesh for variations in input and yield levels and soil properties. Journal of Soil Science. 5(1): 133-136.

  14. Mondal, R.C. (1983). Salt tolerance of tomato grown around earthen pitchers. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science. 53(5): 380-382.

  15. Mondal, R.C. (1984). Pitcher farming techniques for use of saline waters. Annual Report Central Soil and Salinity. 5: 12-15.

  16. Mutanen, M.., Pajari, A.M., Levy., J. Walfisch, S., Atzmon, A., Hirsch, K.., Khanin, M., Linnewiel, K., Morag, Y., Salman, H., Veprik, A., Danilenko., Sharoni, Y. (2011). The role of tomato lycopene in cancer prevention. In Vegetables, Whole Grains and Their Derivatives in Cancer Prevention, Springer, Netherlands. 2: 47-66. 

  17. Olsen, S.R. and Sommers, L.E. (1982). Phosphorous. In: Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, Soil Science Society of America. Madison, pp. 403-430.

  18. Orji. O.A. and Eke, I.P. (2018) Effect of mulch materials on soil physico-chemical properties and the performance of castor bean plant (Ricinus communis) in rivers state, Nigeria. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 52 (6): 649-654.

  19. Pal, A., Adhikary, R. (2020). Improving of Phosphorus use Efficiency in Acid and Alkaline Soil: a Critical Review Study. Indian Journal of Natural Sciences. 10(59): 18558-18562.

  20. Setiawan,B.I.., Saleh. E. and Nurhidayat, Y. (1998). Pitcher irrigation system for horticulture in dry lands. Water and Land Resources Development and Management for Sustainable Use Vol-II A The Tenth ICID Afro Asian Regional Conference on Irrigation and Drainage, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia, 19-26. 

  21. Singh, D.P., Mahata, K.R., Saha, S. and Ismail, A.M. (2010). Crop diversification for improving water productivity and rural livelihoods in coastal saline soils of the Mahanadi Delta, India. Tropical deltas and coastal zones: Food production, communities an environment at the land and water interface. 249-263.

  22. Singh, R.P. and Mishra, A. (2012). Available macronutrients in soils of Chiragaon block of district Varanasi (UP) in relation to soil characteristics. Indian Journal of Soil Research. 37: 97-100.

  23. Stein T.M. (1998). Development and evaluation of design criteria for pitcher irrigation systems (translation of original title). Selbstverlag des Verbandesder Tropenlandwirte. 66: 48-69.

  24. Stein. T.M. (1997). The influence of evaporation, hydraulic conductivity, wall-thickness and surface area on the seepage rates of pitchers for pitcher irrigation, Journal of Applied Irrigation Science. 32: 65-83.

  25. Subbiah, B.V. and Asija, G.L. (1956). A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Current Science. 25: 259-260.

  26. Tesfaye, T., Tesfaye. K. and Woldetsadik, K. (2011). Clay pot irrigation for tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum M) production in the north east semiarid region of Ethiopia. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics. 112(1): 11-18.

  27. Walkley, A. and Black, I. A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science. 37: 29-38

  28. Yihenew, G. S., Fentanesh, A. and Solomon, A. (2015). Effects of land use types management practices and slope classes on selected soil physicochemical properties in Zikre watershed, North- Western Ethiopia. Environmental System Research. 4: 3-9.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)