Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorT. Mohapatra

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.20

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 55 issue 4 (august 2021) : 403-409

Efficacy of Bacterial Isolates against Causal Agent of Late Blight of Potato, Phytophthora infestans

Anju Rani, Sushil Kumar Upadhyay, Gyanika Shukla, Chhaya Singh, Raj Singh
1Department of Biotechnology, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana-133 207, Ambala, Haryana, India. 
Cite article:- Rani Anju, Upadhyay Kumar Sushil, Shukla Gyanika, Singh Chhaya, Singh Raj (2021). Efficacy of Bacterial Isolates against Causal Agent of Late Blight of Potato, Phytophthora infestans. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 55(4): 403-409. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5548.
Background: Potato (Solanum tuberosum) is main crop in subtropical and temperate regions as vegetable crop. It is affected by Phytophthora infestans causing a devasting disease late blight. The chemical pesticides used against this disease in this present scenario cause pollution (soil as well as water) and adversely affect beneficial soil micro-flora, grazing animals and human beings. 
Methods: An experiment was designed at the Department of Botany, K.V. Subharti College of Science, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, Meerut (UP), India during 2017-2018. Three bacterial bioagents, Pseudomonas isolate 1 and 2 and Bacillus species was isolated from infected phylloplane and used against late blight pathogen, P. infestans. The efficacy of antagonistic bio-agents tested against mycelial growth, zoospore and zoosporangial germination of P. infestans by dual culture method and detached leaf method.
Result: The present study focused on use of bio-agents or antagonistic bacteria to control late blight pathogen showed concentration biased potential inhibitory activity against mycelial growth, zoospore and zoosporangial germination. It means higher the concentration of bacterial isolate, greater the inhibitory effect on various tested parameters. Among the three tested antagonistic bioagents, Bacillus showed maximum zone of inhibition to late blight pathogen. The proved that the Pseudomaonas and Bacillus as potential antagonistic agent for ecofriendly sustainable management of pathogenic mycoflora, P. infestans.
  1. Ab-Rahman, S.F.S., Singh, E., Pieterse, C.M.J., Schenk, P.M. (2018). Emerging microbial biocontrol strategies for plant pathogens. Plant Sciences. 267: 102-111. 
  2. Agaras, B.C., Scandiani, M., Luque, A., Fernández, L., Farina, F., Carmona, M., Gally, M., Romero, A., Wall, L., Valverde, C. (2015). Quantification of the potential biocontrol and direct plant growth promotion abilities based on multiple biological traits distinguish different groups of Pseudomonas spp. isolates. Biological Control. 90: 173-186.
  3. Aneja, K.R. (2007). Experiments in microbiology, plant pathology and biotechnology. New Age International. 665p.
  4. Behie, S.W., Bonet, B., Zacharia, V.M., McClung, D.J. and Traxler, M.F. (2017). Molecules to ecosystems: Actinomycete natural products in situ. Frontiers in Microbiology, 17(7): 2149. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02149 .
  5. Daranas, N., Roselló, G., Cabrefiga, J., Donati, I., Francés, J., Badosa, E., Spinelli, F., Montesinos, E., Bonaterra, A. (2019). Biological control of bacterial plant diseases with Lactobacillus plantarum strains selected for their broad spectrum activity. Annals of Applied Biology. 174(1): 92-105.
  6. Demirkol, G. (2018). Antibacterial activity of the seeds, roots and shoots of Lotus populations. Legume Research: An International Journal. 41: 778-783.
  7. El-Sheikh, M.A., El-Korany, A.E. (2004). Screening for bacteria antagonistic to Phytophthora infestans for the organic farming of potato. Alexandria Journal of Agricultural Research. 47(3): 169-178.
  8. Frades, I. andreasson, E. (2016). Phytophthorainfestans specific phosphorylation patterns and new putative control targets. Fungal Biology. 120(4): 631-644.
  9. Grover, R.K., Moore, J.D. (1962). Toximetric studies of fungicides against brown rot organisms, Sclerotinia fructicola and s-laxa. Phytopathology. 52(9): 876-879.
  10. Iftikhar Y., Sajid, A., Shakeel, Q., Ahmad, Z., UlHaq, Z. (2020). Biological Antagonism: A safe and sustainable way to manage plant diseases. In: Plant disease management strategies for sustainable agriculture through traditional and modern approaches. Sustainability in Plant and Crop Protection, volume 13. Springer, Cham.
  11. Jarosz, A.M., Burdon, J.J. (1991). Host-pathogen interactions in natural populations of Linumm arginale and Melamp soralini: II. Local and regional variation in patterns of resistance and racial structure. Evolution. 45(7): 1618-1627.
  12. King, E.O., Ward, M.K., Raney, D.E. (1954). Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescin. The Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine. 44(2): 301-307.
  13. Levings, C.S. (1990). The Texas cytoplasm of maize: Cytoplasmic male sterility and disease susceptibility. Science. 250: 942-947.
  14. Lindow, S.E., Brandl, M.T.2003. Microbiology of the phyllosphere. Appled Environmental Microbiology. 69(4): 1875-1883.
  15. Lumsden, R.D., Rishbeth, J., Gibbs, J.N., Hamilton, W.D., Cook, R.J. (1988). Biological control of air-borne pathogens: Discussion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B. 318: 280-281.
  16. Mota, M.S., Gomes, C.B., Souza Júnior, I.T., Moura, A.B. (2017). Bacterial selection for biological control of plant disease: criterion determination and validation. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 48(1): 62–70.
  17. Ntushelo, K., Ledwaba, L.K., Rauwane, M.E., Adebo, O.A., Njobeh, P.B. (2019). The mode of action of Bacillus species against Fusarium graminearum, tools for investigation and future prospects. Toxins. 11(10): 606. 
  18. Padmaja, G.A., Ramachandra, B., Manjunath, H., Prabha, R., Krishna, R., Shankar, P.A. (2011). Characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from fruits and vegetables for their antibacterial activity. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 30: 85-89.
  19. Prapagdee, B., Kuekulvong, C., Mongkolsuk, S. (2008). Antifungal potential of extracellular metabolites produced by Streptomyces hygroscopicus against phytopathogenic fungi. International Journal of Biological Sciences. 4(5): 330-337.
  20. Rani, A., Bhat, M.N., Singh, B.P. (2007). Effect of potato phylloplane fungi on potato late blight pathogen Phytophthora infestans. Journal of Mycology Plant Pathology. 37: 413-417.
  21. Rani, A., Singh, R., Kumar, P., Shukla, G., Singh, C. (2017). Eco-friendly management of late blight of potato caused by Phytophthora infestans (L). International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 9(3): 21-27.
  22. Rani, A., Bhat, M.N., Singh, B.P. (2006). Efficacy of neem formulations against late blight of potato in sub-tropical plains. Crop Research. 31(1): 179-180.
  23. Rani, U., Choudhary, P., Rao, A.S. (2016). Antifungal properties exhibited by bacteria isolated from agriculturally cultivable soils and their antagonistic nature towards fungal phyto-pathogen suppression. Agricultural Science Digest. (36): 17-23.
  24. Rhoades, R.E., Bebbington, A.J. (1990). Mixing it up: Variations in Andean farmers’ rationales for intercropping of potatoes. Field Crops Research. 25(1-2): 145-156.
  25. Saville, A.C., Martin, M.D., Ristaino, J.B. (2016). Historic late blight outbreaks caused by a widespread dominant lineage of Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary. PloS One. 11(12): e0168381. 
  26. Schaad, N.W., Jones, J.B, Chun, W. (2001). Laboratory guide for the identification of plant pathogenic bacteria (edition, 3). American Phytopathological Society. 454p.
  27. Schlatter, D.C., Kinkel, L.L. (2014).Global biogeography of Streptomyces antibiotic inhibition, resistance and resource use. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 88(2): 386-397.
  28. Siddiqui, Z. A., Khan, M. (2017). Biofilm formation by Pseudomonas spp. and their significance as a biocontrol agent. Biofilms in Plant and Soil Health. ch5.
  29. Singh, B.P., Bhattachayya, S.K. (1995). Field resistance to late blight of four Indian potato cultivar. Potato Reseach. 38: 171-178.
  30. Stephan, D., Koch, E. (2002). Screening of plant extracts, micro-organisms and commercial preparations for biocontrol of Phytophthora infestans on detached potato leaves. IOBC WPRS Bulletin. 25(10): 391-394.
  31. Stockwell, V.O., Stack, J.P. (2007). Using Pseudomonas spp. for integrated biological control. Phytopathology. 97(2): 244-249.
  32. Verma, A., Kumar, S., Harshita, A.S., Jaiswal, S. (2018). Evaluate the efficacy of bio-control agents and botanicals against early blight of potato caused by Alternaria solani. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 7(3): 28-30.
  33. Wicaksono, W.A., Jones, E., Casonato, S., Monk, J., Ridgway, H.J. (2018). Biological control of Pseudomonas syringaepv. actinidiae (Psa), the causal agent of bacterial canker of kiwifruit, using endophytic bacteria recovered from a medicinal plant. Biological Control. 116: 103-112.

Editorial Board

View all (0)