Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 54 issue 1 (february 2020) : 95-100

Growth and Biochemical Variations in Macrotyloma Uniflorum Var. Madhu Under Chromium Stress

Shilpee Dhali1, Madhusmita Pradhan1, Ranjan Kumar Sahoo2, Chinmay Pradhan1,*, Santanu Mohanty3
1Department of Botany, Utkal University, Bhubaneswar-751 003, Odisha, India.
2Department of Biotechnology, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Bhubaneswar-752 050, Odisha, India.
3Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, College of Agriculture, OUAT, Bhubaneswar-751 003, Odisha, India.
Cite article:- Dhali Shilpee, Pradhan Madhusmita, Sahoo Kumar Ranjan, Pradhan Chinmay, Mohanty Santanu (2019). Growth and Biochemical Variations in Macrotyloma Uniflorum Var. Madhu Under Chromium Stress . Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 54(1): 95-100. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5209.
The discharge of contaminated mining and industrial residues has become a major cause of environmental pollution. Seed is highly protective against external metal stresses. But they are highly sensitive during vegetative developmental process. In this study, germination was conducted in Macrotyloma uniflorum var. Madhu, in order to find out the effect of chromium toxicity on germination, growth and biochemical variations. The seeds were germinated in five different concentrations of chromium (25ìM, 50ìM, 100ìM, 150ìM and 200 ìM) solution. The hydroponically grown plants revealed the toxic phenotypic expression (root length, shoot length, seedling length, shoot vigor index, shoot fresh weight, shoot dry weight, root fresh weight and root dry weight) of plant after 3 growth stage (15 d, 30 d and 45 d). Similarly biochemical characteristics as well as antioxidant activities (Chlorophyll, carotenoid, carbohydrate, reducing sugar, catalase, proline content and peroxidase) were studied to see the toxic effect of chromium. 
The term heavy metal usually includes metals and metalloids with atomic density greater than 5 g/cm3, or 5 times or more, greater than water (Jarup, 2003). Among these chromium (Cr) is known to be the 7th most important and abundant metal on the earth’s crust (Katz and Salem, 1994). Though chromium (Cr) exists in different oxidation states, the two oxidation states [trivalent (III) and hexavalent (VI)] of chromium are more stable and prevalent in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. However, hexavalent Cr found in association with oxygen as chromate (CrO4 2-) or dichromate (CrO72-) anions are the most toxic forms.
       
Crops grown on soil toxicated with hexavalent chromium usually take up and assemble this metal in their aerial and sub-aerial parts (Jarup, 2003). Chromium compounds are highly toxic to plants and are detrimental to their growth and development. Once crop up take these hexavalent forms of Cr, it adversely affects the physiological processes in crops. As reported previously, the toxic effects of hexavalent Cr include inhibition of plant growth, chlorosis, biochemical lesions, less enzyme activities, decrease in yield etc (Panda and Patra, 2000; Arun et al., 2005; Mohanty et al., 2011). Most often these increased levels of hexavalent Cr in crop organs initiate production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) like H2O2, O2 -, OH- etc. These ROS induce oxidative stress in plants ultimately destroying DNA, proteins and pigments as well as activate lipid peroxidation process (Reddy et al., 2005).
       
The present study is focused on growth and biochemical variations occurring in Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam) Verdc (horse gram) under the influence of hexavalent chromium. Macrotyloma uniflorum is one of the wild pulses of  Fabaceae family and has been used as most important pulse in daily diet of poor and malnourished people. This is why it is also known as “poor man’s crop” particularly in drought prone areas. Further adding medicinal value to the crop, the seeds are generally used to treat kidney stones, diabetes and heart diseases. Previous reports suggest that, these seeds contain antiurolithiatic activities which could prevent stone formation in kidneys (Atodariya et al., 2013). It also has an important role as antioxidant as it can tolerate heavy metal contamination and therefore can be useful as a phytoremediating plant. Hence, the present study progressed to assess a general picture of the variations in growth and biochemical properties of Macrotyloma uniflorum var. Madhu under Cr (VI) stress.
Seed germination assay
 
Certified seeds of Macrotyloma uniflorum var. Madhu were procured from Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar and were surface sterilized with 0.1% mercuric chloride (w/v) for 5 minutes and then thoroughly washed with tap water  and distilled water for several times. After the preliminary disinfection seeds were germinated in petriplates over saturated paper towel and supplemented with different concentrations of Cr+6 (K2Cr2O7) solution. The experiment was established in 3 replications of 10 seeds in triplicate. The petriplates were placed inside BOD incubator at 25±2°C in two days. After two days the number of seeds germinated from each concentration was recorded. Germination percentage and germination indices of seeds were determined by formula.
 
Germination (%) =
  No. of seeds germinated/ Total no. of seeds taken × 100
 
Seedling growth and growth parameter study
 
The 3 days old seedling was transferred to Hoagland cup containing half-strength sterile Hoagland’s nutrient solution after Epstein (1972) as described by Taiz and Zeiger (2002) and supplemented with different doses of Cr (VI) stress (25, 50, 100 150 and 200 µM). Macrotyloma uniflorum seedlings supplemented with different concentrations of Cr (VI) (25μM to 200 μM) were taken for the study of various growth parameters for 15d, 30d and 45d respectively. The plants grown on half-strength Hoagland medium without chromium solution served as control.
 
Phenotypic growth of Macrotyloma uniflorum var. Madhu
 
Shoot length  (cm)  was  measured  from  the  base  of  primary  leaf  to  base  of  hypocotyls. Ten  normal  seedlings  were  selected  from  each  treatment along with their replicates  were selected after final  count  of  the  germination  test. The root length (cm) was measured from the tip of the of primary  root  to  base  of  hypocotyls  .The mean shoot and root length(cm) was  calculated by  adding  the  shoot  and  root  lengths  of  already  selected  ten  normal  seedlings. Seedling vigor index is calculated  by the  formula  as  suggested  by  Abdual  Baki  and  Anderson  (1973)  and  expressed  in  number.
 
Seedling vigor index (SVI) =
          Germination percentage × Seedling length (cm)
 
The fresh weight of shoot and root samples were measured in weighing balance and measured in grams per plant. After that the shoots and roots were put in  butter  paper pockets  and  kept  in  an  oven  maintained  at  100  ±  2°C  for  24  hrs for root and shoot dried weight.  The weight  of  dried  seedlings  was  recorded  and  mean  dry  weight  was  expressed  in  milligrams  (Pantola et al., 2017).
 
Biochemical properties Macrotyloma uniflorum var. Madhu under Cr stress
 
The total chlorophyll and carotenoid content were analyzed and calculated by the method of Porra (2002) by using 10 ml of 80% cold acetone. The absorbance of Chlorophyll-a, Chlorophyll-b and carotenoid was recorded at 663.6 nm, 646.6 nm and 470 nm respectively (Mathan et al., 2014).
       
The protein content were extracted and quantified by the method of Lowry et al., (1951) taking Bovine Serum Albumin as standard. Proline content was estimated by Bates et al., (1973) and the absorbance is measured at 520nm. Soluble carbohydrate was estimated by the anthrone method described by Sadasivam and Manickam (2008). Reducing sugar was estimated by using Nelson-SoMoggi method and the absorbance was taken at 525nm. Catalase (CAT; EC 1.11.1.6) and Guaiacol peroxidase activity (POX; EC 1.11.1.1) enzyme assay and activity were measured as per the method (Mathan et al., 2014) with little modifications.
 
Statistical analysis
 
Data were statistically analyzed by using analysis of variance (ANOVA). The values are expressed as mean ± standard error (S.E.) of three replications. Differences of data from different concentrations and control were considered significant at p<0.05 level.
Germination studies
 
Seeds of Macrotyloma uniflorum germinated well under all concentrations of chromium (Fig 1A, B). Seed germination at all different concentrations showed variation as compared to control. The least number of seeds germinated at 200 µM treated plants after 15d of germination. Decline in seed germination ranges up to 19% with supplementation of 200 µM of Cr (VI) (Fig 1C).
 

Fig 1: Germination studies of Macrotylomauniflorum var- Madhu under different concentrations of chrominm stress.


 
Effect of hexavalent Cr on germination parameters of
Macrotyloma uniflorum
 
The effect of Cr (VI) on root length, shoot length, seedling length, shoot vigor index, shoot fresh weight, shoot dry weight, root fresh weight and root dry weight was presented in (Table 1). Phytotoxic symptoms were observed at ≥100 µM of Cr (VI). Root length and shoot length showed a decline in its elongation and morphology with increasing chromium concentration up to 50 µM with increasing number of days of exposure. In 15 days old Macrotyloma uniflorum, there is marked difference in elongation and morphology of root and shoot growth in different concentration of Cr (VI). There is a decline in shoot length at higher concentration of 100 µM Cr (VI), where as in control it was observed to be more elongated. The severity of root length inhibition was observed in similar decreasing trend at 100 µM, 150 µM and 200 µM (Table 1) respectively when compared with control. Reduction in shoot length was observed in treatment with Cr (VI) in Macrotyloma uniflorum. Root and shoot length progressively reduced with 100µM, 150µM and 200 µM of Cr (VI) supplementation with number of days.
 

Table 1: Effect of different concentration of Cr (VI) stress of 15, 30 and 45 days on morphological parameters of Macrotyloma uniflorum.


 
Effect of Cr (VI) on biochemical properties of Macrotyloma uniflorum
 
The chlorophyll content from Macrotyloma uniflorum at different concentrations of chromium stress (from 25 µM to 200 µM) at 3 growth stage i.e. 15, 30 and 45 days old is presented in Fig 2A. Total chlorophyll content seen to decrease with increasing Cr (VI) concentration i.e. 6.82 mg g-1 FW (25 µM) after 15 days of germination to 4.54 mg g-1 FW (200 µM) respectively. Decrease in the total chlorophyll levels was noted after 45 days of germination with increasing Cr (VI) with respect to control (Fig 2A). Carotenoid content tend to increase as a mean to counter act the Cr (VI) stress effects on total chlorophyll content (Fig 2B). Macrotyloma uniflorum seedlings experienced a general inhibition of soluble carbohydrate content (Fig 2C) from 28.39 mg/g FW (25 µM) to 21.11 mg/g FW (200 µM) in 15 days. Whereas in 30 days there was a sharp decline from 24.47 mg/g FW (25 µM) to 15.53 mg/g FW (200 µM) to 23.64 mg/g FW (25 µM) to 13.59 mg/g FW (200 µM) respectively in 45 day old Macrotyloma uniflorum. There was a gradual decrease of reducing sugar in leaves with rise in Cr (VI) level (Fig 2D). In 15 days old Macrotyloma uniflorum the reducing sugar content decreased from 23.37 mg g-1 FW (25 µM) to 16.23 mg g-1 FW (200 µM) to 20.12 mg g-1 FW (25 µM) to 12.45 mg g-1 FW (200 µM) in 45 days old plant.
 

Fig 2: Biochemical characterization of plants after different concentrations (25ìM, 50ìM, 100ìM, 150ìM and 200ìM) of chromium stress at different growth stage (15 d, 30 d and 45 d)


       
Total protein concentration of chromium treated seedlings was determined by Lowry method and is given in Fig 3A. In Madhu variety the protein content decreased with increasing level of Cr (VI) in 200 µM. Whereas in 30 days of germination at higher Cr (VI) concentrations the protein content decreased from 29.65 mg g-1 FW (50 µM) to 22.17 mg g-1 FW (200 µM) as compared to control. Reduction in protein content follows the same trend 22.31 mg g-1 FW (50 µM) to 15.8 mg g-1 FW (200 µM) respectively in 45 days of germination.
 

Fig 3: Antioxidant parameters of plants after different concentrations (25μM, 50μM, 100μM, 150μM and 200μM) of of chromium stress at different growth stage (15 d, 30 d and 45 d).


       
 
Treatment of different hexavalent chromium concentrations (25 µM, 50 µM, 100 µM, 150µM, 200 µM) as well as the control pots showed marked variations in the catalase activity of 30 days and 45days old Macrotyloma uniflorum seedlings grown under Cr (VI) stress. In Macrotyloma uniflorum the highest catalase activity was observed in 25 µM after 30 days treatment and 45 days treatment of Cr (VI). 200 µM of Cr (VI) treatment shows the least catalase activity. The catalase activity decreased with increasing number of days 30 days and 45 days and increase in the concentration of Cr (VI). The order of catalase activity in the seedlings of Macrotyloma uniflorum treated with different chromium concentration were Control >Cr (VI)(25 µM) < Cr (VI)(50μM) < Cr (VI)(100 µM) > Cr (VI)(150 μM) > Cr (VI)(200μM) and Control > Cr (VI)(25 µM) < Cr (VI)(50µM) > Cr (VI)(100 µM) > Cr (VI)(150 µM) > Cr (VI)(200µM) respectively after 30 and 45 days.
       
The catalase activity decreased from 1.09µl/gm FW to 0.74µl/gm FW (200 µM). The POX level showed an increasing trend with Cr (VI) treatment from 18µl/gm FW to 32µl/gm FW (200 µM) in 45 day old Macrotyloma uniflorum (Fig 3B).
       
The results pertaining to proline content is presented in Fig 3C. The proline content increased   from 6.112 mg/g FW (25 µM) to 11.329 mg/g FW (200 µM) in 15 days old Macrotyloma uniflorum. The level of proline gradually increased from 9.231 mg/g FW (25 µM) to 18.993 mg/g FW (200 µM) in 30 days. Further rise in the proline content from 12.65 mg/g FW (25 µM) to 21.34 mg/g FW (200 µM) respectively is noticed in 45 day old Macrotyloma uniflorum (Fig 3C).
       
Peroxidase activity increased significantly with respect to the higher levels of Cr (VI) treatments in all the tested varieties. The activity was increased with the increasing dose of Cr (VI) treatment. In Macrotyloma uniflorum, the maximum peroxidase activity was observed in Cr (VI) (200 µM) treatments after 30 days and after 45 days seedlings. The order of peroxidase activity in the seedlings of Macrotyloma uniflorum treated with different chromium concentration were Control > Cr (VI)(25 µM) > Cr (VI)(50 µM) > Cr (VI)(100 µM) > Cr (VI)(150 µM) > Cr (VI)(200 µM) and Control > Cr (VI)(25 μM) > Cr (VI)(50 µM) > Cr (VI)(100 µM) > Cr (VI)(150 µM) > Cr (VI)(200 µM) respectively after 30 and 45 days (Fig 3D).
       
SOD activity increased significantly with increased concentrations of Cr (VI) treatments in all the tested varieties. The activity was increased with the increasing dose of Cr (VI) treatment. In Macrotyloma uniflorum, the maximum SOD activity was observed in Cr (VI) (200 μM) treatments after 30 days and after 45 days seedlings. The order of SOD activity in the seedlings of Macrotyloma uniflorum treated with different chromium concentration were Control >Cr (VI)(25 µM) > Cr (VI)(50 µM) > Cr (VI)(100 μM) > Cr (VI)(150 µM) > Cr (VI)(200 µM) and Control > Cr (VI)(25 µM) > Cr (VI)(50 µM) > Cr (VI)(100 µM) > Cr (VI)(150 µM) > Cr (VI)(200 µM) respectively after 30 and 45 days (Fig 3E).
       
Soil hexavalent chromium when enters plants exhibits ruinous effects on the various aspects of plant growth and metabolism. Germination of seeds is the preliminary process occurring to a crop plant. Hence tolerance to chromium can be an indicative measure for plants to tolerate this type of abiotic stress (Peralta et al., 2001).  According to Zeid (2001) reduction in seed germination under Cr stress could be attributed to reduction of activities of amylase enzymes and on the subsequent transport of sugars to the embryo axes. High level of Cr also could able to inhibit root cell division/ root elongation which in turn results in decreased root growth (Barcelo et al., 1986).
       
The present study was conceptualized with the legume crop Macrotyloma uniflorum to evaluate the Cr toxicity in relation to germination and plant growth. All the studied traits were negatively affected with the increasing doses of chromium. Plant dry matter production was critically affected by Cr (VI) concentrations (> 100 µM). Nutrient deficiency in shoot can be observed through the poor growth of plants which ultimately can be attributed to the adverse uptake of hexavalent Cr. According to Clijsters and Van Assche (1985) Plant metabolic process which includes photosynthesis, electron transport, photophosphorylation and enzyme activities badly decreased by the intake of Cr. Protoporphyrin-a is the major component containing iron which is required for the development of chlorophyll pigment. It was evident that high level of Cr uptake can reduce the incorporation of iron into the protoporphyrin molecules, ultimately reducing the amounts of chlorophyll pigments in leaves (Krouma and Ab delly, 2003). Plants also can activate some chemical substances such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase etc to detox the heavy metal (Prasad 1998; Shanker et al., 2003). Hydrophilic antioxidant proline accumulation suggested Macrotyloma uniflorum convey an efficient antioxidant response due to Cr toxicity. Higher concentrations of proline are considered as a profound method to regulate the redox potential, scavenge the hydroxyl radicals, provide osmoprotection and also the major protection against different macromolecules. Plant cells with proline can perform non-enzymatic free radical detoxifications of heavy metals (Mohanty and Patra, 2012). This study with the crop Macrotyloma uniflorum in hydroponics provides a promising beginning for revising and comparing the level of chromium toxicity. This elaborated the capability of the legume crop Macrotyloma uniflorum against the toxic effect of hexavalent Cr and their tolerance mechanisms.
       
Plants grown in soil with higher level of hexavalent Cr can develop variety of tolerance mechanisms which can be defined as the potential of that particular plant to survive in the toxic soil. This potential of the plants can be attributed to the interaction between the plant genotype and its environment.
 Chromium stress in this crop triggered a defense mechanism against oxidative stress as evident from the response to different anti-oxidative enzymes activity. In concurrence, the increase in the levels of SOD and POX activity in this crop suggests an effective scavenging mechanism towards removing H2O2 caused by Cr stress. A better anti-oxidative capacity may be an adaptive trait against chromium treated soils and can confer a better sustainability against oxidative stress injury. The response of Macrotyloma uniflorum can be used to evaluate heavy metal tolerance potential and can be considered for reclamation of Cr contaminated soils. The above investigation revealed the changes in the metabolic pattern as induced by chromium in Macrotyloma uniflorum. Future studies on accumulation of hexavalent Cr with different varieties of Macrotyloma uniflorum are essential. The potential of different cultivars of Macrotyloma uniflorum on its metabolism under Cr stress needs to be checked. After harvest the Cr accumulated plants and its parts should be disposed with some suitable techniques which can minimize further uptake in the subsequent crop.
The authors are thankful to the financial support provided by UGC-DRS-SAPIII and DST-FIST scheme to Department of Botany, Utkal University Bhubaneswar, India.

  1. Abdul-Baki, A. A. and Anderson, J. D. (1973). Relationship between decarboxylation of glutamic acid and vigour in soyabean seed. Crop Science. 13: 222-226.

  2. Arun, K., Shanker, T., Cervantes, T., Loza-Tavera, H., Avudainayagam, S. (2005). Chromium toxicity in plants. Environment International. 31: 739-753.

  3. Atodariya, U., Barad, R., Upadhyay, S., Upadhyay, U. (2013). Anti-Urolithiatic activity of Dolichos biflorus Seeds. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2(2): 209-213.

  4. Barcelo, J., Poschenrieder, C., Gunse, B. (1986). Water relations of chromium VI treated bush bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv Contender) under both normal and water stress conditions. Journal of Experimental Botany. 37: 178-187.

  5. Bates, L.S., Waldran, R.P., Teare, I.D. (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant and Soil. 39:205-208. 

  6. Krouma, A. and Ab delly, C. (2003). Importance of iron use-efficiency of nodules in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) for iron deficiency chlorosis resistance. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science. 166: 525-528.

  7. Clijsters, H. and Van Assche, F. (1985). Inhibition of photosynthesis by heavy metals. Photosynthesis Research. 7: 31-40.

  8. Epstein, E. (1972). Mineral Nnutrition of Plants: Principles and Perspectives. John Wiley and Sons, London, pp, 412.

  9. Pantola, S., Vibhuti, Kiran, B., Bargali, S.S. (2017). Effects of NaCl on germination and seedling growth in Macrotyloma uniflorum and Vigna mungo. Current Agricultural Research Journal. 5(2): 169-176.

  10. Jarup, L. (2003). Hazards of heavy metals contamination. British Medical Bulletin, 68: 167-182.

  11. Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, A.L., Randall, R.J. (1951). Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 193: 265-275.

  12. Mathan, J., Mohanty, M., Pradhan, C., Patra, H. K. (2014). Toxicological changes in rice under nickel stress. Biolife Journal. 2(1): 363-369.

  13. Mohanty. M. and Patra, H.K. (2012). Effect of chelate assisted Hexavalent Chromium on physiological changes, biochemical alterations and Cr bioavailability in crop plants - An in vitro phytoremediation approach. Bioremediation Journal. 16(3): 147-155.

  14. Mohanty, M., Pattanaik, M.M., Misra, A.K., Patra, H.K. (2011). Chromium bioaccumulation in rice grown in contaminated soil and irrigated mine waste water - A case study at south Kaliapani Chromite Mine Area, Orissa, India. International Journal of Phytoremediation. 13: 397-409.

  15. Reddy, A.M., Kumar, S.G., Jyothsnakumari, G., Timmanaik, S., Sudhaka, C. (2005). Lead induced changes in antioxidant metabolism of horse gram [Macrotyloma uniforum (Lam.) Verdc.] and Bengal gram (Cicer arietinum L.). Chemosphere. 60: 97–104.

  16. Panda, S.K. and Patra, H.K. (2000). Nitrate and ammonium ions effect on the chromium toxicity in developing wheat seedlings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B. 70: 75-80.

  17. Peralta, J.R., Gardea Torresdey, J.L., Tiemann, K.J., Gomez, E., Arteaga, S., Rascon, E. (2001). Uptake and effects of five heavy metals on seed germination and plant growth in alfalfa (Medicago sativa) L. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 66(6): 727-734.

  18. Porra, R.J. (2002). The chequered history of the development and use of simultaneous equations for the accurate determination of chlorophylls a and b. Photosynthesis Research. 73(1-3): 149-156.

  19. Prasad, M.N.V. (1998). Metal-biomolecule complexes in plants: occurrence, functions, and applications. Analusis. 26-28.

  20. Sadasivam, S. and Manickam, A. (2008). Biochemical Methods. New Age International Publishers, 3rd ed. New Delhi, India.

  21. Shanker, A.K., Sudhagar, R., Pathmanabhan, G. (2003). Growth, phytochelatin SH and antioxidative response of sunflower as affected by chromium speciation. 2nd International Congress of Plant Physiology on sustainable plant productivity under changing environment, New Delhi, India.

  22. Taiz, L. and Zeiger, E. (2002). Plant Physiology. 3rd ed. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, M.A. pp. 690. 

  23. Zeid, I.M. (2001). Responses of Phaseolus vulgaris to chromium and cobalt treatments. Biologia Plantarum. 44: 111-115. 

Editorial Board

View all (0)