Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorT. Mohapatra

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Research Article

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 53 issue 4 (august 2019) : 405-410

Nitrogen fertigation schedule and irrigation effects on productivity and economics of spring sugarcane

Hari Singh, R.K. Singh, R.N. Meena, Vikram Kumar
1Department of Agronomy, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221 005, Uttar Pradesh, India. 
Cite article:- Singh Hari, Singh R.K., Meena R.N., Kumar Vikram (2019). Nitrogen fertigation schedule and irrigation effects on productivity and economics of spring sugarcane. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 53(4): 405-410. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5208.

ABSTRACT

The field experiment was conducted to find the appropriate irrigation method, fertilization schedule and its influence on growth, yield and quality of sugarcane.  The soil of the experimental site was sandy clay loam, neutral in reaction (pH 7.7), low in organic carbon (0.41%) and available nitrogen (167.0 kg ha-1), medium in available phosphorus (19.1 kg ha-1) and potassium (208.0 kg ha-1). Experiment was laid out in split plot design with four replications. The treatments consisted of three irrigation methods in main plot viz., flood, furrow and drip; five nitrogen scheduling in sub plot viz., farmers practice, 4 splits, 6 splits, 8 splits and 10 splits. In flood method of irrigation all growth and quality parameter were recorded lowest. Thus, it may be concluded that to achieve highest millable cane and quality parameters, drip irrigation is a better option. The number of tillers (177.2 thousand ha-1), number of millable canes (123.3 thousand ha-1), cane length (367.98 cm), cane yield (168.51 t ha-1), commercial cane (CCS) yield (25.05 t ha-1) and economic return were found significantly higher under drip irrigation during first year. Similar trends were recorded during second year of experimentation. The highest dry matter accumulation and crop growth rate were also recorded under drip irrigation during both the years. Similarly, water use efficiency and water productivity were found maximum under treatment of drip irrigation. Significantly highest number of tillers (165.6 thousand ha-1), millable canes (116.3 thousand ha-1), cane yield (154.72 t ha-1), dry matter accumulation, crop growth rate, CCS yield (23.39 t ha-1) and economic return were recorded with 6 splits of nitrogen application. The overall effect of nitrogen scheduling was in the order of 6 splits > 8 splits > 10 splits > 4 splits > farmer’s practice. 

REFERENCES

  1. Anonymous. (2017). Agriculture Statistical at a Glance. Department of Agriculture, cooperation and Farmer Welfare, Government of India.
  2. Bhatnagar, V. K., Singh R. D., Dey P., and Singh P. N. (2007). Efficient water management in sugarcane production for increasing sugar recovery. Proceeding National Symposium on Sugar recovery, Problem and Prospects, June 13-15, 2007, 27- 29.
  3. Chen, G.F., Tang Q. Z., Li Y. R., Huang Y. Y., Liu B., Xu L., and Huang H. R. (2012). Effects of sub-soil drip fertigation on sugarcane in field conditions. Sugar Tech, 14 (4): 418–421.
  4. Farooq, U., Mehmood S., Afghan S., Shahzad A., and Asad M. (2015). Comparative study on agrophysiology of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) genotypes at different irrigation coefficient values. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 47 (2): 527-532.
  5. Gomez, K. A., and Gomez A. A. (1984). Statistical Procedures in Agriculture Research. 2nd Edition: Wiley New York, Chichester.
  6. Hirwe, N. A., and Jadhav A. S. (2010). Productivity and economics of cropping sequences under different irrigation methods. Agriculture Update, 5 (1): 132-135.
  7. Hussain, K. A., Majeed, Nawaz K., Afghan S., Ali K., Lin F., Zafar Z., and Raza G. (2010). Comparative study of subsurface drip irrigation and flood irrigation systems for quality and yield of sugarcane. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 5 (22): 3026-3034. 
  8. Hussain, S., Anwar-ul-Haq M., Hussain S., Akram Z., Afzal M., and Shabbir I.. (2017). Best suited timing schedule of inorganic NPK fertilizers and its effect on qualitative and quantitative attributes of spring sown sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 16: 66–71.
  9. Kumar, V., Singh S., and Chand M. (2014). Nutrient and water management for higher sugarcane production, better juice quality and maintenance of soil fertility. Agricultural Review, 35 (3): 184-195.
  10. Mahendran, S., and Dhanalakhmi M. (2003). Effect of crop geometry and drip fertigation on growth and yield of sugarcane crop, Souvenir: 65th Annual Convention of the Sugar Technologists’ Association of India, 22-24th August, 2003, Bhubaneshwar, Orissa, Publication Sugar Technologists’ Association of India: New Delhi, India, 80-87.
  11. Narayanamoorthy, A. (2010). Can drip method of irrigation be used to achieve the macro objectives of conservation agriculture. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65 (3): 428–438.
  12. Padmanabhan, M., Nagaraju M. B., and Thimmegowda M. N. (2017). Influence of subsurface drip fertigation duration and levels on growth parameters of plant and ratoon Sugarcane. Internatational Journal of agricultural Sciences, 13 (2): 315-320.
  13. Punetha, A, and Reddy K. Y. (2006). APMIP-The first and the largest comprehensive Micro irrigation project in India, In: Proceedings of the 7th International Micro Irrigation Congress (7th IMIC) Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  14. Saleem, M. F., Ghaffar A., Anjum S. A., Cheema M. A., and Bilal M. F. (2012). Effect of nitrogen on growth and yield of sugarcane. Journal American Society of Sugarcane Technologists, 32: 75-93.
  15. Sarala, N. V., Rao M. S., Kumar M. H., and Nagamadhuri K. V. (2014). Response of sugarcane to plant geometry and irrigation methods in southern agro- climatic zone of Andhra Pradesh. Journal of Sugarcane Research, 4 (1): 86-90.
  16. Shrivastava, A. K., Arun K. Srivastava, and Soloman S. (2011). Sustaining sugarcane productivity under depleting water resources. Current Science, 101 (6): 748–754.
  17. Singandhupe, R. B., Bankar M. C., Anand P. S. B., and Patil N. G. (2008). Management of drip irrigated sugarcane in Western India. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 54 (6): 629-649.
  18. Singh, A. K., Kumari V. V., Gupta R., Singh P., and Solomon S. (2018). Efficient irrigation water management in sugarcane through alteration of field application parameters under subtropical India. Sugar Tech, 20 (1): 21–28.
  19. Spencer, G. L. and Meade G. P. A. (1955). Handbook of sugarcane–A manual for cane sugar manufactures and their chemists, John Willey and Sons, Inc, New York, Chapman and Hall Limited, London.
  20. Sreewarome, A., Saensupo S., Prammanee P., and Weerathworn P. (2007). Effect of rate and split application of nitrogen on agronomic characteristics, cane yield and juice quality. Proceeding International Society of Sugarcane Technology, 26: 465-468.
  21. Viets, F.G. (1962). Fertilizers and the efficient use of water. Advances of Agronomy, 14: 223-264.
  22. Watson, D. J. (1947). Comparative physiological studies on growth of field crops, variation in net assimilation rate and leaf area between species and varieties, and within and between years. Annals of Botany, 11: 41-76.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)