Evaluation of cropsyst model for yield and water productivity of chickpea

DOI: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5203    | Article Id: A-5203 | Page : 463-467
Citation :- Evaluation of cropsyst model for yield and water productivity of chickpea.Indian Journal Of Agricultural Research.2019.(53):463-467
Ramesh Kumar, R.S. Yadav, Amit Kumawat, V.S. Rathore, N.D. Yadava and Vinay Nangia amit.agron@gmail.com
Address : College of Agriculture, Bikaner-334 006, Rajasthan, India.
Submitted Date : 12-01-2019
Accepted Date : 16-04-2019


An experiment entitled “Evaluation of CropSyst model for yield and water productivity of chickpea” was conducted on farmers field during rabi2012-13 at village Mainawali in Hanumangarh district of Rajasthan. The soils of the area are alluvial and calcareous in nature formed under arid and semi arid climate. The soils of site are brown to grayish brown and dark gray in colour, besides being calcareous and slightly alkaline in reaction having 67.7, 11.1 and 21.0 % of sand, clay and silt, respectively in 0-15 cm soil depth with pH 8.09 and low soil organic matter content. The simulated and observed green area index differs with field measurements at all stages. The simulate yield of chickpea were closer to the observed yield. The total water applied in chickpea was 415 mm out of this 356.5 mm consumed in ET. Thus, ET constituted 86% of total water applied and deep drainage constituted 12% and rest 2% stored as residual soil moisture.


Chickpea CropSyst Model Simulation.


  1. Arora, V.K., Singh, C. and Singh, K. (1997). Comparative assessment of soil water balance under wheat in a sub-tropical environment with simplified models. J. Agri. Sci.,128: 461-468. 
  2. Aujla, M.S., Singh, C.J., Vashist, K.K. and Sandhu, B.S. (1991). Evaluation of methods for irrigation of cotton (Gossypiumhirsutam) in a canal irrigated area of south west Punjab, India. Arid Soil Research,5:225-234.
  3. Bennett, A.J. (2000). Environmental consequences of increasing production: some current perspectives. Agric. Ecosys. Environ.,82: 89-95.
  4. Blake, G.R. and Hartge, K.H. (1986). Bulk Density. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1 - Physical and Mineralogical Methods Second Edition. [A. Klute (ed.)] American Society of Agronomy, Madison WI. 
  5. Bouyoucos, H.J. (1962). A hydrometer method for the determination of textural class of soils. Tech. Bult. 132, Michigan State Coll. Agr. Exp. Sta. pp.1-38. 
  6. Costanza,R., Daly, H.E. (1992). Natural capital and sustainable development. Conservation Biology. 6 (1): 37 – 46.
  7. Harper, H.J. (1924).The accurate determination of nitrates in soils. Ind. Eng. Chem. 16: 180-183. 
  8. Hu, C., Saseendran, S.A., Green, T.R., Ma, L., Li, X. and Ahuja, L.R. (2006). Evaluating nitrogen and water management in a double-    cropping system using RZWQM. Vadose Zone Journal, 5: 493-405.
  9. Jalota, S.K., Parihar, S.S. and Gajri, P.R. (1985). Drainage loss under different irrigation schedules and stage sensitivity of wheat to water stress. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,55: 574-581. 
  10. Jalota, S.K., Sood, A., Chahal, G.B.S. and Choudhary B.U. (2006). Crop water productivity of cotton (GossypiumhirsutumL.) – wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) system as influenced by deficit irrigation, soil texture and precipitation. Agricultural Water Management 84: 137–46.
  11. Keating, P., Cho, T., Fougeron, C. and Hsu, C.S. (2003). Domain-initial strengthening in four languages. In Phonetic Interpretation: Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI [Local J., Ogden R. & Temple R. (Eds.)], Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK: (pp.143-161). 
  12. Kumar, R., Yadav, R.S., Yadava, N.D., Kumawat, Amit, Nangia, V., Glazirina, M., Rathore, V.S, Soni, M.L. and Birbal (2016). Evaluation of CropSyst model for clusterbean under hot arid condition. LegumeResearch, 39(5): 774-779.
  13. McCrown, R.L., Hammer, G.L. and Hargreaves, J.N.G. (1996). APSIM: a novel software system for model development , model testing ,and simulation in agricultural systems research. Agric syst., 100: 87-97.
  14. Peech, M., Alexander, L.T., Dean, L.A., Reed, J.F. (1947). Methods of Soil Analysis for Soil-Fertility Investigations. U.S. Department Agricultural Circular, 25: 757.
  15. Prince, A.L. (1945). Determination of total nitrogen, ammonia, nitrates, and nitrites in soils. Soil Science, 59: 47-52.
  16. Rathore, V.S., Singh, J.P., Soni, M.L., Yadava, N.D. and Beniwal, R.K. (2010). Evaluation of irrigated farming systems of hot arid region of north-western Rajasthan. Annals of Arid Zone 49(1): 39-45.
  17. Richards, L.A. (1954). Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. USDA Hand book No.60. Oxford and IBH Pub. Co. New Delhi. 
  18. Rosegrant, M.W., Ringler, C., Zhu, T. (2009). Water for agriculture :Maintianing food security under growing scarcity. Annual Review of Environmental Resources34 : 205 – 22.
  19. Singh, R., Jhorar, R.K., van Dam, J.C. and Feddes, R.A. (2006). Distributed ecohydrological modelling to evaluate the performance of irrigation systems in Sirsa district. India II: impact of viable water management scenarios, Journal of Hydrology. 329: 714–    723.
  20. Stockle, C.O. and Nelson, R. (1999). ClimGen, Manual, Biological Systems Engineering Department, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 28 pp.
  21. Stockle, C.O., Martin, S.A. and Campbell, G.S. (1994). CropSyst a cropping system simulation model: Water/nitrogen budgets and crop yield. Agricultural Systems, 46: 335–59.
  22. Stockle, C.O., Ddonattelli, M. and Nelson, R. (2003). CropSyst, a cropping system simulation model.Europian Journal of Agronomy, 18:289-307.
  23. Walkley, A. and Black, I.A. (1934). Rapid titration method for organic carbon of soils. Soil Science, 37: 29-32. 

Global Footprints