Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

Research Article

volume 53 issue 4 (august 2019) : 391-397,   Doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5139

Productivity and resilience based indices for identification of water stress resilient genotypes in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)

M
Musharib Gull
P
Parvaze A. Sofi
R
R.R. Mir
A
Asmat Ars
S
S.M. Zargar
1Division of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology- Kashmir, Wadura, Sopore-193 201, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Cite article:- Gull Musharib, Sofi A. Parvaze, Mir R.R., Ars Asmat, Zargar S.M. (2019). Productivity and resilience based indices for identification of water stress resilient genotypes in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 53(4): 391-397. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5139.

ABSTRACT

This paper reports the usefulness of a new method for identification of productive and resilient cowpea genotypes. The new indices called as Yield Susceptibility Score Index (YSSI) and Yield Production Score Index (YPSI)  are based on a scoring scales, offer simple and easy visualization and identification of genotypes that possess resilience, productivity, both or none. A set of 40 cowpea genotypes was evaluated  and stress indices were combined  in terms of  new indices based on a combination of stress susceptibility index, the stress tolerance index, the mean productivity index and the tolerance index, which have been previously used either in isolation or together for understanding water stress adaptation. This new selection method could help breeders and researchers by defining clear and strong criteria to identify genotypes with high resilience and high productivity and provide a clear visualization of contrasts in terms of grain yield production under stress. The approach is highly useful in initial evaluation of large germplasm sets for identification of resilient and productive cowpea genotypes. 

REFERENCES

  1. FAO (2015). FOA Database. www.foa.org/foastat.en.  
  2. Fernandez, G. C. (1992). Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance, p. 257-27 In: Proceeding of a symposium on adaptation of vegetables and other food crops in temperature and water stress, Taiwan. 
  3. Fisher, R. A., and Maurer, R. (1978). Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses in spring wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 29: 892-912. 
  4. Jacquot M., Hamon S. and Nicolas D. (eds), Tropical Plant Breeding. Science publishers, Enfield, pp. 177-198.
  5. Khayatnezehad, M and Gholamin, R. (2010). Investigation and selection drought stress indexes for corn. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 9: 22-26.
  6. Mohammadi M, Karimizadeh R, Abdipour M. (2011). Evaluation of drought tolerance in bread wheat genotypes under dryland and supplemental irrigation conditions. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5: 487–493. 
  7. Pasquet R.S. and Baudoin J.P. (2001). Cowpea. In: Charrier A., 1194–1199.
  8. Ramýrez P and Kelly J D. (1998). Traits related to drought resistance in common bean. Euphytica, 99:127–136 36. 
  9. Rosielle, A. A. and  Hamblin J. (1981). Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environments. Crop Science, 21: 943-946.
  10. Sareen S, Tyagi BS, Sharma I. (2012). Response estimation of wheat synthetic lines to terminal heat stress using stress indices. Journal of Agricultural Science, 4 (10): 97-104. 
  11. Singh, R.P. (2014). Status paper on pulses. Ministry of Agriculture, GOI., 219 pp .
  12. Singh, B. B., Mohan Raj, D. R., Dashiell, K. E. and Jackai, L.E. (2003). Advances in cowpea research. Co-publication of International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) and Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS). 73:108-111.
  13. Sofi, P.A., Rehman, K, Asmat Ara,. Mir S. A. and Dar S.A. (2017). Improving screening methods to water stress in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) using new score indices based on productivity and resilience. International Journal of Current Microbioly and Applied Science, 6(7): 967-981.
  14. Thiry, A, Perla, N. Chavez, D, Reynolds, M. P. and Davies, W. J. (2016).  How can we improve crop genotypes to increase stress resilience and productivity in a future climate? A new crop screening method based on productivity and resistance to abiotic stress. Journal of Experimental Botany, 67 (19): doi:10.1093/jxb/erw330.
Published In
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Research Article

    volume 53 issue 4 (august 2019) : 391-397,   Doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5139

    Productivity and resilience based indices for identification of water stress resilient genotypes in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)

    M
    Musharib Gull
    P
    Parvaze A. Sofi
    R
    R.R. Mir
    A
    Asmat Ars
    S
    S.M. Zargar
    1Division of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology- Kashmir, Wadura, Sopore-193 201, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
    Cite article:- Gull Musharib, Sofi A. Parvaze, Mir R.R., Ars Asmat, Zargar S.M. (2019). Productivity and resilience based indices for identification of water stress resilient genotypes in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 53(4): 391-397. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5139.

    ABSTRACT

    This paper reports the usefulness of a new method for identification of productive and resilient cowpea genotypes. The new indices called as Yield Susceptibility Score Index (YSSI) and Yield Production Score Index (YPSI)  are based on a scoring scales, offer simple and easy visualization and identification of genotypes that possess resilience, productivity, both or none. A set of 40 cowpea genotypes was evaluated  and stress indices were combined  in terms of  new indices based on a combination of stress susceptibility index, the stress tolerance index, the mean productivity index and the tolerance index, which have been previously used either in isolation or together for understanding water stress adaptation. This new selection method could help breeders and researchers by defining clear and strong criteria to identify genotypes with high resilience and high productivity and provide a clear visualization of contrasts in terms of grain yield production under stress. The approach is highly useful in initial evaluation of large germplasm sets for identification of resilient and productive cowpea genotypes. 

    REFERENCES

    1. FAO (2015). FOA Database. www.foa.org/foastat.en.  
    2. Fernandez, G. C. (1992). Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance, p. 257-27 In: Proceeding of a symposium on adaptation of vegetables and other food crops in temperature and water stress, Taiwan. 
    3. Fisher, R. A., and Maurer, R. (1978). Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses in spring wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 29: 892-912. 
    4. Jacquot M., Hamon S. and Nicolas D. (eds), Tropical Plant Breeding. Science publishers, Enfield, pp. 177-198.
    5. Khayatnezehad, M and Gholamin, R. (2010). Investigation and selection drought stress indexes for corn. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 9: 22-26.
    6. Mohammadi M, Karimizadeh R, Abdipour M. (2011). Evaluation of drought tolerance in bread wheat genotypes under dryland and supplemental irrigation conditions. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5: 487–493. 
    7. Pasquet R.S. and Baudoin J.P. (2001). Cowpea. In: Charrier A., 1194–1199.
    8. Ramýrez P and Kelly J D. (1998). Traits related to drought resistance in common bean. Euphytica, 99:127–136 36. 
    9. Rosielle, A. A. and  Hamblin J. (1981). Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environments. Crop Science, 21: 943-946.
    10. Sareen S, Tyagi BS, Sharma I. (2012). Response estimation of wheat synthetic lines to terminal heat stress using stress indices. Journal of Agricultural Science, 4 (10): 97-104. 
    11. Singh, R.P. (2014). Status paper on pulses. Ministry of Agriculture, GOI., 219 pp .
    12. Singh, B. B., Mohan Raj, D. R., Dashiell, K. E. and Jackai, L.E. (2003). Advances in cowpea research. Co-publication of International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) and Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS). 73:108-111.
    13. Sofi, P.A., Rehman, K, Asmat Ara,. Mir S. A. and Dar S.A. (2017). Improving screening methods to water stress in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) using new score indices based on productivity and resilience. International Journal of Current Microbioly and Applied Science, 6(7): 967-981.
    14. Thiry, A, Perla, N. Chavez, D, Reynolds, M. P. and Davies, W. J. (2016).  How can we improve crop genotypes to increase stress resilience and productivity in a future climate? A new crop screening method based on productivity and resistance to abiotic stress. Journal of Experimental Botany, 67 (19): doi:10.1093/jxb/erw330.
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)