Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorT. Mohapatra

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.20

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Research Article

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 53 issue 2 (april 2019) : 218-222

Changes in soil carbon stock in Mewat and Dhar under cereal and legume based cropping systems 

B. Chakrabarti, S.K. Bandyopadhyay, H. Pathak, D. Pratap, R. Mittal, R.C. Harit
1Centre for Environment Science and Climate Resilient Agriculture, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110 012, India.
Cite article:- Chakrabarti B., Bandyopadhyay S.K., Pathak H., Pratap D., Mittal R., Harit R.C. (2019). Changes in soil carbon stock in Mewat and Dhar under cereal and legume based cropping systems. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 53(2): 218-222. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5137.

ABSTRACT

Soil organic carbon is strongly affected by agricultural management practices. Cropping systems can influence the amount of carbon present in soil. Increase in SOC can be related with the choice of crops present in the cropping sequence as well as on the management practices followed. The present study was undertaken to quantify the changes in soil carbon stock under different cropping systems. Two major cropping systems i.e. pearlmillet-wheat and pearlmillet-mustard were selected in Mewat, Haryana while soybean-wheat cropping systems was identified in Dhar, Madhya Pradesh. Results showed that SOC of surface soil layer decreased from 0.42% to 0.39% in pearlmillet-mustard cropping system during the study period. But in soybean-wheat cropping system it increased from 1.14% to 1.24%. Legume based cropping system showed enhancement of surface soil carbon. 

REFERENCES

  1. Amundson, R., (2001). The carbon budget in soils. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet, 29: 535–62. 
  2. Aziz, I., Mahmood, T., Khandakar, R.I. and Ashraf, E., (2013). Estimation of cropping system impacts on carbon and nitrogen status of soil. Int. J. Agric. Appl. Sci., 5(1): 1-7. 
  3. Bellamy, P.H., Loveland, P.J., Bradley, R.I., Murray, R., Lark, G.J.D. and Kirk., (2005). Carbon losses from all soils across England and Wales 1978- 2003. Nature, 437: 245-248. 
  4. Bhattacharya, T., Pal, D.K., Mondal, C. and Velayutham, M., (2000). Organic carbon stock in Indian soils and their geographical distribution. Curr. Sci., 79: 655–659.
  5. Bhattacharyya, R., Ved Prakash, Kundu, S., Pandey, S.C. Srivastva, A.K., and Gupta, H.S., (2009). Effect of fertilisation on carbon sequestration in soybean–wheat rotation under two contrasting soils and management practices in the Indian Himalayas. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 47: 592–601. 
  6. Chakrabarti, B., Pramanik, P., Mina, U., Sharma, D.K. and Mittal, R., (2014). Impact of conservation agricultural practices on soil physic-chemical properties. International Journal on Agricultual Sciences, 5(1): 55-59.
  7. Chaudhari, P.R., Ahire, D.V., Ahire, V.D., Chkravarty, M. and Maity, S., (2013). Soil Bulk Density as related to soil texture, organic matter content and available total nutrients of Coimbatore Soil. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3(2): 1-8. 
  8. Chaudhury, S., Bhattacharyya, T., Wani, S.P., Pal, D.K., Sahrawat, K.L., Nimje, A., Chandran, P., Venugopalan, M.V. and Telpande, B., (2016). Land use and cropping effects on carbon in black soils of semi-arid tropical India. Curr. Sci., 110(9): 1692-1698. 
  9. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A., (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
  10. Gregory, A.S., Watts, C.W., Griffiths, B.S., Hallett, P.D., Kuan, H.L. and Whitmore, A.P., (2009). The effect of long-term soil management on the physical and biological resilience of a range of arable and grassland soils in England. Geoderma 153: 172-185. 
  11. Grossman, R.B. and Reinsch, T.G., (2002). Bulk density and linear extensibility. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 4, Physical Methods, (J.H. Dane and G.C. Topp, Eds.) Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, WI, pp. 201-225.
  12. Gupta, R.K. and Rao, D.L.N., (1994). Potential of wastelands for sequestering carbon by reforestation. Curr. Sci., 66(5): 73-75. 
  13. Jobbagy, E.G. and Jackson, R.B., (2000). The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecol. Appl., 10(2): 423–436.
  14. Kimble, J.M., Lal, R. and Follett, R.R., (2002). Agricultural practices and policy options for carbon sequestration: what we know and where we need to go. In: Agricultural Practices and Policies for Carbon Sequestration in Soil. [Kimbel, J.M., Lal, R., Follett, R.F. (Eds.)], Lewis, New York, p. 512.
  15. Kumar, P., Aggarwal, R.K. and Power, J.F., (1997). Cropping systems: Effects on soil quality indicators and yield of pearl millet in an arid region. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 12(4): 178-184.
  16. Kumar, V., Rawat, A.K. and Rao, D.L.N. (2018). Slow and fast-growing soybean rhizobial population, their symbiotic efficiency and soil nitrogen behavior under different cropping systems in Vertisols of Madhya Prasesh, India. Legume Res., 41: DOI: 10.18805/LR-3920. 
  17. Lal, R., (1995). ‘Global Soil Erosion by Water and Carbon Dynamics’, In: Soil and Global Change, [Lal, R., Kimble, J. M., Levine, E., and Stewart, B. A. (eds.)], CRC/Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 131–142.
  18. Lal, R., Kimble, J.M., Follett, R.F. and Cole, C.V. (Eds.) (1998). The potential for US cropland to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect. Annals of Arboureal Science, Chesla, MI.
  19. LECO. (1996). CNS-2000 Elemental Analyzer - Instruction Manual. LECO Corp., St. Joseph, MI.
  20. Leifeld, J., Bassin, S. and Fuhrer, J., (2005). Carbon stocks in Swiss agricultural soils predicted by land-use, soil characteristics, and altitude. Ag. Ecosyst. Environ., 105: 255–266.
  21. Manna, M.C., Swarup, A., Wanjari, R.H., Mishra, B. and Shahi, D.K., (2007). Long-term fertilization, manure and liming effects on soil organic matter and crop yields. Soil Tillage Res., 94(2): 397-409.
  22. Moore, J.M., Klose, S. and Tabatabai, M.A., (2000). Soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen as affected by cropping systems. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 31: 200-210.
  23. Morisada, K., Ono, K., Kanomata, H., (2004). Organic carbon stock in forest soils in Japan. Geoderma, 119: 21-32.
  24. Nelson, D.W. and Sommers, L.E., (1982). Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Laboratory methods. In Methods of Soil Analysis (A.L. Page et al., Eds.) Part 2. 2nd edn. Agronomy Monograph 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI, USA, pp. 539-579.
  25. Pathak, H., Chakrabarti, B., Mina, U., Pramanik, P. and Sharma, D.K., (2017). Ecosystem services of wheat (Triticum aestivum) production with conventional and conservation agricultural practices in the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 87(8): 987-991.
  26. Robinson, C.A., Cruse, R.M. and Ghaffarzadeh, M., (1996). Cropping systems and nitrogen effects on mollisol organic carbon. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 60: 264-269.
  27. Sisti, C.P.J., de Santos, H.P., Kochhann, R.A., Alves, B.J.R., Urquiaga, S. and Boddey, R.M., (2004). Change in carbon and nitrogen stocks in soil under 13 years of conventional or zero tillage in southern Brazil. Soil Tillage Res., 76: 39-58.
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)