Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

Research Article

volume 53 issue 5 (october 2019) : 614-618,   Doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5075

Characterization, classification and evaluation of major soils in Sollapura sub-watershed of Chikmagalur district in Karnataka for sustainable crop production

S
S. Venkatesan
K
K. Dhanasekararan
1<div style="text-align: justify;">Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry,&nbsp;Faculty of Agriculture, Annamalai University, Annamalainagar-608 002, Tamil Nadu, India.</div>
Cite article:- Venkatesan S., Dhanasekararan K. (2019). Characterization, classification and evaluation of major soils in Sollapura sub-watershed of Chikmagalur district in Karnataka for sustainable crop production. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 53(5): 614-618. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5075.

ABSTRACT

The morphological, physical and physico-chemical characteristics of soils in Sollapura sub-watershed of Chikmagalur district in Karnataka have been studied. The district comprises of 7 taluks of which Tarikere comes under southern transition zone. Tarikere talu have wide range of climate variation from perhumid to semi-arid. The study revealed that the soils had colours in the hue of 10YR to 5 YR, well to poorly drained, slightly acidic to moderately alkaline, low to high in organic carbon and low to medium in cation exchange capacity with wide textural variations. The soils on gently sloping topography exhibit the development of argillic horizon (Bt). The soils have been classified as Alfisols soil order and Ustalfs at sub-order level due to the presence of ustic soil moisture regime. On the basis of the major soil constraints, sustainable land use plan for the micro-watershed has also been suggested for their better management.

REFERENCES

  1. Basava raju, D., Naidu, M.V.S., Ramavatharam, N., Venkaiah, K. Ramarao, G. and Reddy, K.S. (2005). Characterization, classification and evaluation of soils in Chandragiri mandal of Chittoor district, Andhra Pradesh. Agropedology 15: 55-62.
  2. Buol, S.W., Hole, R.D., McCracken, R.J. and Southard, R.J. (1998). Soil Genesis and Classification. 4th ed., Panima Publishing Corporation, New Delhi.p.165
  3. Childs, C.W. and Wilson, A.D. (1983). Iron oxide minerals in soils of the Haapai group, Kingdom of Tonga. Aust. J. Soil Res., 21: 489-503.
  4. Jackson, M.L. 1973. Soil Chemical Analysis, Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.pp253-256 
  5. Jenny, H. (1941). Factors of Soil Formation Mc Graw-Hill Inc., New York.pp173-174
  6. Klich, I., Wilding, L. P. and Pfordresher, A. A. (1990). Close interval spatial variability of Udertic Paleustalfs in East Central Texas. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54: 489-494.
  7. Klingebiel, A.A. and Montgomery, P.H. (1966). Land capability classification. Agriculture Handbook No 210, USDA, Washington, DC.
  8. Schwertmann, U. and Taylor, R.M. (1977). Iron oxides. Minerals in Soil Environments (eds. Dixon, J.B. and Weed, S.W.). Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, pp.145-180.
  9. Sehgal, J. L., Saxena, R.K. and Vadivelu, S. (1987). Soil Resource Mapping of Different States in India. Field Manual. Technical Bulletin 13. NBSS&LUP (ICAR), Nagpur, India.
  10. Shrikant, N., Deshmukh and Bapat, M.V. (1993). Characterization and classification of soils in relation to different parent rocks and landforms. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 41: 326-330.
  11. Soil Survey Staff. (2003). Soil Taxonomy. A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., USA.pp123-124
  12. Thangasamy, A., Naidu, M.V.S., Ramavatharam, N. and Raghava Reddy, C. (2005). Characterization, classification and evaluation of soil resources in Sivagiri micro-watershed of Chittoor district in Andhra Pradesh for sustainable land use planning. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 53: 11-21.
  13. Torrent, J., Nettleton, W. D. and Borst, G. (1980). Clay illuviation and lamella formation in a Psammentic Haploxeralf in Southern California. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44: 363-369.
  14. Wakene Negassa. (2001). Assessment of important physicochemical properties of Dystric Udalf (Dystric Nitosols) under different management systems in Bako area, Western Ethiopia. MSc Thesis, Alemaya University, Alemaya, Ethiopia. 93p.
  15. Wani, S.P. and Sidhu,G.S. (2009). Land Use Planning in Integrated Watershed Development Program for Improving Livelihoods. Indian Society of Soil Science Platinum Jubilee Symposium - Proceedings, pp 154-164. 
Published In
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Research Article

    volume 53 issue 5 (october 2019) : 614-618,   Doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5075

    Characterization, classification and evaluation of major soils in Sollapura sub-watershed of Chikmagalur district in Karnataka for sustainable crop production

    S
    S. Venkatesan
    K
    K. Dhanasekararan
    1<div style="text-align: justify;">Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry,&nbsp;Faculty of Agriculture, Annamalai University, Annamalainagar-608 002, Tamil Nadu, India.</div>
    Cite article:- Venkatesan S., Dhanasekararan K. (2019). Characterization, classification and evaluation of major soils in Sollapura sub-watershed of Chikmagalur district in Karnataka for sustainable crop production. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 53(5): 614-618. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5075.

    ABSTRACT

    The morphological, physical and physico-chemical characteristics of soils in Sollapura sub-watershed of Chikmagalur district in Karnataka have been studied. The district comprises of 7 taluks of which Tarikere comes under southern transition zone. Tarikere talu have wide range of climate variation from perhumid to semi-arid. The study revealed that the soils had colours in the hue of 10YR to 5 YR, well to poorly drained, slightly acidic to moderately alkaline, low to high in organic carbon and low to medium in cation exchange capacity with wide textural variations. The soils on gently sloping topography exhibit the development of argillic horizon (Bt). The soils have been classified as Alfisols soil order and Ustalfs at sub-order level due to the presence of ustic soil moisture regime. On the basis of the major soil constraints, sustainable land use plan for the micro-watershed has also been suggested for their better management.

    REFERENCES

    1. Basava raju, D., Naidu, M.V.S., Ramavatharam, N., Venkaiah, K. Ramarao, G. and Reddy, K.S. (2005). Characterization, classification and evaluation of soils in Chandragiri mandal of Chittoor district, Andhra Pradesh. Agropedology 15: 55-62.
    2. Buol, S.W., Hole, R.D., McCracken, R.J. and Southard, R.J. (1998). Soil Genesis and Classification. 4th ed., Panima Publishing Corporation, New Delhi.p.165
    3. Childs, C.W. and Wilson, A.D. (1983). Iron oxide minerals in soils of the Haapai group, Kingdom of Tonga. Aust. J. Soil Res., 21: 489-503.
    4. Jackson, M.L. 1973. Soil Chemical Analysis, Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.pp253-256 
    5. Jenny, H. (1941). Factors of Soil Formation Mc Graw-Hill Inc., New York.pp173-174
    6. Klich, I., Wilding, L. P. and Pfordresher, A. A. (1990). Close interval spatial variability of Udertic Paleustalfs in East Central Texas. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54: 489-494.
    7. Klingebiel, A.A. and Montgomery, P.H. (1966). Land capability classification. Agriculture Handbook No 210, USDA, Washington, DC.
    8. Schwertmann, U. and Taylor, R.M. (1977). Iron oxides. Minerals in Soil Environments (eds. Dixon, J.B. and Weed, S.W.). Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, pp.145-180.
    9. Sehgal, J. L., Saxena, R.K. and Vadivelu, S. (1987). Soil Resource Mapping of Different States in India. Field Manual. Technical Bulletin 13. NBSS&LUP (ICAR), Nagpur, India.
    10. Shrikant, N., Deshmukh and Bapat, M.V. (1993). Characterization and classification of soils in relation to different parent rocks and landforms. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 41: 326-330.
    11. Soil Survey Staff. (2003). Soil Taxonomy. A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., USA.pp123-124
    12. Thangasamy, A., Naidu, M.V.S., Ramavatharam, N. and Raghava Reddy, C. (2005). Characterization, classification and evaluation of soil resources in Sivagiri micro-watershed of Chittoor district in Andhra Pradesh for sustainable land use planning. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 53: 11-21.
    13. Torrent, J., Nettleton, W. D. and Borst, G. (1980). Clay illuviation and lamella formation in a Psammentic Haploxeralf in Southern California. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44: 363-369.
    14. Wakene Negassa. (2001). Assessment of important physicochemical properties of Dystric Udalf (Dystric Nitosols) under different management systems in Bako area, Western Ethiopia. MSc Thesis, Alemaya University, Alemaya, Ethiopia. 93p.
    15. Wani, S.P. and Sidhu,G.S. (2009). Land Use Planning in Integrated Watershed Development Program for Improving Livelihoods. Indian Society of Soil Science Platinum Jubilee Symposium - Proceedings, pp 154-164. 
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)