Published In
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research
Article Metrics

0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
In this Article
APC
APC cover the cost of turning a manuscript into a published manuscript through peer-review process, editorial work as well as the cost of hosting, distributing, indexing and promoting the manuscript.
Publish With US
Submit your manuscript through user friendly platform and acquire the maximum impact for your research by publishing with ARCC Journals.
Become a Reviewer/Member
Join our esteemed reviewers panel and become an editorial board member with international experts in the domain of numerous specializations.
Open Access
Filling the gap between research and communication ARCC provide Open Access of all journals which empower research community in all the ways which is accessible to all.
Products and Services
We provide prime quality of services to assist you select right product of your requirement.
Support and Policies
Finest policies are designed to ensure world class support to our authors, members and readers. Our efficient team provides best possible support for you.
Follow us
Research Article
volume 52 issue 6 (december 2018) : 643-648, Doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-4764
G × E interaction estimation for forage yield of dual purpose barley by Nonparametric measures
1Statistics and Computer Center ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal-132 001, India.
Submitted08-04-2017|
Accepted12-09-2018|
First Online 01-12-2018|
Cite article:- Verma Ajay, Singh J., Kumar V., Kharab A.S., Singh G.P. (2018). G × E interaction estimation for forage yield of dual purpose barley by Nonparametric measures. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 52(6): 643-648. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-4764.
ABSTRACT
Nonparametric measures were utilized to estimate the genotype-environment interaction for seventeen dual purpose barley genotypes evaluated at 10 major barley growing locations of the country. Average forage yield identified higher yielder genotypes as RD2928, RD2927 and JB325 while descriptive statistics pointed out towards KB1420, RD2927 and KB1401& JB322. However RD2927& RD2928 based on MR, UPB1054 & RD2035 based on SD and genotypes JB325& RD2928 based on CV identified as the unstable genotypes. Nonparametric measures of stability based on corrected forage yield showed highly significant positive correlation among these measures. Most prominent relation was no significant positive or negative association of Si6 with corrected and uncorrected nonparametric measures. Ward’s method of clustering based on 21 nonparametric measures along with average forage yield, clustered the with higher to moderate yielding genotypes into group comprised of RD29276, AZAD, UPB1053, RD2552, BH1010 and KB1401 genotypes.
REFERENCES
- Adugna, W. and Labuschagne, M. (2003). Parametric and nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability in linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.).Euphytica.,129: 211-218.
- Asghar E. S., Sayyed H. S.,Hamid D., and Morteza K.(2008). Non-parametric measures of phenotypic stabilityin chickpea genotypes (Cicer arietinum L.).Euphytica, 162:221–229
- Akcura M., and Kaya Y. (2008).Nonparametric stability methods for interpreting genotype by environment interaction of bread wheat genotypes (Triticum aestivum L.),Genetics and Molecular Biology, 31(4): 906-913.
- Cravero V., Martin E., Anido F.L., and Cointry E. (2010). Stability through years in a non-balanced trial of globe artichoke varietal types, Sci Hort,126:73-77.
- Dadarwal, M., Gupta, P.C. and Kajala, I.S. (2018) Phenotypic stability studies in pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br.], Indian Journal of Agricultural Research , 52(3): 278-283.
- Dehghani H. (2008). Estimating yield stability by nonparametric stability analysis in maize (Zea mays L.), Plant Breed Seed Sci. 58:61-77.
- EbadiS,A., Sabaghpour S.H., Dehghani H.and Kamrani M. (2008). Nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability in chickpea genotypes (Cicer arietinum L.). Euphytica. 2:221-229.
- Huehn M. (1996). Non-parametric analysis of genotype x environment interactions by ranks. In: Kang M.S. and Gauch H.G. (eds) Genotype by Environment Interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 213-228.
- Huehn, M. and Leon, J.(1995). Non-parametric analysis of cultivar performance trials: Experimental results and comparison of different procedures based on ranks, Agron J 87: 627-632.
- Hussein M.A., Bjornstad A, and Aastveit A.H. (2000). SASG × ESTAB: A SAS program for computing genotype 3 environment stability statistics. Agron J. 92:454-459.
- Kharub A.S., Verma R. P. S. , KumarD., KumarV., Selvakumar R. and Sharma I. (2013). Dual purpose barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in India: Performance and potential. J. Wheat Res. 5 (1) : 55-58.
- Kaya Y. and Taner S. (2002). Estimating genotypes ranks by nonparametric stability analysis in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), J Cent Europ Agric 4:47-53.
- Ketata H., Yan S.K. and Nachit M.(1989).Relative consistency performance across environments. Int Symp on Physiology and Breeding of Winter Cereals for Stressed Mediterranean Environments. Montpellier, July 3-6.
- Lu H.S. (1995). PC-SAS Program for estimating Huhn’s nonparametric stability statistics, Agron J 87:888-891.
- Piepho H.P. and Lotito S.(1992). Rank correlation among parametric and nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability. Euphytica. 64: 221-225.
- Rahmatollah K., Mohtasham M., Naser S.and Mohammad K.S.(2012).Using Huehn’s Nonparametric Stability Statistics to Investigate Genotype × Environment Interaction. Not Bot Horti Agrobo, 40(1):293-301.
- Sabaghnia N., Karimizadeh R. and Mohammad M. (2012) The use of corrected and uncorrected nonparametric stability measurements in durum wheat multi-environmental trials. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. 10(3): 722-730.
- Sabaghnia N., Dehghani H. and Sabaghpour S.H. (2006). Nonparametric methods for interpreting genotype x environment interaction of lentil genotypes. Crop Sci. 46:1100-1106.
- Truberg B. and Huehn M.(2000). Contribution to the analysis of genotype by environment interactions: comparison of different parametric and non-parametric tests for interactions with emphasis on crossover interactions. J Agron Crop Sci. 185: 267-274.
- Ward, J.H. (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc 58:236–224.
- Yau, S. K., and Hamblin J.. (1994). Relative yield as a measure of entry performance in variable environments, Crop Sci. 34:813-817.
Disclaimer :
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Copyright :
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
In this Article
APC
APC cover the cost of turning a manuscript into a published manuscript through peer-review process, editorial work as well as the cost of hosting, distributing, indexing and promoting the manuscript.
Publish With US
Submit your manuscript through user friendly platform and acquire the maximum impact for your research by publishing with ARCC Journals.
Become a Reviewer/Member
Join our esteemed reviewers panel and become an editorial board member with international experts in the domain of numerous specializations.
Open Access
Filling the gap between research and communication ARCC provide Open Access of all journals which empower research community in all the ways which is accessible to all.
Products and Services
We provide prime quality of services to assist you select right product of your requirement.
Support and Policies
Finest policies are designed to ensure world class support to our authors, members and readers. Our efficient team provides best possible support for you.
Follow us
Published In
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research