Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

Research Article

volume 51 issue 5 (october 2017) : 483-487,   Doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-4715

Comparative yield gaps, economic impact and constraint analysis in front line demonstrations of  soybean and black soybean in Uttarakhand hills

A
Anuradha Bhartiya
N
N. Chandra
R
R.S. Pal
J
J.P. Aditya
J
Jyoti Bajeli
1ICAR-Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhan Sansthan, Almora-263 601, Uttarakhand, India
Cite article:- Bhartiya Anuradha, Chandra N., Pal R.S., Aditya J.P., Bajeli Jyoti (2017). Comparative yield gaps, economic impact and constraint analysis in front line demonstrations of soybean and black soybean in Uttarakhand hills. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 51(5): 483-487. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-4715.

ABSTRACT

Soybean and black soybean are important kharif crops which play a vital role in nutritional and livelihood security in Uttarakhand hills. Considering the scope of improvement in productivity through the improved varieties and recommended production technologies, front line demonstrations were conducted by ICAR-VPKAS, Almora during Kharif 2015 and 2016. The present study revealed that the average technology gap for black soybean (1.58 q/ha) was lower than soybean (7.87 q/ha) at farmer’s field which is suggesting the need to further develop better  performing varieties in black soybean than existing ones as the potential yield levels of improved varieties are easily achievable in given environment. The extension gap for black soybean (5.57 q/ha) and soybean (6.25 q/ha), exhibiting the potential of improving productivity by understanding the causes of yield gaps and abridging them with proper interventions. In terms of economic impact based on benefit cost ratio in front line demonstrations, the cultivation of black soybean (1.0) was found more profitable than soybean (0.94) besides, better feasibility of improved technological interventions in black soybean at farmer’s field revealed by lower technology index of black soybean (12.72%) than soybean (39.10%). An insight on  various constraints  causing yield gaps and potential interventions to mitigate them have also been discussed.

REFERENCES

  1. Agarwal D.K., Billore S.D., Sharma A.N., Dupare B.U. and Srivastava S.K. (2013) Soybean: introduction, improvement and utilization in India-problems and prospects. Agricultural Research 2(4): 293-300.
  2. Anonymous (2015) Vision-2050 document ICAR-Directorate of Soybean Research (DSR), Indore. 33p.
  3. Balai C.M., Jalwania R., Verma L.N., Bairwa R.K. and Regar P.C. (2013) Economic impact of front line demonstrations on vegetables in tribal belt of Rajasthan. Curr. Agri. Res. 1(2): 69-77.
  4. Bhartiya A. and Aditya J.P. (2016) Genetic variability, character association and path analysis for yield and component traits in black seeded soybean lines under rainfed condition of Uttarakhand hills of India. Legume Res. 39(1): 31-34.
  5. Bhartiya A., Aditya J.P., Kumar R.A., Pal R.S., Stanley J. and Singh S. (2015) Black Soybean-A treasure of nutrition and health benefits in Uttarakhand hills. Indian Farming. 65(8):28-30.
  6. Bhatia V.S., Singh P., Wani S.P., Kesava Rao A.V.R. and Srinivas K. (2006) Yield Gap Analysis of soybean, groundnut, pigeon pea and chickpea in India using simulation modeling. Global Theme on Agroecosystems Report. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT). 156 pp. 
  7. Choudhary B.N. (1999) Krishi Vigyan Kendra- A guide for KVK managers. Division of Agricultural Extension, ICAR. 73-78 pp.
  8. Directorate of Economics and Statistics (2014-15) Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare, Govt. of India, http:/    /eands.dacnet.nic.in/APY_96_To_06.htm.
  9. Hiremath, S.M. and Nagaraju, M.V.(2009) Evaluation of front line demonstration trials on onion in Haveri district of Karnataka. Kar. J. Agril. Sci. 22(5):1092-1093.
  10. Joshi N.S., Bariya M.K. and Kunjadia B.B. (2014) Yield gap analysis through front line demonstration in wheat crop. Int. J. Scientific and Res. Publications 4(9):1-3.
  11. Samui S.K., Maitra S., Roy D.K., Mandal A.K. and Saha D. (2000) Evaluation of front line demonstration on groundnut. J . Indian Soc .Coastal Agric. Res. 18: 180-183.
  12. Shah N.C. (2006) Black soybean: An ignored nutritious and medicinal food crop from the Kumaon region of India. Asian Agri-History 10: 33–42.
  13. Stuart A.M., Pamea A.R.P., Silva J.V., Dikitanana R.C., Rutsaerta P., Malabayabasa A.J.B., Lampayana R.M., Radanielsona A.M. and Singletona G.R. (2016) Yield gaps in rice-based farming systems: Insights from local studies and prospects for future analysis. Field Crops Research 194:43–56.
  14. Venkattakumar R., Ramana Rao S.V., Padmaiah M. and Madhuri P. (2010) Production constraints and information needs of growers in Andhra Pradesh. Indian J.Dry land Agril Res. and Dev. 25 (1): 117-121. 
Published In
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Research Article

    volume 51 issue 5 (october 2017) : 483-487,   Doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-4715

    Comparative yield gaps, economic impact and constraint analysis in front line demonstrations of  soybean and black soybean in Uttarakhand hills

    A
    Anuradha Bhartiya
    N
    N. Chandra
    R
    R.S. Pal
    J
    J.P. Aditya
    J
    Jyoti Bajeli
    1ICAR-Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhan Sansthan, Almora-263 601, Uttarakhand, India
    Cite article:- Bhartiya Anuradha, Chandra N., Pal R.S., Aditya J.P., Bajeli Jyoti (2017). Comparative yield gaps, economic impact and constraint analysis in front line demonstrations of soybean and black soybean in Uttarakhand hills. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 51(5): 483-487. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-4715.

    ABSTRACT

    Soybean and black soybean are important kharif crops which play a vital role in nutritional and livelihood security in Uttarakhand hills. Considering the scope of improvement in productivity through the improved varieties and recommended production technologies, front line demonstrations were conducted by ICAR-VPKAS, Almora during Kharif 2015 and 2016. The present study revealed that the average technology gap for black soybean (1.58 q/ha) was lower than soybean (7.87 q/ha) at farmer’s field which is suggesting the need to further develop better  performing varieties in black soybean than existing ones as the potential yield levels of improved varieties are easily achievable in given environment. The extension gap for black soybean (5.57 q/ha) and soybean (6.25 q/ha), exhibiting the potential of improving productivity by understanding the causes of yield gaps and abridging them with proper interventions. In terms of economic impact based on benefit cost ratio in front line demonstrations, the cultivation of black soybean (1.0) was found more profitable than soybean (0.94) besides, better feasibility of improved technological interventions in black soybean at farmer’s field revealed by lower technology index of black soybean (12.72%) than soybean (39.10%). An insight on  various constraints  causing yield gaps and potential interventions to mitigate them have also been discussed.

    REFERENCES

    1. Agarwal D.K., Billore S.D., Sharma A.N., Dupare B.U. and Srivastava S.K. (2013) Soybean: introduction, improvement and utilization in India-problems and prospects. Agricultural Research 2(4): 293-300.
    2. Anonymous (2015) Vision-2050 document ICAR-Directorate of Soybean Research (DSR), Indore. 33p.
    3. Balai C.M., Jalwania R., Verma L.N., Bairwa R.K. and Regar P.C. (2013) Economic impact of front line demonstrations on vegetables in tribal belt of Rajasthan. Curr. Agri. Res. 1(2): 69-77.
    4. Bhartiya A. and Aditya J.P. (2016) Genetic variability, character association and path analysis for yield and component traits in black seeded soybean lines under rainfed condition of Uttarakhand hills of India. Legume Res. 39(1): 31-34.
    5. Bhartiya A., Aditya J.P., Kumar R.A., Pal R.S., Stanley J. and Singh S. (2015) Black Soybean-A treasure of nutrition and health benefits in Uttarakhand hills. Indian Farming. 65(8):28-30.
    6. Bhatia V.S., Singh P., Wani S.P., Kesava Rao A.V.R. and Srinivas K. (2006) Yield Gap Analysis of soybean, groundnut, pigeon pea and chickpea in India using simulation modeling. Global Theme on Agroecosystems Report. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT). 156 pp. 
    7. Choudhary B.N. (1999) Krishi Vigyan Kendra- A guide for KVK managers. Division of Agricultural Extension, ICAR. 73-78 pp.
    8. Directorate of Economics and Statistics (2014-15) Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare, Govt. of India, http:/    /eands.dacnet.nic.in/APY_96_To_06.htm.
    9. Hiremath, S.M. and Nagaraju, M.V.(2009) Evaluation of front line demonstration trials on onion in Haveri district of Karnataka. Kar. J. Agril. Sci. 22(5):1092-1093.
    10. Joshi N.S., Bariya M.K. and Kunjadia B.B. (2014) Yield gap analysis through front line demonstration in wheat crop. Int. J. Scientific and Res. Publications 4(9):1-3.
    11. Samui S.K., Maitra S., Roy D.K., Mandal A.K. and Saha D. (2000) Evaluation of front line demonstration on groundnut. J . Indian Soc .Coastal Agric. Res. 18: 180-183.
    12. Shah N.C. (2006) Black soybean: An ignored nutritious and medicinal food crop from the Kumaon region of India. Asian Agri-History 10: 33–42.
    13. Stuart A.M., Pamea A.R.P., Silva J.V., Dikitanana R.C., Rutsaerta P., Malabayabasa A.J.B., Lampayana R.M., Radanielsona A.M. and Singletona G.R. (2016) Yield gaps in rice-based farming systems: Insights from local studies and prospects for future analysis. Field Crops Research 194:43–56.
    14. Venkattakumar R., Ramana Rao S.V., Padmaiah M. and Madhuri P. (2010) Production constraints and information needs of growers in Andhra Pradesh. Indian J.Dry land Agril Res. and Dev. 25 (1): 117-121. 
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)