Analysis of variance
Knowledge of genetic diversity in germplasm is essential for active germplasm collection, conservation, utilization and strategies in and crop improvement programs
(Alghamdi et al., 2014). In the current investigation, analysis of variance showed statistically significant difference among the genotypes for all traits under study
viz., days to first flowering, days to 50% flowering, days to maturity, plant height, number of primary branches plant
-1, number of pods peduncle
-1, number of pods plant
-1, number of seeds plant
-1, number of seeds pod
-1, 100-seed weight and seed yield plant
-1 (Table 2) indicating the existence of genetic diversity in the genotypes. Hence, selection could better be employed considering these traits in practical lentil breeding program and the broadening of genetic base (Gupta and Sharma, 2006). This results were in consistent with
Gautam et al., (2013) and
Roy et al., (2013).
Trait wise mean performance of the genotypes
The mean performances of the lentil genotypes for different yield and yield attributing traits are presented in Table 3. The genotypes displayed considerable amount of difference in their mean value and this indicating the presence of variability among the genotypes for the characters studied (Table 3). Considering the traits days to first flowering, days to fifty percent flowering and days to maturity, the genotype BD-5983 was earliest followed by the genotype BD-3975, BD-3808 and BD-3810 reflected that this material could be used to develop early maturing variety, which is the vital need for lentil improvement program in Bangladesh context
(Roy et al., 2013). Maximum plant height (39.94 cm) was observed in genotype BD-3995 which was followed by BD-4095 (39.89 cm) while minimum (28.27 cm) was found in genotype BARI Masur-6. The maximum number of primary branches plant
-1, number of pods plant
-1, Number of pods peduncle
-1 and number of seeds plant
-1 was observed in the genotypes namely BD-3806, BD-3804, BD-3810, BD-3986 and BD-4090, and BARI Masur-7. Seed yield was dependent on number of seeds per pod in lentil genotyeps (Sinha and Chowdhury, 1991; Rajput and Sarwar, 1989). The highest 100-seed weight was recorded in BARI Masur-6 where the minimum value of 100-seed weight was found in the genotype BD-3986. Our results were in consistent with Rahman and Ali (2004) who observed wide range of variability in existing lentil cultivars in case of 100-seed weight. The maximum seed yield plant
-1 was recorded in genotype BARI Masur-7 followed by genotype BARI Masur-6, BD-3806, BD-4090, BD-4028, BD-3804 and BD-3995 whereas BD-3986 had the lowest seed yield plant
-1. Considering all the traits, BARI Masur-6, BARI Masur-7 followed by genotypes BD-3806 and BD-4090 were the best performer considering yield and yield attributing traits. So, there is a great scope of genetic improvement of traits studied in the selected best genotypes. Similar result was observed by
Ahamed et al., (2014) and
Singh et al., (2014) among the lentil genotypes.
Clustering of the genotypes considering morpho-physiological traits
Cluster analysis is one of the most powerful tool for estimating the extent of genetic diversity which have a practical use in plant breeding
(Sultana et al., 2006). Using Euclidean distance following Ward’s method, 20 lentil genotypes were grouped into three separate clusters (Fig 1). The largest cluster III consist of maximum number of genotypes
viz., BARI Masur-6, BD-3806, BD-4028, BD-4090, BD-4095, BD-5983, BARI Masur-7, BD-3986 and BD-4088. This genotypes contained maximum value mean value for different traits such as number of pods peduncle
-1, number of pods plant
-1, number of seeds plant
-1, 100-seed weight, and seed yield plant
-1 (Table 4) which indicates that this genotypes could get the major priority for the yield improvement. Earlier
Gautam et al., (2014) observed moderate to high yield donating traits in cluster III and II in the lentil genoypes. The members of cluster I were BD-3810, BD-3945, BD-3948, BD-3985 and BD-4134, the members of cluster II were BD-3804, BD-3808, BD-3975, BD-3995, BD-5958 and BD-5959. All the short duration genotypes were grouped into cluster II whereas cluster I included long duration genotypes indicating maximum contribution of this character towards the divergence between cluster II and I.
Gautam et al., (2014) also reported early maturing genotypes in cluster II and late maturing genotypes in cluster III. The genotypes which are grouped into the same cluster probably disperse very little from one to another
(Roy et al., 2013). Many researchers exploited that cluster analysis could be a powerful tool to screen a large number of germplasms on the basis of similarity
(Chunthaburee et al., 2016; Siddiqui et al., 2017).
@figure1
Diversity analysis through SSR primers
Genetic similarity analysis using UPGMA
UPGMA dendrogram revealed the 20 genotypes were categorized into four major clusters considering their similarity (Fig 2) which somewhat failed to match the earlier dendrogram (Fig 1) based on the data for yield traits. BD-3948 and BD-5983 genotypes of cluster I showed low yield and late maturity in mean performance where cluster II genotypes BD-3995, BD-4088, BD-4090 and BARI masur-6 were moderate yielding in mean performance. Maximum genotypes of cluster III
viz., BD-3806, BD-3975, BD-3985, BD-3986, BD-4028, BD-4134, BD-4095 and BARI- masur-7 were the best performer and they were moderate to high yielding and early maturity in mean performance. The genotypes
viz., BD-3804, BD-3808, BD-3810, BD-3945, BD-5958 and BD-5959 of cluster IV were also reported as moderate yielding variety. Genetic distance of the genotypes of cluster I and II was higher whereas genetic distance of the genotypes between cluster III and IV was lower. Previous research work of
Singh et al., (2016) showed the genetic distance of the cluster ranged from fifty to seventy percent with an average of fifty four percent. Genotypic variations based on molecular characterization indicated that genotypes fit in different clusters due to their genetic components itself. Therefore, it will be used for further lentil breeding program, especially for hybridization and genotype that selected from different clusters will provide maximum heterosis as favors yield.
@figure2
Overall allelic diversity and polymorphic information content (PIC) value
The seven SSR primer sets were employed in the present study, among this four SSR primer sets were polymorphic and produced varying number of alleles with different size. Among the 20 lentil genotypes, entirely 33 alleles were identified with an average of 8.25 alleles per locus. The maximum number of alleles per locus produced in SSR 19 (10) whereas minimum number of alleles per locus was displayed by SSR 90 (7) (Table 5). The similar result was recorded by
Kushwaha et al., (2015) who observed the minimum SSR loci in SSR 130 and maximum in SSR 191 markers. Major allele frequency was highest in SSR 90 and lowest frequency was found in two marker namely, SSR 19 and SSR 33.
Yadav et al., (2016) also found maximum allelic frequency in SSR 99, SSR 113 and SSR 124 and lowest in SSR 90.
Polymorphism information content (PIC) value is a reflection of allele diversity and frequency among the genotypes. PIC value of each marker can be evaluated on the basis of its alleles and it varied greatly for all the tested SSR loci. In the present investigation, the highest genetic diversity was observed in primer SSR 19 whereas SSR 90 showed the lowest genetic diversity among all the markers for different yield attributing traits (Table 5).
Singh et al., (2016) also conducted an experiment and he reported maximum genetic diversity and polymorphism information content values in primer PBA_LC_1288 and the lowest value was found in PBA_LC_1423 with mean values, respectively. These result revealed that markers SSR 19 could be best in screening 20 lentil genotypes for yield and yield attributing traits followed by marker SSR 213, SSR 33 and SSR 90. Previously many other researchers,
Rao et al., (2007), Datta et al., (2010), Datta and Lal (2011) and
Ruwali et al., (2013) recommended that SSR markers can be successfully used in the identification of suitable genotypes.