Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 50 issue 6 (december 2016) : 594-598

Disaster preparedness in Himalayan region: Flood disaster victim perspective

H.R. Meena*, B.S. Meena, Gopal Sankhala
1<p>Division of Dairy Extension,&nbsp;ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal-132 001, India.</p>
Cite article:- Meena* H.R., Meena B.S., Sankhala Gopal (2016). Disaster preparedness in Himalayan region: Flood disaster victim perspective . Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 50(6): 594-598. doi: 10.18805/ijare.v0iOF.3760.

The objective of this study is to understand the dairy farmers’ perception and preparedness for flood disaster, perceived losses due to disaster and their adaptation measures. This study is based on both secondary and primary data collected through a survey of 400 dairy farming households from the Chamoli and Rudraprayag district of Himalayan region of Uttarakhand. The results of the study revealed that majority (61.50%) respondents were 36-50 years of age and among them 59 percent were female. The workforce mainly engaged in crop cultivation and animal husbandry, average land holding and livestock per house hold was just 0.46 acres and 5 animals respectively.  About 78.6% farmers’ perceived flood as a natural phenomenon, while 21.4% perceived it an unnatural and man-made tragedy. Around (59%) respondents reported that they participated in the village disaster management planning process and 87 percent perceived that state government is prepared for disaster management any time. Very few (15%) respondents received literature about disaster preparedness from developmental agencies. About hundred percent of respondents agreed that flood caused unemployment (50.8%SA & 49.2 %A) in study area whereas, 55 per cent of respondents strongly believed that flood reduced the household income. About 91% of farmers preferred to stored crop residual and forage from forest area to fulfill the fodder demand during the anticipated flood. Majority (89%) of the respondents watching television, listing radio and reading newspaper for flood management practices.  Also to mitigate disaster, the government provided various mitigation measures, but the level of satisfaction amongst farmers is low.


  1. Adger, W. N., Brooks, N., Bentham G., Agnew M. and Eriksen S. (2004). New indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity, Technical Report 7, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

  2. Arkin, H. Colton R. (1963). Tables for Statisticians. Barnes & Noble; New York.

  3. Ashraf, M. and Routray, J. K. (2013). Perception and understanding of drought and coping strategies of farming households in north-west Balochistan. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 5:49–60.

  4. Douglas, I., Alam K., Maghenda M., Mcdonnell Y. and Mclean, L. (2008). Unjust Waters: Climate change, flooding and the urban poor in Africa. Journal of Environment and Urbanisation 20: 187-205.

  5. Few, R. (2003). Flooding, vulnerability and coping strategies: Local responses to a global threats. Prog Dev Stud 3: 43-58.

  6. Habiba, U., Shaw, R. and Takeuchi Y. (2012). Farmers perception and adaptation practices to cope with drought: perspectives from Northwestern Bangladesh. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 1:72–84.

  7. Keshavarz, M., Karami, E. and Vanclay, F. (2013). The social experience of drought in rural Iran. Land Use Policy. 30:120–9.

  8. Manandhar, S., Vogt, D. S., Perret, S.R. and Kazama, F. (2011). Adapting cropping systems to climate change in Nepal: across-regional study of farmers’ perception and practices. Reg Environ Change 11: 335–48.

  9. Ologunorisa, T.E. and Adeyemo, A., (2005). Public perception of flooding hazard in Niger Delta, Nigeria. The Environmentalist 25: 39-45. 

  10. Statistics Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Designing household survey samples: practical guidelines. United Nations. Studies in methods series F No. 98; 2005.

  11. UNISDR, (2005). Hyogo framework for action 2005-2015: Building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters. 

  12. Van Aalst, M., Nyong, T., Osman-Elasha B. and Rwabizambuga , A. (2012). Assessing (and addressing) risk in a changing climate, Red Cross Red Crescent Climate Centre and African Development Bank.

  13. Rawat, V. S. and Chandra, J. (2015). Women’s role in management and utilization of forest resource in hills of Rawain valley of Uttarakhand. International Journal of Bioassays 4.11:4476-4478

  14. Negi, V.S. and Rawat, L.S. (2010). Work participation and Role of Gender in Village Ecosystem, Central Himalaya, India. Environ. We Int. J. Sci. Tech. 5: 137-146

     

Editorial Board

View all (0)