Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorT. Mohapatra

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 50 issue 6 (december 2016) : 520-527

Relationship of flowering pattern and pollen sterility on productivity of chickpea genotypes under temperature regimes 

B.A. Kiran*, M. Venkatesh Dore, B.R. Megha
1<p>Department of Crop Physiology,&nbsp;University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad-580 005, Karnataka, India.</p>
Cite article:- Kiran* B.A., Dore Venkatesh M., Megha B.R. (2016). Relationship of flowering pattern and pollen sterility on productivityof chickpea genotypes under temperature regimes . Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 50(6): 520-527. doi: 10.18805/ijare.v50i6.6669.

Three chickpea genotypes (Annigeri-1, JG-11 and JG-14), with five dates of sowings (40th to 48th standard meteorological week (SMW) with an interval of two weeks) were evaluated in field to study the effect of temperature regimes on pollen sterility per cent (%), phenological characters and productivity. Pollen sterility per cent increased significantly from D1 to D3 dates of sowing and then decreased towards D5 date of sowing. JG-14 and JG-11 recorded less pollen sterility as compared to Annigeri-1 at all the dates of sowing. When the low temperature around 9.7 oC to 11.0 oC the pollen sterility per cent was increased (44 to 62 %). The third date of sowing was showed significantly greater duration of flowering (25, 32 and 32 days), total number of flowers (225, 195 and 97) produced with respect to the genotypes (Annigeri-1, JG-11 and JG-14) and longer cool season during flowering produced average number of flowers per day per plant (9.00, 6.09 and 3.03), with optimum flowers to pod ratio (3.42, 2.60 and 1.39). Accumulation of more heat units measure (GDD, 1735) untill physiological maturity helps to get a higher yield (28.52 q per hectare) with a test weight of 19.6 g and more number of pods and seeds per plant.


  1. Ahmed, F., Islam, M. N., Jahan, M. A., Rahman, M. T. and Ali, M. Z. (2011). Phenology, growth and yield of chickpea as influenced by weather variables under different sowing dates. J. Exptl. Biol., 2 : 83-88. 

  2. Alexander, M. P. (1969). Differential staining of aborted and non-aborted pollen. Biotechnic and Histochem., 44 :117-122.

  3. Anonymous. (2012). Area, production and yield of principle crops. Agriculture Statistics at Glance.

  4. Basu, P. S., Ali, M. and Chaturvedi, S. K. (2011). Terminal heat stress adversely affects chickpea productivity in northern India: Strategies to improve thermo tolerance in the crop under climate change. Impact of Climate Change on Agriculture, ISPRS Archives XXXVIII-8/W3 Workshop Proc., pp. 189-193.

  5. Clarke, H. and Siddique, K. H. M. (1998). “Growth and Development” in The Chickpea Book (eds. S. Loss, N. Brandon & K.H.M. Siddique), Agriculture Western Australia, Bulletin 1326.

  6. Devasirvatham, V. (2012). The basis of chickpea heat tolerance under semi-arid environments. M. Sc. (Agri.) (Hons.) University of Western Sydney.

  7. Devasirvatham, V., Tan, D. K. Y., Gaur, P. M., Mallikarjuna, N. and Trethowan, R. M. (2010). Impact of high temperature on the reproductive stage of chickpea.In Food Security from Sustainable Agriculture’. Proceeding of the 15th Australian Society of Agronomy Conference, 15-18 November 2010, Lincoln, New Zealand. Experimental Station, p. 33.

  8. Kakani, V. G., Prasad, P. V. V., Craufurd, P. Q. and Wheeler, T. R. (2002). Response of in vitro pollen germination and pollen tube growth of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes to temperature. Plant Cell and Environ., 25 : 1651-1661.

  9. Monteith, J. C. (1984). Consistency and Convenience in the choice of units for Agriculture. Experimental Agriculture, 20: 115-117. 

  10. Neeraj, K., Nandwal, A. S., Yadav, R., Bhasker, P., Kumar, S., Devi, S., Singh, S. and Lather, V. S. (2012). Assessment of chickpea genotypes for high temperature tolerance. Indian J. Plant Physiol., 17 : 225-232.

  11. Prasad, P. V. V., Craufurd, P. Q., Kakani, V. G., Wheeler, T. R. and Boote, K. J. (2001). Influence of high temperature during pre and post-anthesis stages of floral development on fruit set and pollen germination in peanut. Functional Plant Biology, 28 : 233-240.

  12. Sanjeev K., Harsha Nayyer., Bhanwar, R. K. and Upadyaya, H. D. (2010). Chilling stress effects on reproductive biology of chickpea. J. SAT Agriculture Res., 8 : 1-14.

  13. Savithri, K. S., Ganapathy, P. S. and Sinha, S. K. (1980). Sensitivity to low temperature in pollen germination and fruit-set in Cicer arietinum L. Journal of Experimental Botany 31: 475-481.

  14. Saxena, N. P. (1984). Chickpea. In: Goldsworthy, P. R. and Fisher, N. M. (Eds.). The Physiology of Tropical Field Crops. Wiley, New York, USA. p. 419-452.

  15. Srinivasan, A., Johnsen, C. and Saxena, N. P. (1998). Cold tolerant during early reproductive growth of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): characterization of stress and genetic variation in pod set. Field Crops Res., 57 : 181-193.

  16. Summerfield, R. J., Hadley, P., Roberts, E. H., Minchin, F. R. and Rawsthorne, S. (1984). Sensitivities of chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) to hot temperatures during the reproductive period. Experimental Agriculture, 20 : 77-93.

  17. Wang, J., Gan, Y. T. F., Clarke. and Mc Donald, C. L. (2006). Response of chickpea yield to high temperature stress during reproductive development.Crop Sci., 46 : 2171-2178. 

     

Editorial Board

View all (0)