Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 50 issue 6 (december 2016) : 542-548

Effect of mulching on soil environment, microbial flora and growth of potato under field conditions

P. Bhagat*, S.K. Gosal, C.B. Singh
1<p>Department of Microbiology and Department of Soil Science,&nbsp;Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141 004, Punjab, India.</p>
Cite article:- Bhagat* P., Gosal S.K., Singh C.B. (2016). Effect of mulching on soil environment, microbial floraand growth of potato under field conditions . Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 50(6): 542-548. doi: 10.18805/ijare.v50i6.6671.

Mulches modify hydrothermal regime, recycles plant nutrients, promote crop development and increase yields. The impact of straw mulch and different doses of recommended nitrogen was studied on soil microbial flora, soil physico-chemical properties and plant growth parameters of potato at different time intervals under field conditions. Maximum bacterial population (75× 107 cfu g-1 soil), plant growth promoting rhizobacteria count (63× 105 cfu g-1 soil) and fungal population (69× 103 cfu g-1 soil) were observed with the treatment having rice straw mulch @ 6 tonnes/ha and 100% N-level while diazotrophic count (42× 105 cfu g-1 soil) was found with treatment having mulch (6t) but no nitrogen fertilizer at 30 DAS. Mulched soil samples gave statistically higher microbial population. The soil pH and the electrical conductivity of soil were not significantly affected by the different applications. A slight improvement in soil organic content was observed in mulched (0.32%) over unmulched (0.24%) soil samples at 90 DAS. The mineral nitrogen content of soil i.e. ammonical (235.2 kg/ha) and nitrate (156.8 k/ha) nitrogen were greatly affected at 90 DAS by mulching and higher doses of nitrogen fertilization. The altered microbial population helps in improving the various growth parameters of potato plants. Maximum chlorophyll content (1.84 mg/g), maximum dry root-shoot biomass (0.7 g/pl and 5.8 g/pl) and maximum yield (366.8 q/ha) were observed with the treatment having mulch and 100% N-level. It is also concluded that mulch increased the minimum soil temperature by 2-30C and lower down the maximum by 2 to 80C.


  1. Aguero M V, Ponce A G, Moreira M R and Roura S I. (2008). Plastic mulch improves microbial quality and shelf life of cold stored Butter Lettuce (Lactuca sativa var. Lores). Fresh Produce 2: 6-13.

  2. Alam M N, Jahan M S, Ali M K, Ashraf M A and Islam M K. (2007). Effect of vermicompost and chemical fertilizers on growth, yield and yield components of potato in Barind soils of Bangladesh. Journal of Applied Sciences Research 3: 1879-88. 

  3. Anderson J M and Bardman M K. (1964). Studies on greening of dark brown bean plants. II. Development of Photochemical activity. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 17: 93-101.

  4. Ashworth S and Harrison H. (1983). Evaluation of mulches for use in the home garden. HortSciences 18: 180-82.

  5. Barea J M, Pozo M , Azcon R and Azcon-Aguilar C. (2005). Microbial cooperation in the rhizosphere. Journal of Experimental Botany 56: 1761-78. 

  6. Benbi D K and Brar J S. (2009). A 25-year record of carbon sequestration and soil properties in intensive agriculture. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 29: 257–265.

  7. Carrera L M, Buyer J S, Vinyard B, Abdul-Baki A A, Sikora L J and Teasdale J R. (2007). Effects of cover crops, compost, and manure amendments on soil microbial community structure in tomato production systems. Applied soil ecology 37: 247-55.

  8. Carter J and C Johnson. (1988). Influence of different types of mulches on egg plant production. HortSciences 23: 143-45.

  9. Csaba V, Fekete I, Piskolczi M, Dorka D and Helmeczi. (2007). The effect of different mulching materials on quantitative changes of microbes in the soil of an integrated apple plantation. Seventh International Multidisciplinary Conference, May 17-18, pp 725-30. Baia Mare, Romania.

  10. De la Morena I, Guillen A and Garcia del Morel L F. (1994). Yield development in potatoes as influenced by cultivar and the timing and level of nitrogen fertilizer. American Journal of Potato Reasearch 71: 165-73.

  11. Gangawar S K, Sinha P S, Singh B D, Ramnagina, Jayaswal J and Griya Ghey U P. (2000). Maximization of leaf yield of mulberry Morus alba (L.) and economic return per unit area of land from sericulture through mulching. Sericologia 40: 491-97.

  12. Gao Y, Li Y, Zhang J, Liu W, Dang Z Cao W and Qiang Q. (2009). Effects of mulch, N fertilizer and plant density on wheat nitrogen uptake and residual soil nitrate in a dryland area of China. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 85: 109-21.

  13. Geiger S C, Manu A and Bationo A. (1992). Changes in a sandy sahelian soil following crop residue and fertilizer additions. Soil Science Society of American Journal J 56: 172-77.

  14. Hu W, Duan S and Sui Q. (1995). High yield technology for groundnut. International Arachis Newsletter 15:1-22 (Supple).

  15. Insam H, Mitchell C C and Dormaar J F. (1991). Relationship of soil microbial biomass and activity with fertilization practices and crop yield of three Ultisols. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 23: 459-64.

  16. Jacks C V, Brind W D and Smith R. (1955). Mulching Technology. Comm., No. 49, Common Wealth. Bulletin of Soil Science, pp 118.

  17. Jackson M L. (1958). Soil Chemical Analysis.Prenlice Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi. Pp 1-498.

  18. Kandeler E and Eder G. 1993. Effect of cattle slurry in grassland on microbial biomass and on activities of various enzymes. Biology and Fertility of Soils 16: 249-54.

  19. Kennedy A C and K L Smith. (1995). Soil microbial diversity and the sustainability of agricultural soils. Plant and Soil 170: 75-86.

  20. Lalitha M, Thilagam V K, Balakrishnan N and Mansour M. (2010). Effect of plastic mulch on soil properties and crop growth- A Review. Agricultural Review 31: 145-49.

  21. Liu J, Xu S A, Zhou G Y and Lu H H. (2002). Effects of transplanting multi-cropping spring maize with plastic film mulching on the ecological effect, plant growth and grain yield. Journal of Hubei Agricultural College 2: s100–02.

  22. Lynch D R and Rowberry R G. (1997). Population density studies with Russet Burbank potatoes. II. The effect of fertilization and plant density on growth, development, and yield. American Journal of Potato Reasearch 54: 57-71.

  23. Lynch D R and Tai G C. (1989). Yield and yield component response of eight potato genotypes to water stress. Crop Science 29: 1207-11.

  24. Millard P and Marshall B. (1986). Growth, nitrogen uptake and partitioning within the potato crop (Solanum tuberosum L.) in relation to nitrogen application. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 107: 421-29.

  25. Mukherjee D, Mitra S and Das A C. (1991). Effect of organic matter cakes on changes in carbon, nitrogen and microbial population in soil. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 39: 121-26.

  26. Neill C, Piccolo M C, Cerri C C, Steudler P A, Melillo J M and Brito M. (1997). Net nitrogen mineraization and net nitrification rates in soils following deforestation for pasture across the southwestern Brazilian Amazon Basin landscape. Oecologia 110: 242-52.

  27. Newton J W, Wilson P W and Burris R H. (1953). Direct determination of ammonia as an intermediate in nitrogen fixation by Azotobacter. Journal of Biological Chemistry 204: 445-5 1.

  28. Persello-Cartieaux F, Nussaume L and Robaglia C. (2003). Tales from the underground: molecular plant–rhizobacteria interactions. Plant Cell and Environment 26: 189–99.

  29. Persson J and Kirchmann H. (1994). Carbon and nitrogen in arable soils affected by supply of N fertilizers and organic manures. Agriculture, Ecosystem & Environment 51: 249-55.

  30. Ponce A G, Aguero M V, Rowa S I, Del Valle C E and Moreira M R. (2008). Dynamics of indigenous microbial populations of Butter Head Lettuce Grown in Mulch and on Bare. Food Science Research Journal 73: 257-63.

  31. Powlson D S and Jenkinson D S. (1981). A comparison of the organic matter, biomass, adenosine triphosphate and mineralizable nitrogen contents of ploughed and direct drilled soils. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 97: 713-21.

  32. Richard L A. (1954). Diagnosis and improvement of Saline and Alkaline Soils. United States salinity laboratory Staff. In: Agriculture Hand Book No. 60 United States Deparment of Agriculture, pp 160.

  33. Sainju U M, Singh B P and Whitehead W F. (2001). Comparison of the effects of cover crops and nitrogen fertilization on tomato yield, root growth and soil properties. Science Horticulturae-Asterdam 91: 201–14.

  34. Schnürer J, Larholm J, and Rosswall T. (1985). Microbial biomass and activity in an agricultural soil with different organic matter contents. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 17: 611-18.

  35. Shashidhar K R, Bhaskar R N, Priyadharshini P and Chandrakumar H L. (2009). Effect of different organic mulches on pH, organic carbon content and microbial status of soil and its influence on leaf yield of M5 mulberry (Morus indica L.) under rainfed condition. Current Biotica 2: 405-12.

  36. Shiri-e-Janagard M, Tobeh A, Abbasi A, Jamaati-e-Somarin S and Hokmalipour S. (2009). Vegetative growth of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars, under the effects of different levels of nitrogen fertilizer. Research Journal of Biological Sciences 4: 807-14.

  37. Sidhu B S and Beri V. (2008). Rice residue Management: Farmer’s Perspective. Indian Journal of Air Pollution Control 8: 61-67.

  38. Singh G, Jalota S K and Sidhu B S. (2005). Soil physical and hydraulic properties in a rice-wheat cropping system in India: effects of rice-straw management. Soil Use Manage (in press).

  39. Tiquia S M, J H C Wan and Tam N F Y. (2002). Microbial population dynamics and enzyme activities during composting. Compost Science & Utilisation 10: 150-61.

  40. Tolk J A, Howell T A and Evett S R. (1999). Effect of mulch, irrigation and soil type on water use and yield of maize. Soil and Tillage Research 50: 137-47.

  41. Walkley A and Black’s C A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determination of soil organic matter and proposed modification of chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37: 29-38.

  42. Wright, Hedley D. (1933). The importance of adequate reduction of peptone in the preparation of mediafor the pneumococcus and other organisms. Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology 37: 257-82.

  43. Workneh F and van Bruggen A H C. (1994). Microbial density, composition, and diversity in organically and conventionally managed rhizosphere soil in relation to suppression of corky root of tomatoes. Applied Soil Ecology 1: 219-30.

  44. Wu J, Donnell A C and Syers J K. (1993). Microbial growth and sulphur immobilization following the incorporation of plant residues into soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 25: 1567-73.

  45. Yaun C P, Lei T W, Mao L L, Liu H and Wu Y. (2009). Soil surface evaporation processes uder mulches of different sized gravel. Catena 78: 117-21.

  46. Zahir Z A, Arshad M, Frankenberger W T. (2004). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: applications and perspectives in agriculture. Advances in Agronomy 81: 97-168.

     

Editorial Board

View all (0)