Effect of crop geometry and drip irrigation levels on sugarcane in South Saurashtra region of India

DOI: 10.18805/ijare.v0iOF.9360    | Article Id: A-4512 | Page : 366-369
Citation :- Effect of crop geometry and drip irrigation levels on sugarcanein South Saurashtra region of India .Indian Journal of Agricultural Research.2016.(50):366-369

P.D. Kumawat*, D.J. Kacha1 and N.U. Dahima

Address :

Main Sugarcane Research Station, Junagadh Agricultural University, Kodinar– 362 725, Gujarat, India.

Submitted Date : 14-10-2015
Accepted Date : 31-12-2015


An experiment was conducted to study the effect of crop geometry and irrigation levels on sugarcane under drip irrigation at Main Sugarcane Research Station, Junagadh Agricultural University, Kodinar during 2011-14. The treatment consisted of three crop geometry (90 cm normal planting, paired row planting (60: 90 cm) and paired row planting (60: 120 cm) and three drip irrigation levels (0.5 PEF, 0.7 PEF and 0.9 PEF) and with an extra treatment (control)  having surface irrigation (90 cm) at 1.0 IW/CPE ratio. Experimental results indicated that paired row (60:  90 cm) planting gave significantly higher cane yield (101.04 t/ha) over 60: 120 cm paired row planting (88.82 t/ha) and remained at par with 90 cm row spacing (97.34 t/ha). Drip irrigation level of 0.9 PEF gave significantly higher cane yield (108.63 t/ha) over 0.7 PEF (96.01 t/ha) and 0.5 PEF (82.56 t/ha). Juice quality parameters like brix, sucrose, purity and sugar recovery percent were not affected significantly due to either crop geometry or different drip irrigation levels. Significantly higher cane yield was recorded under drip irrigation (95.74 t/ha) compared to surface irrigation (76.86 t/ha). The total water use was not affected due to different crop geometries. Water use decreased constantly in 0.7 and 0.5 PEF compared to 0.9 PEF and accordingly WUE increased.


Cane yield Crop geometry Drip irrigation Sugarcane Water use efficiency.


  1. Anonymous. (2015). Sugar India Year Book. pp. 155.
  2. Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. Edn. 2. An International Rice Research Institute Book. Wiley-Inter-Science Publication, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  3. Gupta, R.; Yadav, R. L. and Prasad, S. R. (2004). Comparison of planting methods and irrigation techniques for water use efficiency, yield and juice quality of sugarcane in semi arid sub tropics of India. Indian J. Sugarcane Technol. 19: 1-6.
  4. More, S. M.; Bhoi, P. G. and Kadam, U. A. (2006). Studies on intercropping of suru sugarcane with different plant geometries under drip irrigation. J. Maharashtra Agril. Univ. 31: 69-73. 
  5. Ombase, K. C.; Ghadge, H. L. and Raundal, P. U. (2013). Effect of planting patterns and intercropping on growth and yield of suru sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) var. Co- 86032. J. Agric. Res. Technol. 38: 225-228.
  6. Rajanna, M. P. and Patil, V. C. (2003). Effect of fertigation on yield and quality of sugarcane. Indian Sugar. 52: 1007-1011. 
  7. Ramesh, P.; Kailasam, C. and Srinivasan, T. R. (1994). Performance of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) under surface drip, sub surface drip (Biwall) and furrow methods of irrigation. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 172: 237-241. 
  8. Singh, R. D.; Singh, P. N. and Abhay, K. (2006). Evaluation of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) genotypes under variable water regimes. Indian J. Crop Sci. 1: 142-145.
  9. Solomon, S. (2012). Cost effective and input efficient technologies for productivity enhancement in sugarcane. (In) 25th meeting of sugarcane research and development workers of A. P. held at Visakhapatnam on 20-21st July, 2012. pp: 1-10.
  10. Spencer, G. L. and Meade, G. P. (1955). Sugarcane Hand Book, John Wiley & Sons, London.
  11. Yadav, B. S.; Bhati, A. S.; Bhunia, S. R. and Chouhan, R. P. S. (2014). Effect of levels of irrigation and crop geometry on growth and yield of sugarcane under drip irrigation. Indian J. Sugarcane Technol. 29: 22-26.

Global Footprints