Indirect Selection of Tolerant Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Genotypes under Semi Arid Conditions Based on the Numerical Images Analysis Indices

DOI: 10.18805/IJARe.A-448    | Article Id: A-448 | Page : 151-156
Citation :- Indirect Selection of Tolerant Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Genotypes under Semi Arid Conditions Based on the Numerical Images Analysis Indices.Indian Journal Of Agricultural Research.2021.(55):151-156
Hocine Bendada, Ali Guendouz, Ramdane Benniou, Nasreddine Louahdi
Address : Department of Agronomy University of M’sila 28000 Algeria.
Submitted Date : 20-05-2019
Accepted Date : 26-12-2019


Image analysis systems have been increasingly utilized for the assessment of plant growth and health for decades. We used in this study the software Mesurim Pro to evaluate the variation of the leaf reflectance at Red, Green and Blue and the variation of the senescence parameters. The analysis of variance revealed that the reflectance at different wavelengths (Red, Blue and Green) was highly significant genotypes effects (P < 0.001); for this parameter the good genotypes are those we have the lowest values such as G19. In addition, the preferable genotypes were those which have low values for the mean senescence and senescence velocity; based on this raison the best genotype was the introduce genotype G12. The genotypes effect was significant for the grain yield and thousand-kernel weight, for the chlorophyll content and the analysis of variance showed a significant effect of genotypes, the highest values registered by the introduced genotype G5 this one was in the same homogenize group of G2, G4, G8 and G18. The ranking of genotypes based on all parameters suggested that the genotypes G11, G12, G5, G15 and G18, respectively (introduce genotypes) were the ideal genotypes under these conditions.      


Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Reflectance Senescence Selection Semi-arid


  1. Adamsen, F.J., Pinter Jr, P.J., Barnes, E.M., LaMorte, R.L., Wall , G.W., Leavitt, S.W. and Kimball, B.A. (1999). Measuring wheat senescence with a digital camera. Crop Science. 39 (3): 719-724.
  2. Aparicio, N., Villegas, D., Royo, C., Casadesus, J., Araus, J.L. (2004). Effect of sensor view angle on the assessment of agro-    nomic traits by ground level hyper-spectral reflectance measure-ments in durum wheat under contrasting Mediterranean conditions. Int. J. Remote Sens. 25: 1131-1152.
  3. Blackmer, T.M. and Schepers, J.S. (1995). Use of a chlorophyll meter to monitor nitrogen status and schedule fertigation for corn. Journal of Production Agriculture. 8: 56-60.
  4. Carter, G.A. and Knapp, A.K. (2001). Leaf optical properties in higher plants: linking spectral characteristics to stress and chlorophyll concentration. Am. J Bot. 84: 677–684.
  5. Ceccarelli, S. and Grando, S. (1996). Drought as a challenge for the plant breeder. Plant Growth Regulation. 20: 149–155.
  6. Ellen, J. (1987). Effects of plant density and nitrogen fertilization in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): I. Production pattern and grain yield. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 35: 137-153.
  7. Ferrio, J.P., Villegas, D., Zarco, J., Aparicio, N., Araus, J.L. and Royo, C. (2005). Assessment of durum wheat yield using visible and near-infrared reflectance spectra of canopies. Field Crops Res. 94: 126-148.
  8. Filella, I., Serrano, L., Serra, J., Penuelas, J. (1995). Evaluating wheat nitrogen status with canopy reflectance indices and discriminate analysis. Crop Sci. 35: 1400–1405.
  9. Guendouz, A. and Maamari, K. (2011). Evaluating durum wheat performance and efficiency of senescence parameter usage in screening under Mediterranean conditions. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 2(3): 400-404.
  10. Guendouz, A., Guessoum, S., Maamari, K. and Hafsi, M. (2012). Predicting the efficiency of using the RGB (Red, Green and Blue) reflectance for estimating leaf chlorophyll content of Durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) genotypes under semi arid conditions. American-Eurasian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture. 6:102-106.
  11. Guendouz, A., Guessoum, S., Maamri, K., Benidir, M., Hafsi, M. (2013). Flag leaf reflectance efficiency as indicator for drought tolerance in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) under semi arid conditions. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production. 4: 1204-1215.
  12. Grant, L. (1987). Diffuse and Specular Characteristics of Leaf Reflectance. Rem. Sens. Environ. 22: 309-322.
  13. Hafsi, M., Mechmeche, W., Bouamama, L., Djekoune, A., Zaharieva, M. and Monneveux, P. (2000). Flag leaf senescence, as evaluated by numerical image analysis and its relationship with yield under drought in durum wheat. J. Agronomy and Crop Sci. 185: 275–280.
  14. Hafsi, M. and Guendouz, A. (2012). Some Aspects of Leaf Senescence. In: Tetsuji Nagata, Senescence, IntechOpen, pp. 107-    116. DOI: 10.5772/32787.
  15. Rawson, H.M., Hindmarsh, J.H., Fisher, R.A. and Stockman, Y.M. (1983). Changes in leaf photosynthesis with plant ontogeny and relationships with yield per ear in wheat cultivars and 120 progeny. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 10: 503-514.
  16. Richardson, A.D., Berlyn, G.P. and Gregoire, T.G. (2001). Spectral reflectance of Picea rubens (Pinaceae) and Abies balsamea (Pinaceae) needles along an elevational gradient, Mt.Moosilauke, New Hampshire, USA. Am. J. Bot. 88: 667-676.
  17. Schrevens, E. and Raeymaeckers, L. (1992). Colour characterization of golden delicious apples using digital image processing. Acta Horticulturae. 304: 159-166.
  18. Wood, C.W., Reeves, D.W. and Himelrick, D.G. (1993). Relationships between chlorophyll meter readings and leaf chlorophyll concentration, N status and crop yield: A review. Proceedings - Agronomy Society New Zealand. 23: 1-9.
  19. Yang, J., Wang, Z., Zhu, Q. (1997). Photosynthetic characteristics, dry matter accumulation and its translocation in inter-    specific hybrid rice. Acta Agron. Sincia. 23: 82-88.

Global Footprints