Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorT. Mohapatra

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.20

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 51 issue 1 (february 2017) : 38-43

Impact of amended APMC act on apple business in Himachal Pradesh, India

Ankur Saxena*, Mustfa Hussain, Ashutosh Singh
1<p>College of Agribusiness Management,&nbsp;G.B. Pant University of Agriculture &amp; Technology, Pantnagar-263 145, Uttrakhand, India.</p>
Cite article:- Saxena* Ankur, Hussain Mustfa, Singh Ashutosh (2017). Impact of amended APMC act on apple business in Himachal Pradesh, India . Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 51(1): 38-43. doi: 10.18805/ijare.v51i1.7059.

Indian agricultural marketing system is suffering from various problems viz. improper warehousing, lack of grading and packaging, inadequate transport facilities, presence of large number of middlemen, malpractices of traders, inadequate market information and insufficient funds etc. Long chain of middlemen decrease the producer’s share in consumer rupee and exploit the farmer. Though Agricultural Produce Marketing Committees (APMCs) under the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Act, 1964 control and regulate buying and selling operations at all regulated agriculture marketing yards but there are lot of inefficiencies involved in practices of APMCs. However amended APMC Act prevents anticompetitive practices. There is no compulsion on the producer to sell their produce in APMC market yards, producer are quite free to sell directly to private companies or private market yards or farmers-consumer market under amended APMC Act. The present Study has analysed awareness and perception of apple growers regarding amended APMC Act. Two districts of Himachal Pradesh viz. Shimla and Kullu were selected on the basis of highest apple production. Apple growers were divided in two groups viz. Group 1 (growers who follow traditional supply chain) and Group 2 (growers who follow traditional and modern supply chain both). 

  1. Arora V.P.S. (2005). Marketing and Export of Horticultural Products of Uttaranchal: Status, Potential and Strategies. Indian Journal of Agricultural Marketing, 19 (2): 194-201.

  2. Gujral M.S. (2011). Trends in Private and Public Investments in Agricultural Marketing Infrastructure in India. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 21: 371-376.

  3. Pandey Mukesh, Baker Gregory A. and Tewari Deepali. (2013). Supply Chain Re-Engineering in The Fresh Produce Industry: A Case Study of Adani Agri-Fresh. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review. 16: 115-136.

  4. Reports on Planning commision (2001).

  5. Singh Ram and Suhag K.S. (2010). Role of State Agricultural Marketing Board in Marketing Development in Haryana. Indian Journal of Agricultural Marketing, 24: 38-48.

  6. Sikka B.K., Sharma M.L. and Jairath M.S. (2005). Managing Marketing Problems and Emerging Needs of Apple Growers of Uttaranchal. Indian Journal of Agricultural Marketing, 19: 238-248.

  7. Singh Surendra P., Sikka B.K. and Singh Ashutosh. (2009). June 20-23, Budapest Hungry. Supply Chain Management and Indian Fresh Produce Supply Chain: Opportunities and Challenges- A paper prepared for presentation in International food & agribusiness management association, 19th annual world symposium.

  8. Saraswat S.P. Sharma M.L. and Sharma Amresh. (2001). Marketing of Plum in Himachal Pradesh. Bihar Journal of Agricultural Marketing, 9 : 448-461.

  9. Panel urges States to amend APMC Act to remove ‘barriers’. 




  13. list. 

  14. reforms.

  15. National Horticulture Database. 



Editorial Board

View all (0)