Phosphorus and nitrogen use efficiency
Data in Table 2 showed that the phosphorus use efficiency (PUE) is strongly affected by phosphorus rates (P ≤ 0.001), while they were not affected by phosphorus sources in all experiments. The highest mean PUE was obtained in the year 2008-09, which was twice and six times higher than that of 2009-10 and 2010-11, consequently.
Increased phosphorus supply had a highly significant negative effect on the PUE regardless of the year, more so during last two growing seasons (2009-10 and 2010-11) for NUE (P £0.05) and the P levels 30 and 60 gave the best values (Table 2, Fig 2).
These results are identical to the observations by
Sandana and Pinochet (2014),
Balcha (2014) and
Ghafoor (2016). They also reported that P sources had non-significant effect and the lower phosphorus use efficiency was observed at higher P application rates. In the case of nitrogen fertilization,
Mandic et al., (2015), Zemichael et al., (2017) and
Pandey et al., (2018) also reported that increased N level reduced NUE.
Phosphorus and nitrogen absorption efficiency
The efficiency of absorption reflects the ability of plant to extract phosphorus or nitrogen from the soil. PAE is strongly affected by phosphorus rates in the three experiments (Table 2). Differences between treatments are very highly significant (P ≤ 0.001), while fertilizer source had non-significant effect on PAE.
For all tests, the rate 30 kg ha
-1 soil supply had the best phosphorus absorption efficiency, whereas the highest rate gave the lowest PAE values. This efficiency was reduced due to increasing phosphorus inputs that did not result in an improvement of P uptake. In 2008-09, the PAE was twice as high as in 2009-10 and eight times higher than in 2010-11. This can be explained by high temperatures, above 30°C, occurred during anthesis for 2008-09 and during grain filling for 2009-10 and 2010-11; consequently the dry matter accumulation in grain was interrupted and grain weight decreased
(Hunt et al., 1991; Wu et al., 2018; Erekul and Yigit, 2018). P uptake into shoots increased substantially with increased P supply as a result of increased dry weight and increased shoot P concentration
(Osborne and Rengel, 2002).
Nitrogen absorption efficiency was influenced by P rates only in 2010-11. The lowest P level 30 kg ha
-1 recorded the best value, following by the two levels 60 kg ha
-1 and 90 kg ha
-1 respectively.
Pierozan et al., (2015), in their study on nitrogen fertilization of soybean found that NUE was dependent on the phonological stage of the crop and climate conditions during crop growth, in addition to the timing of fertilizer application.
Phosphorus and nitrogen utilization efficiency
It expressed the efficiency with which the phosphorus absorbed is utilized to produce grain
(Moll et al., 1982). In 2009-10 and 2010-11, significant results were obtained for P rates on PUTE, however, source of fertilizer had non-significant effect. The best values were obtained by the level 30 kg P/ha in 2009-10 and the 60 kg P/ha rate in 2010-11 (Table 2). The results were in confirmation with the findings of
Osborne and Rengel (2002) and
Fernández
et_al(2009), who concluded that phosphorus utilization efficiency decreased markedly with increasing P supply for all cereals studied.
NUTE was significantly affected by P fertilizers (P ≤0.05) and rates (P≤0.001) in 2008-09, where fertilizer fosfactyl and P level 90 kg ha
-1 gave the best results (Table 2).
Grain protein
The total protein content of durum wheat is a quality factor closely related to the grain nitrogen concentration. They vary under the influence of genetic as well as agro-climatic factors
(Triboi et al., 2000). It resulted from a balance within the plant, between nitrogen nutrition and carbon nutrition (
Jeuffroy and Oury, 2012).
In the present study, grain protein content was significantly influenced by source P fertilizer (P ≤ 0.05) and P rates (P ≤ 0.01) in the first growing season 2008-09, where SSP and 60 kg ha-1recorded the best values (Table 2). These results confirmed the findings of
Zhu et al., (2012) and
Zhang et al., (2017) who indicated that the increasing in P application decreased grain protein content of wheat. The optimum P fertilizer increased grain yield and improved grain quality with high P use efficiency, which improved leaf area index, increased chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rate, stable acid phosphatase activity to accumulate more dry matter after anthesis
(Zhu et al., 2012).
The correlations achieved between different parameters studied (Table 3) revealed that grain protein content was related positively to NAE and negatively to NUTE in the three seasons. While a positive relationship was established between protein content and PAE only in 2010-11. According to
Crista et al., (2012), Phosphorus has no big influence like nitrogen on protein content, it supports in better assimilation and metabolism of nitrogen forms.
Paunescu et al., (2009) indicated that environmental factors significantly influenced wheat grain yield and protein accumulation in grain, particularly affecting the quantity and quality of gluten. Dryness or high temperatures during grain filling induced a decrease in the protein and gluten content of grains (
Daniel and Triboi, 2000). It also affects more carbonaceous nutrition than nitrogen, therefore, tending to increase protein content
(Labuschange et al., 2009; Jeuffroy and Oury, 2012;
Šukalovic
et_al2013). These findings were in perfect agreement with our results obtained in 2009-10, where the Tmax during grain filling exceeded 30°C, resulting average protein content upper 17.6%.