Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 50 issue 3 (june 2016) : 206-213

Analysis of gene effects governing yield and yield traits in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)

R.S. Singh*, M.N. Singh
1<p>Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Institute of Agricultural Sciences,&nbsp;Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221 005, India.</p>

The six generations (P1, P2, F1, F2, BC1 and BC2) of twelve cross combinations of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) were studied during 2003-2006 for days to 50 % flowering, days to maturity, plant height, number of primary branches, number of secondary branches, pods per plant, pod length, number of seeds per pod, 100-seed weight, harvest index and seed yield per plant. The means of six generations were subjected to detect main gene effects and interactions. The estimates of six parameter model revealed that both additive and dominant gene effects were important in all the crosses for almost all the traits. However, the relative contribution of dominant gene effects was much higher than additive gene effects for plant height, pods per plant and seed yield per plant. Higher frequency of duplicate type of epistasis also confirms the prevalence of dominance gene effects for above traits except for seed yield per plant.


  1. Mather, K. (1949). Biometrical Genetics. Chapman and Hall Ltd., London.

  2. Hayman, B. I. and Mather, K. (1955). The description of genetic interaction in continuous variation. Biometrics, 16: 69-82.

  3. Hayman, B. I. (1958). The separation of epistatic from additive and dominance variation in generation means. Heredity, 12: 371-390.

  4. Jink, J. L. and Jones, R. M. (1958). Estimation of components of heterosis. Genetics. 43: 223-234. 

  5. Hooda, J. S., Tomar, Y. S., Vashishtha, R. D. and Phogat, D. S. (2000). Generation mean analysis in pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]. Annals of Biology (Ludhiana), 16: 105-109.

  6. Hooda, J. S., Tomer, Y. S., Mehla, B. S. and Khatri, R. S. (2001). Gene effects in certain crosses in pigeonpea. Annals of Agriculture Biological Research, 6: 47-51. 

  7. Parmar M. B. and Kathiria, K. B. (2016). Genetic analysis of seed yield and quantitative traits in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.). Global Journal of Research Analysis. Vol. 5 (1) :January 10501. (worldwidejournals.com/gra/certificate. php?rut=January_2016).

  8. Ramya, K.T., Veerakumar, G. N., Prasad, P.S., Venkatesha, S. C. and Abdul Fiyaz R. (2012). Genetic analysis of yield and quantitative traits in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp.) Euphytica. 186: 705-714.

  9. Oommen, A., Namboodiri, K. M. N. and Unnithan, V. K. G. (1999). Genetic analysis of yield and yield components in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.). Journal of Tropical Agriculture. 37: 12-16.

  10. Sreelakshmi, Ch. and Shivani, D. (2013). Components of genetic variance and degree of dominance for seed yield and attributing traits in pigeonpea, (Cajanus cajan L.). Electronic Journal of Biosciences. 01: 38-43.

     

Editorial Board

View all (0)