Correlation of agronomic traits and individual yield
Expression of agronomic traits and yield per plant of 10 experimental salt-tolerant rice cultivars were shown in Table 2. Due to the influence of salinity and low soil fertility of the experimental soil, the growth, development, and yield of the 10 selected salt-tolerant rice cultivars were low average values. Panicles per plant, panicle length, panicle weight, grains per panicle, filled grains per panicle, fertilization rate, 1000 grains weight, dry biomass and yield per plant were 8.4 panicles, 22.4 cm, 2.4 g, 113.2 grains, 92.7 grains, 82.0%, 26.5 g, 34.5% and 16.6 g, respectively.
The correlation coefficient (
r) between the agronomic traits of the salt-tolerant rice varieties were obtained in Table 3. Individual yield had a significant positive correlation coefficient with the studied traits as did plant height (
r = 0.3624), panicles per plant (
r = 0.7019**), panicle weight (
r = 0.4530*) and dry biomass per plant (
r = 0.7837***). Plant height had a significant positive correlation coefficient with panicle length (
r = 0.3664*), panicle weight (
r = 0.4548*), number of grains per panicle (
r = 0.4502*), number of filled grains per panicle (
r = 0.4062*) and dry biomass per plant (
r = 0.5057**). Thus, as the height of plant increases the above traits will increase. Similar to height of plant and yield, panicles per plant, panicle length, panicle weight, and number of grains per panicle had a significant positive correlation with dry biomass per plant with
r = 0.5479**, 0.4198*, 0.4057* and 0.4207*, respectively.
Because the correlation between agronomic traits and yield was greatly influenced by environmental factors and research materials (varieties, fertilizers, etc.), the results of the correlation coefficients were not uniform among crops if the environmental conditions and varieties were different in usage
(Ramakrishnan et al., 2006; Rasheed et al., 2002). Oad et al., (2002) concluded that individual yield positively correlated with the weight of 1000 grains, number of effective branches per plant and length of panicle.
Khan et al., (2009) suggested that individual yield was positively related to panicle length and the number of grains per panicle.
Akinwale et al., (2011) concluded that individual yield was positively correlated with the number of branches per plant, panicle weight, and grains per panicle.
Sürek and Beser (2003) showed a positive correlation between individual yield with dry biomass per plant and the number of filled grains per panicle. Therefore, it can be concluded that studying the correlation between yield and its components, we should analyze and conclude for each detailed research and materials condition.
Direct and indirect effects of agronomic traits on individual yield
Table 4 showed that panicle weight had the highest positive direct coefficient on individual yield with dC = 0.8294, followed by panicles per plant (dC = 0.5524), number of grains per panicle (dC = 0.4355), fertilization rate (dC = 0.2561), and dry biomass per plant (dC = 0.2516). Although the plant height has a positive correlation with yield (
r = 0.3624*), it has a very low direct coefficient (dC = 0.1330). This parameter had an indirect effect on yield through panicle weight (iC = 0.3772) and grains per panicle (iC = 0.1960). Thus, the direct influencing of plant height on individual yield of salt-tolerant rice cultivars in this area was very small (dC = 0.1330). The number of panicles per plant was highly positively correlated with yield (
r = 0.7019***) and the coefficient of direct effect (dC = 0.5525) which were much larger than other indirect effect coefficients. This result indicated that the number of panicles per plant strongly and directly influences the yield of salt-tolerant rice cultivars. Panicle weight was highly positively correlated with yield (
r = 0.4530*) and a high coefficient of direct effect (dC = 0.8294) whichs were much larger than other indirect effect coefficients. Similar to the number of panicles per plant, yield was strongly and directly governed by panicle weight.
In addition, panicle weight had a high indirect effect coefficient on yield via the number of grains per panicle (iC= 0.3344). Although the number of grains per panicle insignificantly correlated for yield (
r = 0.2085
ns), it had a high direct (dC = 0.4355) and high indirect effect coefficients on yield through trait of panicle weight (iC = 0.6369). Thus, the number of grains per panicle also played an important role in rice yield. Moreover, the dry biomass per plant had a high positive correlation coefficient with individual yield (
r =0.7837***). However, it had a low direct effect coefficient (dC = 0.2516), indirectly affecting the yield through panicle weight (iC = 0.3365) and panicles per plant (iC = 0.3027). Thus, the dry biomass per plant did not directly influence the final rice yield.
Analysis results of
r, dC, and iC in s 3 and Table 4 shown that the panicles per plant and panicle weight directly influence the final rice yield. Total dry biomass per plant and plant height do not directly affect yield, but indirectly affected via traits of panicle weight and grains per panicle. Similar to the correlation between yield and its components, the direct (dC) and indirect (iC) coefficients were also governed by the different factors of environment and research materials. For example, yield was influenced directly by the number of branches per plant and number of days of flowering (
Amirthadevarathinam, 1983), panicle length
(Arvind et al., 2011), number of panicles per plant, number of grains per panicle, weight of 1000 grains
(Yang, 1986), number of filled grains per panicle and plant height
(Bhadru et al., 2012), number of effective branches per plant, panicle length and flowering time
(Ibrahim et al., 1990), plant height and branch numbers per plant (
Kumar, 1992), number panicles per plant and number of spikelet per panicle (
Lin and Wu, 1981), number of effective branches per plant, number of grains per panicle and weight of 1000 grains (
Ram, 1992), number of grains per panicle and number of effective branches per plant (
Sundaram and Palanisamy, 1994) and dry biomass per plant, harvesting index and weight of 1000 grains
(Sürek
et_al1998).