Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorT. Mohapatra

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.20

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 50 issue 2 (april 2016) : 117-121

Estimation of genetic parameters and character associations for yield and quality traits in chickpea

Tejbir Singh*
1<p>Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding,&nbsp;Kisan P.G. College, Simbhaoli- 245 207, (U.P.), India</p>
Cite article:- Singh* Tejbir (2016). Estimation of genetic parameters and character associations foryield and quality traits in chickpea . Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 50(2): 117-121. doi: 10.18805/ijare.v0iOF.8437.

Twenty genetically diverse chickpea genotypes were grown in a randomized block design experiment with three replications during two years 2010-11 and 2011-12. Data on individual plants were recorded on days to 50% flowering, seed yield, protein content (%), volume of seed (ml), density of seed, hydration capacity, swelling capacity, cooking time (min) and swelling index (%).The analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed significant differences among the genotypes for all the characters  showing enough variability among the genotypes. Further, the estimates of heritability were high for all the traits except days to 50% flowering in both the years. Swelling index, volume of seed, cooking time and seed yield had high heritability coupled with high genetic advance indicated that these characters are under additive genetic control and simple selection will be effective for their improvement. None of the quality traits showed any association with seed yield, however, quality traits showed certain positive/negative associations among selves e.g. volume of seed showed significant and positive association with hydration capacity and swelling capacity; swelling capacity with hydration capacity in both the years. Further, density of seed showed significant and negative association with volume of seed and hydration capacity during both the years.

  1. Badshah, A., Ahmad, M., Bibi, N., Mohammad, T. and Khan, I. (1987). Relationship between physico-chemical characters and cooking time in chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.). Pakistan J. Scientific Industrial Res., 30: 795-798.

  2. Burton, G.W. (1952). Quantitative inheritance in grasses. Proc. 6th Int. Grassland Congress 1: 227-233.

  3. Clemente, A., Sanchez-Vioque, R., Vioque, J., Bautista, J. and Millan, F. (1998). Effect of processing on water absorption and softening kinetics in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) seeds. J. Sci. Food Agric., 78: 169-174.

  4. Coskuner, Y. and Karababa, E. (2003). Effect of location and soaking treatments on the cooking quality of some chickpea breeding lines. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 38: 751-757.

  5. Dahiya, B.S., Mehta, B.S. and Lather, V.S. (1990). A new approach to chickpea breeding. Crop Improv., 17: 104-110.

  6. Hanson, C.H., Robinson, H.E. and Comstock,R.E. (1956). Biometrical studies of yield in segregating population of Korean lespedza. Agron. J. 48: 248-272. 

  7. Jeswani, L.M. (1986). Breeding strategies for the improvement of pulse crops. Indian J. Genet., 46(Suppl.): 267-280.

  8. Johnson, H.W., Robinson, H.E. and Comstock, R.E. (1955). Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybean. Agron. J. 47: 314-318.

  9. Kumar, S., Onkar Singh, Rheenen, H.A. Van and Rao, K.V.S. (1998). Repeatability of different stability parameters in chickpea. Plant Breed., 117: 143-146.

  10. Mehla, I.S. Waldia, R.S. and Dahiya, S.S. (2001). Variation and relationship among cooking quality attributes across the environments in ‘kabuli’ chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). J. Food Sci. Technol., 38: 283-286.

  11. Searle,S.R. (1961). Phenotypic, genotypic and environmental correlations. Biometrics 57: 474-480.

  12. Singh, K.B., Bejiga, G. and Malhotra, R.S. (1990). Association of some characters with seed yield in chickpea collections. Euphytica, 49: 83-88.

  13. Singh, U., Subhrahmanyam N. and Kumar, J. (1991). Cooking quality and nutritional attributes of some newly developed cultivars of chickpea (Cicer arietinum). J. Sci. Food Agric., 55: 37-46.

  14. Singh, U. and Jambunathan, R. (1981). Studies on desi and kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars : Levels of protease inhibitors, levels of polyphenolic compounds and in vitro protein digestibility. J. Food Sci., 46: 1364-1367.

  15. Waldia, R.S., Singh, V.P., Sood, D.R., Sardana, P.K. and Mehta, I.S. (1996). Association and variation among cooking quality traits in ‘Kabuli’ chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). J. Food Sci. Techno., 33: 397-402.

Editorial Board

View all (0)