Banner

Chief Editor:
V. Geethalakshmi
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University Coimbatore, INDIA
Frequency:Monthly
Indexing:
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Go...
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 49 issue 3 (june 2015) : 229-234

Evaluation of pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum) and clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.) intercropping system under arid western plain zone in India

Ranu Tiwari, R.S. Yadav, Amit Kumawat*
1Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner–334 006, India.
Cite article:- Tiwari Ranu, Yadav R.S., Kumawat* Amit (2025). Evaluation of pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum) and clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.) intercropping system under arid western plain zone in India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 49(3): 229-234. doi: 10.5958/0976-058X.2015.00035.9.
A field experiment was conducted during kharif season (July-November) of 2011 to evaluate the pearlmillet and clusterbean intercropping system in the arid region of Rajasthan. Intercropping of pearlmillet cultivar HHB-67 with clusterbean cultivar RGC-1003 in row ratio 1:3 resulted significantly maximum effective tillers per plant. Sole pearlmillet cultivar HHB-67 produced significantly maximum seed yield and had the maximum harvest index. Among intercropping treatments pearlmillet cultivar HHB-67 with clusterbean cultivarRGC-1003 in row ratio 1:1 resulted significantly maximum seed yield over other treatment.Pearlmillet cultivar Raj 171 + clusterbean cultivarRGC-1003 (1:1 row ratio)resulted in significantly maximumstover and biological yield. Intercropping of pearlmillet cultivar HHB-67 + clusterbean cultivarRGC-986 in row ratio 1:3 was superior to all the intercropping treatments in terms of PMEY, net returns and B:C ratio. But LER ofpearlmillet cultivar HHB-67 + clusterbean cultivarRGC-986 in row ratio 2:2 was maximum among all the treatments.
  1. Bangali M K. (1987) Studies on pearl millet (PennisetumamericanumL.) under intercropping system at different nitrogen levels, M.Sc. (Ag.)Thesis, Sukhadia University, Udaipur, Rajasthan.
  2. Joshi N L. (1999) Effect of component densities on the performance of pearlmillet- mungbean intercropping system under different rainfall situation in an arid environment.Annals of Arid Zone 38(1):15-25.
  3. Kiroriwal A. (2009) Weed management study in pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br. Emend Stuntz] based intercropping systems, M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner, Rajasthan.
  4. Kumar P, Hooda R S, Singh H. and Nanwal R K. (2006) Economics of pearlmillet- legume association as influenced by intercropping and strip-cropping system in sandy loom soils. Haryana Agricultural University Journal Research 36: 101-04.
  5. McPherson H G. and Slatyer R O. (1973) Mechanisms regulating photosynthesis in Pennise tumtyphoides.Australian Journal of Bio Sciences26: 329-39.
  6. Pal C, Kaushik S K. and Gautum R C. (2000) Weed control studies in pearlmillet (Pennisetumglaucum)-pigeonpea (Cajanuscajan) intercropping system under rainfed condition. Indian Journal of Agrononomy 45(4): 662-68.
  7. Rathore V. S., Singh J.P., Meel B. andNathawat N.S. (2014) Agronomic and economic performances of different cropping systems in a hot arid environment: A case study from North-western Rajasthan, India.Journal of Arid Environments 105: 75 -90.
  8. Rathore V.S., Singh J.P. and Beniwal R.K. (2009) Rainfed farming systems of hyper arid north-western Rajasthan: an analysis. Annals of Arid Zone 48 (2): 125-31.
  9. Reddy M S. and Willey R W. (1981) Growth and resource use studies in an intercrop of pearlmillet/ groundnut. Field Crop Research4:13-24.
  10. Sharma K C. (2008) Fodder productivity and economics of multicutpearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum) intercropped with clusterbean (Cyamopsistetragonoloba. Indian Journal of Agronomy 53(1): 43-45.
  11. Singh D K. and Agrawal R L. (2004) Nitrogen and phosphorus nutrition of pearlmillet (Pennisetumglaucum) grown in sole and intercropping systems under rainfed conditions. Indian Journal of Agronomy 49(3): 151-53.
  12. Singh M. and Joshi N L. (1994) Effect of mixed and intercropping system on dry matter and grain yields of component crops in arid environment.Annals of Arid zone 33(2): 125-28.
  13. Singh R. 1994. Pearlmillet based intercropping in arid zone of Rajasthan. Annals of Arid Zone 33(2): 155-56.
  14. Tetarwal J P. and Rana K S. (2006) Impact of cropping system fertility level and moisture- conservation practice on productivity, nutrient uptake, water use and profitability of pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum) under rainfed conduction. Indian Journal of Agronomy 51(4): 263-66.
  15. Willey W and Heath S B. (1969)The quantitative relationship between plant population and crop yield. Advances Agronomy 21: 281-21.
  16. Yadav G L. and Jat B L. (2005) Intercropping of mothbean varieties with pearlmillet for sustainable crop production in arid eco-system.Indian Journal of Pulses Research 18(2): 252-53.
  17. Yadav R S. and Yadav O P. (2000) Differential competitive ability and growth habit of pearlmillet and clusterbean cultivars in a mixed cropping system in the arid zone of India. Journal of Agronomy & Crop Science 185: 67-71.
  18. Yadav R S. and Yadav O P. (2001)The performance of cultivars of pearlmillet and clusterbean under sole cropping and intercropping systems in arid zone conditions in India. Experimental Agriculture 37: 231-40.

Editorial Board

View all (0)