Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 49 issue 3 (june 2015) : 229-234

Evaluation of pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum) and clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.) intercropping system under arid western plain zone in India

Ranu Tiwari, R.S. Yadav, Amit Kumawat*
1Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner–334 006, India.
Cite article:- Tiwari Ranu, Yadav R.S., Kumawat* Amit (2024). Evaluation of pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum) and clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.) intercropping system under arid western plain zone in India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 49(3): 229-234. doi: 10.5958/0976-058X.2015.00035.9.
A field experiment was conducted during kharif season (July-November) of 2011 to evaluate the pearlmillet and clusterbean intercropping system in the arid region of Rajasthan. Intercropping of pearlmillet cultivar HHB-67 with clusterbean cultivar RGC-1003 in row ratio 1:3 resulted significantly maximum effective tillers per plant. Sole pearlmillet cultivar HHB-67 produced significantly maximum seed yield and had the maximum harvest index. Among intercropping treatments pearlmillet cultivar HHB-67 with clusterbean cultivarRGC-1003 in row ratio 1:1 resulted significantly maximum seed yield over other treatment.Pearlmillet cultivar Raj 171 + clusterbean cultivarRGC-1003 (1:1 row ratio)resulted in significantly maximumstover and biological yield. Intercropping of pearlmillet cultivar HHB-67 + clusterbean cultivarRGC-986 in row ratio 1:3 was superior to all the intercropping treatments in terms of PMEY, net returns and B:C ratio. But LER ofpearlmillet cultivar HHB-67 + clusterbean cultivarRGC-986 in row ratio 2:2 was maximum among all the treatments.
  1. Bangali M K. (1987) Studies on pearl millet (PennisetumamericanumL.) under intercropping system at different nitrogen levels, M.Sc. (Ag.)Thesis, Sukhadia University, Udaipur, Rajasthan.
  2. Joshi N L. (1999) Effect of component densities on the performance of pearlmillet- mungbean intercropping system under different rainfall situation in an arid environment.Annals of Arid Zone 38(1):15-25.
  3. Kiroriwal A. (2009) Weed management study in pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br. Emend Stuntz] based intercropping systems, M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner, Rajasthan.
  4. Kumar P, Hooda R S, Singh H. and Nanwal R K. (2006) Economics of pearlmillet- legume association as influenced by intercropping and strip-cropping system in sandy loom soils. Haryana Agricultural University Journal Research 36: 101-04.
  5. McPherson H G. and Slatyer R O. (1973) Mechanisms regulating photosynthesis in Pennise tumtyphoides.Australian Journal of Bio Sciences26: 329-39.
  6. Pal C, Kaushik S K. and Gautum R C. (2000) Weed control studies in pearlmillet (Pennisetumglaucum)-pigeonpea (Cajanuscajan) intercropping system under rainfed condition. Indian Journal of Agrononomy 45(4): 662-68.
  7. Rathore V. S., Singh J.P., Meel B. andNathawat N.S. (2014) Agronomic and economic performances of different cropping systems in a hot arid environment: A case study from North-western Rajasthan, India.Journal of Arid Environments 105: 75 -90.
  8. Rathore V.S., Singh J.P. and Beniwal R.K. (2009) Rainfed farming systems of hyper arid north-western Rajasthan: an analysis. Annals of Arid Zone 48 (2): 125-31.
  9. Reddy M S. and Willey R W. (1981) Growth and resource use studies in an intercrop of pearlmillet/ groundnut. Field Crop Research4:13-24.
  10. Sharma K C. (2008) Fodder productivity and economics of multicutpearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum) intercropped with clusterbean (Cyamopsistetragonoloba. Indian Journal of Agronomy 53(1): 43-45.
  11. Singh D K. and Agrawal R L. (2004) Nitrogen and phosphorus nutrition of pearlmillet (Pennisetumglaucum) grown in sole and intercropping systems under rainfed conditions. Indian Journal of Agronomy 49(3): 151-53.
  12. Singh M. and Joshi N L. (1994) Effect of mixed and intercropping system on dry matter and grain yields of component crops in arid environment.Annals of Arid zone 33(2): 125-28.
  13. Singh R. 1994. Pearlmillet based intercropping in arid zone of Rajasthan. Annals of Arid Zone 33(2): 155-56.
  14. Tetarwal J P. and Rana K S. (2006) Impact of cropping system fertility level and moisture- conservation practice on productivity, nutrient uptake, water use and profitability of pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum) under rainfed conduction. Indian Journal of Agronomy 51(4): 263-66.
  15. Willey W and Heath S B. (1969)The quantitative relationship between plant population and crop yield. Advances Agronomy 21: 281-21.
  16. Yadav G L. and Jat B L. (2005) Intercropping of mothbean varieties with pearlmillet for sustainable crop production in arid eco-system.Indian Journal of Pulses Research 18(2): 252-53.
  17. Yadav R S. and Yadav O P. (2000) Differential competitive ability and growth habit of pearlmillet and clusterbean cultivars in a mixed cropping system in the arid zone of India. Journal of Agronomy & Crop Science 185: 67-71.
  18. Yadav R S. and Yadav O P. (2001)The performance of cultivars of pearlmillet and clusterbean under sole cropping and intercropping systems in arid zone conditions in India. Experimental Agriculture 37: 231-40.

Editorial Board

View all (0)