Banner

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.217, CiteScore: 0.595

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 49 issue 1 (february 2015) : 88-91

Impact of front line demonstration on yield and economics of hybrid rice (Rajalaxmi)

T.K. Samant*
1Krishi Vigyan Kendra (OUAT), Angul-759132, Odisha, India
Cite article:- Samant* T.K. (2025). Impact of front line demonstration on yield and economics of hybrid rice (Rajalaxmi). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 49(1): 88-91. doi: 10.5958/0976-058X.2015.00013.X.

ABSTRACT

The Hybrid rice Rajalaxmi recorded  higher plant height(98.1 cm), effective tillers hill-1(21.5), Length of panicle(24.1 cm),  grains panicle-1(248) and test weight(23.65 g)  than the local check(HYV Lalat). The same also recorded grain yield  63.75 q ha-1 which is 56.53 % higher yield than local check(Lalat) with harvest index of 47.2 % over the years of study .  In spite of increase in yield of  improved technology the technological gap, extension gap and technology index existed which was 6.25 q ha-1, 23.05 q ha-1 and  8.93 % respectively. The improved technology of hybrid rice gave higher gross return of Rs. 88834 ha-1 with a benefit cost ratio of 1.88 and  additional net return of Rs.25277 ha-1 as compared to local check . Hence the existing HYV Lalat can be replaced by Hybrid rice Rajalaxmi  since it fits to the existing farming situation for higher productivity and income.

REFERENCES

  1. Akram, M., Rehman, A., Ahman, A. and Cheema, A. (2007). Evaluation of rice hybrids for yield and yield components in three different environments. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 17(3- 4):70-75. ISSN 2071-7024.
  2. Anonymous. (2011). Odisha Agriculture Statistics 2011-12. Directorate of Agriculture and Food production. Govt of Odisha.pp:40.
  3. CRRI. (2006). Annual Report, (2005-06). Central Rice Research Institute, Cuttack.pp.56-62
  4. Dwibedi, S.K., Dhal, A. and Sangramsingh, S. P. (2009). Varshadahn: A suitable variety for medium deep waterlogged ecosystem. In: Extended summaries-Symposium on Resource management in crops and cropping systems under changing climate,7-8, May,2009, OUAT, Bhubaneswar. pp:100-101.
  5. Gardner, F.P., Pearce, R.B. and Mistecell, R.I. (1985). Physiology of Crop Plants. Iowa State University. Press, Iowa. 66.
  6. Ghosh, R.K., Sharma, L., Barman, S. and Dolai, A.K., (2009). System of rice Intensification: The alternate approach for increasing production of field crops. Journal of Crop and Weed .5: 63-67.
  7. Mahadevappa, M., Ratho, S.N., Vijaykomar, R.and Shenoy, V.V. (1996). Hybrid rice: a novel approach to augment rice production. Indian Farming .46(9):12-15
  8. Maiti, S., Narzari, N. and Pal,S. (2003). Response of high yielding and hybrid rice to varied level of Nutrition. Environment and Ecology .21:296-300
  9. Mandavkar, P.M., Sawant, P.A. and Mahadik. (2012). Evaluation of Front line demonstration trial on rice in Raigad district of Maharastra. Rajstan Journal of Extension Education.20:4-6
  10. Mondal, M.M.A, Islam, A.F.M.S. and Siddique, M.A. (2005). Performance of 11 modern transplant aman cultivar in the northern region of Bangladesh. Bangladesh J. Crop Sci. 16: 23-29.
  11. Nirmala, B., Vasudev, N., and Suhasini, K. (2012). Acomparision of economic potential of HYVs Hybrid rice cultivation in Ambedkar nagar district of Uttar pradesh.World Journal of Agronomy.1(1):07-10
  12. Raj, A.D.,Yadav,V. and Rathod, J.H. (2014). Evaluation of Front Line Demonstration on yield of Pigeonpea(Cajanus Cajan L.)in Tribal Region of Gujarat. Research Journal of Agricultural Sciences.5(1):94-96.
  13. Samui, S. K., Maitra, S., Roy, D. K., Mondal. A. K. and Saha, D. (2000). Evaluation on front line demonstration on groundnut(Arachis hypogea L.). Journal of Indian Society Coastal Agricultural Research. 18: 180-183.
  14. Sharma, P., Khar, S., Kumar, S., Ishar, A., Prakash, S., Mahajan, V. and Jamwal, S. (2011). Economic impact of front line demonstrations on cereals in Poonch district of Jammu and Kashmir. Journal of Progressive Agriculture. 2: 21-25.
  15. Tripathi, K., Pandey, J. and Saxsena, A. (2013). Performance of local , improved and hybrid rice varieties in district Rewa,(M.P), India. International Journal of Pharmacy & life Science.4(12):3205-3208.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)