Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 49 issue 3 (june 2015) : 241-244

Perception of constraint at different developmental stages of Common Interest Group by stakeholders in Rajasthan, India

Banwari Lal*, Uzma Kalam1, Amit Singh, Mukesh Bhakat
1National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal-132 001, Haryana, India.
Cite article:- Lal* Banwari, Kalam1 Uzma, Singh Amit, Bhakat Mukesh (2024). Perception of constraint at different developmental stages of Common Interest Group by stakeholders in Rajasthan, India . Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 49(3): 241-244. doi: 10.5958/0976-058X.2015.00037.2.
The government of Rajasthan (India) had focused on community group approaches in project of “District Poverty Initiative Project (DPIP)”. The relevance of Common Interest Group (CIG) comes in this context. The study was planned in 3 district and total of 18 CIGs, six from each district involved in dairy farming were selected. All the 250 members of selected CIGs were taken as respondents and data was collected by using structured interview schedule. The constraint that CIG members faced in the group formation stages includes is sceptic about success of the sub project and lack of information about schemes well-on time as perceived by 94.40 and 91.60 per cent of the members. In group stabilization stage the members depicted that Hurdles from DPIP officials in sanctioning grants (86.40%), constant lack of involvement of members in training (85.20%) and lack of timely availability of dairy inputs and services (81.60%) were ranked high by the members. The respondents perceived ‘lack of training opportunities for effective and smooth functioning, feeling of superiority complex among higher caste people (84.80%), ambiguity in terms of leadership roles (74.40%) and delay in repayment of loans by CIG members were also important constraints at functioning stage. The CIG had helped to improve the assets, mutual cooperation among members and increased awareness about the scheme.
  1. Annual Report. (2011-12). Department of Animal Husbandry, GOI, New Delhi
  2. Bharathi R. A. (2009). Constraints and suggestions of self-help groups under the project empowerment of women in agriculture. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 22(2): 457-459.
  3. Manmeet Kaur, Mishra, B., Prakash Singh, Archana Singh and Surya Rathore. (2007). Empowerment of rural women: An analysis of constraints. Indian Res. J. Ext. Edu. 7(2&3).
  4. Natchimuthu, K. (2002). Socio-economic and technical impact of Animal Husbandry Programme in Pondicherry. Ph.D. Thesis, NDRI Deemed University, Karnal.
  5. Sanchita Garai, Mazumder, G., and Maiti, Sanjit. (2013) Group Dynamics Effectiveness among Self Help Groups –in West Bengal. Indian Res. J. Ext. Edu. 13(1).
  6. Sanjay Kanti Das. (2012). An analysis of constraints in women empowerment in tribal area: evidences from Assam. Asian Journal of Research in Social Science & Humanities. 2(4).
  7. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2001). Participatory governance, people’s empowerment and poverty reduction. UNDP Conference Paper Series.

Editorial Board

View all (0)