Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 49 issue 1 (february 2015) : 59-64

Effect of dates of sowing, row spacings and varieties on growth and yield attributes of rabi Indian bean (Dolichos lablab L.)

Shashi Kiran Joshi*, Hemrajsinh Rahevar
1Department of Agronomy, C.P. College of Agriculture, S.D.A.U., Sardarkrushinagar-385 506, India
Cite article:- Joshi* Kiran Shashi, Rahevar Hemrajsinh (2024). Effect of dates of sowing, row spacings and varieties on growth and yield attributes of rabi Indian bean (Dolichos lablab L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 49(1): 59-64. doi: 10.5958/0976-058X.2015.00008.6.
A field experiment was conducted on loamy sand soils of during 2012-13. Plant height was recorded significantly higher in variety Gujarat Val 1 when sown on 15th October at 30 cm row spacing. All the growth and yield attributing characters such as number of primary and secondary branches per plant, number of nodules per plant, dry weight of nodules per plant, dry matter accumulation per plant at 30, 60 and 90 DAS as well as at harvest, days required to maturity, number of pods per plant, number of grains per pod, length of pod, seed yield per plant and 100 – seed weight noticed significantly higher when crop was sown on 15th October at 60 cm row spacing using variety Gujarat Val 1. Seed yield and B:C ratio of Indian bean significantly affected with sowing dates, row spacings and varieties.
  1. Guriqbal Singh; Sekhon, H. S. (2007). Effect of sowing date on growth and yield of mungbean varieties during kharif season. Journal of Food Legumes 20 (1) 59-61.
  2. Jackson, M.L. (1967). Soil Chemical Analysis, Prentice Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi, 183-192.
  3. Patel, M.M.; Patel I.C.; Patel P.H.; Vaghela, S.G.; Patel R.I. and Acharya S. (2010). Effect of sowing time, row spacing and seed rate on yield and yield attributes of moth bean (V. aconitifolia) under rain fed conditions. Journal of Arid Legumes 7 (2): 112-114.
  4. Peng Youlin, Wan Haiqing and Hu Nanyun (1999). Effect of plant density and fertilizer on yield of extremely early (Dolicus lablab L.) China Vegetables 19 (6) 32-33.
  5. Ramakrishna, K., Krishnappa, K.S. and Umamaheswarappa, P. (2000). Dry matter production, nutrient accumulation and uptake of primary nutrients in french bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) as affected by genotypes, spacings and fertilizer levels. South Indian Horticulture, 50 (1-3): 105-112.
  6. Reddy, M. M.; PadmajaHYPERLINK “http://www.cabdirect.org/search.html?q=au%3A%22Padmaja%2C+B.%22”, B. and Reddy, D. R. R. (2010). Performance of Frenchbean at different dates of sowing and plant densities in Telangana region of Andhra Pradesh. Journal of Food Legumes 23 (1) 54-56.
  7. Srivastava, H. C., Bhaskaran, S., Menon, K.K.G., Ramanjam, S. and Rao, M.V. (1984). Pulse Production Constraints and opportunities. 23 (2): 167-176.
  8. Trivedi, R.V. (1985). Performance of gram (Cicer arietinum L.) under different dates of sowing and levels of phosphorus. M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Gujarat Agricultural University, Sardar Krushinagar.
  9. Yoshida, S. (1972). Physiological aspects of grain yield. Ann. Rev. Pl. Physiol., 23 : 437-464

Editorial Board

View all (0)