Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 48 issue 1 (february 2014) : 76-78,   Doi: 10.5958/j.0976-058X.48.1.014

SURVIVAL AND DEVELOPMENT OF RICE HISPA, DICLADISPA ARMIGERA (OLIVIER) (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE) ON DIFFERENT RICE CULTIVARS

R
Rupesh Sharma*
L
Lakhi Ram
R
Renu Devi
A
Ashok Kumar
1Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Rice Research Station, Kaul- 132 021, India
Cite article:- Sharma* Rupesh, Ram Lakhi, Devi Renu, Kumar Ashok (2025). SURVIVAL AND DEVELOPMENT OF RICE HISPA, DICLADISPA ARMIGERA (OLIVIER) (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE) ON DIFFERENT RICE CULTIVARS. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 48(1): 76-78. doi: 10.5958/j.0976-058X.48.1.014.

ABSTRACT

The survival and development of rice hispa, Dicladispa armigera (Olivier) was studied on four different cultivars of rice namely Taraori basmati, HKR 126, IR 64 and HKR 47 under screen house condition. The larval duration (12.50 and 13.65 days), pupal period (7.77 and 8.63 days) and total life period (25.27 and 26.46 days), was shortest on Taraori basmati and longest on HKR47, respectively. The larval survival was significantly higher (82.25%) on Taraori basmati than IR 64 (76.65%) and HKR 47 (76.09%) but was at par with HKR 126 (79.04%). The overall larval survival was maximum (82.90%) on 4th day followed by 7th day (77.90%) and 10th day (74.95%) of observation. The pupation and adult emergence was non-significant in the test cultivars of rice. The pupation was highest (76.66%) in Taraori basmati and lowest (71.60%) in HKR 47 and adult emergence was highest (95.39%) in Taraoti basmati and lowest (92.40%) in HKR 47. Sex ratio of male to female fluctuated between 1:1.26 (Taraori basmati) and 1:1.46 (HKR 47) showed preponderance of females.

REFERENCES

  1. Anonymous. (1998). Annual Report, (1998). CCS Haryana Agricultural University Rice Research Station, Kaul.
  2. Deka, M. (1990). Mating behaviour of rice hispa, Dicladispa armigera (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). M. Sc. (Agri.) thesis. Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat.
  3. Dutta, B.C. and Hazarika, L.K. (1995). Development of Dicladispa armigera (Olivier) on different host plants. Plant Health 1: 21–25.
  4. Hazarika, L.K., Puzari, K.C. and Dutta, P. (2005). Beauveria bassiana in Rice Hispa Management in Assam. Biocontrol News and Information. 26 (4): 106N-108N.
  5. Krishnaiah, P.V., Rao, P.S., Rao, N.H.P., Rao, P.S. and Narasimham, V. (1987). Control of rice hispa. Indian Fmg. 37 (7): 37-38.
  6. Pathak, M.D., Khelsa, M.S. and Varma, S.K. (1982). Controlling major pests of rice plant. Indian Fmrs’ Digest. 15:6-9.
  7. Rajehja, A.K. (1995). Practice of IPM in South Asia. Integrated pest management in Tropics, Status and Future Prospectus. (eds. Mengech, A.N., Saxsena, K.S. and Gopalan H.B.N.). pp.69-111.
  8. Sen, P. and Chakravorty, S. (1970). Biology of hispa (Dicladispa armigera) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Indian J. Ent. 32: 123-126.
  9. Singh, G. (1993). Studies on biology and sources of resistance in rice to rice hispa, Dicladispa armigera Olivier (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). M.Sc. Thesis, Punjab Agril. Univ., Ludhiana.
  10. Vadadia, L.D., Shah, A.H. and Pandya, H.V. (1989). Biology of rice hispa. Oryza 26: 206-208.
Published In
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)