Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 48 issue 2 (april 2014) : 120-126,   Doi: 10.5958/j.0976-058X.48.2.020

PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES AND WATER HOLDING CAPACITY OF CULTIVATED SOILS ALONG ALTITUDINAL GRADIENT IN SOUTH SIKKIM, INDIA

P
P. Deb
P
P. Debnath
S
S.K. Pattanaaik1
1Department of Natural Resource Management, College of Horticulture and Forestry ,CAU, Pasighat-791 102, India
Cite article:- Deb P., Debnath P., Pattanaaik1 S.K. (2025). PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES AND WATER HOLDING CAPACITY OF CULTIVATED SOILS ALONG ALTITUDINAL GRADIENT IN SOUTH SIKKIM, INDIA. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 48(2): 120-126. doi: 10.5958/j.0976-058X.48.2.020.

ABSTRACT

An investigation was carried out to study the physical and chemical properties of soils and its relationship with water holding capacity along altitudinal gradient for cultivated soils of South Sikkim. The physiography of the study area was mainly hilly terrain with closely spaced contour on steep sloppy lands. The soil texture ranged from sandy loam to clay with slightly acidic (6.6) to highly acidic (4.2) in reaction. The organic carbon content varied from 1.22 to 3.45 per cent with a mean value of 2.31 per cent.  The bulk density, particle density, porosity, volume expansion and water in air dry soils ranged from 1.08 to 1.54 gm/cc, 2.05 to 2.77 gm/cc, 42.44 to 61.73 per cent, 2.95 to 11.9 per cent and 0.68 to 4.32 per cent, respectively. The water holding capacity (WHC) ranged from 33 to 73.86 per cent with a mean value of 54.18 per cent. The results revealed that 80 per cent of the soil samples have medium to high WHC while only 20 per cent are of low category. A significant positive relationship was observed between WHC and organic carbon, clay and porosity, while, a negative relationship was found with pH and bulk density with sand and silt content.

REFERENCES

  1. Bisht, A.S. and Bhatt, A.B.(2010). Physico-chemical status of forest soils along altitudinal gradient in Western Uttarakhand Himalayas. Indian J. Ecol.37(1):65-69.
  2. Chen,H., Ping, H., YanPing, S. and Ming., H.( 2003). Physico-chemical properties of the main agro-soils in Jiading District, Shanghai.J. Shanghai Jiaotong Universities Agric. Sci. 21(4): 313-319.
  3. Day, P.R. (1965). Particle fraction and particle-size analysis.In Methods of Soil Analysis (C.A. Black, Ed.) Agronomy No.9,PartI.American Society of Agronomy,Madison.WI,pp.545-567.
  4. Das, D.K.(2011). Introductory Soil Science, KalyaniPublishers,New Delhi.
  5. Debnath, P., Mahanta, M. and Ghosh, S.K. (2009).Distribution of available boron in the selected surface and subsurface soils of Terai zone of West Bengal in relation to physico-chemical properties.J. Maharastra Agric. Universities 3, 357 – 358.
  6. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1976).Statistical Procedures for Agriculture Research.2nded IRRI. Los Banos. Philippines.
  7. Guo,Q.,Wang,D.,Fang,K.andBao,J.(2011). Dependence of soil physical properties on altitudes in pinusaramandii forest ecosystem.Bioinformatics and Biomedical engineering,5th international conference.10-12th may,2011, Yangling, China.
  8. Jackson, M.L. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis, Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
  9. Parihar, S.S. (2004). Physico-chemical properties of soil and grain yield of rice (Oryzasativa) as influenced by organic and inorganic sources of nutrients.Annals of Agric. Res. 25: 408-411.
  10. Paudel, S. and Sah, J.P. (2003).Physiochemical characteristics of soil in tropical sal (Shorearobusta) forest in Eastern Nepal.Himalayan Journal of Science 1:107
  11. Piper, C.S.(1966). Soil and Plant Analysis, Hans Publishers, Bombay.
  12. Pradhan,Y.,Sachan,R,S. and Avasthe,R,K.(1996).Relationship between altitude and status of zinc and copper in some soils of Sikkim. J. of Hill Res. 9(1): 11-17.
  13. Rajeswar, M. and Khan,M.A.A.(2008).Characterization and classification of forest soils of Nizamabad district of Andhra Pradesh.Asian J. Soil Sci. 3(1): 11-16.
  14. Ramesh,V., Ballol,S.S., Sharma,K.L., Kausalya,R., Korwar,G.R. and Ramakrishna,Y.S.(2008). Characterization of soil for physical properties under different land use systems. Indian J. Dryland Agric. Res. Dev. 23(1): 102-109.
  15. Sheik, M.A. and Munesh,K. (2010). Nutrient status and economics analysis of soils in oak and pine forest in GarhwalHimalaya.Journal of American Science.6(2):117-122.
  16. Tahboub,M.B., Lindemann,C.W. and Murry, L.(2008). Chemical and physical properties of soil amended with peacan wood chips. Hort Science. 43(3):891-896.
  17. Tandel,M.B., Kukadia,M.U., Kolambe,B.N. and Jadeja,D.B.(2009). Influence of tree cover on physical properties of soil. Indian Forester 135(3): 420-424.
  18. Tiwari,R.K and Bajpai,S.P. (2004).Physico-chemical properties of soil from the core area in Kanha Tiger Reserve.Plant Archives 4(1): 71-75.
  19. Upadhyaya, A.U., Arunachalam,.K.A. and Arunachalam,K. (2003). Microbial biomass and physico-chemical properties of soils under the canopy of BambusabalcooaRoxb.andBambusapallida Munro.Indian J. Soil Cons. 31(2): 152-156.
Published In
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)