Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 50 issue 4 (august 2016) : 335-339

Water demand management in different structures of agriculture product market (A case study of Coastal Lands of Yengejeh Dam)

Zahra Noori Tupkanloo1, Saeed Yazdani*2, Reza Moghadasi3
1<p>Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture,&nbsp;Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.</p>
Cite article:- Tupkanloo1 Noori Zahra, Yazdani*2 Saeed, Moghadasi3 Reza (2016). Water demand management in different structures of agriculture product market (A case study of Coastal Lands of Yengejeh Dam) . Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 50(4): 335-339. doi: 10.18805/ijare.v0iOF.11009.

This research aims to study the management of water demand in different product markets in downstream lands of Yengejeh Dam in Neyshabur. This is an exploration research survey and library study conducted in 2015-2016. The required information to test the research hypotheses was gathered by questionnaire. The statistical population includes 150 wheat farmers randomly selected  A scenario of increasing the elasticity of product demand in resource allocation in the competitive and monopolar water market was developed by assimilation algorithm in the studied region. According to the market situation of water in the region which is almost similar to monopoly water market, the results suggest that wheat farming can be superseded by farming some other trade and export-oriented crops. This brings about an increasing amount of product and yield per hectare of land with using less water supply and less area under cultivation.


  1. Cowen, Penelope B. and Cowen, T. (1998). Deregulated Private Water Supply: A Policy Option for Developing Countries, Cato Journal 18(1), Spring/Summer.

  2. Chakravorty U., Hochman , E., Umetsu ,C. and Zilberman, D (2008). Water allocation under distribution losses: Comparing alternative institutions, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 33:463–476

  3. Chakravorty U., Hochman , E., Umetsu ,C. and Zilberman, D. (1995). A Spatial Model of Optimal Water Conveyance, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29: 25-41.

  4. Chakravorty U., and Umetsu ,C. (2003), Basinwide Water management: A Spatial Model, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45: 1-23.

  5. Grafton R.Q., Landry C., Libecap G.D. and O’Brien J.R. (2009). Water markets: Australia’s murraydarling basin and the U.S. Southwest. International center economic research working paper series, ICER, and Turin Italy.

  6. Repetto, R. (1986). Skimming the Water: Rent-seeking and the Performance of Public Irrigation Systems, Research Report, World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C. 

  7. Silberberg , E. (1991). The Structure of Economics, New York: Prentice Hall.

  8. Wade, R. (1987). The management of common property resources: collective action as an alternative to privatization or state regulation. Cambridge Journal of Economics , 95–106.

     

Editorial Board

View all (0)