Fungal infection rate
The perforation in the
Gigaspora sp. significantly reduced the incidence during the blossoming and end-of-season stages by 64.019% and 56.221%, respectively. The control treatment calculated averages of 40.161% and 36.504%. This is in line with
Al-Anzi (2024). Fungal infection achieved significantly higher levels when treated with organic fertilizer as depicted in table.
The application of organic fertilizer at 2 t ha
-1 (W
1) produced average values of 54.873% and 49.711% during the blossoming and end-of-season stages, respectively. The control treatment exhibited average values of 47.173% for flowering and 40.457% for the end-of-season stages, respectively This is consistent with
Al-Shabani (2005).
Table 2 indicates that mineral fertilization significantly influenced the results, with values rising under the treatment using 100% of the fertilizer guideline (D
2), achieving 58.176% and 52.187% during the flowering and end-of-season phases, respectively. The control treatment exhibited average values of 46.927% for the flowering stage and 41.349% for the end-of-season stage. This is consistent with the findings of
Sylvia and Neal (1990).
The data indicate that the interaction between
Gigaspora sp. and mineral fertilizer exerts a considerable effect. Treatment G
2D
2 had the highest infection rates during the flowering and end-of-season phases, with 73.761% and 62.801%, respectively. The control treatment exhibited average rates of 37.618% at the flowering stage and 31.804% at the end-of-season stage this is consistent with
Garmendia et al. (2005).
The table indicates that the interaction between organic and mineral fertilizers has an impact. The fungal infection values rose due to treatment (W
2D
2) to 64.615 and 56.260, respectively, during the flowering and end-of-season stages. Conversely, the control treatment had average values of 43.112 and 35.017 for the flowering and end-of-season stages, respectively this is consistent with
Al-Nuaimi (1987).
The three-way interaction exerted a significant influence, with treatment (G
1W
2D
2) demonstrating the most pronounced effect, with average values of 84.463 and 69.573 for the flowering and end-of-season stages, respectively. The control treatment exhibited average values of 32.570 and 25.243.
Number of spores
The inoculated plants with
Gigaspora sp. exerted a considerable influence. This application increased the number of spores to 45,539 and 49,120 spores per 100 g of soil for flowering and end-of-season stages. The control treatment yielded 31.860 and 34.633 spores per 100 g of soil, respectively. This is consistent with
(Ahamad et al., 2023).
Table 3 indicates that organic fertilization influenced spore count. Treatment W
2 markedly elevated the spore count at both the flowering and end-of-season phases, yielding averages of 45.712 and 42.511 spores per 100 g of soil, respectively. The control treatment produced 36.410 and 33.053 spores per 100 g of soil. This is due to the enhancement of soil moisture and fertility by the application of organic fertilizers. This subsequently amplifies the activity of beneficial bacteria and enhances their efficacy in performing essential functions, resulting in a higher spore count. This is consistent with
Al-Shabani (2005).
The (Table 4) indicates that mineral fertilization markedly elevated spore count. Treatment (D
2) markedly elevated the spore count at both the flowering and end-of-season phases, resulting in 43.044 and 46.850 spores per 100 g of soil, respectively. The control treatment exhibited average values of 37.831 and 34.951 spores per 100 g of soil at the flowering and end-of-season stages, respectively. This aligns with
Tanwar and Aggarwal (2012).
Our data demonstrate an effect of the interaction between
Gigaspora sp. and mineral fertilizer is very important for the increase of number spores. Treatment G
1D
2 achieved a significant increase in spore amount, with an average of 56.537 spores and 51.863 per 100 g soil, respectively for the flowering and end-of-season stages (Table 3). The average values of the control treatment for flowering and end-of-season stages were 32.206 spores per 100 g of soil and 29.480 spores per 100 g of soil, respectively.
As can be seen with (Table 5) the interaction between organic and mineral fertilizers (W
2D
2) exercised a highly significant influence on all observations, producing 55.082 and 49.600 spores per 100 g of soil for flowering phase and end-season phase treatments, respectively. The averages for the control treatment are 33.893 and 30.315 spores per 100 g of soil in flowering and end-of-season soil samples, respectively consistent with the findings of
Turk et al., (2006).
The triple treatment interaction demonstrated a substantial impact, with treatment G
1W
2D
2 exhibiting a markedly elevated average spore count of 67.633 and 59.563 spores 100 g of soil, compared with the control treatment, which averaged 28.440 and 25.367 spores 100 g of soil, during both the blooming and end-of-season phases, respectively.
Dry weight of the vegetative parts
Inoculation with the fungus
Gigaspora sp. significantly increased the dry weight of vegetative parts. The average dry weight of the vegetative parts increased significantly with G
1 treatment, with values equal to 62.514 g per plant compared to 47.142 g per plant in the control supported by the observations of
Utobo et al., (2011).
The results in (Table 6) showed that organic fertilization significantly increased the vegetative mass of the plant. The W
2 was particularly remarkable and had an average vegetative biomass of 62.121 g per plant over the course of the study. The control treatment produced an average of 48.661 g plant
-1, according to
Sumner (2000).
The results showed that the application of mineral fertilizers significantly increased dry weight of vegetative mass. Highest values were noted during the treatment D
2, with an average 65.308 g per plant. Results indicate an average yield of 43.388 g per plant for the control treatment, according to the
Nora et al. (2017). The data show that the fungus
Gigaspora sp. and the amount of mineral fertilizer applied has a great impact on the vegetative dry weight. In the same way, G
1D
2 (interaction treatment) was 76.343 g and the control treatment was 39.747 g. This concurs with important implications of (
Hag Husein et al., 2021).
The interaction between organic and mineral fertilizers using analysis of variance significantly affects, as follows: 22 bulek treated W
2D
2 indicates an average plant weight of 76.855 g per plant than the dry weight control leaves (36.177 g). That is in line with the findings of
Koodi et al., (2017).
There was a significant increase in vegetative dry weight (Table 2) from the triadic interaction among treatments. Treatment G
1W
2D
2 produced a mean plant weight increase of 91.000 g compared to the control treatment at 34.630 g.
Total yield
The (Table 7) shows strong effects of inoculation with the fungus
Gigaspora sp. on yield enhancement. The yield at the control treatment was 55.070 t ha
-1 while treatment G
1 provided a significant increase of production with 64.810 t ha
-1. This finding is in line with the findings by
Dey et al., (2024). This tabular summary(7) shows that the yield increase was significantly affected by organic fertilizer. Based on comparisons with the control-identified as 42.500 t ha
-1 the yield obtained with treatment W
2 was greater by 70.760 t ha
-1. The production was significantly increased due to the mineral fertilization. This treatment was equivalent to 83.630 t ha
-1 higher in yield than that of the control, which averaged 40.840 t ha
-1 as also observed by
Jassim et al., (2014). The data show that
Gigaspora sp. fungus interaction results in such cells and mineral fertilizer significantly increases yield. Yield over time It has been shown that G
2D
2 (interaction treatment) yield of 83.940 t ha
-1 was higher than the control treatment (G
1D
1 which produced yield 33.470 t ha
-1). That goes along with similar fact, showing up in the same work of
Al-Samarrai and Al-Tamimi (2018).
The interaction between organic and mineral fertilizers leads to significant increases in production. Under the interaction treatment W
2D
2, the average yield was 97.650 t ha
-1 and the one from control treatment was 22.840 t ha
-1 as has been noted by
Al-Sahaf and Ati (2007). G
1W
2D
2 triple interaction had a significant 98.050 t ha
-1 increase in production over control treatment with an average of 10.620 t ha
-1.