Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 44 issue 2 (april 2024) : 201-211

Applications of Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria (PGPB) and Vesicular Arbuscular Mycorrhizal (VAM) Fungi on Aloe barbadensis Mill., a Medicinally Important Succulent Herb

Shinjan Dey1, Debapriya Choudhury1, Chandrama Mukherjee1, Sikha Dutta1,*
1Department of Botany, Applied and Molecular Mycology and Plant Pathology Laboratory, Centre for Advanced Studies, The University of Burdwan, Purba Bardhaman-713 104, West Bengal, India.
Cite article:- Dey Shinjan, Choudhury Debapriya, Mukherjee Chandrama, Dutta Sikha (2024). Applications of Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria (PGPB) and Vesicular Arbuscular Mycorrhizal (VAM) Fungi on Aloe barbadensis Mill., a Medicinally Important Succulent Herb . Agricultural Science Digest. 44(2): 201-211. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-5811.

Background: Application of biofertilizers is an appropriate replacement of harmful chemical fertilizers to fulfil the rising demands of herbal medicine. The main objective of this study was to establish a potent biofertilizer with the help of microbial consortia and observe their effects on the primary growth of Aloe barbadensis Mill.

Methods: Rhizospheric soil of the plant Aloe barbadensis Mill. was taken and isolation, characterization and identification of the vesicular arbuscular mycorrhiza (VAM) fungi, rhizospheric bacteria and the VAM fungal spore associated bacteria was done. To check the microbial effects on morphological parameters of the plant, a total number of eight experimental sets were prepared by using different microbial strains.

Result: In our experiment, VAM+ABM1 treated plant set showed the significant responses in plant primary growth which can be used as a potent biofertilizer in more sustainable way. 

At present, uses of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, etc. reduce the soil fertility and effectiveness of soil (Mushtaq et al., 2021). Thus, the use of chemical fertilizer produces a great concern in agriculture in near future.
       
One alternative way to diminution bad effects of chemical fertilizers is inoculation of soil by biofertilizers, such as vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal (VAM) fungi and plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). Mycorrhizal fungi are able to enhance plant growth mainly by increasing the soil available phosphorus and other nutrients (Huey et al., 2020).
       
The group of bacteria that colonize in the roots of higher plant and helps in plant growth are known as Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR). They are also known as efficient bio-fertilizers for enhancing the growth of several crops as well as some medicinal plants (Aloo et al., 2022).
       
Some PGPR are known to enhance mycorrhizal fungal growth, by supporting the spore germination and hyphal growth of VAM fungi (Xavier et al., 2003). The exchange of nutrients takes place between PGPR and VAM fungi and these bacteria are considered as mycorrhiza helper bacteria (MHB) (Xavier et al., 2003).
       
The plant Aloe barbadensis Mill. belongs to family Asphodelaceae is considered as one of the most important medicinal plants worldwide (Chinchilla et al., 2013). The Aloe gel is, the world’s best natural anti-septic use as an effective anti-oxidant and also are recommend as an analgesic, pain killer, anti-asthmatic, hypoglycaemic, liver stimulant, stomach ache (Chinchilla et al., 2013).
       
Due to multiple uses of Aloe gel, its demand in our daily life is rising internationally. Keeping these in mind, the endeavour of this study was to isolate and screen the vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizospheric bacteria from the roots and rhizospheric soil of the plant Aloe barbadensis Mill. and the bacteria which were reside on the spore wall of mycorrhizal fungi and test out their effects on the primary growth of the plant Aloe barbadensis Mill. in different microbial combinations so that they can be established as an effective biofertilizer. 
A brief experimental design of this research work was shown in Fig 1.
 

Fig 1: Complete flowchart to explain this research work briefly.


 
Collection of root and rhizosphere soil sample
 
Tertiary roots and roots adhering soil of the plant Aloe barbadensis Mill. were collected from our departmental garden, Department of Botany, The University of Burdwan (Latitude- N 23°14'20.86", Longitude- E 87°51'45.743).
 
Study of root samples for VAM fungal association
 
The root samples were prepared following the standard protocol of Phillips and Hayman (1970):
 
 

Collection and identification of mycorrhizal spores from soil sample
 
It was done following the protocol of Gerdemann and Nicolson (1963). The VAM fungal spores were observed under a microscope (Leica model no. DMLB 3000) with a magnification of 100x and identified the VAM fungi using INVAM (Dwiastuti et al., 2019).
 
Mycorrhizal inoculum production
 
The single spore Funneliformis mosseae, formerly known as Glomus mosseae derived cultures were maintained by subculturing in the pots under the same atmospheric conditions by using the host plant Zea mays L. (Ferrol, 2021).
 
VAM fungal spore disinfection
 
Spores of Funneliformis mosseae were collected following the method of Bécard and Fortin (1988).
 
Isolation of bacteria from the rhizospheric soil of the plant
 
To isolate the bacteria from the rhizospheric soil of the plant Aloe barbadensis, soil was collected from our departmental garden which was followed by serial dilution plating technique. One phosphate solubilizing bacterial colony was selected and named as ABB1.
 
Isolation of the bacteria from the spore wall of VAM fungi
 
Isolation of bacteria from the outer wall of Funneliformis mosseae spore was done following the standard protocol (Mayo et al., 1986). Two bacterial colonies were selected and named as ABM1 and ABM2.
 
In vitro characterization of plant growth promoting (PGP) traits
 
PGP traits like, phosphate solubilization (PS), indole acetic acid (IAA) production, Ammonia (NH3) production, Hydrogen cyanide (HCN) production, Siderophore production of the selected isolates were detected by the universal methods (Dutta et al., 2019).
 
Molecular Identification and phylogenetic trees construction of the bacterial strains
 
The three bacterial strains (ABB1, ABM1 and ABM2) were identified using 16S rDNA sequencing method from NCMR-NCCS, Pune, India.
       
For better identification and their systematic position, the phylogenetic trees of the strains were constructed based on neighbor-joining method (Saitou and Nei, 1987) using MEGAX software (Kumar et al., 2018).
 
Cell load optimization for VAM and bacterial strains for application on the plant
 
Post imbibed seeds of the plants were treated with different concentrations (106 - 109 CFU mL-1) of bacteria (ABB1, ABM1 and ABM2). After germination, seeds were treated with mycorrhizal fungi (number of spores mL-1). Then the seed germination percentage and the seedling survival percentage were calculated by using the formula of Pattanaik et al., (2015).
 
Pot experiment
 
Eight experimental sets were prepared, including CONTROL set and seven microbial treated sets (VAM, ABB1, ABM1, ABM2, VAM+ABB1, VAM+ABM1, VAM+ABM2). The experimental  pots were maintained in the net house where temperature (27-33°C). After 360 days of inoculation morphological and biochemical parameters of the plants were measured.
 
Analysis of physicochemical properties of soil
 
Various soil parameters like available phosphorus, nitrogen, potassium, pH and electrical conductivity of the soil were checked after inoculating by the microorganisms (Patle et al., 2019).
 
Study of morphological parameters of the plant
 
Morphological growth parameters like, root length, leaf length, fresh root weight, fresh leaf weight, fresh gel weight and fresh rind weight were recorded for inoculated and control sets.
 
Study of biochemical parameters of the plant
 
Estimation of chlorophyll-a, Chlorophyll-b and Total Chlorophyll was done by using the method of Arnon’s (Arnon, 1949). Assessment of total carbohydrate and total protein content of the plants were done following standard protocols (Khan et al., 2019).
 
Statistical analysis
 
In our present study, all data were presented as mean of five replicates. Standard errors (SE) represented as error bars in figures and ± in tables. Differences between groups were determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Different alphabets represented significant differences at P<0.05.
Isolation and Identification of VAM fungi from the rhizospheric soil sample
 
Among the isolates, the dominant species was Funneliformis mosseae (165±6 spores per 10 g of rhizospheric soil of the plants) which was followed by Glomus fasciculatum (67±7 spores per 10 g of rhizospheric soil of the plants) and Rhizophagus irregularis (58±9 spores per 10 g of rhizospheric soil of the plants) respectively (Table 1). So, we selected Funneliformis mosseae for further studies.
 

Table 1: VAM fungi isolated from the rhizospheric soil of the plant Aloe barbadensis Mill.


 
Isolation of bacteria from the rhizospheric soil of the plant
 
One phosphate solubilizing bacterial isolate was selected and named as ABB1.
 
Isolation of the bacteria from the spore wall of VAM fungi
 
Two phosphate solubilizing bacterial isolates were selected and named as ABM1 and ABM2.
 
Morphological characterization of the bacterial strains
 
The bacterial isolates were characterized according to Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology (Table 2). Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) study (Fig 2) showed their morphology.
 

Table 2: Morphological characterization of bacterial isolates isolated from rhizospheric soil (ABB1) and outer wall of VAM fungi (ABM1 and ABM2) of the plant Aloe barbadensis Mill.


 

Fig 2: Scanning electron microscopic images of the bacterial strain.


 
In vitro characterization of PGP traits
 
The bacterial strain ABM1 solubilize the phosphate more readily (184.8 µg mL-1) than the bacterial isolates ABM2 (162.4 µg mL-1) and ABB1 (158.4 µg mL-1) respectively (Fig 4). The phosphate solubilization index was highest in strain ABM1 (Fig 5). Quantitative assay showed maximum IAA production by the bacterial isolate ABM1 (224.5 µg mL-1) which was followed by ABB1(206 µgmL-1) and ABM2 (201 µg mL-1) (Fig 4). All the bacterial isolates except ABM2 showed positive result for NH3 production, siderophore assay and HCN production (Table 3) (Fig 3). PGPR plays a significant role in sustainable agriculture through the enhancement of plant growth via different processes like biological nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, siderophore production and phytohormone synthesis (Riaz et al., 2021). The practice of PGPR is possibly increased in sustainable farming for its eco-friendly and capable nature (Riaz et al., 2021).
 

Fig 3: Some important PGP traits by the bacterial strains.


 

Fig 4: Quantitative estimation of Phosphate solubilization and IAA production by the bacterial strains.


 

Fig 5: Phosphate solubilizing index (PSI) by the bacterial strains.


 

Table 3: Some important PGP traits of the bacterial isolates.


 
Molecular Identification and construction of phylogenetic tree for the bacterial isolates
 
NCMR-NCCS, Pune identified the isolates ABB1, ABM1 and ABM2 as Bacillus cereus ATCC 14579(T), Bacillus tequilensis KCTC 13622(T) and Enterobacter chuandaensis 090028(T) (Table 4) respectively.
 

Table 4: Molecular identification of bacterial strains ABB1, ABM1 and ABM2 by 16S rDNA sequencing.


       
The phylogenetic trees of the bacterial strains ABB1, ABM1 and ABM2 were done in Mega X software (Fig 6A-C). The analysis involved 9 nucleotide sequences for strain ABB1 (Fig 6A), 16 nucleotide sequences for strain ABM1 (Fig 6B), 14 nucleotide sequences for strain ABM2 (Fig 6C). All ambiguous positions were removed for each sequence pair. There were a total of 1485 positions in the final dataset for ABB1, 1658 for ABM1 and 1613 for ABM2 (Fig 6A-C).
 

Fig 6: Phylogenetic trees showing the position of Bacillus cereus.


 
Effects of bacterial strains on spore germination and hyphal growth of VAM fungi under In vitro condition
 
After applying three bacterial strains (ABB1, ABM1 and ABM2) on sterilized VAM fungal (Funneliformis mosseae) spores, it was found that ABM1 showed more promising result than the other two strains (ABB1 and ABM2). The strain ABM1, isolated from the spore wall of VAM fungi showed highest VAM spore germination percentage (Fig 7) and it also significantly increased the length of the hyphae after VAM spore germination (Fig 8, 9).
 

Fig 7: VAM fungi spore germination percentage either in presence of bacteria (VAM+ABB1, VAM+ABM1 and VAM+ABM2) or absence of bacteria (VAM).


 

Fig 8: Hyphal length of VAM fungi after inoculating sterilized VAM spores by different bacterial strains.


 

Fig 9: Effect of bacterial strains on VAM fungal spore germination


 
On the other hand, the rhizobacteria (ABB1) did not increase the VAM spore germination significantly (Fig 7) along with hyphal length after VAM spore germination (Fig 8, 9).
 
Cell load optimization for VAM and bacterial strains
 
For cell load optimization of three bacterial strains (ABB1, ABM1 and ABM2), we have used different concentrations of bacterial suspension on the post-imbibed seeds of the plant and after that we found that the bacterial suspension (108 CFUmL-1) showed the highest seed germination percentage (Fig 10A) and seedling survival percentage (Fig 10B). Thus, we chose 108 CFUmL-1 as optimum concentration of bacteria for the final application procedure.
 

Fig 10: A): Seed germination percentage; B): Seedling survival percentage of the plant Aloe barbadensis Mill. after inoculation by different concentration of bacterial strains (ABB1, ABM1 and ABM2); C): Seedling survival percentage of the plant after inoculation by VAM spores.


       
For cell load optimization of VAM fungal spore, we used different number of VAM fungal spore mL-1 on the germinating seedlings of the plant and found that 100 number of VAM spore mL-1 of distilled water showed the highest seedling survival percentage and thus, we selected 100 VAM spore mL-1 as the optimum concentration of VAM fungi for the final application procedure (Fig 10C).
 
Study of Physicochemical properties of soil
 
Different soil parameters were checked after treatment and found that the physicochemical properties of soil significantly increased in all the treated sets than that of uninoculated control set (Table 5). The soil, inoculated with VAM+ABM1 showed highest increase in available phosphorus, potassium and nitrogen than other experimental sets (Table 5). Gupta et al., (2012) found the simultaneous increase in soil available Phosphorus after application of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria in Aloe barbadensis Mill. Phosphate solubilizing rhizobacteria produces organic acids which improve Phosphate availability chemically and other growth substances hence stimulating plant growth (Uzma et al., 2022).
 

Table 5: Physicochemical properties of soil after treatment.


 
Morphological parameters of the plant
 
The results of the plant experiment showed that all the microbial inoculated sets considerably increased the morphological parameters like root length, leaf length, fresh root weight, fresh leaf weight, fresh gel weight and fresh rind weight of the plant Aloe barbadensis than uninoculated Control set (Table 6, 7).  The overall morphological growth was found highest in the VAM+ABM1 treated set where the leaf length increased up to 137.9%, root length 158.19%, fresh leaf weight 184.12%, fresh gel weight 212.73% times than uninoculated control set. Among Unipartite interactions, the overall morphological growth was found highest in ABM1 treated set and lowest in VAM treated set (Table 6, 7). The same trend was noticed in case of dry leaf weight, dry gel weight and dry rind weight (Table 8).  Pandey et al., (2009) reported augmentation of morphological growth was occurred in Aloe barbadensis Mill. after dual inoculation with Glomus mosseae and Azotobacter. Gupta et al., (2012) reported that after applying the phosphate solubilizing bacteria on the plant Aloe barbadensis Mill., the leaf length, root length and fresh gel weight of the plant increased by 39.5%, 31.1% and 143% respectively. Mamatha et al., (2002) also reported that increase in morphological parameters of Morus alba L. were noticed after inoculating with Glomus fasciculatum and Bacillus coagulans. Among unipartite sets, the highest growth was found in ABM1 treated set and lowest was found in VAM treated set. Vafadar et al., (2014) also reported that the morphological parameters of the plant Stevia rebaudiana increased more in Azotobacter chroococcum treated set from Glomus intraradices treated set.
       

Table 6: Root length, leaf length of the plants after inoculating with mycorrhizal fungi and bacterial strains.


 

Table 7: Fresh root weight, fresh leaf weight, fresh gel weight and fresh rind weight of the plants after inoculating with mycorrhizal fungi and bacterial strains.


 

Table 8: Dry root weight, dry leaf weight, dry gel weight and dry rind weight after inoculating with mycorrhizal fungi and bacterial strains.


 
In terms of mycorrhizal root colonization percentage (Fig 11), the highest root colonization by the VAM fungal species was found in VAM+ABM1 treated set, that is, mycorrhizal association within the roots become enhanced when we inoculated the plant roots with Funneliformis mosseae with Bacillus tequilensis. Mycorrhizal association was found lowest in VAM treated set.
 

Fig 11: Mycorrhizal root colonization (%), number of vesicles and arbuscules per cm of root length (cm) of the plants, after inoculating with mycorrhizal fungi and bacterial strains.


 
Estimation of biochemical parameters of the plant
 
In the present study, highest chlorophyll content was found in VAM+ABM1 treated set (Table 9). In the un-inoculated control set, the chlorophyll-a, chlorophyll-b and total chlorophyll content were 12.82±0.24 mg g-1 FW, 2.2±0.09 mg g-1 FW and 14.88±0.6 mg g-1 FW respectively (Table 9). But the chlorophyll content was significantly increased in all the treated sets than uninoculated control set. In the VAM+ABM1 treated set, the highest chlorophyll content was found. The chlorophyll-a, chlorophyll-b and total chlorophyll content were increased up to159.43%, 321.81% and 175.33% in VAM+ABM1 than uninoculated control set (Table 9).
 

Table 9: Chlorophyll content, total carbohydrate and total protein content of the plants after inoculating with microbial strains.


       
In case of total Carbohydrate content of the plants, all the inoculated sets showed the highest carbohydrate content from that of control set (Table 9). The highest carbohydrate content was found in VAM+ABM1 treated set.  In this treated set, the carbohydrate content of the plants increased upto 164.19% than uninoculated control set. The total Protein content in all the treated sets were significantly (p<0.05) increased than uninoculated control set (Table 9). The total protein was increased upto 115.73% in VAM+ABM1 treated set than control set. Khan et al., (2019) also reported that the PGPR+PGRs treatment produced significantly higher sugar content than the uninoculated set. The increase in sugar content of the treated sets helped to maintain a healthy photosynthetic system which demonstrates a significantly increased in morphological growth rate compared to the uninoculated control set.
From our experiment, we found that the overall morphological growth of the plant was highest in the VAM+ABM1 treated set. In terms of mycorrhizal colonization percentage, it was highest in VAM+ABM1 treated set and was much lowered in VAM+ABB1 treated set.  Moreover, after application of different bacterial strains with mycorrhizal fungi, the nutrient contents in soil were increased in all the treated sets than uninoculated set. In this study, the bacterial strain (ABM1) which was initially isolated from the spore wall of the VAM fungi proved to be quite beneficial and served the function of a potent Mycorrhiza Helper Bacteria (MHB) along with plant growth promotion. Thus, inoculation of Aloe barbadensis Mill. with VAM fungi (Funneliformis mosseae) in conjugation with Mycorrhiza Helper Bacteria (Bacillus tequilensis) proved to be quite beneficial and this microbial combination might be used as a potent biofertilizer in near future. But intense study of this microbial combination is required to progress agricultural productivity in more sustainable ways.
The authors are thankful to the Department of Botany, The University of Burdwan for providing necessary facilities for work and WB State Funded Fellowship for financial support.
Sikha Dutta provided the main concept of the work. Literature study and lab work were done by Shinjan Dey. Debapriya Choudhury and Chandrama Mukherjee  helped in formatting. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Ethical approval
 
Authors declare this manuscript does not include any studies using animal and human beings.
 
Consent to publication
 
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
 
Conflict of interest
 
The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  1. Aloo, B.N., Tripathi, V., Makumba, B.A., Mbega, E.R. (2022). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacterial biofertilizers for crop production: The past, present and future. Frontiers in Plant Science. 13: 1002448. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022. 1002448. 

  2. Arnon, D.I. (1949). Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant physiology. 24(1): 1. doi: 10.1104%2Fpp.24.1.1.

  3. Bécard, G., Fortin, J.A. (1988). Early events of vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhiza formation on Ri T DNA transformed roots.  New phytologist. 108(2): 211-218. doi: 10.1111/j.1469- 8137.1988.tb03698.x.

  4. Belder, P., Bouman, B.A.M., Cabangon, R., Guoan, L., Quilang, E.J.P., Yuanhua, L. and Tuong, T.P. (2004). Effect of water-saving irrigation on rice yield and water use in typical lowland conditions in Asia. Agricultural Water Management. 65(3): 193-210.

  5. Chinchilla, S.N., Carrera, F.C.A., Durán, A.G., Macías, M., Martínez, A.T., Macías, D.F.A. (2013). Aloe barbadensis: How a miraculous plant becomes reality. Phytochemistry Reviews.  12(4): 581-602. doi: 10.1007/s11101-013-9323-3.

  6. Dutta, S., Sarkar, A., Dutta, S. (2019). Characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa MCC 3198 and its potential for growth promotion  of Celosia cristata L. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 8(4): 985-97.

  7. Dwiastuti, M.E., Widyaningsih, S., Wicaksono, R.C., Agustina, D., Triasih, U. (2019). Identification of Vesicular Arbuscular Mycorrhiza (VAM) From soil and potency in reducing disease development (Phytophthora) on 5 citrus rootstock.  El-Hayah. 7(2): 74-83.

  8. Ferrol, N. (2021). Membrane Transporters, an overview of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal transportome. Encyclopedia  of Mycology. 44-53. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-819990- 9.00021-4.

  9. Feng, J., Chen, C., Zhang, Y., Song, Z., Deng, A., Zheng, C and Zhang, W. (2013). Impacts of cropping practices on yield- scaled greenhouse gas emissions from rice fields in China: A meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 164: 220-228.

  10. Gerdemann, J.W., Nicolson, T.H. (1963). Spores of mycorrhizal Endogone species extracted from soil by wet sieving and decanting. Transactions of the British Mycological Society.  46(2): 235-244.

  11. Gupta, M., Kiran, S., Gulati, A., Singh, B., Tewari, R. (2012). Isolation and identification of phosphate solubilizing bacteria able to enhance the growth and aloin-A biosynthesis of Aloe barbadensis Miller. Microbiological Research. 167(6): 358-363. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2012.02.004.

  12. Huey, C.J., Gopinath, S.C., Uda, M.N.A., Zulhaimi, H.I., Jaafar, M.N., Kasim, F.H. and Yaakub, A. R.W. (2020). Mycorrhiza:  A natural resource assists plant growth under varied soil conditions. Biotech. 10: 1-9.

  13. Khan, N., Bano, A., Rahman, M.A., Guo, J., Kang, Z., Babar, M. (2019). Comparative physiological and metabolic analysis reveals complex mechanism involved in drought tolerance  in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) induced by PGPR. Scientific Reports. 9(1): 1-9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38702-8.

  14. Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C., Tamura, K. (2018). MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 35(6): 1547. doi: 10.1093%2Fmolbev%2Fmsy096.

  15. Mamatha, G., Bagyaraj, D., Jaganath, S. (2002). Inoculation of field- established mulberry and papaya with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and a mycorrhiza helper bacterium. Mycorrhiza.12(6): 313-6. doi: 10.1007/s00572-002-0200-y.

  16. Mayo, K., Davis, R.E., Motta, J. (1986). Stimulation of germination of spores of Glomus versiforme by spore associated bacteria. Mycologia. 78: 426-431.

  17. Mushtaq, Z., Faizan, S., Hussain, A. (2021). Role of Microorganisms as Biofertilizers. Microbiota and Biofertilizers. [Hakeem, K.R., Dar, G.H., Mehmood, M.A., Bhat, R.A. (Eds.)]. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-48771-3_6. pp. 83-98.

  18. Materu, S.T., Shukla, S., Sishodia, R.P., Tarimo, A. and Tumbo, S.D. (2018). Water use and rice productivity for irrigation management alternatives in Tanzania. Water. 10(8): 1018. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10081018.

  19. Pandey, D.K., Banik, R.M. (2009). The influence of dual inoculation with Glomus mossae and Azotobacter on growth and barbaloin content of Aloe vera. American Eurasian Journal  of Sustainable Agriculture. 3(4): 703-714.

  20. Patle, T., Khaddar, V.K., Tiwari, R., Para, P. (2019). Phosphorus fractions in different soil orders in india and their relationship with soil properties. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science. 8(5): 1609-1620.

  21. Pattanaik, S., Dash, A., Mishra, R.K., Nayak, P.K., Mohanty, R.C. (2015). Seed germination and seedling survival percentage of Shorea robusta Gaertn. f. in buffer areas of Similipal biosphere reserve, Odisha, India. Journal of Ecosystem and Ecography.  5(1): 1. doi: 10.4172/2157-7625.1000153.

  22. Phillips, J.M., Hayman, D.S. (1970). Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Transactions of the British Mycological Society. 55(1): 158-IN18.

  23. Poddar, R., Acharjee, P.U., Bhattacharyya, K. and Patra, S.K. (2022). Effect of irrigation regime and varietal selection on the yield, water productivity, energy indices and economics of rice production in the lower gangetic plains of Eastern India. Agricultural Water Management. 262: 107327.

  24. Riaz, U., Murtaza, G., Anum, W., Samreen, T., Sarfraz, M., Nazir, M.Z. (2021). Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) as Biofertilizers and Biopesticides. Microbiota and Biofertilizers. [Hakeem, K.R., Dar, G., Mehmood, M., Bhat, R.A. (Eds.)]. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-48771-3_11. pp: 181-196.

  25. Saitou, N., Nei, M. (1987). The neighbor-joining method: New method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 4(4): 406-425. doi: 10.1093/ oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454.

  26. Trost, B., Prochnow, A., Drastig, K., Meyer-Aurich, A., Ellmer, F. and Baumecker, M. (2013). Irrigation, soil organic carbon and N2O emissions. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 33: 733-749.

  27. Uzma, M., Iqbal, A., Hasnain, S. (2022). Drought tolerance induction and growth promotion by indole acetic acid producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Vigna radiata. PloS one. 17(2): e0262932. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262932.

  28. Vafadar, F., Amooaghaie, R., Otroshy, M. (2014). Effects of plant- growth-promoting rhizobacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal  fungus on plant growth, stevioside, NPK and chlorophyll content of Stevia rebaudiana. Journal of Plant Interactions. 9(1): 128-136. doi: 10.1080/17429145.2013.779035.

  29. Xavier, L.J.C., Germida, J.J. (2003). Bacteria associated with Glomus clarum spores influence mycorrhizal activity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 35: 471-478. doi: 10.1016/ S0038-0717(03)00003-8. ​​​

Editorial Board

View all (0)