Plant height (cm)
The results of the statistical analysis of Table 2 showed significant differences in the experimental factors for the plant height trait, as spraying with hydrogen peroxide at level 0 gave the highest average for the plant height trait, reaching 113.72 cm, compared to level 6, which gave the lowest average for the plant height trait, reaching 80.83 cm, while the experimental treatment of spraying with zinc at level 100 was significantly excelled with a value of 100.56 cm compared to level 0, which recorded the lowest value of 93.07 cm. As for the treatment of the amino acid selenocysteine, the spraying treatment at level 50 was significantly excelled, recording the highest value of 102.84 cm, compared to the treatment at level 0, which gave the lowest value of 90.06 cm. However, it was found that bi-interaction of the spray treatment between zinc for level 100 + selenocysteine for level 50 gave the highest value of 106.57 cm compared to the spray treatment for bi-interaction between zinc for level 0 + selenocysteine for level 0, the lowest values were recorded at 87.61 cm. As for the triple interaction, we note the presence of significant differences in the plant height trait, as the triple interaction treatment was significantly excelled among the study treatments, where the triple interaction treatment of spraying between hydrogen peroxide for level 0 + zinc for level 100 + selenocysteine for level 50 recorded the highest value of 131.45 cm compared to the spraying treatment for bi-interaction of spraying between hydrogen peroxide for level 6 + zinc for level 0 + selenocysteine for level 0, recording the lowest values of 75.07 cm.
Total chlorophyll content in leaves (SPAD)
The results of the statistical analysis of Table 3 showed significant differences between the experimental factors for the trait of relative chlorophyll content in leaves, where spraying with hydrogen peroxide at level 0 gave the highest average for the trait of relative chlorophyll content in leaves, reaching 38.46 SPAD compared to level 6, which achieved the lowest average for the trait, reaching 36.26 SPAD. The experimental treatment for spraying with zinc at level 100 was significantly excelled with a value of 37.90 SPAD compared to level 0, which recorded the lowest value of 36.85 SPAD, while the treatment of the amino acid selenocysteine was significantly excelled to the treatment of spraying at level 50, recording the highest value of 38.94 SPAD compared to the treatment at level 0, which gave the lowest value of 35.95 SPAD compared to the spray treatment for bi-interaction between zinc at leve l 0 + selenocystin for level 0 recorded the lowest value of 35.51 SPAD. The results of the same table for the triple interaction showed significant differences in the relative chlorophyll content in leaves, where the triple interaction treatment was significantly excelled among the study treatments, as the triple interaction treatment of spraying between hydrogen peroxide for level 0 + zinc for level 100 + selenocystin for level 50 recorded the highest value of 40.55 SPAD compared to the spraying treatment for bi-interaction of spraying between hydrogen peroxide for level 6 + zinc for level 0 + selenocystin for level 0, recording the lowest value of 34.09 SPAD.
Proline concentration in leaves
The results of the statistical analysis of Table 4 showed significant differences between the experimental factors for the protein percentage trait, as spraying with hydrogen peroxide at level 6 gave the highest average for the protein percentage trait, reaching 3.18% compared to level 0, which achieved the lowest average for the trait, reaching 1.96%, while no significant differences were observed between the treatments when spraying with zinc. As for the treatment of the amino acid selenocysteine, the spraying treatment at level 0 was significantly excelled, recording the highest value of 3.33% compared to the treatment at level 50, which gave the lowest value of 1.83% compared to The spray treatment for bi-interaction between zinc for level 0 + selenocysteine for level 50 and the spray treatment for bi-interaction between zinc for level 100 + selenocysteine for level 50 recorded the lowest value of 1.86 and 1.80% respectively. As for the triple interaction, we note the presence of significant differences in the protein percentage, as the triple interaction treatment was significantly excelled among the study treatments, as the triple interaction treatments for spraying hydrogen peroxide for level 6 + zinc for level 0 + selenocysteine for level 0 and the treatment between hydrogen peroxide for level 6 + zinc for level 100 + selenocysteine for level 0 recorded the highest value of 4.11 and 4.08% respectively, compared to the spray treatment for bi-interaction between hydrogen peroxide for level 0 + zinc for level 100 + selenocysteine for level 50, recording the lowest value of 1.25%.
Number of fruits (fruit.plant-1)
The results of the statistical analysis of Table 5 showed significant differences between the experimental factors for the number of fruits trait, as spraying with hydrogen peroxide at level 0 gave the highest average for the number of fruits trait, reaching 11.18 fruit. plant
-1 compared to level 6, which achieved the lowest average for the trait, reaching 3.31 fruit. plant
-1, while the experimental treatment for spraying with zinc at level 100 was significantly excelled with a value of 9.03 fruit. plant
-1 compared to level 0, which recorded the lowest value of 6.42 fruits per plant
-1. As for the treatment of the amino acid selenocysteine, the spraying treatment at level 50 was significantly excelled, recording the highest value of 9.01 fruit. plant
-1 compared to the treatment at level 0, which gave the lowest value of 6.67 fruit. plant
-1.
As for bi-interaction of the spray treatment between zinc at level 100 + selenocysteine at level 50, it achieved the highest value of 11.61 fruit. plant-1compared to the spray treatments for bi-interaction between zinc at level 0 + selenocysteine at level 0, zinc spray at level 0 + selenocysteine at level 25, zinc spray at level 0 + selenocysteine at level 50 and zinc spray at level 100 + selenocysteine at level 0, recording the lowest values of 6.32, 6.53, 6.41 and 7.03 fruit. plant
-1, respectively. Regarding the triple interaction, we note the presence of significant differences in the number of fruits trait, where the triple interaction treatment was significantly excelled among the study treatments, where the triple interaction treatment of spraying between hydrogen peroxide at level 0 + zinc at level 100 + selenocysteine at level 50 recorded the highest value of 19.07 fruit.plant
-1 compared to the spray treatments for bi-interaction between hydrogen peroxide at level 6 + zinc at level 0 + selenocysteine at level 0, spraying hydrogen peroxide at level 6 + zinc at level 0 + selenocysteine at level 25, spraying hydrogen peroxide at level 6 + zinc at level 0 + selenocysteine at level 50, spraying hydrogen peroxide at level 6 + zinc at level 100 + selenocysteine at level 0, spraying hydrogen peroxide at level 6 + zinc at level 100 + selenocysteine at level 25 and spraying hydrogen peroxide at level 6 + zinc at level 100 + selenocysteine at level 50 recorded the lowest value of 2.73, 3.56, 2.63, 3.10, 3.66 and 4.20 fruit.plant
-1 respectively.
Total plant yield (Mg.ha-1)
The results of the statistical analysis of Table 6 showed significant differences between the experimental factors for the total plant yield trait, as spraying with hydrogen peroxide at level 0 gave the highest average for the total plant yield trait, reaching 134.00 Mg.ha
-1 compared to level 6, which achieved the lowest average for the trait, reaching 39.66 Mg.ha
-1. The experimental treatment for spraying with zinc at level 100 was significantly excelled with a value of 94.33 Mg.ha
-1 compared to level 0, which recorded the lowest value of 80.55 Mg.ha
-1, while the treatment of the amino acid selenocysteine was significantly excelled to the spraying treatment at level 50, recording the highest value of 115.72 Mg.ha
-1 compared to the treatment at level 0, which gave the lowest value of 67.88 Mg.ha
-1. The results of the same table for the triple interaction showed significant differences in the total plant yield trait, as the triple interaction treatment was significantly excelled among the study treatments, as the triple interaction treatment for spraying between hydrogen peroxide for level 0 + zinc for level 100 + selenocysteine for level 50 recorded the highest value of 195.00 Mg.ha
-1 compared to the spray treatment for bi-interaction between hydrogen peroxide for level 6 + zinc for level 0 + selenocysteine for level 0, recording the lowest value of 28.33 Mg.ha
-1.
The results of the experiment showed that spraying the plant with hydrogen peroxide at a concentration of 6 mg L
-1 led to a significant decrease in all the studied characteristics, as hydrogen peroxide (H
2O
2) is one of the reactive oxygen species (ROS), which leads to damage to the cell structure and also acts as a strong signal molecule that mediates physiological and biochemical processes in plants
(Nurnaeimah et al., 2020; Li et al., 2017). Hydrogen peroxide (H
2O
2) is a weak acid from the ROS group that is formed inside the plant cell under natural conditions and its concentration increases when exposed to various stresses as a result of the reduction of two electrons from the oxygen molecule with the help of the enzyme superoxide dismutase (SOD). Hydrogen peroxide participates in many vital reactions and when its concentration increases, it causes oxidative damage to enzymes, membrane lipids, proteins and other cellular components, leading to cell death. It is the only free radical capable of spreading through membrane water channels (Aquaporin) and crossing longer distances inside the cell, as it is able to It causes damage in areas far from its place of production inside the cell, while at low concentrations it acts as a chemical signal transmitter that causes resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses, contributes to the growth of root hairs, wood differentiation and stomata and regulates the process of closing and opening stomata to correct plant growth and development
(Rahman et al., 2020; Nagalakshmi et al., 2017).
Zinc has many different important physiological roles as it is an essential element in manufacturing and metabolic processes and this element has a role in the vital functions of structural molecules such as nucleic acid and an activator of metabolism and regulation of enzymes and these results are consistent with what
(Rahman et al., 2024) reached when studying the effect of foliar spraying with zinc on okra yield and these results are consistent with what 10 reached when evaluating the effect of foliar spraying with zinc sulfate on okra growth and yield and also consistent with what
(Singh et al., 2022) reached to evaluate the effect of foliar spraying with zinc on okra growth and yield. While spraying with the amino acid selenocysteine at a concentration of 50 mg L
-1 led to a significant increase in all experimental traits, the reason for improving the yield traits may be due to the role of selenium, which is the main element of the amino acid selenocysteine, in increasing the relative water content of leaves, proline, total soluble sugars, protein, phenols, flavonoids and antioxidant enzymes. Selenium also contributes to the stability of the cell membrane and reducing the leakage of ions by enhancing the production of protective compounds and enhancing the activity of antioxidant enzymes
(Nurnaeimah et al., 2020). Selenium also has vital and physiological functions in the plant, as it encourages the formation of dry matter, increases the rates of carbohydrate and starch formation and their accumulation in plastids, regulates the water balance in the plant and encourages the plant to form anti-stress hormones such as ethylene, jasmonic and salicylic acids, which leads to an increase in the diameter and length of the fruit and thus an increase in its weight (
Alrawi, 2018;
Muñoz-Salinas et al., 2021).