The interplay between environmental degradation and real GDP per capita has been the subject of extensive investigation in recent empirical research. Specifically, notable economic growth has been documented in developing nations over the past several decades. Nevertheless, this economic advancement has precipitated environmental degradation, primarily attributed to the substantial levels of carbon dioxide (CO
2) emissions. This phenomenon exacerbates the greenhouse effect and arises from quotidian activities associated with fossil fuel-dependent energy sources and deforestation practices. According to the
World Population Reviews (2025), the leading three emitters of CO
2 globally in 2025 are identified as China, the United States and India. India, as examined in this research, represented a global share of 7.57% in carbon dioxide (CO
2) emissions in 2023. Collectively, these three nations have contributed over 53% of global CO
2 emissions (
WPR, 2025). India is experiencing a rapid increase in energy consumption, driven by essential GDP growth for a developing economy and increased demands for cooling during heatwaves. In light of notable progress in the deployment of renewable energy sources and a continuous decline in associated costs, the demand for fossil fuels in India remains unchanged. In the first half of 2024, coal production and imports reached an unprecedented high to meet the heightened seasonal demand for electricity. At present, non-fossil energy sources represent 46% of India’s total installed capacity, suggesting that the nation is progressing effectively towards its conditional NDC target of reaching 50% non-fossil capacity ahead of the anticipated timeline. Nonetheless, The Climate Action Tracker (CAT) evaluates India’s climate targets and policies as “Highly Insufficient,” suggesting that India’s climate strategies and commitments are not consistent with the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C temperature threshold (
CAT, 2025).
Developing nations exhibit a significant reliance on fossil fuel resources, specifically oil, coal and natural gas. The empirical literature regarding the robustness of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis, particularly in relation to electricity consumption, remains limited within the specified demographic. For example,
Al Sayed and Sek (2013) conducted an inquiry into the EKC hypothesis across both developed and developing economies. Their findings indicated that developed nations possess elevated turning points when juxtaposed with their developing counterparts. Environmental degradation has emerged as a pressing issue and a significant concern that impacts the attainment of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), primarily attributable to the rapid escalation of CO
2 emissions and global warming
(Ahmed et al., 2020; Ibrahim and Law, 2016). The origins of pollutant emissions in developing nations remain ambiguous and contentious (
Ha and Nguyen, 2021). A multitude of studies has demonstrated that nations with a strong institutional framework are more likely to undertake initiatives aimed at reducing CO
2 emissions, lessening greenhouse gases, addressing climate change and improving environmental quality. A significant number of empirical analyses have confirmed that nations with well-established institutional structures are more inclined to undertake efforts focused on reducing CO
2 emissions, greenhouse gas expansion, the consequences of climate change and the enhancement of environmental quality
(Ahmed et al., 2020; Dées, 2020;
Ibrahim and Law, 2016;
Khan and Rana, 2021;
Ntow-Gyamfi et al., 2020). The caliber of institutions can play a pivotal role in promoting sustainable development
(Hunjra et al., 2020), as the enhancement of institutional efficacy constitutes a fundamental mechanism for regulating and diminishing pollutant emissions within the context of economic advancement
(Lau et al., 2014). An alternative investigation posited that the quality of institutions exerts a beneficial influence on the growth of per capita CO
2 emissions
(Runar et al., 2017) and adversely affects environmental quality
(Islam et al., 2021). Institutional performance is critically important in establishing a connection between foreign direct investment (FDI) and environmental pollutants; additionally, climate change negatively affects productivity growth, yet robust institutions can alleviate the adverse effects of climate change by facilitating the technology adoption process in developing nations (
Ha and Nguyen, 2021;
Kumar and Managi, 2016). In this context, it is essential to enhance institutional frameworks to implement more effective and efficient practices, wherein a well-functioning institution can be realized through the enforcement of suitable regulations, legal frameworks, property rights and corruption mitigation measures that collectively contribute to the reduction of pollutant emissions
(Ali et al., 2019). Therefore, the intricate relationship between institutional quality and carbon dioxide emissions continues to pose a significant challenge within academic discourse as a means to fulfill the United Nations’ SDGs (
Haldar and Sethi, 2021).
Verick, (2014) defined Labour Force Participation Rate (LFPR) as a measure of the proportion of a country’s working-age population that engages actively in the labor market, either by working or by looking for work. LFPR is key component in economic development, contributing significantly to rise in country’s GDP (
Costagliola, 2021;
Venu et al., 2018). In addition to this LFPR remains the most key factor of production in the agriculture as well as in manufacturing which has most influential role in contributing to efficiency in productivity of a nation (
Vishal and Sikander, 2020). As global greenhouse gas emissions have continued to rise, environmental quality has continued to deteriorate over time. In terms of labor market dynamics, these increased emissions lead to climate change and other socio-economic issues
(Achuo et al., 2023). Designing strategies to ensure social equity through the creation of decent jobs and to improve environmental quality has been a growing priority for development organization and governments
(Achuo et al., 2022). Environmental degradation is a global concern because it affects other regions of the world rather than the nation causing it. In view of growing world population, it becomes most essential priority for nations to create job opportunities for newly formed workforce. Economic growth generates new job opportunities and employment dives economic expansion
(Koyuncu et al., 2024). Economic growth and environmental degradation are positively correlated according to empirical research (
Alola, 2019;
Nasrullah et al., 2023; Rahman and Kashem, 2017). In examining the connections between environmental pollution and employment, prior research has established that the generation of foreign employment contributes to an escalation in environmental degradation, even in nations experiencing a decline in domestic job opportunities (
Zhong and Su, 2021). The implementation of environmental regulations is increasingly recognized as a vital strategy for mitigating carbon dioxide emissions, influencing both direct and indirect employment levels by fostering technological advancements and reshaping industrial frameworks
(Cao et al., 2017). Generally, a decrease in carbon dioxide emissions is associated with substantial job losses; however, it simultaneously encourages the growth of labor-intensive industries. Specifically, the service sector has the potential to realize a mutually beneficial scenario for economic advancement, the alleviation of environmental harm and the preservation of stable employment
(Bai et al., 2021), whereas prolonged working hours in households contribute to carbon dioxide emissions and diminish environmental quality in the United States
(Fremstad et al., 2019). Based on the future implications of the study of
Achuo et al., (2023), this study tries find out nexus of LFPR and environmental degradation for India. Quality green employment is crucial for resource productivity and sustainable development (
International Labor Organization, 2018) as it tackles the global issues of economic advancement, environmental conservation and social inclusion. These positions offer employment possibilities, enhance resource efficiency and foster low-carbon, sustainable civilizations.