Acreage under fodder and green manure crops
District-wise acreage under fodder crops in the Eastern plain zone of U.P. was estimated and presented in Table 1. The table reveals that the percentage area under fodder crops to the net sown area in districts of the Eastern plain zone varied 0.39 per cent to 3.58 per cent. The Eastern plain zone accounted 1.55 per cent of acreage under fodder crops to net sown area. The table further reveals that the area under kharif fodder was more as compared to the area under
Rabi and
Zaid fodder crops in all districts, except Ghazipur, indicating the disproportionate distribution of area under fodder crops across the season. It is further reported (Table 2) that the area under green manure crops varied 0.03-1.16 per cent in the districts of the zone indicating insignificant proportionate coverage to the net sown area.
Supply-demand gap of formal seeds for fodder crops
Presently, the country faces a net shortfall of 35.6 per cent of green fodder, 10.5 per cent of dry crop leftovers and 44 per cent of concentrate feed ingredients. The option for increasing land area under fodder cultivation is very limited
(Singh et al., 2022). Hence, it is a big challenge in front of us to utilize the available meager land wisely with its fullest potential to produce the fodders for the animals. The productivity of forage crops depends upon various factors and appropriate seed is one of them
(Rahman and Cho, 2016). Non-availability of quality seeds of forage crops is also limiting fodder productivity in India.
Hence, crops-wise and farmers category wise supply-demand gap of formal seeds for fodder and green manure crops was estimated and presented in Table 3 and 4. Findings presented in Table 3 reveal that the supply-demand gap of formal seeds of fodder crops was 56 per cent for sorghum and Perlmillet (bajra), 50 per cent for maize, 52 per cent for barseem (
Trifolium alexandrinum). The formal seeds of oats, cowpea, lucerne and napier grass were found negligible. The gap in the supply-demand gap of formal seeds of fodder crops across the various categories of the farms
viz., marginal and small farmers (<1 ha), medium farmers (1-2 ha) and large farmers (>1 ha) was also estimated and found that significant gap in the supply-demand of formal seeds of fodder was reported in the study area. The supply-demand gap was found 34 per cent, 39 per cent and 41 per cent for sorghum at the marginal and small farms, medium farms and large farms, respectively.
Similarly, supply-demand gap was found 42 per cent, 44 per cent and 54 per cent for sorghum at the marginal and small farms, medium farms and large farms, respectively. The estimated gap for barseem was reported 56 per cent, 58 per cent and 48 per cent at the marginal and small farms, medium farms and large farms. From the above analysis, we may say that the size of the farm and gaps in demand and supply of formal seeds for fodder crops in the study area was positively associated.
Thomas and Thomas (2019) in their study reported that only 25-30 per cent of the required quantity of quality seeds is available in cultivated fodders. So, there is a need to evolve superior varieties of forage crops with high yield and quality and also development of new technologies for multiplication.
Supply demand gap of formal seeds for green manure crops
The urd (
Vigna mungo), moong (
Vigna radiata) and dhaincha (
Sesbania bispinosa) were the main crops grown for green manuring in the study area. The supply-demand gap was estimated for seeds of green manure crops (urd, moong, dhaincha, pea, sunhemp) and presented in Table 4. Table shows that the supply-demand gap for urad, moong and dhaincha was 59 per cent, 57 per cent and 35 per cent, respectively. The farm’s category-wise supply-demand gap was highest for large farmers and lowest for marginal farms indicating an inverse relationship between the size of the farm and the use of formal seeds for green manure crops in the study area. The gap at marginal and small farms, medium farms and large farms for urd was 46 per cent, 52 per cent and 64 per cent, respectively. Similarly, the marginal and small farms, medium farms and large farms reported supply-demand gaps of 49 per cent, 52 per cent and 64 per cent for moong and 6.5 per cent, 39 per cent and 39.8 per cent for dhaincha crop. The formal seeds of pea and sunhemp were found negligible.
Seed replacement rates (SRRs) for fodder and green manure crops
Seed replacement rate (SRR) is a criterion to assess the use of certified and/or quality seed of a crop and indicates the area under quality seeds. The seed replacement ratio is a measure of how much of the total cropped area was sown with certified seeds in comparison to farm-saved seeds
(Chand, 2007). Improving SRR helps in enhancing the productivity of the crop. Table 5 shows that the SRR was highest for cowpea (49.6%) followed by sorghum, maize, perlmillet (bajra) and barseem accounted 48.3 per cent, 46.2 per cent, 45.4 per cent and 42.3 per cent, respectively. Further, oats and lucerne accounted 100 per cent use of formal seeds but these were grown by only a few large farmers.
Similarly, Table 6 shows seed replacement rates (SRR) for green manure crops indicating the share of formal seeds as percentage of cropped area. The SRR was highest for dhaincha (65.00%) followed by moong (42.35%), urd (40.18%). Table 6 further reveals that marginal and small farmers use proportionate more land for cultivation of fodder and green manure crops by formal seeds compared to large farmers. Alternatively, the proportion of land allocated for formal seeds declines with the size of landholdings for fodder and green manure crops. Seed replacement for fodder and green manure crops were positively associated with the price and timely availability of the formal seeds (Table 7). Farm size is negatively associated with SRR of the fodder and green manure crops in the study area. Low SRR signifies the need to strengthen the seed supply systems for fodder and green manure crops.
Perceptions of the seed characters by farmers
The distribution of farmers on various parameters of accessibility of formal seed is provided in Table 7. The attitude of the farmers toward access to formal seeds from different sources was found to be the significant cause of the supply-demand gap mentioned above (Table 4 and 5). It is clear from Table 7 that the formal seeds produced by the private sector were the best on the quality scale among the seeds that were made available from different sources. However, the seeds of the public sector also had a significant place in terms of quality. On the other hand, seeds from the informal sector were given less preference by farmers in terms of quality. Despite these, the reason for the gap found in the access to formal seeds belonging to the public sector was its non-availability in time and quantity. The availability of seeds of desired varieties through the public sector was also an issue of concern. Whereas, access to formal seeds belonging to the private sector was limited due to higher prices in comparison to the farmers’ saved seeds and formal seeds of the public sector causing the supply-demand gap for the fodder and green manure crops.
The informal seeds were found cheapest among all as almost 64 per cent of farmers believed that the seed prices through the informal system varied from cheap to very cheap in prices. The public sector also provided the seeds at lower prices in comparison to the private sector and informal sectors but farmers thought that the seeds from the public sector were less available compared with seeds produced by farmers and the private sector. Whereas formal seeds provided through the private sector were made available in time and proper quantity as 66 per cent of farmers agreed to fair availability and 23 per cent of farmers reported reasonably abundant the seeds through the private sector. Apart from this, the informal seeds for fodder and green manure crops were made available timely at cheap prices. Hence, the question arises of how formal sectors, either private or public sector, channelize the formal seeds through the informal sector so that seeds are made available in time and at the possible lowest prices.