Germination energy and germination percentage
The results showed that germination energy was significantly affected by genotype (F=57.65; df=3; p<0.001), temperature (F=791.64; df=2; p<0.001), salinity level (F=81.06; df=5; p<0.001) and interaction of temperature x genotype (F=19.91; df=6; p<0.001), temperature ´ salinity level (F=7.51; df=10; p<0.001), genotype ´ salinity level (F=9.40; df=15; p<0.001), temperature × genotype x salinity level (F=1.95; df=30; p=0.0058).
The highest germination energy of CUF-101 and alfalfa genotypes was observed at 25
oC (T
25), while the lowest germination energy was observed at 32
oC (T
32). CUF-101 had the highest germination energy (85.61%) followed by genotype 16 (71.39%) (Table 1). The highest germination energy was also obtained at T25 and 100 mM of NaCl (95.00%) and KCl (91.67%) in CUF-101, followed by genotype 16. The germination energy of genotype 16 under 100 mM of CaCl
2 at T
25 (91.33%) was higher than CUF-101 (87.67%) (Table 2). The lowest germination energy was recorded at T
32. Genotype 16 had the lowest germination energy, with 200 mM NaCl and CaCl
2 (9.33%). T
25 had a positive effect on germination energy for CUF-101 and alfalfa genotypes, although T
32 had a lethal effect on germination energy. According to the temperature, the germination energy of CUF-101 and alfalfa genotypes was lined T
25, T
18 and T
32 (Fig 1).
The ANOVA showed that germination percentage was significantly affected by genotype (F=70.09; df=3; p<0.001), temperature (F=1733.83; df=2; p<0.001), salinity level (F=92.41; df=5; p<0.001) and interaction of temperature x genotype (F=31.48; df=6; p<0.001), temperature × salinity level (F=9.13; df=10; p<0.001), genotype x salinity level (F=8.30; df=15; p<0.001) and temperature x genotype x salinity level (F=2.58; df=30; p=0.001).
The germination percentage of the alfalfa plants was the highest at T
25 with 91.06% in CUF-101, followed by genotype 16 with 78.11%. Similar to the germination energy, T32 had a negative effect on germination percentage, with the lowest germination percentage values (Table 1). The highest germination percentage was obtained at T
25 and 100 mM of KCl (97.33%) and NaCl (96.33%) in CUF-101, followed by genotype 16. The highest germination per centage at T
25 under 100 mM CaCl
2 was recorded in genotype 16 (95.33%) (Table 2). The lowest germination percentage was observed at T
32, similar to the germination energy. Genotype 16 had the lowest germination percentage, with 200 mM NaCl (12.00%) and CaCl
2 (12.66%). In particular, the germination percentage followed a decreasing trend from T
25 to T
32‚ due to the interactive effects of temperature and increasing salt levels (T25 > T18 > T32) (Fig 1).
Germination indexes and mean germination days
The ANOVA showed that germination index was significantly affected by genotype (F=100.66; df=3; p<0.001), temperature (F=833.36; df=3; p<0.001), salinity level (F=259.47; df=5; p<0.001) and interaction of temperature x genotype (F=30.66; df=6; p<0.001), temperature ´ salinity level (F=8.14; df=10; p<0.001), genotype x salinity (F=8.93; df=15; p<0.001) and temperature × genotype x salinity level (F=2.87; df=30; p<0.001).
The germination index was the highest at T
25 in CUF-101 (73.49%), followed by genotype 16 (60.89%) (Table 1). The genotype 16 had a higher germination index at T
32‚ compared to CUF-101, similar to germination energy and germination percentage. The negative effect of T
32‚ on the germination index was significantly higher compared to T
18 and T
25 (Fig 1). The highest germination index was obtained at T
25 and 100 mM of KCl in CUF-101 (94.22%), followed by genotype 16 under 100 mM of CaCl
2 (88.67%) (Table 2). The lowest germination index was found at T
32, similar to the germination energy and germination percentage. CUF-101 and genotype 16 had the lowest germination index values with 200 mM NaCl (5.16% and 5.99%), respectively. KCl had the highest germination index at all three stable temperatures (Fig 4). The most lethal effect of salt type on the germination index was observed with NaCl, followed by CaCl
2 and KCl in the same order.
The ANOVA showed that mean germination days were significantly affected by genotype (F=56.64; df=3; p<0.001), temperature (F=933.83; df=2; p<0.001), salinity level (F=76.91; df=5; p<0.001) and interaction of temperature x genotype (F=26.18; df=18; p<0.001), temperature x salinity level (F=7.86; df=10; p<0.001), genotype x salinity (F=6.95; df=15; p<0.001) and temperature x genotype x salinity level (F=2.18; df=30; p=0.0016).
T
25 gave the earliest mean germination days compared to T
18 and T
32 (T
25 > T
18 > T
32) (Fig 1). CUF-101 and genotype 16 were the two earliest alfalfa plants at T
25 (3.47 and 3.21 days), respectively (Table 1). Genotype 16 had the earliest mean germination days under 100 mM of NaCl (1.20 days) and KCl (1.26 days) at T25, which were earlier than CUF-101. The latest mean germination days were obtained at T32 and 200 mM of KCl in CUF-101 (9.73 days), followed by genotype 16 under 200 mM CaCl
2 (9.53 days) (Table 2).
Root length and shoot length
The ANOVA showed that root length was significantly affected by genotype (F=36.68; df=3; p<0.001), temperature (F=662.33; df=2; p<0.001), salinity level (F=359.27; df=5; p<0.001) and interaction of temperature x genotype (F=11.60; df=6; p<0.001), temperature ´ salinity level (F=11.44; df=10; p<0.001), genotype ´ salinity level (F=4.23; df=15; p<0.001), except temperature x genotype x salinity level (F=2.49; df=30; p=0.0003) (p£0.01).
The root length of CUF-101 at T
25 (2.36 cm) and T
18 (1.96 cm) was higher compared to T
32 (0.79 cm). Genotype 16 was the closest genotype to CUF-101 in terms of root length at T
25 (1.89 cm) and T18 (1.80 cm) (Table 1). The highest root length was obtained at T
25 and 100 mM of NaCl (3.39 cm) and KCl (3.21 cm) in CUF-101, followed by genotype 3. The root length of genotype 3 was recorded at T
18 and 100 mM NaCl (3.33 cm). Genotype 3, genotype 9 and genotype 16 did not survive the interactive effects of T
32 and 200 mM CaCl
2. These genotypes germinated but were not sufficiently developed to progress the next stage (vegetative stage) of the plant life cycle, except for CUF-101. Both temperature from T
25 to T
32 and increasing salinity levels’ resulted in reduced root length. CaCl2 was the salt type that had the greatest negative effect on root length, followed by NaCl and KCl, especially at T
32.
The ANOVA showed that shoot length was significantly affected by genotype (F=42.27; df=3; p<0.001), temperature (F=1961.38; df=3; p<0.001), salinity level (F=531.40; df=5; p<0.001) and interaction of temperature x salinity level (F=21.08; df=10; p<0.001), genotype ´ salinity level (F=11.26; df=15; p<0.001), temperature ´ genotype ´ salinity level (F=4.17; df=30; p<0.001), except temperature ´ genotype (F=4.06; df=6; p=0.0095) (p≤0.01).
The highest shoot length of CUF-101 and alfalfa genotypes was obtained at T
25, followed by T
18 and T
32 (Fig 1). The highest shoot lengths at T25 were found for CUF-101 (2.91 cm) and genotype 16 (2.47 cm), (Table 1). CUF-101 (4.37 cm) and genotype 16 (3.85 cm) had the highest shoot lengths under the interactive effects of 100 mM KCl at T
25 and T
18, respectively (Table 2). Genotype 3, genotype 9 and genotype 16 did not survive at the T
32 under 200 mM CaCl
2.
Fresh weight, dry weight and seed vigor
The ANOVA showed that fresh weight was significantly affected by genotype (F=274.97; df=3; p<0.001), temperature (F=235.63; df=2; p<0.001), salinity level (F=258.91; df=5; p<0.001) and interaction of temperature x genotype (F=40.40; df=6; p<0.001), genotype ´ salinity level (F=14.03; df=15; p<0.001), temperature x genotype x salinity level (F=7.31; df=30; p<0.001), except temperature´ salinity level (F=3.67; df=10; p=0.0003) (p≤0.01).
The temperature effects on the fresh weight were T
25 > T
18 > T
32 (Fig 1). CUF-101 had the heaviest fresh weight (0.340 g), followed by genotype 16 (0.271 g) under all three stable temperatures (Table 1). The fresh weight was also the heaviest for CUF-101 under the interactive effects of T25 and 100 mM KCl (0.429 g) and NaCl (0.392 g). The lightest fresh weight was obtained at T
32 with 200 mM CaCl
2 for genotype 9 (0.087 g). This was followed by genotype 3 at T
32 with 200 mM CaCl
2 (0.092 g). Compared to the different salt types in comparison to each other, CUF-101 and alfalfa genotypes were more resistant to KCl, although they were more sensitive to CaCl
2 (Fig 4).
The ANOVA showed that dry weight was significantly affected by genotype (F=3.70; df=3; p=0.001), salinity level (F=2.91; df=5; p=0.0162), temperatures x genotype (F=3.47; df=6; p=0.0187) (p£0.05), except temperature (F=4.11; df=2; p=0.106), temperature ´ salinity level (F=1.07; df=10; p=0.387), genotype ´ salinity level (F=0.72; df=15; p=0.757) and temperatures x genotype x salinity level (F=1.27; df=30; p=0.182).
The dry weight of CUF-101 and alfalfa genotypes showed variability (0.057-0.147 g) (Table 1). CUF-101 had the heaviest dry weight, followed by genotypes 16, 3 and 9. The effect of the salinity levels on dry weight ranged (0.043-0.114 g). The heaviest dry weight was obtained with 100 mM NaCl, whereas the lightest dry weight was obtained with 200 mM CaCl2 (Table 2). The most damaging salt type for dry weight was CaCl2 (0.057 g), followed by KCl (0.087 g) and NaCl (0.097 g).
The ANOVA showed that seedling vigour was significantly affected by genotype (F=189.77; df=3; p<0.001), temperature (F=981.83; df=3; p<0.001), salinity level (F=371.21; df=5; p<0.001) and interaction of temperature x genotype (F=62.44; df=6; p<0.001), temperature ´ salinity level (F=32.12; df=10; p<0.001), genotype x salinity level (F=9.67; df=15; p<0.001), temperature × genotype x salinity level (F=3.05; df=30; p<0.001).
The maximum seedling vigour values were obtained at T
25, followed by T18 and T32. The maximum seedling vigour was observed for CUF-101 at T25 with 100 mM KCl (737.36) and NaCl (656.13) (Table 2). Genotype 16 was incubated at the same temperature with 100 mM KCl (601.14). Except for CUF-101, genotypes 3, 9 and 16 did not survive the interactive effects at T32 and 200 mM CaCl2. The lowest seedling vigour was observed in CUF-101 (17.15), genotype 16 (17.73) and genotype 9 (26.54) at T
32 with 200 mM NaCl, in the same order.
Principal component analysis (PCA) of CUF-101 and alfalfa genotypes
PCA revealed a high level of variation in the genotypes. The variation examined by PCA showed that two principal components with more than two eigenvalues accounted for 79.90% of the total variance among the nine germination traits, with germination energy (0.366) and germination percentage (0.369) being the main contributors (Fig 2). All PC1 contributors had positive associations, whereas PC2 contributors had negative associations. CUF-101 and genotype 16 are positively associated with components 1, 2 and the loading matrix (Fig 2). PCA plots about temperatures and salinity levels showed that all salt types with 100 mM and T
25 were optimal conditions that had positive associations with the PCA plots (Fig 2).
Pearson’s correlation coefficients of the quantitative germination traits were tested to determine the relationship between germination percentage and other germination traits (Fig 3). Germination percentage had very strong and positive relationship with germination energy (+0.98) and germination index (+0.89). Secondly; shoot length (+0.72), root length (+0.66) and fresh weight (+0.64) may be considered to have strong relationship with germination percentage (Fig 3).
The current study aimed to investigate the interactive effects of temperature and different salt levels on CUF-101 and alfalfa genotypes during the germination phase. Temperature and salinity have a statistically significant effect on seed germination (
Weber, 2009;
Farooq et al., 2021). The combination between them can be complex, with different temperature and salinity levels leading to various effects on seed germination and seedling growth (
Munns and Tester, 2008).
The interactive effects of increasing temperature and salinity progressively reduced germination energy and percentage in CUF-101 and the three alfalfa genotypes.
Li et al., (2010) and
Soltani et al., (2012) emphasized that salinization reduces the germination percentage of alfalfa.
Malik et al., (2022) also stated that increasing temperature and salinity levels significantly reduced the germination energy and germination percentage at 30-35oC in their study, which had a similar temperature (T
32) with the current study. When combined with high temperatures, excessive concentrations of salt ions can impede water uptake by germinating seeds
(Mangwane et al., 2021). The results indicated that the optimal temperature (T
25) to the highest temperature (T
32) and higher salinity delayed germination energy and percentage very sharply, which was in agreement with
Sharavdorj et al., (2021) (Fig 4). Genotype 16 was the alfalfa genotype, which had similar features to CUF-101 in terms of germination energy and percentage. In addition, genotype 16 was more resistant to the interactive effects of T
32 and had lower salinity levels than CUF-101. Alfalfa genotypes showed a greater alleviating effect on germination percentage at T
25 and T
32 under 100 mM CaCl
2 compared to 100 mM NaCl and KCl. At the higher salinity level of the salts (200 mM) on CUF-101 and alfalfa genotypes, KCl had the highest germination percentage over NaCl and CaCl
2. Steppuhn
et al. (2012) determined that CaCl
2, NaCl and their mixture reduced the alfalfa emergence (3.00-30.00%).
Germination index is a quantitative measure of seed viability and germination potential. It is also used as an indicator of seed quality and vigour. The germination index increased from T
18 to T
25 in CUF-101 and alfalfa genotypes except for genotype 9, but it decreased dramatically from T
25 to T
32 (Fig 1). These results showed that the T
25 can mitigate the inhibitory effect of salt stress on the germination index of CUF-101 and alfalfa genotypes, except genotype 9. NaCl had a significantly higher lethal effect on the germination index than CaCl
2 and KCl in CUF-101 and alfalfa genotypes at T
25. The germination index drastically decreased with increasing temperature and salinity, which was consistent with the results of
Wang et al., (2022). Higher salinity level (200 mM) of CaCl
2 and KCL at T
25 showed a superior germination index compared to NaCl for CUF-101 and alfalfa genotypes (Fig 4). It is also well known that salinity negatively correlates with the germination index
(Saddiq et al., 2021). Salinization, combined with temperature, increased the mean germination days.
Sepehri et al., (2015) stated that mean germination days varied for alfalfa genotypes (1.00-3.60 days), which was parallel to results at T
25 under 100 mM NaCl and KCl in the current study. In all three stable temperatures, T32 was negatively affected by mean germination days (T
32 > T
18 > T
25), especially when it is combined with 200 mM NaCL and CaCl
2 and KCl. The 200 mM NaCl and T
32 combination delayed mean germination days longer than the other salt types. It was observed that alfalfa plants were more sensitive to NaCl than CaCl
2 and KCl when the temperature increased.
Among the various parameters used to assess salinity tolerance, root and shoot lengths were considered the most important. This is because roots are the primary organs responsible for water and nutrient uptake from the soil and their growth and function are directly affected by salt stress
(Saddiq et al., 2021; Yu et al., 2021). A similar pattern was observed for germination traits such as seedling growth; root length, shoot length, fresh weight and dry weight all decreased with increasing salinity in both CUF-101 and alfalfa genotypes. T
25 provided an available seedling establishment, which could minimize competition in the seedling stage as a suitable thermo-period. The interactive effects of salinity and temperature, through osmotic and specific ion toxic effects, ultimately limited root length and shoot length in the current study, which is in agreement with
Niste et al., (2015) and
Sepehri et al., (2015). In particular, when the temperature reached T
25 with 200 mM CaCl
2, there was no development in root length or shoot length for the alfalfa genotypes in the current study. The lethal effect of CaCl2 on alfalfa plants was more evident at high temperatures than that of NaCl and KCl. The closest genotype root length to CUF-101 (3.39 cm) was genotype 3 (3.33 cm) at T
18 under 100 mM NaCl in the current study. The shoot length was the highest for CUF-101 at T
25 (4.36 cm). Genotype 16 was the closest genotype to CUF-101 under a similar salinity level of salt type at the T
25. The reduction of fresh and dry weights is a common phenomenon in plants under salinity stress. Similar trends were observed for fresh weight, dry weight and root and shoot lengths. The reduction of fresh weight and dry weight was observed from T
18 to T
32. The fresh weight of the alfalfa genotypes decreased from T
18 to T
32, except for CUF-101. The genotype with the lowest reduction and the closest genotype to CUF-101 was genotype 16. This genotype’s fresh weight decreased (10.00%) from T
18 to T
25 compared to other alfalfa genotypes. Seedling vigour was dramatically reduced by increasing temperature and salinity level for CUF-101 and all alfalfa genotypes, similar to the findings of
Baha (2022). Seedling vigour was the maximum at T25 compared to the other two stable temperatures (T
25 > T
18 > T
32). The combination of 100 mM KCl and T
25 showed the maximum seedling vigour. Similar to the purposes of
Benlioglu et al., (2022), Ozkan et al., (2022) and Guo and Shi (2024), PCA revealed the similar links between the some parameters which were germination traits for CUF-101 and genotype 16 in the current study (Fig 2). Especially, PC1 separated the salinity tolerance genotype with higher potential performance from genotypes sensitive to salinity with low potential performance. PCA, a multivariate analysis, highlighted the relationships between CUF-101 and genotype 16 in contrast to genotype 3 and genotype 9. CUF-101 and genotype 16 were considered salt-tolerant alfalfa plants, while genotype 3 and genotype 9 were salt-sensitive.