Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Characterization of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria and Their Benefits on Soybean Growth

Sanja Kajić1,*, Andrea Gradinščak1, Dominik Königshofer1, Ivana Fadljević1, Sanja Sikora1, Ivana Rajnović1
1Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
  • Submitted31-05-2024|

  • Accepted13-09-2024|

  • First Online 18-10-2024|

  • doi 10.18805/LRF-819

Background: Soybean is the most important legume in the world and its seeds contains 40% protein and 20% oil. In recent years, more attention has been paid to the use of plant growth-promoting (PGP) rhizobacteria as a biofertilizer alternative to chemical fertilizers, which may pose risks to the environment. The rhizobia inoculation of soybean is a sustainable practice to induce atmospheric nitrogen fixation and subsequently improve crop productivity and soil fertility.

Methods: In this study, 19 indigenous rhizobia isolated from soybean were tested in vitro for their plant growth-promoting properties (PGPR), while genotypic characterization included sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene.

Result: Morphological characterisation has shown that all of the isolates were rod-shaped gram negative bacteria. The sequencing has shown that 12 out of 19 isolates belong to the genus Pseudomonas, four of which belong to P. fluorescens species. Isolates which belong to the Pseudomonas genus have shown the highest ability of indole-3-acetic acid synthesis, phosphorous solubilization and along with isolates SGN6, SGN7 and SGS4 (Sphingomonas sanguinis) potassium solubilisation too. All the isolates from Pseudomonas genus as well as those belonging to B. japonicum species have shown the protease synthesis abilities while amylase synthesis abilities was observed only in the isolate SAK2 (P. chlororaphis). The most efficient strains in in vitro biological nitrogen fixation assay belong to Pseudomonas and Rhizobium genera. Most of the isolates were positive to the organic acid production while all of them have shown the ability of the exopolysaccharide production.

Soybean (Glycine max L.) is one of the most important cultivated legumes in the world due to the chemical composition of its grain; high content of oil (18-22%), protein (17 to 42%), minerals (calcium, zinc and iron) and vitamins (Widawati, 2018). As a legume, soybean has the ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen through symbiosis with efficient root nodule bacteria. This capability provides significant amounts of available nitrogen, making soybean well fitted for crop rotations (Marinkovic et al., 2018). Because of its importance, more research related to the production of soybean in different parts of the world is being conduct. This includes utilization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) to increase soybean yield and to aid soybean adaptation in extreme environments. Application of PGPR in legume production has been mainly restricted to rhizobia manipulation in studies on increase legume growth and development, specifically by means of nodulation and nitrogen fixation. The main reason for that is because a broad range of soil-borne rhizobia species can establish symbiosis with legumes (Cooper, 2007). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) include an ample variety of soil bacteria which, when grown in association with host plant stimulate the growth of their host by increasing mobility uptake and enrichment of nutrients in plant (Cakmakci et al., 2006). PGPR also possess lots of mechanisms for the production and regulation of phytohormones and suppression of disease causing organisms (Ngoma et al., 2012). These bacteria are used to sustain agriculture as biofertilizers and biocontrol agents (Babalola, 2010). Plant growth promotion occurs by the alteration of the whole microbial community in rhizospheric region through the production of various substances by PGPR (Vacheron et al., 2013). PGPR promote plant growth directly by either enhancing plant‘s nutritional status facilitating resource acquisition (nitrogen, phosphorus and essential minerals) and stimulating systemic disease resistance mechanisms or modulating plant hormone levels or indirectly by decreasing the inhibitory effects of various pathogens on plant growth and development in the forms of biocontrol agents (Yu et al., 2016; Glick et al., 2007).
       
Several different studies have depicted proteobacteria especially those from family Pseudomonadaceae or Burkholderiaceae as dominant members of rhizosphere microflora (Wei et al., 2017, Uroz et al., (2010). Diverse symbiotic (Rhizobium, Bradyrhizobium, Mesorhizobium) and non-symbiotic (Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Klebsiella, Azotobacter, Azospirillum, Azomonas) rhizobacteria are used worldwide as bio-inoculants in order to promote plant growth and development by various mechanisms, including nitrogen fixation, production of siderophores, solubilization of minerals such as phosphorus and synthesis of phytohormones (Compant et al., 2010). Different PGPR can be administered to crops in some formulations that are commercially available (Lucy et al., 2004) and recently, the popularity of microbial inoculants has substantially increased, facilitated by extensive and systematic research that has enhanced effectiveness and consistency (Berg, 2009). Understanding how plant roots select soil microbes to form the microbial community of the rhizosphere is an important scientific issue when considering the use of rhizobacteria as plant growth promoters (Drogue et al., 2012).
       
According to Ferreira de Paula et al., (2021), the demand for PGPR biofertilizers has risen continuously due to the increasing importance of organic farming with minimal use of chemicals.The effects of the use of biofertilizers on plant development and soil quality are cumulative and long-lasting; they are also less harmful to the ecosystem than those of chemical fertilizers and pesticides.
       
The objective of work was to characterize bacterial isolates regarding their biological activity and growth promotion of soybean plants (Glycine max L.) grown in a controlled environment.
Isolation of bacterial strains
 
Soil samples were collected  from the agricultural area of the Faculty of Agriculture (45o 82' 56.36"  N, 16o 032' 31.80"  E). In greenhouse pot experiment, surface sterilized soybean seeds (cultivar Gabriela) were sown directly into soil samples collected. Each experimental pot contained about 3 kg of soil sample. These plants were grown under controlled conditions; day temperature 26oC, night temperature 22oC, moisture was continiously 65%. Daylight period was setup for 16 h and night period for 8 h. The soybean tissue was collected at the flowering stage. Ten healthy plants were carefully removed, washed under tap water to remove vermiculit and they were then separated into stems, roots and nodules. Stems and roots were cut into sections 2-3 cm long. The tissue was rinsed in 70% ethanol for 30 seconds and then sterilized with 3% NaClO 3 minutes for roots and nodules and 5 minutes for stems. The tissue was then washed ten times with sterile water (Hung and Annapurna, 2004). Surface-disinfected tissue was crushed with a sterile glass rod in a sterile test tube. One loop full of the nodule, stem or root content suspension was streaked on yeast mannitol agar (YEM) plates containing 0.0025% (w/v) Congo red. After incubation for 3 to 5 days at 28oC, single colonies were selected and restreaked on YEM agar for purity (Vincent 1970). Pure cultures were preserved in 20% glycerol at -20°C until further use. The study involved 19 selected isolates and this population was partially characterized on the basis of their morphology, 16S rRNA gene sequencing and screened for different PGP traits and biocontrol properties.
 
Screening of isolates for potential plant growth promoting properties
 
Phosphate solubilisation
 
Cells from each isolate in the LOG growth phase (108 CFU/ml) were spotted on Pikovskaya’s agar (Bhutani et al., 2018). All the bacterial isolates were spot inoculated (15 µl bacterial culture previously grown on Yeast Mannitol Broth medium) at the centre of the Pikovskay agar plates and incubated for 5-6 days at 28°C. After incubation at 30oC a clear zone around the inoculation spot indicated positive result.
 
Organic acid production
 
For testing production of organic acids 24-h-old cultures produced in YMB were transferred to Methyl red - Voges-Proskauer (MR-VP) liquid medium (Senko et al., 2024) and incubated for five days at 30oC on a shaker (150 rpm). After incubation for visualization of results Methyl red test according to Senko et al., (2024) was performed using 0.02% Methyl red solution.
 
Indole-acetic-acid (IAA) test
 
IAA production was detected as described by Sherpa et al., (2021). 1 ml of the overnight culture of bacteria inoculated to a 250 ml Erlenmeyer containing 100 ml nutrient broth fortified with L-tryptophan (0.1 mg/ml). After incubation in shaker incubator for 48 h at 30oC with 150 rpm (Biosan ES-20, Latvia), bacterial culture was centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 30 min. Then 2 ml of the supernatant was mixed with 2 ml Salkowski reagent (0.5 M FeCl3 in 35% per chloric acid) and incubated for 30 min at room temperature in darkness. The optical density (OD) was recorded at 530 nm using a UV-VIS spectrophotometer (Lambda EZ 210, Perkin Elmer, USA) and the produced IAA was measured by standard curve graph. 
 
N2- fixation test
 
The capability of nitrogen fixation was checked by allowing the bacterial strains to grow in medium devoid of nitrogen. The qualitative estimation of N-fixation was checked using N-free Jensen’s agar medium. Jensen’s Medium is used for detection and cultivation of nitrogen fixing bacteria. Bacterial strains were streaked on Jensen’s medium and incubated at 28±2oC for 4-5 days. After incubation plates were observed for the bacterial growth (Sherpa et al., 2021). The growth of the milk colonies indicates a positive result.
 
EPS production
 
EPS producing activity of the bacterial isolates was done according to the method described by Jain et al., (2016). Volume of 200 µl of overnight grown cultures of all bacterial isolates were inoculated in 100 ml of NB medium and incubated at 28±2oC for 72 h at 150 rpm in shaking incubator (Biosan ES-20, Latvia). After incubation, supernatant was collected with centrifugation at 12000 rpm for 10 min at 4oC and pre-chilled acetone was added to supernatant in 3:1 ratio. Formation of precipitation was considered as positive result for EPS production.
 
Screening bacterial isolates for hydrolytic enzyme production
 
Bacterial isolates were screened for their hydrolytic enzyme production like protease and amylase.
       
Bacterial isolates were screened for their ability to produce protease onto skim milk agar or SMA (3 % v/v) medium. After 48 hours of incubation at 30oC, bacterial isolates with a clear halo zone on skim milk agar showed a positive result for protease synthesis (Tsegaye et al., 2019).
       
Amylase production by bacterial isolates was determined using starch agar as described in Mir et al., (2021) and incubated at 30oC for 48 h. At the end of the incubation period, the plates were flooded with iodine solution. Iodine reacts with starch to form a blue color compound. Hence the colorless zone surrounding colonies indicates the production of amylase.
 
Molecular characterization of plant growth promoting bacteria
 
Total DNA was extracted using DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. After extraction of genomic DNA, it was stored at -20oC for further studies. The 16S rRNA genes were polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplified by using two universal bacterial primers fD1 (5'-CCGAATTCGTCGACAACA GAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG- 3') and rD1 (5'- CCCGGGATC CAAGCTTAAGGAGGTGATCCAGCC- 3') (Sikora and Redzepović, 2003). The reaction mixture with a total volume of 25 µl, is composed of bacterial DNA (100 ng), buffer, dNTP (100 pmol), TaKaRa TaqTM polymerase (1.25U) and sterile Milli-Q water. PCR conditions were: an initial cycle of denaturation at 95oC for 3 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 94oC for 1 min, annealing at 57oC for 1 min, 72oC for 1.5 min; and a final extension at 72oC for 10 min (Sikora and Redzepovic). The PCR products were checked by horizontal gel electrophoresis (1% w/v agarose) in Tris-Acetate-EDTA (TAE) buffer. The PCR products were visualised under UV illumination after staining with ethidium bromide and photographed with Cannon Powershot A640 camera. The PCR products were purified and sequenced by Macrogen (Seoul, South Korea) using an ABI3730 XL automatic DNA sequencer and the primers fD1 and rD1. A similarity search for so generated sequence was performed using National Centre of Biotechnology Information (NCBI) BLAST program. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by Neighbour-joining (NJ) method using software MEGA X.
Bacterial isolation
 
For the preliminary characterizations of potential PGPR, 18 pure bacterial colonies were selected and characterized for their morphological traits. All bacterial isolates were Gram negative rods.
 
Screening of isolates for potential growth promoting properties
 
Testing the phosphate solubilization ability, the results showed that two isolates (SAN1 and SAK2) were able to solubilizate phosphate. Both isolates belong to the genus Pseudomonas, one of the most potent phosphomobilizers in addition to the genera Bacillus, Rhizobium, Enterobacter, Aspergillus and Penicillium (Xiao et al., 2011).
       
In a search for organic acids synthesize ability, it was found that seven isolates produced ring on the top of test tubes i.e. were able to synthesize organic acid. Glulati et al., (2010) demonstrated good results by application of P. fluorescens in soils with a high tricalcium phosphate content and concluded that the decomposition of phosphate was directly related to the production of organic acids.
       
Nitrogen fixation ability was demonstrated for 12 isolates belonging to the genera Pseudomonas, Rhizobium and Bradyrhizobium. All tested isolates had the ability to produce exopolysaccharides which is very important trait while inoculation of plants with exopolysaccharide-producing PGP bacteria results in decreased salt uptake and growth stimulation (Haggag et al., 2014).
       
Different  bacteria possess the ability to produce IAA. Ahmad et al., (2008) found that more than 80% of the tested Azotobacter and Pseudomonas strains as well 20% of the Bacillus strains synthesized indole-3-acetic acid. Kumar et al., (2012) found that PGPRs synthesize indole-3-acetic acid and other metabolically active substances which leads to an increase in root length, height of the shoot of the plant and the yield. The results in Table 1 show that all isolates have the ability to synthesize IAA. The amount of IAA produced ranges from 6.83-95.30 µg ml-1. Isolates SGS1 and SAN1 showed the highest concentration of IAA produced.
 

Table 1: Plant growth promoting characteristics of bacterial isolates.


 
Screening bacterial isolates for hydrolytic enzyme production
 
The results in Table 2 show that 63% of the isolates exhibit protease synthesis capability, which was evident as the clear zone was formed around the colony. These isolates could play a significant role in the biocontrol of a large number of plant pathogens such as Botrytis cinerea, Pythium ultimum, Fusarium oxysporum, Phytophthora spp., Sclerotium rolfsii, Rhizoctonia solani (Glick, 2012). The ability to synthesize amylase was demonstrated only by the SAK2 isolate belonging to P. chlororaphis.
 

Table 2: Biochemical caracterization of plant growth promoting bacterial isolate.


       
The obtained results present valuable data about strains which should further be analyzed in order to replace environmentally harmful mineral fertilizers. Among them, two strains deserve special attention; SAN1 for its ability to produce indole-3-acetic acid, organic acids and to solubilize phosphates and SAK2 which was also able to solubilize phosphates, fix nitrogen and demonstrated protease activity.
 
Molecular characterization of plant growth promoting bacteria
 
According to the results of 16S rRNA gene sequencing (Fig 1), 12 of 19 isolates (63%) belong to the genus Pseudomonas, four of which were identified as P. fluorescens (21%) and eight isolates (42 %) belong to P. chlororaphis species. Three out of 19 isolates (16%) were identified as B. japonicum and three as S. sanguinis. Only one isolate (0.05%) belongs to the genus Rhizobium but it was not possible to identify it at species level only by sequencing 16S rRNA gene.
 

Fig 1: Phylogenetic tree showing the relationship among 19 bacterial isolates of soybean endophytes, 16S rRNA gene sequences with reference sequences obtained through BLASTn analysis.

Inoculation with rhizobacteria to promote soybean growth is useful because they efficiently mineralize and make nutrients available. In addition, many of them have an antagonistic effect against pathogens and produce phytohormones for growth. The isolates SAN1, SAN2 and SAK2 were highlighted for all PGPR traits and show biotechnological potential. However, the efficiency and biotechnological potential of these bacterial isolates should be confirmed in the field to evaluate the effects of these microorganisms in combination with biotic and abiotic factors.
The authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educatioanl grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, empolayment, consultancies, stock ownership, on other equity interest; and expert  testimony or petent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial  interest (such as personal or professional relationship, affiliation, knowledge or beliefs)  in the subject matter or meterials discussed in this manuscript.

  1. Ahmad, F., Ahmad, I., Khan, M.S. (2008). Screening of free-living rhizospheric bacteria for their multiple plant growth promoting activities. Microbiological Research. 163(2): 173-181.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2006.04.001.

  2. Babalola, O.O. (2010).  Beneficial bacteria of agricultural importance. Biotechnology Letters. 32: 1559-1570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-010-0347-0.

  3. Berg G., Smalla K. (2009). Plant species and soil type cooperatively shape the structure and function of microbial communities in the rhizosphere. FEMS Microbioogy Ecology. 68: 1- 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00654.x.

  4. Bhutani N., Maheshwari R., Negi M., Suneja P. (2018). Optimization of IAA production by endophytic Bacillus spp. from Vigna radiata for their potential use as plant growth promoters. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences. 65(1).#DOI: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link_gateway/2018IsJPS..65...83B/. doi:10.1163/22238980-00001025.

  5. Cakmakci R., Donmez F., Aydin A., Sahin F. (2006). Growth promotion of plants by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria under greenhouse and two different field soil condition.Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 38: 1482-1487. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.09.019.

  6. Compant  S.,Clément  C.,Sessitsch  A.  (2010). Plant  growth- promoting bacteria in the rhizo-and endosphere of plants:heirrole, colonization, mechanisms involved and prospects for utilization. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 42(5): 669-678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.11.024.

  7. Cooper, J.E. (2007). Early interactions between legumes and rhizobia: disclosing complexity in a molecular dialogue. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 103(5): 1355-1365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03366.x.

  8. Drogue B., Dore H., Borland S., Wisniewski-Dyé F., Prigent- Combaret C. (2012). Which specificity in cooperation between phytostimulating rhizobacteria and plants? Research in Microbiology. 163(8): 500-510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2012.08.006.

  9. Ferreira De Paula, G., Bueno Demetrio, G., Sussumu Matsumoto, L. (2021). Biotechnological potencial of soybean plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Revista Caatinga.34(2): 328-338. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252021v34n209rc.

  10. Glick, B.R., (2012). Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria: Mechanisms and Applications. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Scientica. 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6064/2012/963401.

  11. Glick, B.R., Cheng, Z., Czarny, J., Duan, J. (2007). Promotion of plant growth by ACC deaminase-producing soil bacteria. In: Bakker, P.A.H.M., Raaijmakers, J.M., Bloemberg, G.,

  12. Höfte, M., Lemanceau, P., Cooke, B.M. (eds) New Perspectives and Approaches in PlantGrowth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Research. Springer. 26(5-6): 329-339. DOI: https://doi.org /10.1007/978-1-4020-6776-1_8.

  13. Gulati, A., Sharma, N., Vyas, P., Sood, S., Rahi, P., Pathania, V., Prasad, R. (2010). Organic acid production and plant growth promotion as a function of phosphate solubilization by Acinetobacter rhizosphaerae strain BIHB 723 isolated from the cold deserts of the trans-Himalayas. Archives of Microbiology. 192: 975-983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-010-0615-3.

  14. Haggag W.M., Hussein M.M., Mehanna H.M., El-Moneim, D.A. (2014). Polysaccharides elicit resistance of wheat against some biotic and abiotic stress. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research. 50: 292-298.

  15. Hung, P. Q., Annapurna, K. (2004). Isolation and characterization of endophytic bacteria in soybean (Glycine sp.). Omonrice.  12: 92-101. 

  16. Impullitti, A.E., Malvick, D.K. (2013). Fungal endophyte diversity in soybean. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 114: 1500- 1506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12164.

  17. Jain, S., Kumari, S., Vaishnav, A., Choudhary, D.K., Sharma, K.P. (2016). Isolation and characterization of plant growth promoting bacteria from soybean rhizosphere and their effect on soybean plant growth promotion. International Journal of Advanced Scientific and Technical. Research. 6(5): 397-410.

  18. Kumar A., Kumar A., Devi S., Patil S., Payal C., Negi S. (2012). Isolation, screening and characterization of bacteria from rhizospheric soils for different plant growth promotion (PGP) activities: an in vitro study. Recent Research in Sience and Technology. 4: 1-5. DOI: https://datepublishing.com/journal/index.php/rrst/article/view/851.

  19. Lucy M., Reed E., Glick B.R. (2004). Applications of free living plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Review Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 86: 1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00136.

  20. Marinkovic J., Bjecic D., Tintor B., Miladinovic J., Dukic V., Dordevic V. (2018). Effects of soybean co-inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in field trial. Romanian Biotechnological Letters. 23(2): 13401-13408.

  21. Mir,M.I., Kumar, K., Gopalakrishnan, S., Vadlamudi, S., Hameeda, B. (2021). Characterization of rhizobia isolated from leguminous plants and their impact on the growth of ICCV 2 variety of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Heliyon. 7(11): e08321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon. 2021.e08321.

  22. Nogma L., Babalola O.O., Ahmad F. (2012). Ecophysiology of plant growth promoting acteria. Scientific Research and Essays. 7: 4003-4013.

  23. Senko, H., Kajiæ, S., Huǧ, A., Palijan, G., Petek, M, Rajnoviæ, I., Šamec, D., Udiković-Kolić, N., Mešić, A., Brkljaèić, L., Petriæ, I. (2024). Will the beneficial properties of plant-growth promoting bacteria be affected by waterlogging predicted in the wake of climate change: A model study. Applied Soil Ecology. 198: 105379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105379.

  24. Sherpa, M.T., Bag, N., Das, S., Haokip, P.,  Laxuman Sharma, L. (2021). Isolation and characterization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria isolated from organically grown high yielding pole type native pea (Pisum sativum L.) variety Dentami of Sikkim, India. Current Research in Microbial Sciences. 2: 100068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmicr.2021.100068.

  25. Sikora S., Redzepovic S. (2003). Genotypic characterisation of indigenous soybean rhizobia by PCR-RFLP of 16S rDNA, rep-PCR and RAPD analysis. Food Technology and

  26. Biotechnology. 41(1): 61-67. DOI: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:30737869.

  27. Tsegaye ,Z., Gizaw, B., Tefera,G., Feleke, A., Chaniyalew,S., Alemu T., Assefa F. (2019). Isolation and biochemical characterization of plant growth promoting (PGP) bacteria colonizing the rhizosphere of tef crop during the seedling stage. Journal of Plant Science and Phytopathology. 3: 013-027. 261. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.29328/journal.jpsp.1001027.

  28. Uroz S, Buée M, Murat C, Frey-Klett P, Martin F. (2010). Pyrosequencing reveals a contrasted bacterial diversity between oak rhizosphere and surrounding soil. Environmental Microbiology Reports. 2: 281–288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-2229.2009.00117.x.

  29. Vacheron,J., Desbrosses ,G., Bouffaud ,M.L., Touraine,B., Moënne- Loccoz ,Y., Daniel Muller ,D., Legendre, L., Wisniewski- Dyé,F., Prigent-Combaret,C. (2013). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and root system functioning. Frontiers in Plant Science. 4: 356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00356.

  30. Vincent,J.M. (1970). A manual for practical study of root nodule bacteria. IBP Handbook No. 15, Blackwell Scientific Publishers, Oxford, 164p.

  31. Wei,Z., Hu,X.,Li,X., Zhang,Y.,Jiang,L., Li,J., Guan,Z., Cai,Y., Liao, X. (2017). The rhizospheric microbial community structure and diversity of deciduous and evergreen forests in Taihu Lake area, China. PloS One. 12 (4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174411.

  32. Widawati,S.,  Suliasih,S. (2018). Screening of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) to promote growth of soybean, Journal of Biological Researches. 24: 28-36. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23869/bphjbr.24.1.20184.

  33. Xiao,C.Q., Chi,R.A., Lix,H., Xia,M.,  Xia,Z.W. (2011). Biosolubilization of rock phosphate by three stress tolerant fungal strains. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 165: 719-727. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-011-9290-3.

  34. Yu,J., Yu,Z. H.,. Fan,G. Q., Wang,G. H., Liu,X. B. (2016). Isolation and characterization of indole acetic acid producing root endophytic bacteria and their potential for promoting crop growth. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology. 18: 1381-1391. DOI: http://jast.modares.ac.ir/article-23-9488-en.html.

Editorial Board

View all (0)