First location
The results of the statistical analysis indicated that the differences were significant between the two varieties of mungbean used in this study and shown in Table 2 for the first site, as the significant superiority was in favor of the second variety of mungbean in the characteristics of number of branches.plant
-1, (4.717 branches.plant
-1), leaf area (1323.2 cm
2, plant
-1), leaf area index (3.308), number of seeds.pod
-1, (10.71 seeds.pod
-1), weight of 1000 seeds (44.54 gm), seed yield (8.60 gm) and biological yield 26.52 gm). while the first variety significant superiority in traits plant height (61.50 cm), (pod length (9.44 cm), number of pods.plant
-1, (21.77 pods.plant
-1) and harvest index (32.54 %) and this is proven by the studies of
Abdulqader et al., (2021); Ali et al., (2021); Khatik et al., (2022); Ali et al., (2023); Christian et al., (2023); Dikr (2023);
Ali et al., (2023); Priya and Babu (2024).
The results of Table (2) indicated the significant impact of planting dates, as planting in the third date has significantly surpassed the other dates in the characteristics of germination % (81.92%), pod length (9.96 cm), weight of 1000 seeds (44.88 gm) and harvest index (33.88 %). While the second date outperformed the other dates for the characteristics of plant height (65.83 cm), number of branches.plant
-1, (5.650. branches.plant
-1), leaf area (1328.2 cm
2, plant
-1), leaf area index (3.330), number of pods.plant
-1 (22.09 pods.plant
-1), seed yield (9.17 gm) and biological yield (28.99 gm) and recorded a significant superiority for the first date over the rest of the dates in this study for the number of seeds.pod
-1 (9.97 seeds.pod
-1) this is confirmed by the result of
Abdulqader et al., (2021); Ali et al., (2021); Eshanee et al., (2023).
While the results of the statistical analysis in Table (2) indicated that there can be significant variations in the methods of cultivation, as it significant superiority the first cultivation method and for all the studied traits plant height (59.83 cm), number of branches.plant
-1 (5.017 branches. plant
-1), leaf area (1333.5 cm
2, plant
-1, leaf area index (3.340), pod length (9.26 cm), number of pods.plant
-1 (21.30 pods.plant
-1), number of seeds.pod
-1 (9.76 seeds.pod
-1), weight of 1000 seeds (45.80 gm), seed yield (8.90 gm) and biological yield (27.90 gm), except for the Germination % and harvest index traits, no significant differences were recorded between the cultivation methods for this site and the result agreed with
Singh et al., (2011); Ali, (2021);
Ram et al., (2018).
Second location
Through the results of this study, the statistical results in Table (3) showed that the varieties have a significant effect, as they significantly superiority the second vareity in the characteristics of germination % (80.46%), leaf area (1278.8 cm
2, plant
-1), leaf area index (3.197), number of pods (20.72 pods.plant
-1), seed yield (8.301 gm) and biological yield (25.99 gm), while the first vareity significantly outweighed plant height (58.83 cm), number of branches.plant
-1 (58.83 branches.plant
-1), pod length (10.345 cm), number of seeds.pod
-1 (9.98 seeds.pod
-1), weight of 1000 seeds (43.79 gm) and harvest index (33.77 %) This result is similar to the research results of
(Ali et al., 2021; Dikr (2023).
Planting dates recorded a significant impact on the studied traits, as it significantly superiority the 3 date of planting in the traits of germination % (80.67 %), plant height (61.17 cm) and number of pods (21.93 pods.plant
-1), while the first planting date exceeded all other traits Number of branches.plant
-1 (5.692 branches.plant
-1), Leaf area (1297.8 cm
2, plant
-1), Leaf area index (3.245), Number of seeds.pod
-1 (10.20 seeds.pod
-1), Weight of 1000 seeds (43.97 gm), seed yield (8.848 gm), (26.57 gm) and Harvest index (33.77 %) except for the pod length trait (10.422 cm), where it significantly superiority the second planting date. This is similar to what this research showed
(Ali et al., 2021).
The second planting method has a significant superiority compared to the first method for the traits of germination % (78.50%), number of pod (20.91 pods.plant
-1), while the first method of cultivation significantly superiority in the characteristics of plant height (57.76 cm), number of branches (5.550 branches.plant
-1), leaf area (1359.4 cm
2, plant
-1), leaf area index (3.398), pod length (10.479 cm), pod length (10.479 cm), number of seeds.pod
-1 (10.01 seeds.pod
-1), weight of 1000 seeds (43.62 gm), seed yield (8.427 gm), biological yield (25.20 gm) and harvest index (33.51 %) all of this is similar to the studies of
(Singh et al., 2011; Ram et al., 2018).
Varieties
The nature of the growth of the mungbean differs from other crops due to the diversity of varieties among them and this is reflected in the maturity and seed size (
Dodwadiya and Sharma, 2012). The reason for the variation of genetic structures in the studied traits is due to the different genetic nature and thus the difference in their response to the photoperiod, temperature and environmental conditions, that the reason for the superiority of the variety in the characteristics of the yield and its components is due to the superiority of the same variety in the traits of vegetative growth the germination %, plant height, number of branches, leaf area and its evidence tabules (2 and 3), which positively affected the speed of growth and increase the efficiency of photosynthesis
and then the products of representation contributed to the formation of new branches on the plant, so an appropriate paper space was formed and thus the processing of sites new evolution with the requirements of growth is less abortion, which helped in the concentration of nutrients processed by photosynthesis, which contributed to increasing the division and elongation of cells these traits have contributed collectively to increasing the transmission of processed photosynthetic products to the seed formed and thus filling and increasing its weight
and this result was in line with what was confirmed by
Arya et al., (2024); Rai et al., (2024).
Planting dates
The dates of planting leguminous crops are complex due to the belonging of varieties to multiple maturity groups and are greatly affected by the environment and it is necessary to determine the appropriate date for planting varieties with unknown environmental adaptation in order to obtain compatibility between vegetative and fruitful growth
and this is determined by the appropriate planting date for each region (
Venkatshwarulu and Soundararajan, 1991). The planting dates of the first or second in this study allowed the plants a better period of vegetative growth, which improved the division of plant cells and elongation more than the late date (third) as a result of the availability of appropriate conditions for growth and the availability of all the necessary needs for that, which led to an improvement of the characteristics of the yield and its components It is known that the date of planting for crops varies from one country to another and from one region to another according to environmental and climatic conditions and the sites in which it is grown. The late planting date is a major reason for the increase in the costs of agricultural operations and at the same time the yield is low due to the short period of the crop growing season and the decrease in net photosynthesis, while planting on time (optimal) ensures the best compatibility between environmental and plant conditions and this contributes significantly to improving the qualities of the crop and thus the yield. The study by
Rehman et al., (2009) also indicated that optimal planting time improves the growth and yield qualities of the mash crop that correspond to optimal environmental conditions. While early planting of mash varieties achieves the best vegetative growth before flowering and this improves the formation of the best number of pods
Singh and Singh (2011).
Cultivation method
It is possible that the superiority of the method of cultivation furrow in the traits of the yield and its components is due to the superiority of this method with all the traits of growth (plant height, number of branches, leaf area and leaf area index) because the plants that were planted in the method of furrow gave a significant superiority to the characteristic of plant height and this enabled plants to intercept the largest amount of lighting and thus increase the process of photosynthesis and all processes that improve growth and production and this increases the net photosynthesis and resulted in a significant increase in the characteristic of number of branches, this was reflected in a significant increase in the characteristics of leaf area and leaf area index as a result of the higher place of planting seeds in this way compared to planting with lines
and this result was obtained
Singh et al., (2011) when comparing cultivation in furrow and lines. Also, the transplant route in furrow prevents the accumulation of excess water above the plant’s need over the soil and thus reduces the oxygen necessary for the respiration of the roots, which has a negative impact on the growth of the roots and the plant in general, especially if the soils are heavy clay.
Other factors may have an impact on the productivity of this crop that we have not addressed and therefore more future research must be conducted.