Effects on peanut growth and yield
The results showed that compared to control (farmers ‘practice) (T
1), growth of peanut in T
2 (40 kg N (urea) + 90 kg P
2O
5 (Thermophosphate) + 90 kg K
2O (K
2SO
4) + 8 tons of cattle manure + 500 kg lime ha
-1) was improved significantly at two study communes (Table 1). The application of fertilizers in combination increased peanut height by 4.1-4.5%, number of first branches plant
-1 by 5.0-9.7%, number of nodules at pod forming stage by 13.7-14.8% compared to control. The leaf area index and biomass of peanut with application of fertilizer combinations increased by 2.94-10.68% and 6.37-19.57%, respectively compared with control.
There was a significant difference among yield components of peanut (Table 2). The number of pods per plant was highest in treatment with combined application of fertilizers with an increase of 15.77-18.32% compared to control. Similarly, number of filled pods increased by 13.47-18.04%, weight of 100 pods by 0.66-0.93 g, weight of 100 seeds increased by 0.36-0.5 g compared with control. Peanut yield ranged from 4.35-4.48 t ha
-1 with application of fertilizers in combination in Cat Hiep and Cat Hanh communes, which increased by 18.17-19.59% and had a statistical difference compared with control.
Growth and yield of peanut increased with application of fertilizer combination including K and S.
Hoang et al., (2022) reported that K is an important component in nutritional balance of peanuts in sandy soil. Therefore, K should be balanced at 20-30 kg N and 60 - 90 kg K
2O ha
-1.
Hoang et al., (2021) indicated that an increase of peanut growth and yield with application of 30 kg S ha
-1 based on 40 kg N + 90 kg P
2O
5 + 60 kg K
2O + 500 kg lime + 8 t of cattle manure ha
-1 for varieties L14 and SVL1.
Milica et al., (2013) showed that balanced fertilizer application had a positive effect in improving growth and development, yield and yield components of peanut. Addition of K at 90 kg K
2O ha
-1produced the highest peanut yield
(Hoang et al., 2022). Depending on different types of soil and production conditions, supplementing with S helps peanut to affect growth, development, yield, and its components. Therefore, application of fertilizers combined with K and S fertilizers at appropriate rate gave the highest yield and yield components
(Hoang et al., 2022). Hoang et al., (2019) also found that the actual pod yield in Cat Hiep and Cat Hanh communes varied from 3.10 to 3.91 t ha
-1 (2015) and 2.52 to 3.42 t ha
-1 (2016) with different rates of K application and pod yield increased from 2.67 to 3.86 t ha
-1 with increase in S rate. Fertilizer application in combination increased biomass, pod and seed yield of peanut. This increase in peanut is evident that potassium fertilization application at the rate of 110 kg of K
2O ha
-1 increased nutritional status, improving grain production of peanut crop in rotation with sugarcane
(Patel et al., 2018).
Effects on peanut quality
When supplemented with fertilizers, especially K and S, protein and lipid contents in peanut increased from 24.44-24.61% and 52.56-52.65%, compared with farmer’s practice respectively. However, there was no significant difference among treatments (Table 3).
Sulfur (S) is important for peanut nutrition because, along with N, it forms proteins (
Wang et al., 2013). As very mobile in soil, S reserves decline, where soils are cropped continuously without application of S-containing fertilizers. Several recent studies have demonstrated the significant contribution of S application to peanut yield and quality (
Pratiwi et al., 2016;
Solaimalai et al., 2020) evident the present study findings. Likely, non-significant effect of fertilizer in combination on protein and lipid contents is validated from) that fertilization treatments did not show any significant effects, neither on the lipid (49.7-52.4%) nor on protein (25.2-27.9%) content in the peanut seeds
(Hoang et al., 2016).
Soil physico-chemical characteristics
The fertilizer treatments had significant effects on soil properties measured at the end of field experiment (Table 4). The soil acidity decreased with a little of soil pH from 4.76-4.84. Typical to humid tropical regions, soils tend to be very acidic, low in organic matter, and have low cation exchange capacity (CEC)
(Hoang et al., 2016). Lime (CaO), which is a cheap base, is commonly used to reduce soil acidity. For peanut, recommended pH range is 5.8-6.2. If pH is less than 5.8, zinc (Zn) toxicity problems could occur (
Balota 2014). In addition, urea application to acidic soils might further decrease soil pH (
Tong and Xu, 2012) and weaken N
2-fixation by leguminous crops (
Miller 2016). Appropriate crop nutrition management is crucial, particularly on sandy acidic soils in tropics. The sandy soil (97%) has very low CEC, and low pH (5.1), further reduces its ability to store nutrients. The substantial CaO supplement (500 kg ha
-1) used in the present study gave rise to a significant though; there was uneven rise in soil pH (Table 4). The soil organic matter content increased a little in most treatments (0.83-0.85%). Soil N concentration increased, when fertilizer in combination was applied. Available soil P increased from 7.43 to 7.48 mg 100 g
-1 for all treatments. There was a slight increase in soil available K with fertilizer application in combination. However, sulfur content fluctuated within a narrow range from 0.025-0.028%. Peanut, a leguminous crop, does not require significant N inputs (
Balota 2014). Lack of K, led to diminished levels of both soil N and K, which were gradually replenished with rising K application rates. These results indicate that K and S supply are essential for optimum peanut plant development which, in-turn, allows adequate N
2-fixation by the peanut roots, and hence soil enrichment with N as evident from increase in soil N contents of present study.