Mean values and Duncan groups in grass pea genotypes
The results of the Duncan groups are presented in Table 3. It is noteworthy that there was a large variation among genotypes in terms of days to flowering. Minimum and maximum values obtained from Ls36 (81.8 days) and Ls17 (119.2 days) are indicated in Table 3. Similarly, there was great variation among genotypes in terms of the amount of green herba yield. Another remarkable point is that the seed yield of the genotypes used in the research was high. It was observed maximum values on dry herbage yield values from Ls15 and Ls 32, thousends seed yield value from Gurbuz variety, plant main stem length values from Ls15 and Ls 32, number of pods per plant value from Ls36, number of seeds per plant pod values from Ls41, straw yield value from Ls15, biological yield value from Corea variety and Ls15 and harvest index values from Corea and Gurbuz varieties. Based on the available data, it can be said that all genotypes were significantly different.
In previous studies on grass pea conducted in different ecologies of Türkiye, days to flowering were 99.5 to 120.5 days in Antalya
(Arslan et al., 2022), green herbage yield was 813.3-2552.0 kg da
-1 in Antalya
(Oten et al., 2017b), dry herbage yield was 86.8-265.8 kg da
-1 in Elazığ (
Ozdemir, 2020), seed yield was 173.3-202.8 kg da
-1 in Tokat (
Karadag and Iptas, 2007), thousand seed weight was 85.3-154.0 g in Adana (
Gedik, 2007), plant main stem length was 30.27-92.75 cm in Tekirdag
(Tenikecier et al., 2017), the number of pods per plant was 16.63-24.87 in Yozgat (
Kucukkaya and Dogrusoz, 2022), the number of seeds per plant pod was 3.0-3.7 in Diyarbakýr
(Seydosoglu et al., 2015), the straw yield was 231.30-299.33 kg da
-1 in Elazığ (
Kokten and Bakoglu, 2011), biological yield was 528.2-847.1 kg da
-1 in Diyarbakır (
Sayar and Han, 2015), harvest index was 5-82% in Bursa
(Turk et al., 2007). It can be said that the genotypes used in the study were superior in terms of all the traits examined.
Since as a result of variance analysis the interaction of years and genotypes*years was insignificant; Correlation, Regression, Path and Cluster analysis were carried out with the means of two years values.
Correlation coefficients
The correlation coefficients between pairs of investigated traits are presented in Table 4. High correlations were observed between green herbage yield and plant main stem length, straw yield, biological yield and dry herbage yield; biological yield with harvest index, seed yield, plant main stem height, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per plant pod and straw yield. On the other hand, the correlation was not determined on thousand seed weight with other investigated traits (Table 4).
Sayar et al., (2013) observed a positive relationship between hay yield and green forage yield and a significant and negative relationship between hay yield and 50% flowering days. In another study, a positive and significant relationship was determined between seed yield and green herbage yield, dry herbage yield, straw yield, biological yield and harvest index
(Oten et al., 2017a).
Regression analysis
In the breeding studies, it is of great importance to know the effective factors on yield and to reveal the relations between these factors and to direct the breeding programs accordingly
(Oten et al., 2017a). However, not all observations considered in a study have a direct effect on the dependent variable as an independent variable
(Khomari et al., 2017). With the regression analysis, the effect type and degree of each independent variable on the dependent variable is determined and also the possibility of estimating the dependent variable arises
(Andales et al., 2007).
In the regression analysis, days to flowering, harvest index, number of pods per plant, straw yield and biological yield were determined as remaining characteristics (Table 5). Yield estimation was obtained by using the factors affecting grain yield with this formula:
SY=-237.53-0316*FD+585.75*HI-0.995*NPP-0.200*SWY+0603*BIY
Path analysis
The remaining characteristics in the stepwise regression model were determined and path analysis was performed with the data belonging to the characteristics that were determined to have a direct effect on seed yield (Table 6). The study of path analysis indicated that the highest positive direct effect towards seed yield was exhibited due to biological yield (0.848) and harvest index (0.409). This finding indicates that the selection for these characters is likely to lead directly to a full improvement in seed yield. The features that have an indirect positive effect on seed yield through biological yield are harvest index and the days to flowering and the features that have an indirect negative effect are the number of pods per plant and straw yield. According to the path analysis results of
Hakyemez (2000), it was reported that the highest direct effect on grain yield was provided by dry herb yield. In the study by
Oten et al., (2017a), it was stated that biological yield provided the highest direct effect on grain yield and although there was a positive and significant correlation between grain yield and thousand-seed weight, the indirect effect was negative.
Cluster analysis
In this study, regression analysis existing between investigated characters suggested the need for cluster analysis in association with seed yield. Besides, cluster analysis is often used to assess genetic diversity and to classify species (
Van Beuningen and Busch, 1997). The clusters that were done according to Ward Method were illustrated by a dendrogram (Fig 1). Cluster analysis was performed to provide that genotypes were exactly screened based on the investigated traits.
The genotypes were divided into three groups according to the clustering results with the remaining traits as a result of the regression analysis. Genotypes Ls17, Ls33 and Ls41 were in the first group. While the second group included only the Ls25 genotype, the third group included Ls15, Ls23, Ls31, Ls32 and Ls36 genotypes and Gurbuz and Corea varieties.
Furthermore, Ls17, which is one of the genotypes in the 1
st group, was found high in terms of days to flowering, while it was determined between the second and third groups in terms of other characteristics. It is seen that genotype 25 in the second group had a lower value than the other genotypes in terms of all the examined traits, except for the days to flowering. It was determined that the genotypes in the 3
rd group had higher values than the other groups in terms of the number of pods per plant, straw yield and biological yield features.
Khosravi et al., (2022) stated that cluster analysis divided the genotypes into two separate groups, while
Ahamed et al., (2012) divided the genotypes into ten separate groups in their study.