Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 45 issue 10 (october 2022) : 1273-1277

Compensatory Growth of Soybean after Shade during Vegetative Promotes Root Nodule Recovery

Xiaoting Yuan1,2, Kai Luo1,2, Jia Zuo1, Shanshan Liu1,2, Taiwen Yong1,2,*, Wenyu Yang1,2
1College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, P.R. China.
2Sichuan Engineering Research Center for Crop Strip Intercropping System/Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest, Ministry of Agriculture, Chengdu 611130, P. R. China.
  • Submitted02-04-2022|

  • Accepted07-07-2022|

  • First Online 22-07-2022|

  • doi 10.18805/LRF-689

Cite article:- Yuan Xiaoting, Luo Kai, Zuo Jia, Liu Shanshan, Yong Taiwen, Yang Wenyu (2022). Compensatory Growth of Soybean after Shade during Vegetative Promotes Root Nodule Recovery . Legume Research. 45(10): 1273-1277. doi: 10.18805/LRF-689.
Background: The recovery growth of soybean after environmental stress, especially shade stress, is essential for soybean to alleviate the yield loss caused by shade. Although the mechanism of recovery growth on leaves has been intensely researched, little is known about the mechanism of compensatory growth on soybean nodule formation. 

Methods: This study aimed to investigate the effect of recovery growth after shade on soybean nodule formation and the distribution of carbohydrates in root nodules. Four shade treatments, including vegetative period shade (VS), reproductive period shade (RS), total growth period shade (TS) and no shade as control (CK), were applied on monoculture soybean by using a black mesh shading net with light transmittance of 50%. 

Result: The aboveground dry weight, nodule number and weight and grains yield were lowest in TS and those values in VS were higher than in RS. Compared with RS, VS increased the nodule weight by 75.6% and the sucrose and starch content by 19.3% and 15.6%, respectively. We suggested that, compared with RS, VS improved the compensation growth of soybean and promoted the carbohydrate distribution into nodules, ultimately reducing the negative effect on soybean nodule formation and yield production.
Soybean [Glycine max (L.)] is a grain legume with considerable dietetic, industrial, medicinal and economic importance (Joshi et al., 2014). Shade stress negatively affected soybean growth and reduced soybean yield production (Ben Salah et al., 2009). Shade inhibits soybean yield by reducing the photosynthesis process to decrease the assimilate accumulation (Liu et al., 2020). Shade reduces the plant’s leaf number, chlorophyll content and net photosynthesis rate, diminishing the crop’s biomass (Baghdadi et al., 2016). Meanwhile, the decrease in biomass also represses the formation of soybean root nodules, which decline the soybean’s symbiotic nitrogen fixation capacity (Chen et al., 2014).
       
The different shade periods showed various adverse effects on the plant’s biomass accumulation and yield formation. And for a variety that showed late-maturing and a low ratio of the vegetative and reproductive periods, the shade during the vegetative periods had a slighter negative effect on soybean yield loss (Fan et al., 2018). Soybeans have evolved different strategies in response to competition for light: shade avoidance and shade tolerance (Raza et al., 2020). Besides focusing on the adaptability of crops aboveground to a shaded environment, the negative effect of shade on soybean nodule formation and nitrogen fixation capacity has been a concern by researchers in recent years. Previous researchers have proved that the optimal root nodule’s function depends on the proper carbon metabolism since carbon metabolism provides an energy matrix and carbon skeleton for nitrogen assimilation (Chen et al., 2014). The distribution of carbohydrates in soybean roots regulated the formation of root and root nodules. The decline of soybean nodule number and weight was positively related to a photosynthate shortage under shade stress (Ben Salah et al., 2009).
       
After the shade stress has been removed in the vegetative shade period, recovery growth could compensate for the biomass and yield loss by increasing the formation of new leaves and the synthesis of chlorophyll, ultimately promoting the growth of plants (Luo et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2021). However, there is little known about the effect of recovery growth on the distribution of carbohydrates in root nodules and root nodule formation. Therefore, this study was conducted with a simulation experiment with a shade net to clarify the effects of shade in different growth stages on root nodule metabolism and yield formation of varying soybean varieties.
The experiment was conducted at Chong’zhou Modern Agricultural Research and Development Base (30°56'N, 103°64'E), Sichuan Province, China, in 2020. Shade tolerant soybean ‘Nandou25’ (Glycine max (L.) was used in this experiment. This experiment was a completely randomized block design with three replicates with the following treatments: shade from 0 days after sowing (DAS) to 60 DAS (vegetative period shade, VS), shade from 60 DAS to 120 DAS (reproductive period shade, RS), shade from 0 DAS to 120 DAS (total growth period shade, TS) and no shade as a control treatment (CK). Shade treatment used a black mesh shading net with light transmittance of 50%. The light-transmitting radiation of the shade net was measured by an LI-COR line quantum sensor (LI-COR Inc., Lincoln, NE). The soybean was planted with 100 cm row spacing, 17 cm hole spacing and plant densities of 117,000 plants ha-1. The plot size in each replication was 36 m2 (six rows, each 6 m long).
       
At 65, 79, 93 and 121 DAS, three soybean plants in each plot were sampled and cut at ground level. The soybean leaf area was measured as the scan method described by Luo et al., (2022). The aboveground parts of the soybean were oven-baked for drying at a constant temperature of 80°C for at least three days until a stable weight was reached and the biomass was weighed on an electronic balance. At 65 and 93 DAS, collect the root and nodules of soybeans in the soil block with length, width and depth of 68, 50 and 20 cm, respectively, containing four adjacent soybean plants. The root system and nodules extracted from the soil were washed in tap water, peeled off the nodules on the root, wiped the water on the nodules with absorbent paper, counted the nodule number and weighed the fresh nodule weight. After cleaning the soybean nodules, these nodules were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C for further enzyme activity analysis. The sucrose and starch content of nodules were measured as described by Liu et al., (2019). The activity of sugar metabolism-related enzymes using the assay kit provided by Solarbio (Solarbio, Beijing, China). The enzyme activity of sucrose synthase (SS), sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS), sucrose neutral invertase (NI) and sucrose acid invertase (AI) were measured according to the related assay kit instructions. When the soybean matured, investigate the numbers of plant grains, pods and hundred-grain weight in a 6 m2 strip. Recorded the soybean grain yield when the grain moisture content reached about 13.5 per cent.
       
All data were presented as the mean of three replicates and were analyzed using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Fisher’s significant difference test at p<0.05. The data analysis and figure drawing were conducted using Origin Pro 2022 (Learning version) (Origin Lab., Hampton, MA, United States).
Soybean leaf area, aboveground dry weight and grain yield
 
This experiment showed that shade negatively affects soybean leaf area, aboveground dry weight and grain yield. These results were consistent with the previous results that shading reduced soybean biomass accumulation and yield formation (Zhang et al., 2011). In this experiment, the total leaf area in VS was significantly lower than under CK and RS at 65 DAS, but the total leaf area in VS was not different from CK and RS after 79 DAS (Fig 1). The recovery growth after the restoration of the canopy light environment under shade stress increased the soybean leaf number, total leaf area and soybean biomass(Wu et al., 2021). Thus, in this experiment, the aboveground dry weight was lowest in TS and VS increased the aboveground dry weight by 14.1% compared to RS at 93 DAS (Fig 2). The increase in soybean biomass under VS contributed to the yield formation of soybeans. VS increased the pod number, grains number and grain yield by 10.1%, 52.8% and 36.1% compared to RS, respectively (Table 1). And the decrease in soybean pod number and grains number was consistent with the previous results that the reproductive shade inhibited the carbohydrate supply during the flower and pod formation process to decrease soybean pods and grains number (Baghdadi et al., 2016). And the pods and grains number and grain yield in VS was higher than in RS, mostly related to the recovery growth of soybeans in VS. Previous studies proved that the biomass loss caused by the shading stress during the vegetative stage could be alleviated during the recovery growth period, which increased the production of carbohydrates and energy to supply the growth and yield formation (Holubek et al., 2020; Li et al., 2001). Comprehensive the results in soybean leaf area, biomass and grain yield, we suggested that, compared with RS, VS showed a higher grain yield due to its promoted increase in leaf area and aboveground dry weight during the later growth period.
 

Fig 1: The effect of shade treatment on soybean leaf area. Shade treatment: CK- No shade control; VS- Shade soybeans from 0 to 60 days after sowing; RS- Shade soybeans from 60 days to 120 days after sowing; TS- Shaded soybeans from 0 to 120 days after sowing.


 

Fig 2: The effect of shade treatment on soybean aboveground dry weight. CK- No shade control; VS- Shade soybeans from 0 to 60 days after sowing; RS- Shade soybeans from 60 days to 120 days after sowing; TS- Shaded soybeans from 0 to 120 days after sowing.


 

Table 1: Effect of shade treatment on soybean yield and yield components.


 
Soybean nodule phenotype and the sucrose and starch metabolism
 
As a legume crop, soybean could convert atmospheric nitrogen into biological ammonium with the help of symbiotic bacteria in root nodules by biological nitrogen fixation (Zhou et al., 2019). And the soybean nodule number and nodule weight were important phenotype indicators that reflect the ability of root nodules on biological nitrogen fixation. This experiment showed that shade treatments decreased the soybean nodule number and nodule weight at the 93 DAS and those values were lowest in TS (Fig 3). At the 93 DAS, the nodule number between VS and RS was not different, but the soybean nodule weight in VS was significantly higher than in RS. Compared with RS, VS increased the soybean root nodule number, nodule weight and average nodule weight by 13.8%, 75.6% and 54.4%, respectively. And the result that the nodule number and weight in VS were higher than in RS might be related to the change in soybean aboveground dry weight. Since the increase in soybean aboveground biomass might supply more carbohydrates to support the formation of root nodules growth and development. In this experiment, the decrease in soybean nodule number and weight was consistent with previous studies that the shade inhibited soybean nodule formation by reducing the carbohydrate distribution in roots (Ben Salah et al., 2009).
 

Fig 3: The effect of shade treatment on soybean nodule number and nodule weight. A and B represent the soybean nodule number and nodule weight, respectively.


       
The accumulation of sucrose and starch in soybean nodules could reflect the plant’s ability to provide sufficient carbon sources and energy for the growth of underground roots (Bruening and Egli, 2000). The SS and SPS enzymes are essential for normal nodule development and function (Seger et al., 2008). Results in this experiment showed that, at 93 DAS, the sucrose and starch content were highest in VS treatment (Fig 4). Compared with RS, VS increased the sucrose and starch content by 29.3% and 15.6%, respectively. And the increase in sucrose and starch content might suggest that VS promote more carbohydrate allocated in nodules to encourage the formation. And the change in sucrose and starch-related enzymes also proved our suggestion, where VS increased the SPS and AI enzyme activity by 48.7% and 58.3%, compared with RS (Fig 5). Either SS or AI might hydrolyze this sucrose and follow the glycolytic pathway to provide energy and carbon skeletons for bacteroid respiration and ammonia assimilation  (Du et al., 2020). The increase in AI enzyme activity provides a carbon source for the rapid growth of tissue (Burger and Schaffer, 2007). Thus, the increase in SS, SPS and AI enzymes in VS might indicate that VS enhanced the ability of nodules to synthesize sucrose. Comprehensive the above results, we suggested that VS increased the activity of SPS and AI and allocated more carbohydrates in soybean nodules to improve the formation of root nodules during the recovery growth.
 

Fig 4: The effect of shade treatment on sucrose and starch content of soybean nodules. A and B represent the sucrose content and starch content, respectively.


 

Fig 5: The effect of shade treatment on carbon metabolism of soybean nodules. A, B, C and D represent SS,SPS, NI and AI enzyme activities, respectively.

Shade decreased soybean nodule number and weight, leaf area and grain yield, but those values in VS were higher than in RS and TS treatment. Compared with RS, VS increases enzyme activity of SS, SPS and AI to improve the sucrose and starch allocated in root nodules to increase the soybean nodule number and nodule weight, ultimately reducing the negative effect on soybean nodule formation and yield production caused by shade.
This work was supported by the Program on Industrial Technology System of National Soybean (CARS-04-PS20) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFD0201006).
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

  1. Baghdadi, A., Ridzwan, A.H., Ghasemzadeh, A., Ebrahimi, M., Othman, R. and Yusof, M.M. (2016). Effect of intercropping of corn and soybean on dry matter yield and nutritive value of forage corn. Legume Research. 39: 976-981.

  2. Ben Salah, I., Albacete, A. andujar, C.M., Haouala, R., Labidi, N., Zribi, F., et al (2009). Response of nitrogen fixation in relation to nodule carbohydrate metabolism in medicago ciliaris lines subjected to salt stress. Journal of Plant Physiology. 166(5): 477-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2008.06.016.

  3. Bruening, W.P. and Egli, D.B. (2000). Leaf starch accumulation and seed set at phloem-isolated nodes in soybean. Field Crops Research. 68(2): 113-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(00)00110-6.

  4. Burger, Y. and Schaffer, A.A. (2007). The contribution of sucrose metabolism enzymes to sucrose accumulation in cucumis melo. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 132(5): 704-712. https://doi.org/10/gpqqt8.

  5. Chen, Y., Yu, Z., Wang, J. and Zhang, X. (2014). Allocation of photosynthetic carbon to nodules of soybean in three geographically different Mollisols. European Journal of Soil Biology. 62: 60-65. https://doi.org/10/f57s5r.

  6. Du, Y., Zhao, Q., Chen, L., Yao, X., Zhang, H., Wu, J. and Xie, F. (2020). Effect of drought stress during soybean R2-R6 growth stages on sucrose metabolism in leaf and seed. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 21(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21020618.

  7. Fan, Y., Chen, J., Cheng, Y., Raza, M. A., Wu, X., Wang, Z., et al (2018). Effect of shading and light recovery on the growth, leaf structure and photosynthetic performance of soybean in a maize-soybean relay-strip intercropping system. PloS One. 13(5): e0198159. https://doi.org/10/gdnsdb.

  8. Holubek, R., Deckert, J., Zinicovscaia, I., Yushin, N., Vergel, K., Frontasyeva, M., et al (2020). The recovery of soybean plants after short-term cadmium stress. Plants. 9(6): 782. https://doi.org/10/gpqwxx.

  9. Joshi, J., Sharma, S. and Guruprasad, K.N. (2014). Foliar application of pyraclostrobin fungicide enhances the growth, rhizobial- nodule formation and nitrogenase activity in soybean (var. JS-335). Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 114: 61- 66. https://doi.org/10/f6h2r3.

  10. Li, L., Sun, J., Zhang, F., Li, X., Rengel, Z. and Yang, S. (2001). Wheat/maize or wheat/soybean strip intercropping: II. Recovery or compensation of maize and soybean after wheat harvesting. Field Crops Research. 71(3): 173-181. https://doi.org/10/dxdkz3.

  11. Liu, B., Qu, D. and Liu, J. (2020). Light enrichment, flowering asynchrony and reproduction success in two field-grown soybeans in northern China. Legume Research. 43(2): 241-246. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-510.

  12. Luo, K., Yuan, X., Xie, C., Liu, S., Chen, P., Du, Q., Zheng, B., Wu, Y., Wang, X., Yong, T., and Yang, W. (2022). Diethyl aminoethyl hexanoate increase relay strip intercropping soybean grain by optimizing photosynthesis aera and delaying leaf senescence. Frontiers in Plant Science. 12. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2021.818327.

  13. Liu, C., Feng, N., Zheng, D., Cui, H., Sun, F. and Gong, X. (2019). Uniconazole and diethyl aminoethyl hexanoate increase soybean pod setting and yield by regulating sucrose and starch content: S3307 and DA-6 increase soybean pod setting and yield. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 99(2): 748-758. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9243.

  14. Raza, M.A., Feng, L.Y., Iqbal, N., Khan, I., Meraj, T.A., Xi, Z.J., et al (2020). Effects of contrasting shade treatments on the carbon production and antioxidant activities of soybean plants. Functional Plant Biology. 47(4): 342-354. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP19213.

  15. Seger, M., Ortega, J.L. and Sengupta-Gopalan, C. (2008). Constitutive overexpression of maize sucrose phosphate synthetase (SPS) in Medicago sativa (Alfalfa): Effects on nitrogen fixation and assimilation in the nodules. In vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology-Plant. 44(4): 351-352.

  16. Wu, Y., Gong, W., Yang, F., Wang, X., Yong, T., Liu, J., Yang, W. (2021). Dynamic of recovery growth of intercropped soybean after maize harvest in maize-soybean relay strip intercropping system. Food and Energy Security- e350. https://doi.org/10/gnzd9p.

  17. Zhang, J., Smith, D.L., Liu, W., Chen, X. and Yang, W. (2011). Effects of shade and drought stress on soybean hormones and yield of main-stem and branch. African Journal of Biotechnology. 10(65): 14392-14398.

  18. Zhou, H., Yao, X., Zhao, Q., Zhang, W., Zhang, B. and Xie, F. (2019). Rapid effect of nitrogen supply for soybean at the beginning flowering stage on biomass and sucrose metabolism. Scientific Reports. 9(1): 15530. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52043-6.

Editorial Board

View all (0)