Soybean leaf area, aboveground dry weight and grain yield
This experiment showed that shade negatively affects soybean leaf area, aboveground dry weight and grain yield. These results were consistent with the previous results that shading reduced soybean biomass accumulation and yield formation
(Zhang et al., 2011). In this experiment, the total leaf area in VS was significantly lower than under CK and RS at 65 DAS, but the total leaf area in VS was not different from CK and RS after 79 DAS (Fig 1). The recovery growth after the restoration of the canopy light environment under shade stress increased the soybean leaf number, total leaf area and soybean
biomass(Wu et al., 2021). Thus, in this experiment, the aboveground dry weight was lowest in TS and VS increased the aboveground dry weight by 14.1% compared to RS at 93 DAS (Fig 2). The increase in soybean biomass under VS contributed to the yield formation of soybeans. VS increased the pod number, grains number and grain yield by 10.1%, 52.8% and 36.1% compared to RS, respectively (Table 1). And the decrease in soybean pod number and grains number was consistent with the previous results that the reproductive shade inhibited the carbohydrate supply during the flower and pod formation process to decrease soybean pods and grains number
(Baghdadi et al., 2016). And the pods and grains number and grain yield in VS was higher than in RS, mostly related to the recovery growth of soybeans in VS. Previous studies proved that the biomass loss caused by the shading stress during the vegetative stage could be alleviated during the recovery growth period, which increased the production of carbohydrates and energy to supply the growth and yield formation
(Holubek et al., 2020; Li et al., 2001). Comprehensive the results in soybean leaf area, biomass and grain yield, we suggested that, compared with RS, VS showed a higher grain yield due to its promoted increase in leaf area and aboveground dry weight during the later growth period.
Soybean nodule phenotype and the sucrose and starch metabolism
As a legume crop, soybean could convert atmospheric nitrogen into biological ammonium with the help of symbiotic bacteria in root nodules by biological nitrogen fixation
(Zhou et al., 2019). And the soybean nodule number and nodule weight were important phenotype indicators that reflect the ability of root nodules on biological nitrogen fixation. This experiment showed that shade treatments decreased the soybean nodule number and nodule weight at the 93 DAS and those values were lowest in TS (Fig 3). At the 93 DAS, the nodule number between VS and RS was not different, but the soybean nodule weight in VS was significantly higher than in RS. Compared with RS, VS increased the soybean root nodule number, nodule weight and average nodule weight by 13.8%, 75.6% and 54.4%, respectively. And the result that the nodule number and weight in VS were higher than in RS might be related to the change in soybean aboveground dry weight. Since the increase in soybean aboveground biomass might supply more carbohydrates to support the formation of root nodules growth and development. In this experiment, the decrease in soybean nodule number and weight was consistent with previous studies that the shade inhibited soybean nodule formation by reducing the carbohydrate distribution in roots (
Ben Salah et al., 2009).
The accumulation of sucrose and starch in soybean nodules could reflect the plant’s ability to provide sufficient carbon sources and energy for the growth of underground roots (
Bruening and Egli, 2000). The SS and SPS enzymes are essential for normal nodule development and function
(Seger et al., 2008). Results in this experiment showed that, at 93 DAS, the sucrose and starch content were highest in VS treatment (Fig 4). Compared with RS, VS increased the sucrose and starch content by 29.3% and 15.6%, respectively. And the increase in sucrose and starch content might suggest that VS promote more carbohydrate allocated in nodules to encourage the formation. And the change in sucrose and starch-related enzymes also proved our suggestion, where VS increased the SPS and AI enzyme activity by 48.7% and 58.3%, compared with RS (Fig 5). Either SS or AI might hydrolyze this sucrose and follow the glycolytic pathway to provide energy and carbon skeletons for bacteroid respiration and ammonia assimilation
(Du et al., 2020). The increase in AI enzyme activity provides a carbon source for the rapid growth of tissue (
Burger and Schaffer, 2007). Thus, the increase in SS, SPS and AI enzymes in VS might indicate that VS enhanced the ability of nodules to synthesize sucrose. Comprehensive the above results, we suggested that VS increased the activity of SPS and AI and allocated more carbohydrates in soybean nodules to improve the formation of root nodules during the recovery growth.