Loading...

Legume Research

Correlation of Pests Resistance Levels and Seed Chemical Concentrations of Soybean Genotypes

DOI: 10.18805/LRF-658    | Article Id: LRF-658 | Page : 1185-1189
Citation :- Correlation of Pests Resistance Levels and Seed Chemical Concentrations of Soybean Genotypes.Legume Research.2022.(45):1185-1189
Suhartina, Kurnia P. Sari, Purwantoro, Apri Sulistyo, Trustinah, Rudy Soehendi, Suyamto, Sholihin, Made J. Mejaya mmejaya@yahoo.com
Address : Indonesian Legumes and Tuber Crops Research Institute (ILETRI) Jl. Raya Kendalpayak km.8. PO Box 66 Malang 65101, East Java, Indonesia.
Submitted Date : 30-09-2021
Accepted Date : 26-05-2022
First Online:

Abstract

Background: Pests and diseases infestations reduce the quantity and quality of seed yields. The objective of this study was to identify the correlation value between level of resistance to pests and chemical (fat and protein) concentrations of soybean genotypes. 
Methods: A total of 15 soybean genotypes were planted in field and glass house environments in 2017. Observations were made on the infestation intensity of pest and disease, dry seed yield, yield components and chemical (fat and protein) concentrations. 
Result: Soybean genotype DG-91-8 showed resistant (R) category to pod borer and pod sucker, while DM-122-35-17 showed resistant (R) category to army worm and pod borer. Two highest yielding genotypes (DG-91-8 and DG-99-32-14) had 15% higher seed yield than check variety Dering 1 (2.41 t/ha), with higher 100 seeds weight and pod number/plant. Fat concentration showed a significant positive correlation value with leaf rust disease. Pod suckers showed a significant positive correlation value with pod borer infestation, indicating that they had the same preference for soybean pods. Soybean genotypes DG-91-8 showed high seed yield (2.70 t/ha) and resistant (R) level to pod borer and pod sucker.

Keywords

Chemical concentrations Genotypes Pest Resistance Soybean

References

  1. Asadi, Purwantoro, A. and Yakub, S. (2012). Genetic control of soybean resistance to soybean pod sucker (Riptortus linearis L.). Agrivita. 34(1): 28-35. 
  2. BSN. (1992). Prosedur analisis kimia bahan makanan. Badan Standarisasi Nasional. Jakarta. 35 hlm.
  3. Baliadi, Y., Tengkano, W. and Marwoto. (2008). Soybean pod borer, Etiella zinckenella treitschke (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and its control strategy in Indonesia. Jurnal Litbang Pertanian. 27(4): 113-123. 
  4. Chiang, H.S. and Talekar, N.S. (1980). Identification of source of resistance to the beatfly and two other Agromyzed flies in soybean and mungbean. J. of Econ. Entomol. 73: 197-199.
  5. Halder, J. and Srinivasan, S. (2007). Biochemical basis of resistance against Maruca vitrata in urbean. Ann. Pl. Protec. Sci. 15: 287-290.
  6. Halder, J. and Srinivasan, S. (2011). Varietal screening and role of morphological factors on distribution and abundance of spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Geyer) on Cowpea. Ann. Pl. Protec. Sci. 19 (1): 71-74.
  7. Haq, I.U., Amjad, M., Kakakhel, S.A. and Khokhar, M.A. (2003). Morphological and physical parameters of soybean resistance to insect pests. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences. 2(2): 202-204.
  8. Hendrival, Latifah, A. and Nisa. (2013). Efficacy some botanical insecticides for controlling pest pod sucking in soybean fields. Jurnal Agrista. 17(1): 18-27.  
  9. Indiati, S.W., Hapsari. R.T., Prayogo. Y., Sholihin, Sundari. T. and Mejaya. M.J. (2021). Resistance level of mung bean genotypes to pod borer Maruca testulalis geyer. Legume Research. 44(5): 602-607.  DOI:10.18805/LR-590.
  10. Krisnawati, A., Bayu, M.S.Y.I. and Adie, M.M. (2016). Identification of soybean resistance to pod sucking bug (Riptortus linearis) by no-choice test. biosaintifika: Journal of Biology and Biology Education. 8(3): 407-414. DOI: 10.15294/biosaintifika.v8i3.5180. 
  11. Krisnawati, A., Bayu, M.S.Y.I. and Adie, M.M. (2017). Screening of soybean genotypes for resistance to pod sucking bug, Riptortus linearis. Nusantara Bioscience. 9(2): 181-187. DOI: 10.13057/nusbiosci/n090213.
  12. Krisnawati, A. and Adie, M.M. (2018). Evaluation of soybean resistance to pod-sucking bug, Riptortus linearis F. and performance of its agronomic characters. Biosaintifika: Journal of Biology and Biology Education. 10(1): 213-222. DOI: 10.15294/biosaintifika.v10i1.12806.
  13. Lekha, Ameta, O.P.  and Swami, H. (2017). Evaluation of new generation pesticides to control pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) infesting chickpea. Legume Research. 40 (2) : 384-387.
  14. Marwoto, Hardaningsih, S. and Taufiq, A. (2017). Soybean plant pests and diseases, identification and control. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian. Jakarta. 
  15. Motaphale, A.A., Bhosle, B.B. and Khan, F.S. (2016). Screening of germplasm for tolerrance against major stem pests of soybean. Internat. J. Plant Protec. 9(2): 387-394. DOI: 10.15740/HAS/IJPP/9.2/387-394.
  16. Rustam. (2016). Production performance and organisms that disturb rice, corn and soybean plants in Riau Province. J. Agrotek. Trop. 5(1): 39-54.
  17. San, S.H., Sagar, D., Kalia, V.K., Krishnan, V. (2022). Effect of different Chickpea genotypes and its biochemical constituents on biological attributes of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner). Legume Research. 45(4): 514-520. DOI:10.18805/LR-4474.
  18. Sari, K.P. and Suharsono. (2011). The status of the pod sucking pest on soybean, regional distribution area and control method. Bul. Palawija. 22: 79-85. 
  19. Shanmugasundaram, S. (1977). The International Working Group on Soybean Rust and its Proposed Soybean Rust Rating System. Workshop on Rust on Soybean-The Problem and Research Needs. Manila, Philippines, 28 February-4 March 1977.
  20. Shanower, T.G., Romewas, J. and Minja, E.M. (1999). Insect pests of pigeonpea and their management. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 44: 77-96.
  21. Soundararajan, R.P., Chitra, N., Geetha, S. (2013). Host plant resistance to insect pests of grain legumes- A review. Agri. Reviews. 34(3): 176-187.
  22. Soundararajan, R.P.  and Chitra, N. (2017). Field evaluation of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) germplasm for resistance against pod borer complex. Legume Research. 40(4): 768-772. 
  23. Suharsono. (2009). Hubungan kerapatan trikoma dengan intensitas serangan penggerek polong kedelai. Jurnal Penelitian Pertanian Tanaman Pangan 28(3): 176-182. 
  24. Suharsono and Sulistyowati, L. (2012). Expression of resistance of soybean to the pod sucking bug Riptortus linearis F. (Hemiptera: Coreidae). Agrivita. 34(1): 55-59.
  25. Suhartina and Kuswantoro, H. (2011). Pemuliaan tanaman kedelai toleran kekeringan [Soybean breeding genotipe for drought tolerance]. Buletin Palawija. 21: 26-38.
  26. Sunitha, V., Rao, G.V.R., Lakshmi, K.V., Saxena, K.B., Rao, V.R. and Reddy, Y.V.R. (2008). Morphological and biochemical factors associated with resistance to Maruca vitrata (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in short-duration pigeonpea. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science. 28(1).
  27. Umbarkar, P.S., Parsana, G.J. and Jethva, D.M. (2011). Estimation of yield losses by pod borer complex in greengram. Legume Research. 34(4): 308-310.
  28. War, A.R, Paulraj, M.G., Ahmad, T., Buhroo, A.A., Hussain, B., Ignacimuthu, S. and Sharma, H.C. (2012). Mechanisms of plant defense against insect herbivores. Plant Signal Behav. 7(10): 1306-1320.

Global Footprints