Growing environment condition
The environmental temperature was affected by the growing season in which the crop was grown. The average temperature in Trial 1 (wet season) was 26.2°C, which was lower in Trial 2 (wet-dry season) to 25.9°C. The temperature continued to decrease in Trial 3 (dry season) to 25.0°C. The highest temperature was recorded in Trial 1 (29.0°C) at DAS 12, followed by Trial 2 (28.0°C) at DAS 13 and DAS 14 and Trial 3 (27.7°C) at DAS 8, as shown in Fig 1a. The coolest temperature was recorded in Trial 3 (21.8°C) at DAS 46, followed by Trial 2 (22.0°C) at DAS 67 and Trial 1 (24.3°C) at DAS 34. There was not much variation in the daily average temperature throughout the trials, except for Trial 3, which recorded the lowest from DAS 39 and onwards, as shown in Fig 1a.
The relative humidity responded well to the environment temperature throughout the trials. The average relative humidity in Trial 1 was 82.1% which was increased in Trial 2 to 83.8%. The relative humidity was further increased in Trial 3 to 83.9%, as shown in Fig 1b. The maximum relative humidity was 99.0% which was recorded in all three Trials. The lowest relative humidity was recorded in Trial 3 (59.0%) at DAS 59, followed by Trial 1 (63.0%) at DAS 12 and Trial 2 (65.0%) at DAS 54. There was not much variation observed throughout the trials except for Trial 3, which recorded the lowest relative humidity at DAS 56 and DAS 70, as shown in Fig 1b.
Leaf chlorophyll content
Nitrogen is an important mineral element in plants that are mainly found in molecules such as chlorophyll, proteins, amino acids and nucleic acids
(Islam et al., 2016). Therefore, one way to determine the nitrogen content in plants is to determine the chlorophyll content in leaves (
Bausch and Diker, 2001;
Fontes and de Araujo, 2006;
Peng et al., 1996; Piekielek et al., 1995). Besides, chlorophyll is an essential photosynthetic pigment used to determine the photosynthetic capacity and hence plant growth
(Li et al., 2018). The handheld soil plant analysis development (SPAD) chlorophyll meter is an excellent instrument to determine the chlorophyll and nitrogen status of various crops non-destructively
(Fiorentini et al., 2019; Xiong et al., 2015).
The experiment results indicate that the leaf chlorophyll content of the JS15P variety in Trial 1 was significantlygreater than that of DG14 and DG24P. No significant differences in the leaf chlorophyll content of DG24P and DG14 were observed, as shown in Table 3. In Trial 2, both JS15P and DG24P had a significantly higher leaf chlorophyll content than DG14. However, in Trial 3, no significant differences in the leaf chlorophyll content were observed among the three varieties of yard long bean, as shown in Table 3.
The two-way ANOVA results indicated no significant effects of growing conditions on the leaf chlorophyll content of the yard-long bean; however, genotype significantly affected the leaf chlorophyll content. An interaction between growing condition and the genotype had no significant effect on the leaf chlorophyll content of the three varieties of yard long bean, as shown in Table 3.
The experiment result indicates little to no differences in the chlorophyll content of the yard-long bean cultivated in each trial, especially in Trial 3, or when compared among each trial. Therefore, the results indicate that the plant nitrogen content was equal in each trial for each variety. The results also indicate little to no differences in the growth of the plants cultivated in each trial.
Plant growth
To further determine the plant’s growth, the yard-long bean’s stem girth and plant height data were collected (
Attia and Sary, 2021;
Dharmawan et al., 2021; Eboibi et al., 2018; Raihan et al., 2021; Sharma et al., 2021). The secondary growth of a plant is characterized by an increase in the thickness or circumference of the stems. In Trial 1, no significant differences in the girth of the plant were observed among the three varieties of yard long bean. Similar results were observed in Trial 2 as well as in Trial 3. The two-way ANOVA results indicate that neither growing condition nor genotype significantly affected the yard-long bean cultivated in each trial. The results also specified that the interaction between growing environment and genotypes had no significant effect on the stem girth of the three varieties of yard long bean, as shown in Table 3. The results of this experiment indicate that the stem circumference of all three varieties of yard-long bean showed no significant differences within each trial.
As indicated earlier, plant height can also be determining factor for plant growth
(Rai et al., 2020). The plant height of yard-long bean in Trial 1, Trial 2 and Trial 3 was significantly the highest in the JS15P variety than DG14 and DG24P. No significant differences in the plant height of DG14 and DG24P were observed, as shown in Table 3. The results indicated that the JS15P variety of yard-long bean had the highest in all three trials, while no significant differences in the plant height of DG14 and DG24P were observed. The two-way ANOVA results indicate that the growing condition did not significantly affect the plant height of the yard-long bean; however, the genotype had a significant effect on the plant height throughout the trials. An interaction between growing condition and genotype had no significant impact on the height of the plant, as shown in Table 3.
Yield and yield attribute
The yield of the three varieties of the yard-long bean was determined by the pod number, pod length and pod weight (
Attia and Sary, 2021;
Raihan et al., 2021). The results of Trial 1, Trial 2 and Trial 3 indicate that the pod number was significantly the highest in the JS15P variety of yard-long bean. At the same time, no significant differences were observed in the pod number among the DG14 and DG24P varieties of yard long bean. The results of this experiment indicate that the JS15P variety of yard-long bean had the highest pod number in all three trials compared to the other two varieties. The two-way ANOVA results indicate that the growing condition and genotype significantly affected the number of pods in all three varieties of yard long bean. However, the interaction between the growing conditionand the genotype had no significant effect on the number of pods for each of these varieties of yard long bean, as shown in Table 4.
A decline in the number of pods in all three varieties was observed with changes in the growing season. In the wet season, the highest number of pods were harvested, which lowered in the wet-dry season and a further decline in the number of pods was seen in the dry season. The decline in the pod number could be due to the changes in the environment temperature, as shown in Fig 1. The optimum temperature for growing yard-long bean is around 25-30°C (
Rana and Yadav, 2018). However, in this experiment, a gradual drop in the temperature was seen in Trial 2 and Trial 3, which was below the optimum level. The two-way ANOVA results (Table 4) also indicated that this could be due to the changes in the growing condition.
The results for pod length and pod weight showed a similar trend. For pod length, the results of Trial 1, Trial 2 and Trial 3 indicate that the pod length was significantly the highest in the JS15P variety of yard-long bean. At the same time, no significant differences were observed in the pod length among the DG14 and DG24P varieties of yard long bean. For pod weight, the results of Trial 1, Trial 2 and Trial 3 indicate that the pod weight was significantly the highest in the JS15P variety of yard-long bean. At the same time, no significant differences were observed in the pod weight among the DG14 and DG24P varieties of yard long bean. In all three trials, the JS15P had the highest pod length as well as the pod weight. No significant differences were observed in the pod length and pod weight among the DG14 and DG24P varieties. The two-way ANOVA results (Table 4) indicate that this could be due to the growing conditions or the genotype. However, for the pod weight, the interaction between the growing condition and the genotype could also be a factor.